Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR04036
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 32(5)

Biodiversity and invasive grass species: multiple-use or monoculture?

Keith Ferdinands A B , Kerry Beggs A and Peter Whitehead A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Key Centre for Tropical Wildlife Management, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: keith.ferdinands@cdu.edu.au

Wildlife Research 32(5) 447-457 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR04036
Submitted: 3 May 2004  Accepted: 3 May 2005   Published: 8 August 2005

Abstract

Invasive plants are recognised as a major threat to biodiversity conservation worldwide. Despite this recognition, our understanding of the mechanisms controlling the invasion process and its impact on flora and fauna is often poor. We examined the impact of an invasive aquatic grass species, para grass (Urochloa mutica), on seasonally inundated wetlands in tropical northern Australia. Flora and avifauna were surveyed at sites invaded by para grass and in native vegetation. Spatial information systems were used to design surveys and determine environmental correlates of para grass distribution and so predict the potential future spread of para grass and infer impacts in the absence of control. Where para grass was present the median number of plant taxa was ~75% lower. Few birds showed preference for habitats invaded by para grass, and most birds were associated with areas of native vegetation or other habitats with little or no para grass. The study identified several wetland habitats that are at greater risk of invasion, based on the apparent habitat preferences of para grass. The degradation or loss of some of these ‘at-risk’ habitats, including Oryza meriodionalis grasslands that play an integral role in the wetland food chain, has important ramifications for the levels of biodiversity supported by the wetlands.


Acknowledgments

We thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive reviews of the manuscript. Christine Bach, Jane Hosking, Paul Jonauskas and Robert Townsend provided invaluable advice on many aspects of this project. Some of the avifauna survey data reported here were collected by Christine Bach and Jane Hosking. The Parks and Wildlife Commission NT and the Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Environment provided logistic and financial support for the fieldwork component of the project. Alaric Fisher and John Woinarski provided advice on statistical analysis of avifauna data. We thank the numerous volunteers who provided fieldwork support and the Walker family for allowing access to field sites. This project was funded by the Australian Research Council through the Strategic Partnerships with Industry – Research and Training (SPIRT) program, which provided APAI scholarships for Ferdinands and Beggs.


References

Adair R. J., and Groves R. H. (1998). Impact of environmental weeds on biodiversity: a review and development of a methodology. Biodiversity Group, Environment Australia, Canberra.

Anon.  (1998). Finniss, Warrai, Marrakai and Lower Mary River: proposed planning concepts and land use objectives. Connell Wagner Pty Ltd, Darwin. Consultants Report No. Z766.03.

Armstrong M., Woinarski J., Hempel C., Connors G., and Beggs K. (2002). A plan for the conservation of biodiversity in the Mary River catchment, Northern Territory. Parks and Wildlife, Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Environment, Palmerston, NT.

Aspinall, R. (1992). An inductive modelling procedure based on Bayes’ theorem for analysis of pattern in spatial data. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 6, 105–121.
Aspinall R. (1999). ‘An Introduction to Bayesian Modelling.’ (NTU: Darwin.)

Bach C., and Hosking J. (2002). Wetland monitoring for the Mary River catchment. Department of Infrastructure Planning and Environment, Darwin. Natural Heritage Trust Project No. 97152.

Bunn, S. E. , Davies, P. M. , Kellaway, D. M. , and Prosser, I. P. (1998). Influence of invasive macrophytes on channel morphology and hydrology in an open tropical lowland stream, and potential control by riparian shading. Freshwater Biology 39, 171–178.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Cameron A. G. (2001). Information sheet: para grass (DRAFT). Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Darwin.

Clarkson J. R. (1991). The spread of pondage species beyond the pasture system – the risk and associated ecological consequences. In ‘Proceedings of the Probing Ponded Pastures Workshop, Brisbane’. (Ed. Anon.) pp. 1–6. (University of Queensland: Brisbane.)

Corbett L. K. (1995). ‘The Dingo in Australia and Asia.’ (NSW University Press: Sydney.)

Cowie I., Short P. S., and Osterkamp Madsen M. (2000). ‘Floodplain Flora: Flora of the Coastal Floodplains of the Northern Territory, Australia.’ (ABRS: Canberra.)

D’Antonio, C. M. (1993). Mechanisms controlling invasion of coastal plant communities by the alien succulent Carpobrotus edulis. Ecology 74, 83–95.
Dexter N. (1988). The effect of experimental clutch harvest on magpie geese Anseranas semipalmata in subcoastal Northern Territory, Australia. M.Appl.Sc. Thesis, Canberra College of Advanced Education.

Douglas, M. M. , and O’Connor, R. A. (2004). Weed invasion changes fuel characteristics: para grass (Urochloa mutica (Forssk.) T.Q. Nguyen), on a tropical floodplain. Ecological Management & Restoration 5, 147–148.
Douglas M., Finlayson C. M., and Storrs M. J. (1998). Weed management in tropical wetlands of the Northern Territory, Australia. In ‘Proceedings of the Wetlands in a Dry Land: Understanding for Management’. (Ed. Anon.) pp. 240–251. (Environment Australia: Canberra.) [Available at http://www.deh.gov.au/water/wetlands/rd/abs.html.]

Douglas M. M., Bunn S. E., Pidgeon B., Davies P. M., Barrow P. H., O’Connor R. A., and Winning M. (2001). Weed management and the biodiversity and ecological processes of tropical wetlands. Environment Australia & Land and Water Australia. [Available at http://www.deh.gov.au/water/wetlands/rd/weed/index.html.]

Downey, P. (2000). Disturbance and the management of weed invasions – scotch broom, a case study. Weed Watch 12, 3–4.
Groves R. H. (2002). The impacts of alien plants in Australia. In ‘Biological Invasions: Economic and Environmental Costs of Alien Plant, Animal and Microbe Species’. (Ed. D. Pimentel.) pp. 11–25. (CRC Press: New York.)

Groves, R. H. , and Willis, A. J. (1999). Environmental weeds and loss of native plant biodiversity: some Australian examples. Australian Journal of Environmental Management 6, 164–171.
Harper J. L. (1977). ‘Population Biology of Plants.’ (Academic Press: London.)

Humphries, S. E. , Groves, R. H. , and Mitchell, D. S. (1991). Plant invasions: the incidence of environmental weeds in Australia. Kowari 2, 1–134.
Lonsdale W. M. (1992). The impacts of weeds in national parks. In ‘Proceedings of the First International Weed Control Congress’. (Eds J. H. Combellack, K. J. Levich, J. Parsons and R. G. Richardson.) pp. 145–149. (Weed Science Society of Victoria Inc.: Melbourne.)

Low T. (1999). ‘Feral Future: The Untold Story of Australia’s Exotic Invaders.’ 1st edn. (Viking: Melbourne.)

Lynch D. (1996). Mary River Floodplain vegetation. Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Environment, Palmerston, NT.

Mack, R. N. , Simberloff, D. , Lonsdale, W. M. , Evans, H. , Clout, M. , and Bazzaz, F. A. (2000). Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10, 689–710.
McCoy J., and Johnston K. (2001). ‘Using ArcGIS: Spatial Analyst.’ (ESRI: Redlands, CA)

Miller I. L., and Wilson C. G. (1995). Weed threats to Northern Territory wetlands. In ‘Wetland Research in the Wet–Dry Tropics of Australia’. (Ed. C. M. Finlayson.) pp. 190–195. (ERISS: Jabiru, NT.)

Moody, M. E. , and Mack, R. N. (1988). Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. Journal of Applied Ecology 25, 1009–1021.
Mueller-Dombois D., and Ellenberg H. (1974). ‘Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology.’ (John Wiley & Sons: New York.)

Nairn M. E. (2001). An overview of Australia’s biosecurity record and future operating environment. In ‘Proceedings of the Biological Security – A Future Imperative’. (Ed. Anon.) pp. 1–3. (Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, Western Australia Division: Perth.)

Northern Territory Government (1998). Integrated catchment management plan: Mary River. Northern Territory Government, Darwin.

Prieur-Richard, A. , and Lavorel, S. (2000). Invasions: the perspective of diverse plant communities. Austral Ecology 25, 1–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Whitehead P. J. (1998). Dynamics of habitat use by the magpie goose Anseranas semipalmata: implications for conservation management. Ph.D. Thesis, Northern Territory University, Darwin.

Whitehead, P. (1999). Promoting conservation in landscapes subject to change: lessons from the Mary River. Australian Biologist 12, 50–62.
Whitehead P. J., and Chatto R. (1996). Northern Territory. In ‘A Directory of Important Wetlands in Australia’. (Ed. Anon.) pp. 119–176. (Australian Nature Conservation Agency: Canberra.)

Whitehead, P. , and Dawson, T. (2000). Let them eat grass. Nature Australia Autumn, 45–55.
Wilson B. A., Brocklehurst P. S., and Whitehead P. J. (1990). Classification, distribution and environmental relationships of coastal floodplain vegetation, Northern Territory, Australia. Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory, Palmerston, Northern Territory. Technical Memorandum No. 91/2.