Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association

Articles citing this paper

An evaluation of New Zealand’s iterative Workforce Service Reviews: a new way of thinking about health workforce planning

Lucio Naccarella A C , Louise Greenstock A and Brenda Wraight B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Australian Health Workforce Institute, University of Melbourne, Level 3, 766 Elizabeth Street, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia. Email: lgreens@unimelb.edu.au

B Health Workforce New Zealand, Level 2, No. 1 The Terrace, Wellington 6011, New Zealand.

C Corresponding author. Email: l.naccarella@unimelb.edu.au

Australian Health Review 37(2) 251-255 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH12183
Submitted: 21 May 2012  Accepted: 10 October 2012   Published: 15 March 2013



6 articles found in Crossref database.

Protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation of regional District Health Board groupings in New Zealand
Stokes Tim, Atmore Carol, Penno Erin, Richard Lauralie, Wyeth Emma, Richards Rosalina, Doolan-Noble Fiona, Gray Andrew R, Sullivan Trudy, Gauld Robin
BMJ Open. 2019 9(3). p.e030076
Matching the production of doctors with national needs
Gorman Des
Medical Education. 2018 52(1). p.103
The evolution of New Zealand’s health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform
Rees Gareth H.
Human Resources for Health. 2019 17(1).
Rethinking health workforce planning: Capturing health system social and power interactions through actor analysis
Rees Gareth H., Crampton Peter, Gauld Robin, MacDonell Stephen
Futures. 2018 99 p.16
Re: An evaluation of New Zealand’s iterative Workforce Service Reviews: a new way of thinking about health workforce planning
Trim Susanne
Australian Health Review. 2013 37(5). p.620
The promise of complementarity: Using the methods of foresight for health workforce planning
Rees Gareth H, Crampton Peter, Gauld Robin, MacDonell Stephen
Health Services Management Research. 2018 31(2). p.97

Committee on Publication Ethics


Abstract Export Citation