Correction and compensation of an airborne fluxgate magnetic tensor gradiometer
Yangyi Sui 1 2 Hongsong Miao 1 Zhijian Zhou 1 Hui Luan 1 Yanzhang Wang 11 Key Laboratory of Geo-exploration Instruments, Ministry of Education of China, and College of Instrumentation and Electrical Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China.
2 Corresponding author. Email: suiyangyi@jlu.edu.cn
Exploration Geophysics 49(5) 726-734 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG16124
Submitted: 18 October 2016 Accepted: 15 August 2017 Published: 27 September 2017
Abstract
An airborne fluxgate magnetic tensor gradiometer is built on fluxgates to measure directional derivatives of the magnetic field. It has been used to carry out many geophysical exploration programs quickly and efficiently. However, two key issues greatly reduce the data quality of a tensor gradiometer. One is that the fluxgate magnetic tensor gradiometer suffers various errors, such as scale drift, non-orthogonality, misalignment, zero offset, dynamic, and nonlinear errors of individual fluxgates, along with differences between characteristics of fluxgates. The other is that manoeuvring an aircraft flying in the geomagnetic field can generate magnetic interference effects on a tensor gradiometer. Regarding the common airborne fluxgate magnetic tensor gradiometer that has a cross-shaped structure, we have proposed the magnetic interference model of the aircraft and the error model of a single fluxgate. Then we have seamlessly combined these two models into the unified calibration model of a tensor gradiometer by a recursive method. Finally, we have simultaneously determined the correction coefficients and the magnetic properties of the aircraft by a calibration flight at high altitude in an area of low magnetic gradient. We have evaluated the performance of the proposed method through simulation and actual flight results using a microlight aircraft. The root-mean-square noise of each component has reached the level of less than 1.5 nT/m, and the improvement ratios are from 4096 to 17444 in terms of the measured field data of tensor components. The proposed method reduces the reliance of the installation on the aircraft and can easily be applied to other tensor gradiometers, such as airborne superconducting magnetic tensor gradiometers.
Key words: airborne, compensation, correction, fluxgate, magnetic tensor gradiometer.
References
Argast, D., FitzGerald, D., Holstein, H., Stolz, R., and Chwala, A., 2010, Compensation of the full magnetic tensor gradient signal: ASEG 2010, 21st ASEG Geophysical Conference, 1–4.Bracken, R. E., and Brown, P. J., 2005, Reducing tensor magnetic gradiometer data for unexploded ordnance detection: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, 2005–5046, 1–5.
Chwala, A., Stolz, R., Zakosarenko, V., Fritzsch, L., Schulz, M., Rompel, A., Meyer, H., and Meyer, H. G., 2012, Full tensor SQUID gradiometer for airborne exploration: 22nd ASEG International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, 1–4.
Gebre-Egziabher, D., Elkaim, G. H., Powell, J. D., and Parkinson, B. W., 2006, Calibration of strapdown magnetometers in magnetic field domain: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 19, 87–102
| Calibration of strapdown magnetometers in magnetic field domain:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Griffin, D. K., Masseglia, O., Hall, M., Trougnou, L., Hewitson, M., Howe, C., Poyntz-Wright, O., Leopoldi, M., Ding, L., Turner, S., and Harmon, S., 2012, Design and calibration of a compact low-noise magnetic gradiometer: Proceedings of the 2012 ESA Workshop on Aerospace EMC, IEEE, 1–6.
Heath, P., Heinson, G., and Greenhalgh, S., 2003, Some comments on potential field tensor data: Exploration Geophysics, 34, 57–62
| Some comments on potential field tensor data:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Koch, R. H., Keefe, G. A., and Allen, G., 1996, Room temperature three sensor magnetic field gradiometer: The Review of Scientific Instruments, 67, 230–235
| Room temperature three sensor magnetic field gradiometer:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XmvF2gtQ%3D%3D&md5=3f75786586f1c3e23af9a207013c52a4CAS |
Leliak, P., 1961, Identification and evaluation of magnetic-field sources of magnetic airborne detector equipped aircraft: IRE Transactions on Aerospace and Navigational Electronics, ANE-8, 95–105
| Identification and evaluation of magnetic-field sources of magnetic airborne detector equipped aircraft:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Leslie, K., Blay, K., Clark, D., Schmidt, P., Tilbrook, D., Bick, M., Foley, C., and Binks, R., 2007, Helicopter trial of magnetic tensor gradiometer: 19th ASEG International Conference, Extended Abstracts, 1–4.
Noriega, G., 2015, Aeromagnetic compensation in gradiometry – performance, model stability, and robustness: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 12, 117–121
| Aeromagnetic compensation in gradiometry – performance, model stability, and robustness:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pang, H., Pan, M., Wan, C., Chen, J., Zhu, X., and Luo, F., 2014, Integrated compensation of magnetometer array magnetic distortion field and improvement of magnetic object localization: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52, 5670–5676
| Integrated compensation of magnetometer array magnetic distortion field and improvement of magnetic object localization:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pedersen, L. B., and Rasmussen, T. M., 1990, The gradient tensor of potential field anomalies: some implications on data collection and data processing of maps: Geophysics, 55, 1558–1566
| The gradient tensor of potential field anomalies: some implications on data collection and data processing of maps:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schmidt, P. W., and Clark, D. A., 2006, The magnetic gradient tensor: its properties and uses in source characterization: The Leading Edge, 25, 75–78
| The magnetic gradient tensor: its properties and uses in source characterization:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schmidt, P., Clark, D., Leslie, K., Bick, M., Tilbrook, D., and Foley, C., 2004, GETMAG – a SQUID magnetic tensor gradiometer for mineral and oil exploration: Exploration Geophysics, 35, 297–305
| GETMAG – a SQUID magnetic tensor gradiometer for mineral and oil exploration:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stolz, R., Zakosarenko, V., Schulz, M., Chwala, A., Fritzsch, L., Meyer, H. G., and Kötlin, E. O., 2006, Magnetic full-tensor SQUID gradiometer system for geophysical applications: The Leading Edge, 25, 178–180
| Magnetic full-tensor SQUID gradiometer system for geophysical applications:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sui, Y., Li, G., Wang, S., and Lin, J., 2014, Compact fluxgate magnetic full-tensor gradiometer with spherical feedback coil: The Review of Scientific Instruments, 85, 014701
| Compact fluxgate magnetic full-tensor gradiometer with spherical feedback coil:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sui, Y., Miao, H., Zhou, Z., Luan, H., Yu, S., and Lin, J., 2015, A case of fluxgate magnetic gradient tensor measurement system on microlight: International Workshop and Gravity, Electrical & Magnetic Methods and their Applications, 19–22 April 2015, Chenghu, China, 25–28.
Sui, Y., Miao, H., Wang, Y., Luan, H., and Lin, J., 2016, Correction of a towed airborne fluxgate magnetic tensor gradiometer: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 13, 1837–1841
| Correction of a towed airborne fluxgate magnetic tensor gradiometer:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wiegert, R., 2009, Magnetic STAR technology for real-time localization and classification of unexploded ordnance and buried mines: SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7303, 1–9.
Wynn, W., Frahm, C., Carroll, P., Clark, R., Wellhoner, J., and Wynn, M., 1975, Advanced superconducting gradiometer/magnetometer arrays and a novel signal processing technique: IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 11, 701–707
| Advanced superconducting gradiometer/magnetometer arrays and a novel signal processing technique:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yin, G., Zhang, Y., Fan, H., Zhang, G., and Ren, G., 2014, Linear calibration method of magnetic gradient tensor system: Measurement, 56, 8–18
| Linear calibration method of magnetic gradient tensor system:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yin, G., Zhang, Y., Fan, H., Ren, G., and Li, Z., 2015, One-step calibration of magnetic gradient tensor system with nonlinear least square method: Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 229, 77–85
| One-step calibration of magnetic gradient tensor system with nonlinear least square method:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yin, G., Zhang, Y., Fan, H., Ren, G., and Li, Z., 2015a, Integrated calibration of magnetic gradient tensor system: Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 374, 289–297
| Integrated calibration of magnetic gradient tensor system:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |