Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Using undergraduate research to develop transferable skills for the modern workforce

Jack TH Wang
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences
The University of Queensland
Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
Tel: +61 7 3365 4611
Fax: +61 7 3365 4273
Email: t.wang1@uq.edu.au

Microbiology Australia 37(2) 84-87 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA16026
Published: 18 April 2016

In the increasingly competitive global knowledge marketplace, Australian tertiary educators are looking to enrich their program offerings by providing authentic learning experiences for their students. In the biological sciences, this authenticity is best represented by hands-on inquiry and laboratory experimentation, often within the context of research internships. Authentic Large-Scale Undergraduate Research Experiences (ALUREs) aim to broaden the scope of these learning experiences by embedding research into coursework activities accessible by all students within the program. These experiences can promote learning gains in laboratory, analytical, and critical thinking skills, providing students with a transferable skillset applicable to many career paths across the science sector.


In 1998, the Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University published a landmark report on the reinvention of undergraduate education. The report highlighted the emphasis on transmitting large volumes of theoretical knowledge within traditional science education, which often took precedence over practical training in inquiry-driven processes used by professional scientists. The proposed solution was to make research-based learning the standard, which has been shown to further stimulate student interest when compared to didactic instruction1, and promote engagement and deep learning through active problem-solving2. Since the publication of the Boyer Commission report, undergraduate inquiry and research opportunities have increasingly been embedded in university curricula3, spanning across a number of disciplines and higher education settings4. This movement has been further solidified by the Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education program organised through the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and the National Science Foundation (NSF).

Within the context of Australian higher education, the 2008 Bradley review placed significant value on student engagement in critical inquiry, citing access to these learning activities as strategic goals for all publicly funded tertiary institutions5. This view was further supported by the Learning and Teaching Academic Standards project conducted by the Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC) in 20116 as well as the Office for Learning and Teaching’s (OLT) Good Practice Guides for Science7, all of which cite ‘Inquiry and problem solving’ as a key threshold learning outcome for Australian science graduates. The importance of these graduate attributes is further reinforced by the perceptions of STEM employers, who rank problem-solving and critical thinking as highly sought after graduate skills8.


Undergraduate research provides training in scientific inquiry

The setting most amenable to research-based learning in large undergraduate science courses is the practical laboratory classroom – the physical site where scientific experimentation is conducted. Laboratory classes also operate in group-work settings, which enhance collaborative skills9 and facilitate active learning10. There has been a shift away from the ‘tedious’, and ‘repetitive’ cookbook practical classes11,12, and many programs have adopted student-driven inquiry within the undergraduate laboratory1,1320. Inquiry-based learning classes can focus on an authentic research question and be implemented across a continuum of student responsibility, ranging from guided inquiry on specific research questions through to open-ended inquiry involving experimental design14. This inquiry-based learning continuum allows educators to scaffold the complexity of the research question according to prior student knowledge, and has been effective in driving student engagement across both secondary and tertiary education13. Furthermore, there has been a positive correlation between undergraduate research and student interest in scientific careers13,14, as well as improved student retention into further research programs21,22.

Developing authentic research projects for inexperienced undergraduate students can be both resource and time-intensive, and is therefore typically reserved for a small number of intrinsically motivated high-achieving students via an apprenticeship-style model23. To improve student access to undergraduate research opportunities, the ALTC and OLT have funded a number of national leadership grants and fellowships to investigate and support undergraduate research2426. Building on these previous findings, our UQ team launched an OLT leadership project in 2012 to support Australian academics in developing Authentic Large-Scale Undergraduate Research Experiences – the ALURE project.


ALURE: Authentic Large-Scale Undergraduate Research Experiences

An ALURE is characterised by student-driven investigations into research questions in hands-on undergraduate classes that can simultaneously accommodate large numbers of students (groups of 50–500 students). If developed and implemented effectively, an ALURE can provide the benefits of one-on-one research internships through normal coursework activities for hundreds of students, many of who would otherwise not engage in undergraduate research27. The real-world nature of research is a key motivator for student engagement in ALUREs, and in many cases their learning outcomes have directly contributed to research publications13,28,29. Effective scaffolding of the learning activity is also essential, as the research question needs to be investigated using laboratory techniques that are cost-effective, scalable for large classes, and subject to iteration and optimisation through student-driven inquiry27.

At The University of Queensland, ALURE modules have been systematically embedded throughout the microbiology major as part of the three year undergraduate Bachelor of Science degree. In second year, microbiome samples from 400–500 students are crowd-sourced each semester, and used in an ALURE project investigating microbial composition across different human body sites using culture dependent and independent identification methods30. Following on to third year coursework, students apply techniques in DNA analysis and protein expression in an immersive 5-week ALURE to isolate and clone bacterial vaccine antigens against Uropathogenic E. coli31. Participating in these research experiences as a normal part of their undergraduate coursework has impacted hundreds of students each semester at UQ, consistently resulting in learning-gains in key skills following ALURE modules.

Figure 1 illustrates statistically significant increases in student confidence across a range of scientific skills following completion of the third year microbiology research experience at UQ. Students reported increased confidence levels in vocational laboratory skills (e.g. using a plasmid map, designing PCR primers, DNA gel electrophoresis), as well as generic skills in numeracy (graphing, calculations, measurements) and problem solving (planning experiments, choosing between experimental strategies, and data formatting). These perceptions were further corroborated by our previous findings that revealed the high quality of student performance in laboratory and reporting assessment tasks as part of second and third year ALURE modules30,31. The range of learning gains observed following ALURE participation align with graduate attributes desired by STEM employers8 – improvement in practical competencies for pathology and research laboratories, and generic transferable skills applicable to workplaces both in and out of science3032.


Figure 1. Research experiences promote student learning gains in vocational and generic transferable skills. Pre and post course survey results following completion of an undergraduate research experience in a third year Microbiology course at The University of Queensland in 2012 (n = 41, 30% survey completion rate). Bars represents mean ± SEM of student confidence on a 0-4 scale (0 = Do not know how to do; 1 = Not confident; 2 = Need Practice; 3 = Confident; 5 = Highly Confident). * denotes P < 0.05 using a two-tailed Mann–Whitney U-test.
Click to zoom

Consistent with previous findings, we have also observed a positive shift in student attitudes towards scientific career pathways following their participation in undergraduate research experiences13,14. Pre and post survey analyses of second and third year UQ microbiology students revealed increased motivation and appreciation of science, and interest in pursuing postgraduate study and careers in science following the completion of an ALURE (Figure 2). Notably, these shifts in perception were much more evident in third year than second year ALURE students, perhaps indicative of smaller class sizes and increased focus on post-graduation prospects in the final year of undergraduate study. These trends could also signify the success of progressive scaffolding in ALURE activities across second and third year courses at UQ, which gradually increase the cognitive load required for student-driven inquiry while minimising extraneous cognitive burden33. Given the impact of engaging with undergraduate research on student retention within science programs21,22, the long-term value of exposure to research-based learning early in undergraduate education should not be under-estimated34.


Figure 2. Undergraduate research influences students’ educational and career goals. Pre and post course survey results following completion of undergraduate research experiences in second (n = 119, 28% survey completion rate) and third year (n = 38, 30% survey completion rate) Microbiology courses at The University of Queensland in 2012. Bars represents mean ± SEM of student agreement with statements on a 0-5 scale (0 = Strongly Disagree; 1 = Disagree; 2 = Barely Disagree; 3 = Barely Agree; 4 = Agree; 5 = Strongly Agree). * denotes P < 0.05 using a two-tailed Mann–Whitney U-test.
Click to zoom


Future directions and conclusions

Throughout 2012–2015, the ALURE project has documented 21 different ALUREs developed by 39 academics at Australian tertiary institutions, spanning across Biochemistry, Physiology, Chemistry, Ecology, Genetics, Biology and Microbiology. Using a mixed-methods evaluation strategy of student surveys and focus-group interviews, the ALURE team consistently reported student-learning gains in scientific skills following the completion of ALURE modules30,31, with higher gains observed in critical thinking and problem-solving skills when compared to traditional practical modules32. Undergraduate research is a high-impact activity that can be of great benefit to students, and the ALURE project has demonstrated that it can be a valuable addition to the instructor’s toolkit to bolster student-learning outcomes in transferable skills.

To facilitate the development and implementation of new ALUREs to grow our community of practice, the project team has developed assessment frameworks, implementer’s checklists, ALURE exemplars, and laboratory manuals, which can be accessed via the project website (http://alure-project.net).



Acknowledgements

The ALURE project was funded by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching, with the project team being comprised of A/Prof Susan Rowland, A/Prof Gwen Lawrie, Dr Kirsten Zimbardi, Dr Paula Myatt, Dr Jack Wang, and Peter Worthy. The study has been cleared with the UQ human ethics committee in accordance with NHMRC guidelines (Project number 2013000073).


References

[1]  Lord, T. and Orkwiszewski, T. (2006) Moving from didactic to inquiry-based instruction in a science laboratory. Am. Biol. Teach. 68, 342–345.
Moving from didactic to inquiry-based instruction in a science laboratory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Schraw, G. et al. (2001) Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 13, 211–224.
Increasing situational interest in the classroom.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Kenny, S.S. (2003) New Challenges in a Post-Boyer World. Am. Sci. 91, 103.
New Challenges in a Post-Boyer World.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Healey, M. and Jenkins, A. (2009) Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. The Higher Education Academy.

[5]  Bradley, D. et al. (2008) Review of Australian higher education: final report [Bradley review]. Australian Government DEEWR, Canberra.

[6]  Jones, S. et al. (2011) Science Learning and Teaching Academic Standards Statement. Australian Learning and Teaching Council, Sydney.

[7]  Kirkup, L. and Johnson, L. (2013) Threshold Learning Outcome 3 – Inquiry and Problem-solving. Office for Learning and Teaching Good Practice Guide (Science).

[8]  Rayner, G. and Papakonstantinou, T. (2015) Employer perspectives of the current and future value of STEM graduate skills and attributes: an Australian study. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability 6, 100–115.

[9]  Burron, B. et al. (1993) The effects of cooperative learning in a physical science course for elementary/middle level preservice teachers. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 30, 697–707.
The effects of cooperative learning in a physical science course for elementary/middle level preservice teachers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Wood, W.B. (2009) Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25, 93–112.
Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsVKisbrI&md5=bfcad402f0bd2d4556bd5360059981f8CAS | 19575638PubMed |

[11]  Wilson, J. (2008) Report: 1st year practicals – their role in developing future bioscientists. Centre for Bioscience.

[12]  Collis, M., Gibson, A., Hughes, I., Sayers, G., Todd, M. (2008) The student view of 1st year laboratory work in the biosciences – score gamma? Bioscience Education 11.

[13]  Hanauer, D.I. et al. (2006) Inquiry learning. Teaching scientific inquiry. Science 314, 1880–1881.
Inquiry learning. Teaching scientific inquiry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtlGrsb%2FE&md5=3a48376a702ecb5befaa91f826a33230CAS | 17185586PubMed |

[14]  Weaver, G.C. et al. (2008) Inquiry-based and research-based laboratory pedagogies in undergraduate science. Nat. Chem. Biol. 4, 577–580.
Inquiry-based and research-based laboratory pedagogies in undergraduate science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFamtbvE&md5=1158a6a926cfa95d9489059016be8d15CAS | 18800041PubMed |

[15]  Bellin, R.M. et al. (2010) Purification and characterization of Taq polymerase: A 9-week biochemistry laboratory project for undergraduate students. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 38, 11–16.
Purification and characterization of Taq polymerase: A 9-week biochemistry laboratory project for undergraduate students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtl2itbk%3D&md5=6a48b0104d698d1c1ff6352a47d63389CAS | 21567784PubMed |

[16]  Walter, J.D. et al. (2010) Expression, purification, and analysis of unknown translation factors from Escherichia coli: a synthesis approach. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 38, 17–22.
Expression, purification, and analysis of unknown translation factors from Escherichia coli: a synthesis approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtl2itbc%3D&md5=803a2ce0597e4e432e30f99e3b431132CAS | 21567785PubMed |

[17]  Ruller, R. et al. (2011) A practical teaching course in directed protein evolution using the green fluorescent protein as a model. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 39, 21–27.
A practical teaching course in directed protein evolution using the green fluorescent protein as a model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtFKlsrk%3D&md5=22e34426c47603566ca63f9f70cecaa7CAS | 21433249PubMed |

[18]  Girón, M.D. and Salto, R. (2011) From green to blue: site-directed mutagenesis of the green fluorescent protein to teach protein structure-function relationships. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 39, 309–315.
From green to blue: site-directed mutagenesis of the green fluorescent protein to teach protein structure-function relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21774060PubMed |

[19]  Drew, J.C. and Triplett, E.W. (2008) Whole genome sequencing in the undergraduate classroom: outcomes and lessons from a pilot course. J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. 9, 3–11.
Whole genome sequencing in the undergraduate classroom: outcomes and lessons from a pilot course.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23653818PubMed |

[20]  Boyle, M.D. (2010) ‘Shovel-ready’ sequences as a stimulus for the next generation of life scientists. J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. 11, 38–41.
‘Shovel-ready’ sequences as a stimulus for the next generation of life scientists.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23653696PubMed |

[21]  Hathaway, R.S. et al. (2002) The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: an empirical study. J. Coll. Student Dev. 43, 614–631.

[22]  Nnadozie, E. et al. (2001) Undergraduate research internships and graduate school success. J. Coll. Student Dev. 42, 145–156.

[23]  Zimbardi, K. and Myatt, P. (2014) Embedding undergraduate research experiences within the curriculum: a cross-disciplinary study of the key characteristics guiding implementation. Stud. High. Educ. 39, 233–250.
Embedding undergraduate research experiences within the curriculum: a cross-disciplinary study of the key characteristics guiding implementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Jewell, E. and Brew, A. (2010) Undergraduate research experience programs in Australian universities. Australian Learning and Teaching Council, Canberra.

[25]  Kirkup, L. (2013) Inquiry-oriented learning in science: transforming practice through forging new partnerships and perspectives. Australian Learning and Teaching Council, Sydney.

[26]  Howitt, S. et al. (2014) Teaching research – evaluation and assessment strategies for undergraduate research experiences (TREASURE). Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching, Sydney.

[27]  Auchincloss, L.C. et al. (2014) Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: a meeting report. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 13, 29–40.
Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: a meeting report.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24591501PubMed |

[28]  Leung, W. et al. (2010) Evolution of a distinct genomic domain in Drosophila: comparative analysis of the dot chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis. Genetics 185, 1519–1534.
Evolution of a distinct genomic domain in Drosophila: comparative analysis of the dot chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsFOnt77L&md5=8471ec237c3afd6d17b2e43ddb4c0f38CAS | 20479145PubMed |

[29]  Pope, W.H. et al. (2011) Expanding the diversity of mycobacteriophages: insights into genome architecture and evolution. PLoS One 6, e16329.
Expanding the diversity of mycobacteriophages: insights into genome architecture and evolution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21298013PubMed |

[30]  Wang, J.T. et al. (2015) Do you kiss your mother with that mouth? An authentic large-scale undergraduate research experience in mapping the human oral microbiome. JMBE 16, 50–60.
Do you kiss your mother with that mouth? An authentic large-scale undergraduate research experience in mapping the human oral microbiome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25949757PubMed |

[31]  Wang, J.T.H. et al. (2012) Immersing undergraduate students in the research experience. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 40, 37–45.
Immersing undergraduate students in the research experience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[32]  Rowland, S.L. et al. (2012) Is the undergraduate research experience (URE) always best? The power of choice in a bifurcated practical stream for a large introductory biochemical class. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 40, 46–62.
Is the undergraduate research experience (URE) always best? The power of choice in a bifurcated practical stream for a large introductory biochemical class.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XksVyjuw%3D%3D&md5=516cdc92594ada20474f52ee0f4dd787CAS |

[33]  Leppink, J. and van den Heuvel, A. (2015) The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education. Perspect. Med. Educ. 4, 119–127.
The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26016429PubMed |

[34]  Harrison, M. et al. (2011) Classroom-based science research at the introductory level: changes in career choices and attitude. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 10, 279–286.
Classroom-based science research at the introductory level: changes in career choices and attitude.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21885824PubMed |


Biography

Dr Jack Wang is a lecturer and convenor of the microbiology major at The University of Queensland. His work revolves around undergraduate research and technology-enabled assessment in science education, for which he received a Citation for Outstanding Contribution to Student Learning from the Australian Awards for University Teaching in 2015.