Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparisons between nesting densities of Tawny Frogmouths (Podargus strigoides) in open- and closed-canopy woodlands

Stuart Rae
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The School of Botany and Zoology, Building 116, Daley Road, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.

B Email: rae.stuart@gmail.com

Emu 109(4) 327-330 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU09056
Submitted: 25 June 2009  Accepted: 30 August 2009   Published: 4 December 2009

Abstract

The Tawny Frogmouth (Podargus strigoides) is a common and familiar bird, yet there is little known of their densities in different woodland habitats. Nests of Tawny Frogmouths were surveyed in partly cleared open grassy woodland, open-canopy grassy woodland and closed-canopy dry sclerophyll forest in 2006–08. Thirty-nine nesting attempts were recorded. In 2008, when all sites were thoroughly searched, more nests were found in the open-canopy grassy woodland (0.02 nests ha–1) than in closed-canopy dry sclerophyll forest (0.006). The highest recorded density was 0.05 nests ha–1 in the partly cleared woodland in 2006. Nests were evenly spaced but at different densities in the different habitat types, with the mean nearest-neighbour distance shorter in the open-canopy grassy woodland (594 m) than in the closed-canopy dry sclerophyll forest (1322 m). Overall, Tawny Frogmouths nested at highest densities in partly cleared grassy woodland, which grows on moderately rich loamy soils, at intermediate densities in open grassy woodland, which grows on similar soils, and at lowest densities in closed-canopy dry sclerophyll forest, which grows on shallow infertile soils. These findings provide a baseline against which results of future surveys of Tawny Frogmouths can be compared and so assist in monitoring the status of the species in relation to changes in the environment.


Acknowledgements

I thank Penny Olsen and Rod Kavanagh for valuable discussion and comments on this manuscript, and two anonymous referees whose comments improved the text.


References

Baldwin, M. (1975). Birds of Inverell District, New South Wales. Emu 75, 113–120.


Blakers M. , Davies S. J. J. F. , and Reilly P. N. (1984). ‘The Atlas of Australian Birds.’ (Melbourne University Press: Melbourne.)

Brown, D. , and Rothery, P. (1978). Randomness and the local regularity of points in a plane. Biometrika 65, 115–122.
CrossRef |

Ford, H. A. , and Bell, H. (1981). Density of birds in eucalypt woodland affected to varying degrees by dieback. Emu 81, 202–208.


Galbraith, H. , Murray, S. , Rae, S. , Whitfield, D. P. , and Thompson, D. B. A. (1993). Numbers and distribution of the Dotterel (Charadrius morinellus) breeding in Great Britain. Bird Study 40, 161–169.
CrossRef |

Higgins P. J. (Ed.) (1999) ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 4: Parrots to Dollarbird.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Hunter, J. T. (2007). Vegetation of Imbota and Yina Nature Reserves, Armidale, New South Wales. Cunninghamia 10(2), 215–224.


Kavanagh, R. P. , and Bamkin, K. L. (1995). Distribution of nocturnal forest birds and mammals in relation to the logging mosaic in south-eastern New South Wales, Australia. Biological Conservation 71, 41–53.
CrossRef |

Kavanagh, R. P. , and Murray, M. (1996). Home range, habit and behaviour of the Masked Owl Tyto novahollandiae near Newcastle, New south Wales. Emu 96, 250–257.
CrossRef |

Kavanagh R. P. , and Peake P. (1993). Distribution and habitats of nocturnal forest birds in south-eastern New South Wales. In ‘Australian Raptor Studies’. (Ed. P. Olsen.) pp. 101–125. (Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union (Australian Raptor Association): Melbourne.)

Kavanagh, R. P. , Debus, S. , Tweedie, T. , and Webster, R. (1995). Distribution of nocturnal forest birds and mammals in north-eastern New South Wales: relationships with environmental variables and management history. Wildlife Research 22, 359–377.
CrossRef |

Keith D. A. (2004). ‘Ocean Shores to Desert Dunes: The Native Vegetation of New South Wales and the ACT’. (Department of Environment and Conservation: Hurstville, Sydney.)

Körtner, G. , and Geiser, F. (1999). Roosting behaviour of the tawny frogmouth (Podargus strigoides). Journal of Zoology (London) 248, 501–507.


Newton, I. , Marquiss, M. , Weir, D. N. , and Moss, D. (1977). Spacing of sparrowhawk nesting territories. Journal of Animal Ecology 46, 425–441.
CrossRef |

Newton, I. , Wylie, I. , and Mearns, R. M. (1986). Spacing of sparrowhawks in relation to food supply. Journal of Animal Ecology 55, 361–370.
CrossRef |

Olsen P. , Weston M. , Tzaros C. , and Silcocks A. (2005). The State of Australia’s birds 2005: woodlands and birds. Supplement to Wingspan 15(4). (Birds Australia: Melbourne.) Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/publications/birds-05/pubs/birds-05.pdf [Verified 22 November 2009].

Petty S. J. , and Thomas C. J. (2003). Distribution, numbers and breeding performance of Tawny Owls (Strix aluco) in relation to clear-cutting in a conifer forest in northern England. In ‘Birds of Prey in a Changing Environment’. (Eds D. B. A. Thompson, S. M. Redpath, A. H. Fielding, M. Marquiss and C. A. Galbraith.) pp. 111–129. (Scottish Natural Heritage: Edinburgh.)

Redpath, S. M. (1995). Habitat fragmentation and the individual: Tawny Owls Strix aluco in woodland patches. Journal of Animal Ecology 64, 652–661.
CrossRef |

Schodde R. , and Mason I. J. (1980). ‘Nocturnal Birds of Australia.’ (Landsdowne: Melbourne.)

Serventy, D. L. (1936). Feeding methods of Podargus. Emu 36, 74–90.


Specht R. L. (1970). Vegetation. In ‘The Australian Environment’. (Ed. G. W. Leeper.) pp. 44–67. (CSIRO and Melbourne University Press: Melbourne.)

Tjernberg, M. (1985). Spacing of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos nests in relation to nest site and food availability. Ibis 127, 250–255.
CrossRef |

Watson, A. , and Rothery, P. (1986). Regularity in spacing of Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos nests used within years in northeast Scotland. Ibis 128, 406–408.
CrossRef |


Export Citation