Delivering complex surgical services: lessons learned from the evolution of a specialised pelvic exenteration centre
Kilian G. M. Brown A B C D , Kate E. McBride B C , Teresa Anderson B C and Michael J. Solomon A B C D *A
B
C
D
Abstract
Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a potentially curative, ultra-radical surgical procedure for the treatment of advanced pelvic tumours, which involves surgical resection of multiple pelvic organs. Delivering such a complex low-volume, high-cost surgical program presents a number of unique health management challenges, and requires an organisation-wide approach involving both clinical and administrative teams. In contrast to the United Kingdom and France, where PE services have been historically decentralised, a centralised approach was developed early on in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) with referral of these complex patients to a small number of quaternary centres. The PE program at the authors’ institution was established in 1994 and has since evolved into the highest volume PE centre in the ANZ region and the largest single institution experience globally. These achievements have required navigation of specific funding and management issues, supported from inception by a proactive and collaborative relationship with hospital administration and management. The comprehensive state-wide quaternary referral model that has been developed has subsequently been successfully applied to other complex surgical services at the authors’ institution, as well as by more recently established PE centres in Australia. This article aims to summarise the authors’ experience with establishing and expanding this service and the lessons learned from a health management perspective.
Keywords: centralisation, clinical pathways, pelvic exenteration, surgical services.
References
1 Brown KGM, Solomon MJ, Koh CE. Pelvic Exenteration Surgery: The Evolution of Radical Surgical Techniques for Advanced and Recurrent Pelvic Malignancy. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60(7): 745-54.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
2 PelvEx Collaborative. Changing outcomes following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. BJS Open 2019; 3(4): 516-20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
3 Denost Q, Faucheron JL, Lefevre JH, et al. French current management and oncological results of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41(12): 1645-52.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Harji DP, Griffiths B, McArthur DR, Sagar PM. Current UK management of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14(12): 1479-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Heriot AG, Byrne CM, Lee P, et al. Extended radical resection: the choice for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51(3): 284-91.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Wouters MW, Gooiker GA, van Sandick JW, Tollenaar RA. The volume-outcome relation in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer 2012; 118(7): 1754-63.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MW, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 2011; 98(4): 485-94.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Vonlanthen R, Lodge P, Barkun JS, et al. Toward a Consensus on Centralization in Surgery. Ann Surg 2018; 268(5): 712-24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
9 Fitzsimmons T, Thomas M, Tonkin D, et al. Establishing a state-wide pelvic exenteration multidisciplinary team meeting in South Australia. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93(5): 1227-31.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 Dickfos M, Tan SBM, Stevenson ARL, et al. Development of a pelvic exenteration service at a tertiary referral centre. ANZ J Surg 2018; 88: E583-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
11 Cavaliere R, Tedesco M, Giannarelli D, et al. Radical surgery in rectal cancer patients: what does it mean today? J Surg Oncol 1991; 2: 24-31.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
12 Koh CE, Solomon MJ, Brown KG, et al. The Evolution of Pelvic Exenteration Practice at a Single Center: Lessons Learned from over 500 Cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60(6): 627-35.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
13 Steffens D, Solomon MJ, Lee P, Austin K, Koh C, Byrne C, et al. Surgical, survival and quality of life outcomes in over 1000 pelvic exenterations: lessons learned from a large Australian case series. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93(5): 1232-41.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Harris CA, Solomon MJ, Heriot AG, et al. The Outcomes and Patterns of Treatment Failure After Surgery for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg 2016; 264(2): 323-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
15 Konstantinidis IT, Lee B, Trisal V, et al. National postoperative and oncologic outcomes after pelvic exenteration for T4b rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122: 739-44.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
16 Denost Q, Solomon M, Tuech JJ, et al. International variation in managing locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer: prospective benchmark analysis. Br J Surg 2020; 107(13): 1846-54.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
17 PelvEx Collaborative.. Surgical and Survival Outcomes Following Pelvic Exenteration for Locally Advanced Primary Rectal Cancer: Results From an International Collaboration. Ann Surg 2019; 269(2): 315-21.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
18 van Kessel CS, Solomon MJ. Understanding the Philosophy, Anatomy, and Surgery of the Extra-TME Plane of Locally Advanced and Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer; Single Institution Experience with International Benchmarking. Cancers 2022; 14(20): 5058.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
19 Ansari N, Brown KGM, McBride KE, et al. Accelerating the learning curve in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy using an external mentor model. ANZ J Surg 2019; 89(9): 1097-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
