Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Inside the ordering room: characteristics of women’s in-home sex toy parties, facilitators and sexual communication

Debra Herbenick A B , Michael Reece A and Ariane Hollub A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Center for Sexual Health Promotion, Department of Applied Health Science, HPER 116, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.

B Corresponding author. Email: debby@indiana.edu

Sexual Health 6(4) 318-327 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH08086
Submitted: 26 November 2008  Accepted: 6 April 2009   Published: 13 November 2009

Abstract

Background: Previous research suggests that adult bookstores are a unique way through which individuals may learn about sexuality or practice sexual communication. Recently, the woman-oriented in-home sex toy party industry has rapidly expanded in several countries. The purpose of this study was to document the characteristics of the parties, the women who run the parties (‘facilitators’) and facilitator-consumer communication about sexual health topics. Methods: Female facilitators for a large in-home sex toy party company in the USA were invited to participate in an anonymous, cross-sectional online survey. Results: A total of 1197 completed surveys were received. Most respondents were white (85.2%), heterosexual (91.6%), had at least some college education (76.3%) and were married (59.4%). Most parties were held in another woman’s home (88.3%), lasted 1–2 h (72.2%) and had 10 or fewer women in attendance (65.1%). At their most recent party facilitated, most respondents were asked questions about increasing desire/arousal (75.3%), orgasm (57.8%), desire discrepancy (56.4%), erection and ejaculation (73.8%), and vaginal dryness and lubrication (64.5%). Respondents who encountered sexual health questions or disclosures by consumers (those that were more ‘askable’) scored significantly higher on the Sexual Opinion Survey, indicating greater erotophilia. Conclusions: Results suggest that female in-home sex toy party facilitators have the potential to provide a diverse group of women with opportunities to access sexuality information, products and communication and that facilitators’ ‘askability’ is related to erotophilia. Implications for sexual health professionals are discussed.

Additional keywords: sex education, sexual function, sexual health, vibrators.


Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to The Patty Brisben Foundation for an unrestricted grant in support of this research.


References


[1] Bancroft J,  Loftus J,  Long JS. Distress about sex: A national survey of women in heterosexual relationships. Arch Sex Behav 2003; 32 193–208.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified April 2009].

[48] Billups KL. The role of mechanical devices in treating female sexual dysfunction and enhancing the female sexual response. J Urol 2002; 20 137–41.
[verified June 2008].

[61] Laumann EO , Gagnon JH , Michael RT , Michaels S . The social organization of sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994.

[62] Tiefer L. A new view of women’s sexual problems: Why new? Why now? J Sex Res 2001; 38 89–96.


[63] Lewis S,  Bor R. Nurses’ knowledge of and attitudes toward sexuality and the relationship of these with nursing practice. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1994; 20 251–9.
CAS |

[64] Rosen R,  Kountz D,  Post-Zwicker T,  Leiblum S,  Wiegel M. Sexual communication skills in residency training: the Robert Wood Johnson Model. J Sex Med 2006; 3 37–46.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[65] Sansone RA,  Wiederman M. Sexuality training for psychiatry residents: A national survey of training directors. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26 249–56.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[66] Kennedy LA,  Milton B,  Bundred P. Lay food and health worker involvement in community nutrition and dietetics in England: Roles, responsibilities and relationship with professionals. J Hum Nutr Diet 2008; 21 210–24.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |