Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Nature and frequency of services provided by child and family health nurses in Australia: results of a national survey

Virginia Schmied A D , Cathrine Fowler B , Chris Rossiter B , Caroline Homer B , Sue Kruske C and The CHoRUS team
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, NSW 2751, Australia.

B Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia. Email: Cathrine.Fowler@uts.edu.au; Caroline.Homer@uts.edu.au

C Queensland Centre for Mothers & Babies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia. Email: Sue.Kruske@uq.edu.au

D Corresponding author. Email: v.schmied@uws.edu.au

Australian Health Review 38(2) 177-185 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13195
Submitted: 11 July 2013  Accepted: 6 December 2013   Published: 4 March 2014

Abstract

Objective Australia has a system of universal child and family health (CFH) nursing services providing primary health services from birth to school entry. Herein, we report on the findings of the first national survey of CFH nurses, including the ages and circumstances of children and families seen by CFH nurses and the nature and frequency of the services provided by these nurses across Australia.

Methods A national survey of CFH nurses was conducted.

Results In all, 1098 CFH nurses responded to the survey. Over 60% were engaged in delivering primary prevention services from a universal platform. Overall, 82.8% reported that their service made first contact with families within 2 weeks of birth, usually in the home (80.7%). The proportion of respondents providing regular support to families decreased as the child aged. Services were primarily health centre based, although 25% reported providing services in other locations (parks, preschools).The timing and location of first contact, the frequency of ongoing services and the composition of families seen by nurses varied across Australian jurisdictions. Nurses identified time constraints as the key barrier to the delivery of comprehensive services.

Conclusions CFH nurses play an important role in supporting families across Australia. The impact of differences in the CFH nursing provision across Australia requires further investigation.

What is known about the topic? Countries that offer universal well child health services demonstrate better child health and developmental outcomes than countries that do not. Australian jurisdictions offer free, universal child and family health (CFH) nursing services from birth to school entry.

What does this paper add? This paper provides nation-wide data on the nature of work undertaken by CFH nurses offering universal care. Across Australia, there are differences in the timing and location of first contact, the frequency of ongoing services and the range of families seen by nurses.

What are the implications for practitioners? The impact for families of the variation in CFH nursing services offered across Australia is not known. Further research is required to investigate the outcomes of the service provision variations identified in the present study.

Additional keywords: maternal and child health, primary prevention, progressive universalism, well child care.


References

[1]  Schmied V, Donovan J, Kruske S, Kemp L, Homer C, Fowler C. Commonalities and challenges: a review of Australian state and territory maternity and child health policies. Contemp Nurse 2011; 40 106–17.
Commonalities and challenges: a review of Australian state and territory maternity and child health policies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22545909PubMed |

[2]  Cowley S, Caan W, Dowling S, Weir H. What do health visitors do? A national survey of activities and service organisation. Public Health 2007; 121 869–79.
What do health visitors do? A national survey of activities and service organisation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2snit1GisQ%3D%3D&md5=8aca762118c3b757432131bda0570588CAS | 17606280PubMed |

[3]  Fägerskiöld AM, Wahlberg V, Anna C. What child health nurses believe mothers with infants expect of them. Nurs Health Sci 2000; 2 83–91.
What child health nurses believe mothers with infants expect of them.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Magnusson M, Lagerberg D, Sundelin C. Organizational differences in early child health care: mothers’ and nurses’ experiences of the services. Scand J Caring Sci 2012; 26 161–8.
Organizational differences in early child health care: mothers’ and nurses’ experiences of the services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21883341PubMed |

[5]  The Royal New Zealand Plunket Society Inc. Annual report 2011. Royal Plunket New Zealand Society; 2012. Available at http://www.plunket.org.nz/assets/News–research/RNZPlunketSocietyAnnualReport2011.pdf [verified 30 June 2013]

[6]  Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council. National framework for universal child and family health services. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; 2011. Available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/119CD12CB66F8514CA257B660002C659/$File/NFUCFHS.PDF [verified 30 June 2013]

[7]  Kuo AA, Inkelas M, Lotstein DS, Samson KM, Schor EL, Halfon N. Rethinking well-child care in the United States: an international comparison. Pediatrics 2006; 118 1692–702.
Rethinking well-child care in the United States: an international comparison.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17015563PubMed |

[8]  Brinkman SA, Gialamas A, Rahman A, Mittinty MN, Gregory TA, Silburn S, et al Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia. BMJ Open 2012; 2
Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22952161PubMed |

[9]  Oberklaid F, Baird G, Blair M, Melhuish E, Hall D. Children’s health and development: approaches to early identification and intervention. Arch Dis Child 2013; 22
Children’s health and development: approaches to early identification and intervention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Nursing and midwifery workforce 2011. Canberra: AIHW; 2012.

[11]  Barnes MI, Pratt J, Finlayson K, Pitt B, Knight C. The first steps program: a case study of a new model of community child health service. Aust Health Rev 2010; 34 386–9.
The first steps program: a case study of a new model of community child health service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21108896PubMed |

[12]  Borrow S, Munns A, Henderson S. Community-based child health nurses: an exploration of current practice. Contemp Nurse 2011; 40 71–86.
Community-based child health nurses: an exploration of current practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22545907PubMed |

[13]  Briggs C. Nursing practice in community child health: developing the nurse–client relationship. Contemp Nurse 2006; 23 303–11.
Nursing practice in community child health: developing the nurse–client relationship.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17343533PubMed |

[14]  Henderson S. Community child health (CCH) nurses’ experience of home visits for new mothers: a quality improvement project. Contemp Nurse 2009; 34 66–76.
Community child health (CCH) nurses’ experience of home visits for new mothers: a quality improvement project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20230173PubMed |

[15]  Kruske S. Same, but different: contemporary child and family health nursing practice in NSW. Doctoral Thesis, Charles Darwin University, Darwin; 2005.

[16]  Barker DJP. The origins of the developmental origins theory. J Intern Med 2007; 261 412–17.
The origins of the developmental origins theory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s3js1CqsA%3D%3D&md5=e08aa618198ad41bd5e79ec96a1dcec6CAS |

[17]  Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. A science-based framework for early childhood policy: using evidence to improve outcomes in learning, behavior, and health for vulnerable children. Harvard University; 2007. Available at http://www.developingchild.harvard.edu [verified 9 October 2013]

[18]  Shonkoff JP, Boyce WT, McEwen BS. Neuroscience, molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: Building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention. JAMA 2009; 301 2252–9.
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXnt1OjsL8%3D&md5=9029e7b03a5c675690a70ac89af8718cCAS | 19491187PubMed |

[19]  Eronen R, Pincombe J, Calabretto H. Support for stressed parents of young infants. Neonat Paediatr Child Health Nurs 2007; 10 20–7.

[20]  Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. Maternal and child health annual report 2011–2012: statewide. Melbourne: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development; 2012. Available at http://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/childhood/providers/support/report12.pdf [verified 30 June 2013]

[21]  Schmied V, Homer C, Kemp L, Thomas C, Fowler C, Kruske S. The role and nature of universal health services for pregnant women, children and families in Australia. 2008. Available at: http://www.aracy.org.au/publications-resources/command/download_file/id/151/filename/The_role_and_nature_of_universal_health_services_for_ pregnant_women,_children_and_families_in_Australia_-_Literature_review.pdf [verified 17th December 2013]

[22]  Schmied V, Mills A, Kruske S, Kemp L, Fowler C, Homer C. The nature and impact of collaboration and integrated service delivery for pregnant women, children and families. J of Clin Nurs 2010; 19 3516–26.

[23]  Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. London: Thousand Oaks; 2002.

[24]  Kemp L, Harris E, McMahon C, Matthey S, Vimpani GV, Anderson T, et al Child and family outcomes of a long-term nurse home visitation programme: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child 2011; 96 533–40.
Child and family outcomes of a long-term nurse home visitation programme: a randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21429975PubMed |

[25]  Shribman S, Billinham K. Healthy Child Programme: pregnancy and the first five years. London: Departnent of Health; 2009.

[26]  Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. Maternal and child health service: key and stages framework. Melbourne: Victorian Government; 2009. Available at http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/earlychildhood/mch/serv_activity_frameworkmar09.pdf [verified 11 February 2011]

[27]  Western Australian Auditor. General performance audit: universal child health checks. Perth: Government of Western Australia; 2010.

[28]  Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence. 2009–2010 Summary report from the New South Wales child health survey. Sydney: NSW Ministry of Health; 2012.

[29]  Kearney L, Fulbrook P. Open-access community child health clinics: the everyday experience of parents and child health nurses. J Child Health Care 2012; 16 5–14.
Open-access community child health clinics: the everyday experience of parents and child health nurses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22247180PubMed |

[30]  beyondblue. Clincial practice guidelines for depression and related disorders–anxiety, bipolar disorder and puerperal psychosis–in the perinatal period. 2011. Available at http://www.beyondblue.org.au/index.aspx?link_id=6.1246 [verified 17 December 2011]

[31]  NSW Health, Families NSW. NSW Health, Families NSW: supporting families early package. North Sydney: NSW Department of Health; 2009.

[32]  Davis H, Day C, Bidmead C. Working in partnership with parents. London: Harcourt Assessment; 2002.

[33]  Jackiewicz S. Evaluation of family partnership training in Western Australia 2001–2003. Perth: Telethon Institute for Child Health Research; 2004.

[34]  Keatinge D, Fowler C, Briggs C. Evaluating the Family Partnership Model (FPM) program and implementation in practice in New South Wales, Australia. Aust J Adv Nurs 2007; 25 28–35.

[35]  Jack SM, DiCenso A, Lohfeld L. A theory of maternal engagement with public health nurses and family visitors. J Adv Nurs 2005; 49 182–90.
A theory of maternal engagement with public health nurses and family visitors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15641951PubMed |

[36]  Marcellus L. The ethics of relation: public health nurses and child protection clients. Infant Ment Health J 2005; 51 414–20.

[37]  Peckover S. ‘I could have just done with a little more help’: an anlaysis of women’s help-seeking from health visitors in the context of domestic violence. Health Soc Care Community 2003; 11 275–82.
‘I could have just done with a little more help’: an anlaysis of women’s help-seeking from health visitors in the context of domestic violence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12823432PubMed |

[38]  Fowler C, Schmied V, Kruske S, CHoRUS team. Services provided by child and family health nurses in Australia: Results of the CHoRUS survey. Maternal and Child and Family Health Nurses of Australia 5th Biennial National Conference: Connections, May 2013; Canberra, Australia. 2013.

[39]  Fielden JM, Gallagher LM. Building social capital in first-time parents through a group-parenting program: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45 406–17.
Building social capital in first-time parents through a group-parenting program: a questionnaire survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17097090PubMed |

[40]  Hanna B, Edgecombe G, Jackson C, Newman S. The importance of first time parent groups for new parents. Nurs Health Sci 2002; 4 209–14.
The importance of first time parent groups for new parents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12406208PubMed |

[41]  Kruske S, Schmied V, Sutton I, O’Hare J. Mothers’ experiences of facilitated peer support groups and individual child health nursing support: a comparative evaluation. J Perinat Educ 2004; 13 31–8.
Mothers’ experiences of facilitated peer support groups and individual child health nursing support: a comparative evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17273398PubMed |

[42]  Scott D, Brady S, Glynn P. New mother groups as a social network intervention: consumer and maternal and child health nurse perspectives. Aust J Adv Nurs 2001; 18 23–9.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387ksV2nsw%3D%3D&md5=db0a55696deb40185bdec0c875029414CAS | 11878547PubMed |

[43]  Kruske S, Schmied V, Cook M. The earlybird gets the breastmilk: findings from an evaluation of combined professional and peer support groups to improve breastfeeing duration in the first eight weeks after birth. Matern Child Nutr 2007; 3 108–19.
The earlybird gets the breastmilk: findings from an evaluation of combined professional and peer support groups to improve breastfeeing duration in the first eight weeks after birth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17355443PubMed |

[44]  Cowley S, Kemp L, Day C, Appleton J. Research and the organisation of complex provision: conceptualising health visiting services and early years programmes. J Res Nurs 2012; 17 108–24.
Research and the organisation of complex provision: conceptualising health visiting services and early years programmes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[45]  Bar-Zeev SJ, Barclay L, Farrington C, Kildea S. From hospital to home: the quality and safety of a postnatal discharge system used for remote dwelling Aboriginal mothers and infants in the top end of Australia. Midwifery 2012; 28 366–73.
From hospital to home: the quality and safety of a postnatal discharge system used for remote dwelling Aboriginal mothers and infants in the top end of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21684640PubMed |

[46]  Homer CSE, Henry K, Schmied V, Kemp L, Leap N, Briggs C. ‘It looks good on paper’: transitions of care between midwives and child and family health nurses in New South Wales. Women Birth 2009; 22 64–72.
‘It looks good on paper’: transitions of care between midwives and child and family health nurses in New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[47]  Ou L, Chen J, Hillman K. Health services utilisation disparities between English speaking and non-English speaking background Australian infants. BMC Public Health 2010; 10 182
| 20374663PubMed |

[48]  Ou L, Chen J, Hillman K, Eastwood J. The comparison of health status and health services utilisation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous infants in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2010; 34 50–6.
The comparison of health status and health services utilisation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous infants in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20920105PubMed |

[49]  Shribman S, Billingham K. Healthy Child Programme Pregnancy and the first five years of life. London: Department of Health; 2009. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/healthy-child-programme-pregnancy-and-the-first-5-years-of-life [verified October 4th 2013]

[50]  Department of Health. Health Visitor Implementation Plan 2011–15. London: Department of Health; 2011. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-visitor-implementation-plan-2011-to-2015-sets-out-call-to-action [verified October 4th 2013]

[51]  Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Centre for Community Child Health (Royal Children’s Hospital). The Tasmanian Child and Family Centre Action Research Project: phase two report. Department of Education (Tasmania), Department of Health and Human Services (Tasmania), Tasmanian Early Years Foundation; 2013. Aavailable at http://www.researchconnections.org/childcare/resources/25795 [verified 11 October 2013]