Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Using multiple methods to assess detection probabilities of riparian-zone anurans: implications for monitoring

Jacquelyn C. Guzy A D , Steven J. Price B and Michael E. Dorcas C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Biology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.

B Department of Forestry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA.

C Department of Biology, Davidson College, Davidson, NC 28035, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: jcguzy@uark.edu

Wildlife Research 41(3) 243-257 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR14038
Submitted: 4 March 2014  Accepted: 20 August 2014   Published: 26 September 2014

Abstract

Context: Both manual call surveys (MCS) and visual encounter surveys (VES) are popular methods used to monitor anuran populations. Recent statistical developments, specifically the development of occupancy models that permit the use of data from various survey methods to assess method-specific detection probabilities, provide a rigorous framework for evaluating the effectiveness of field methods.

Aim: To compare species-specific detection probabilities generated by MCS and VES and to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods throughout the activity season of several riparian-zone anuran species.

Methods: During 2010 and 2011, we sampled 21 sites along the Broad and Pacolet Rivers, in South Carolina, USA, using MCS and VES. Anuran species were surveyed across three seasons (fall, spring and summer) each year.

Key results: For six species, MCS resulted in a higher mean probability of detection, whereas VES resulted in a higher mean probability of detection for four species. In addition, survey date was an important influence on detection probability of most anurans when using MCS, but largely unimportant when employing VES.

Conclusions: Our findings indicated that VES are as effective as MCS for detecting some species of anurans, and for others, VES represent a more effective method. Furthermore, when using VES outside the breeding window, some anurans can be reliably detected, and in some cases, detected more easily than by using MCS.

Implications: We suggest that VES is a complimentary technique to MCS and a potentially important tool for population monitoring of anurans. VES can provide more flexibility for anuran researchers, as robust estimates of detection and occupancy can be obtained outside a narrow breeding window.

Additional keywords: active search, amphibian, manual call survey, South Carolina, survey method, visual encounter survey.


References

Adams, M. J., Pearl, C. A., Galvan, S., and McCreary, B. (2011). Non-native species impacts on pond occupancy by an anuran. The Journal of Wildlife Management 75, 30–35.
Non-native species impacts on pond occupancy by an anuran.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bailey, L. L., Simons, T. R., and Pollock, K. H. (2004). Estimating site occupancy and species detection probability parameters for terrestrial salamanders. Ecological Applications 14, 692–702.
Estimating site occupancy and species detection probability parameters for terrestrial salamanders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Balas, C. J., Euliss, N. H., and Mushet, D. M. (2012). Influence of conservation programs on amphibians using seasonal wetlands in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 32, 333–345.
Influence of conservation programs on amphibians using seasonal wetlands in the prairie pothole region.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beck, C. W., and Congdon, J. D. (1999). Effects of individual variation in age and size at metamorphosis on growth and survivorship of southern toad (Bufo terrestris) metamorphs. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, 944–951.
Effects of individual variation in age and size at metamorphosis on growth and survivorship of southern toad (Bufo terrestris) metamorphs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blair, W. F. (1961). Calling and spawning seasons in a mixed population of anurans. Ecology 42, 99–110.
Calling and spawning seasons in a mixed population of anurans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brander, S. M., Royle, J. A., and Eames, M. (2007). Evaluation of the status of anurans on a refuge in suburban Maryland. Journal of Herpetology 41, 52–60.
Evaluation of the status of anurans on a refuge in suburban Maryland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brandt, B. B. (1936). The frogs and toads of eastern North Carolina. Copeia 1936, 215–223.
The frogs and toads of eastern North Carolina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown, G. W., Scroggie, M. P., Smith, M. J., and Steane, D. (2007). An evaluation of methods for assessing the population status of the threatened Alpine tree frog Litoria verreauxii alpina in southeastern Australia. Copeia 3, 765–770.
An evaluation of methods for assessing the population status of the threatened Alpine tree frog Litoria verreauxii alpina in southeastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Buckland, S. T., Burnham, K. P., and Augustin, N. H. (1997). Model selection: an integral part of inference. Biometrics 53, 603–618.
Model selection: an integral part of inference.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burbrink, F. T., Phillips, C. A., and Heske, E. J. (1998). A riparian zone in southern Illinois as a potential dispersal corridor for reptiles and amphibians. Biological Conservation 86, 107–115.
A riparian zone in southern Illinois as a potential dispersal corridor for reptiles and amphibians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-theoretic Approach.’ 2nd edn. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Conant, R., and Collins, J. T. (1998). ‘A Field Guide to Amphibians and Reptiles: Eastern and Central North America.’ 3rd edn. (Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston, MA.)

Cook, R. P., Tupper, T. A., Paton, P. W. C., and Timm, B. C. (2011). Effects of temperature and temporal factors on anuran detection probabilities at Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts, USA: implications for long-term monitoring. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 6, 25–39.

Crump, M. L., and Scott, N. J., Jr (1994). Visual encounter surveys. In ‘Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians’. (Eds W. R. Heyer, M. A. Donnelly, R. W. McDiarmid, L. C. Hayek and M. S. Foster.) pp. 84–92. (Smithsonian Institution: Washington, DC.)

Dahl, C., Novotny, V., Moravec, J., and Richards, S. J. (2009). Beta diversity of frogs in the forests of New Guinea, Amazonia and Europe: contrasting tropical and temperate communities. Journal of Biogeography 36, 896–904.
Beta diversity of frogs in the forests of New Guinea, Amazonia and Europe: contrasting tropical and temperate communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Doan, T. M. (2003). Which methods are most effective for surveying rain forest herpetofauna? Journal of Herpetology 37, 72–81.
Which methods are most effective for surveying rain forest herpetofauna?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dodd, C. K. (2013). ‘Frogs of the United States and Canada.’ (Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.)

Dorcas, M. E., and Gibbons, J. W. (2008). ‘Frogs and Toads of the Southeast.’ (The University of Georgia Press: Athens, GA.)

Dorcas, M. E., Price, S. J., Beane, J. C., and Cross, S. S. (2007). ‘The Frogs and Toads of North Carolina.’ (North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission: Raleigh, NC.)

Dorcas, M. E., Price, S. J., Walls, S. C., and Barichivich, W. J. (2010). Auditory monitoring of anuran populations. In ‘Conservation and Ecology of Amphibians’. (Ed. C. K. Dodd.) pp. 281–298. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Dostine, P. L., Reynolds, S. J., Griffiths, A. D., and Gillespie, G. R. (2013). Factors influencing detection probabilities of frogs in the monsoonal tropics of northern Australia: implications for the design of monitoring studies. Wildlife Research 40, 393–402.

Droege, S., and Eagle, P. (2005). Evaluating calling surveys. In ‘Amphibian Declines: the Conservation Status of United States Species’. (Ed. M. J. Lannoo.) pp. 314–319. (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.)

Drost, C. A., and Fellers, G. M. (1996). Collapse of regional frog fauna in the Yosemite area of the California Sierra Nevada. Conservation Biology 10, 414–425.
Collapse of regional frog fauna in the Yosemite area of the California Sierra Nevada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Eskew, E. A., Price, S. J., and Dorcas, M. E. (2012). Effects of river-flow regulation on anuran occupancy and abundance in riparian zones. Conservation Biology 26, 504–512.
Effects of river-flow regulation on anuran occupancy and abundance in riparian zones.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22519586PubMed |

Farmer, A. L., Smith, L. L., Castleberry, S. B., and Gibbons, J. W. (2009). A comparison of techniques for sampling amphibians in isolated wetlands in Georgia, USA. Applied Herpetology 6, 327–341.
A comparison of techniques for sampling amphibians in isolated wetlands in Georgia, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fry, J., Xian, G., Jin, S., Dewitz, J., Homer, C., Yang, L., Barnes, C., Herold, N., and Wickham, J. (2011). Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States. PE&RS 77, 858–864.

Gooch, M. M., Heupel, A. M., Price, S. J., and Dorcas, M. E. (2006). The effects of survey protocol on detection probabilities and site occupancy estimates of summer breeding anurans. Applied Herpetology 3, 129–142.
The effects of survey protocol on detection probabilities and site occupancy estimates of summer breeding anurans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grover, M. C. (2006). Comparative effectiveness of nighttime visual encounter surveys and cover object searches in detecting salamanders. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 1, 93–99.

Heard, G. W., Robertson, P., and Scroggie, M. P. (2006). Assessing detection probabilities for the endangered growling grass frog (Litoria raniformis) in southern Victoria. Wildlife Research 33, 557–564.
Assessing detection probabilities for the endangered growling grass frog (Litoria raniformis) in southern Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hines, J. E. (2006). ‘PRESENCE (Version 5.7): Software to Estimate Patch Occupancy and Related Parameters. USGS-PWRC.’ Available at http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/software/presence.html [verified 1 August 2014].

Hunt, S. D., Guzy, J. C., Price, S. J., Halstead, B. J., Eskew, E. A., and Dorcas, M. E. (2013). Responses of riparian reptile communities to damming and urbanization. Biological Conservation 157, 277–284.
Responses of riparian reptile communities to damming and urbanization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Knutson, M. G., Richardson, W. B., Reineke, D. M., Gray, B. R., Parmelee, J. R., and Weick, S. E. (2004). Agricultural ponds support amphibian populations. Ecological Applications 14, 669–684.
Agricultural ponds support amphibian populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lefcort, H. (1998). Chemically mediated fright response in southern toad (Bufo terrestris) tadpoles. Copeia 1998, 445–450.
Chemically mediated fright response in southern toad (Bufo terrestris) tadpoles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lehtinen, R. M., and Galatowitsch, S. M. (2001). Colonization of restored wetlands by amphibians in Minnesota. American Midland Naturalist 145, 388–396.
Colonization of restored wetlands by amphibians in Minnesota.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lips, K. R. (1999). Mass mortality and population declines of anurans at an upland site in western Panama. Conservation Biology 13, 117–125.
Mass mortality and population declines of anurans at an upland site in western Panama.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacKenzie, D. I., and Bailey, L. L. (2004). Assessing fit of site occupancy models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Ecological Statistics 9, 300–318.

MacKenzie, D. L., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Royle, J. A., and Langtimm, C. A. (2002). Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83, 2248–2255.
Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., Pollock, K. H., Bailey, L. L., and Hines, J. E. (2006). ‘Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)

MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Seamans, M. E., and Gutiérrez, R. J. (2009). Modeling species occurrence dynamics with multiple states and imperfect detection. Ecology 90, 823–835.
Modeling species occurrence dynamics with multiple states and imperfect detection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19341151PubMed |

Mattfeldt, S. D., and Grant, E. H. C. (2007). Are two methods better than one? Area constrained transects and leaf litterbags for sampling stream salamanders. Herpetological Review 38, 43–45.

Miller, D. A., Nichols, J. D., McClintock, B. T., Grant, E. H. C., Bailey, L. L., and Weir, L. A. (2011). Improving occupancy estimation when two types of observational errors occur: non-detection and species misidentification. Ecology 92, 1422–1428.
Improving occupancy estimation when two types of observational errors occur: non-detection and species misidentification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21870616PubMed |

Miller, D. A., Weir, L. A., McClintock, B. T., Grant, E. H. C., Bailey, L. L., and Simons, T. R. (2012). Experimental investigation of false positive errors in auditory species occurrence surveys. Ecological Applications 22, 1665–1674.
Experimental investigation of false positive errors in auditory species occurrence surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22908721PubMed |

Mitchell, J. C., and Lannoo, M. J. (2005). Gastrophryne carolinensis (Holbrook, 1836). Eastern narrow-mouthed toad. In ‘Amphibian declines: conservation status of United States species’. (Ed. M. J. Lannoo.) pp. 501–503. (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.)

Nichols, J. D., Bailey, L. L., O’Connell, A. F., Talancy, N. W., Campbell, E. H., Grant, E. H. C., Gilbert, A. T., Annand, E. M., Husband, T. P., and Hines, J. E. (2008). Multiscale occupancy estimation and modeling using multiple detection methods. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 1321–1329.
Multiscale occupancy estimation and modeling using multiple detection methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parris, K. M., Norton, T. W., and Cunningham, R. B. (1999). A comparison of techniques for sampling amphibians in the forests of south-east Queensland, Australia. Herpetologica 55, 271–283.

Pellet, J., and Schmidt, B. R. (2005). Monitoring distributions using call surveys: estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities, and inferring absence. Biological Conservation 123, 27–35.
Monitoring distributions using call surveys: estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities, and inferring absence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Price, S. J., Marks, D. R., Howe, R. W., Hanowski, J., and Niemi, G. J. (2005). The importance of spatial scale for conservation and assessment of anuran populations in coastal wetlands of the western Great Lakes. Landscape Ecology 20, 441–454.
The importance of spatial scale for conservation and assessment of anuran populations in coastal wetlands of the western Great Lakes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Price, S. J., Cecala, K. K., Browne, R. A., and Dorcas, M. E. (2011). Effects of urbanization on occupancy of stream salamanders. Conservation Biology 25, 547–555.
Effects of urbanization on occupancy of stream salamanders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21175842PubMed |

Rödel, M. O., and Ernst, R. (2004). Measuring and monitoring amphibian diversity in tropical forests. I. An evaluation of methods with recommendations for standardization. Ecotropica 10, 1–14.

Semlitsch, R. D., and Bodie, J. R. (2003). Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conservation Biology 17, 1219–1228.
Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Steelman, C. K., and Dorcas, M. E. (2010). Anuran calling survey optimization: developing and testing predictive models of anuran calling activity. Journal of Herpetology 44, 61–68.
Anuran calling survey optimization: developing and testing predictive models of anuran calling activity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ver Hoef, J. M. (2012). Who invented the delta method? The American Statistician 66, 124–127.
Who invented the delta method?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vonesh, J. R., Mitchell, J. C., Howell, K., and Crawford, A. J. (2010). Rapid assessments of amphibian diversity. In ‘Amphibian Ecology and Conservation: a Handbook of Techniques’. (Ed. C. K. Dodd Jr.). pp. 263–280. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Weir, L. A., Royle, J. A., Nanjappa, P., and Jung, R. E. (2005). Modeling anuran detection and site occupancy on North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) routes in Maryland. Journal of Herpetology 39, 627–639.

Woolbright, L. L. (1985). Patterns of nocturnal movement and calling by the tropical frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui. Herpetologica 41, 1–9.