Environmental Chemistry Environmental Chemistry Society
Environmental problems - Chemical approaches
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Concentration, UV-spectroscopic characteristics and fractionation of DOC in stormflow from an urban stream, Southern California, USA

John A. Izbicki A D , Isabel M. Pimentel A , Russell Johnson A , George R. Aiken B and Jerry Leenheer C

A U.S. Geological Survey, 4165 Spruance Road, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101, USA.

B U.S. Geological Survey, 3215 Marine Street, Boulder, CO 80303, USA.

C U.S. Geological Survey, Denver Federation Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: jaizbick@usgs.gov

Environmental Chemistry 4(1) 35-48 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EN06046
Submitted: 8 August 2006  Accepted: 9 November 2006   Published: 14 February 2007

Environmental context. There is concern that there may be public health issues associated with dissolved organic carbon (DOC) because of its unknown composition and reactivity to disinfection in water used for public supply. Here, changes in the concentration and composition of DOC in stormflow (1995–2004) in the Santa Ana River and its tributaries is evaluated based on its optical properties, molecular weight and solubility differences of the contributing DOC components. Such a study may allow improved water management in the future. Ongoing work in the study area has shown that DOC in surface water diverted for groundwater recharge degrades to near natural levels in underlying aquifers pumped for public supply.

Abstract. The composition of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in stormflow from urban areas has been greatly altered, both directly and indirectly, by human activities and there is concern that there may be public health issues associated with DOC, which has unknown composition from different sources within urban watersheds. This study evaluated changes in the concentration and composition of DOC in stormflow in the Santa Ana River and its tributaries between 1995 and 2004 using a simplified approach based on the differences in the optical properties of DOC and using operationally defined differences in molecular weight and solubility. The data show changes in the composition of DOC in stormflow during the rainy season and differences associated with runoff from different parts of the basin, including extensive upland areas burned prior to the 2004 rainy season.

Samples were collected from the Santa Ana River, which drains ~6950 km2 of the densely populated coastal area of southern California, during 23 stormflows between 1995 and 2004. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations during the first stormflows of the ‘winter’ (November to March) rainy season increased rapidly with streamflow and were positively correlated with increased faecal indicator bacteria concentrations. DOC concentrations were not correlated with streamflow or with other constituents during stormflows later in the rainy season and DOC had increasing UV absorbance per unit carbon as the rainy season progressed. DOC concentrations in stormflow from an urban drain tributary to the river also increased during stormflow and were greater than concentrations in the river. DOC concentrations in stormflow from a tributary stream, draining urban and agricultural land that contained more than 320 000 animals, mostly dairy cows, were higher than concentrations in stormflow from the river and from the urban drain. Fires that burned large areas of the basin before the 2004 rainy season did not increase DOC concentrations in the river during stormflow after the fires – possibly because the large watershed of the river damped the effect of the fires. However, the fires increased the hydrophobic neutral organic carbon fraction of DOC in stormflow from the urban drain and the tributary stream.


References

[1]  Thurman E. M., Organic Geochemistry of Natural Waters 1986 (Nijhoff and Junk Inc.: Boston, MA).

[2]  Kaplan L. A.Reasoner D. J.Rice E. W.1994J. Am. Water Works Assoc.86121

[3]  Volk C.Wood L.Johnson B.Robison J.Zhu H. W.Kaplan L.2002J. Environ. Mon.443
doi:10.1039/B107768F

[4]  Izbicki J. A., Mendez G. O., Burton C. A., Stormflow Chemistry in the Santa Ana River below Prado Dam and at the Diversion Downstream from Imperial Highway, Southern California, 1995–98, USGS WRIR 00–4127, 2000, p. 92 (U.S. Geological Survey: Sacramento, CA). http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/wri/wri004127/ (verified 15 January 2007).

[5]  Izbicki J. A., Pimentel M., Leddy M., Bergamaschi B., Microbial and Dissolved Organic Carbon Characterization of Stormflow in the Santa Ana River at Imperial Highway, Southern California, USGS SIR 2004–5116, 2004, p. 71 (U.S. Geological Survey: Sacramento, CA). http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/sir/2004/5116 (verified 15 January 2007).

[6]  Belitz K., Hamlin S. N., Burton C. A., Kent R., Fay R. G., Johnson T., Water Quality in the Santa Ana Basin, California, 1999–2001, USGS Circular 1238, 2004, p. 37 (U.S. Geological Survey: Sacramento, CA). http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/circ/2004/1238/ (verified 15 January 2007).

[7]  California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements for Area-Wide Urban Storm Water Runoff, NPDES No. CAS618036, Order No. R8-2002-0012, 2001 (Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Boards: Riverside, CA) www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb8/sbpermit/sbpermit6.pdf (verified 15 January 2007).

[8]  National Water Research Institute, Orange County Water District’s Santa Ana River Water Quality and Health Study, Report of the Scientific Advisory Panel, 2004, p. 48.

[9]  Orange County Water District, Santa Ana Water Quality and Health Study, Final Report 2004 [CD-ROM] (Orange County Water District: Fountain Valley, CA).

[10]  Bergamaschi B. A., Kalve E., Guenther L., Mendez G. O., Belitz K., An Assessment of Optical Properties of Dissolved Organic Material as Quantitave Source Indicators in the Santa Ana River Basin, Southern California, USGS SIR 2005-5151, 2005, p. 46 (U.S. Geological Survey: Sacramento, CA). http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2005/5152/ (verified 15 January 2007).

[11]  U. S. Army, Corps of Engineers, Water Control Manual, Prado Dam & Reservoir Santa Ana River, California, Los Angeles District, 1994 (U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers: Los Angeles, CA).

[12]  California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, Santa Ana Region Fact Sheet 2003, p. 2 (Santa Ana Region Water Quality Control Board: Riverside, CA). www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/html/region_overview.html (verified 15 January 2007).

[13]  California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, General Waste Discharge Requirements for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (Dairies and Related Facilities) within the Santa Ana Region, Order No. 99-11, NPDES No. CAG018001, 1999 (Santa Ana Region Water Quality Control Board: Riverside, CA). http://www.epa.gov/region09/cross_pr/animalwaste/generalfact.pdf (verified 15 January 2007).

[14]  Santa Ana River Watermaster, Twenty-Fifth Annual Report of the Santa Ana River Watermaster, for Water Rear October 1, 1994–September 30, 1995: San Bernardino California, 1996, p. 25.

[15]  Burton C. A., Izbicki J. A., Paybins K. S., Water-Quality Trends in the Santa Ana River at MWD Crossing and below Prado Dam, Riverside County, California, USGS WRIR 97-4173, 1998, p. 36 (U.S. Geological Survey: Sacramento, CA).

[16]  Brenton R. W., Arnett T. L., Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory—Determination of Dissolved Organic Carbon by UV-Promoted Persulfate Oxidation and Infrared Spectrometry, USGS OFR 92-480, 1993, p. 12 (U.S. Geological Survey: Washington DC).

[17]  Bird S. M., Fram M. S., Crepeau K. L., Method of Analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey California District Sacramento Laboratory—Determination of Dissolved Organic Carbon in Water by High Temperature Catalytic Oxidation, Method Validation and Quality-Control Practices, USGS OFR 03-366, 2003 (U.S. Geological Survey: Sacramento, CA). http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/ofr03-366/ (verified 15 January 2007).

[18]  American Public Health Association, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th edn 1992 (American Public Health Association: Washington DC).

[19]  Aiken G. R.McKnight D. M.Thorn K. A.Thurman E. M.1992Org. Geochem.18567doi:10.1016/0146-6380(92)90119-I

[20]  Wershaw R. L., Fishman M. J., Grabbe R. R., Lowe L. E. (Eds), Methods for the Determination of Organic Substances in Water and Fluvial Sediments 1987, Book 5, Chap. A3, p. 80 (USGS TWRI: Washington DC).

[21]  Fram M. S., Fujii R., Weishar J. L., Bergamaschi B. A., Aiken G. R., How DOM Composition may Explain the Poor Correlation between Specific Trihalomethane Formation Potential and Specific UV Absorbance, U.S. Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program –Proceedings of the Technical Meeting, Charleston, SC 1999, Vol. 2, pp. 423–430 (U.S. Geological Survey: Sacramento, CA).

[22]  Leenheer J. A.Huffman E. W. D.Jr1976J. Res. USGS4737

[23]  Barber L. H., in Groundwater Contamination and Analysis at Hazardous Waste Sites (Eds S. Lesage, R. E. Jackson) 1992, pp. 753–770 (Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York).

[24]  Gutsche C. D., Pasto D. J., Fundamentals of Organic Chemistry 1975, p. 1249 (Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

[25]  Krazner S. W.Croue J. P.Buffle J.Perdue E. M.1996J. Am. Water Works Assoc.8866


[26]  California Department of Water Resources, Five-Year Report of the Municipal Water Quality Investigations Program, Sacramento, California 1994 (California Department of Water Resources: Sacramento, CA).

[27]  Fujii R., Ranalli A. J., Aiken G. R., Bergamaschi B. A., Dissolved Organic Carbon Concentrations and Compositions, and Trihalomethane Formation Potentials in Waters from Agricultural Peat Soils, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delts, California: Implications for Drinking-Water Quality, USGS WRIR 98-4147, 1998, p. 75 (U.S. Geological Survey: Sacramento, CA).
http://ca.water.usgs.gov/archive/reports/wrir984147/ (verified 15 January 2007).

[28]  Korshin G. V.Kumke M. U.Li C.-W.Frimmel F. H.1999Env. Sci. Technol.331207doi:10.1021/ES980787H

[29]  Kent R.Belitz K.Burton C. A.2005J. Am. Water Works Assoc.411109

[30]  Fram M. S., Bergamaschi B. A., Fujii R., Improving Water Quality in Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California, USGS FS-112-01, 2001, p. 4 (U.S. Geological Survey: Sacramento, CA).
http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/fs/fs-112-01/ (verified 15 January 2007).



Export Citation