Aspects of the Ecological Energetics of Development in Rainbow Bee-eaters
Alan Lill and Peter J. Fell
Australian Journal of Zoology 45(3) 281 - 294
Abstract
Prefledging developmental energetics of rainbow bee-eaters were investigated
by comparing the mass, water fraction and energy density of the egg, hatchling
and fledgling, determining the growth rate and pattern of the nestling and
documenting the reproductive time investments of breeders. The incubation and
nestling periods greatly exceeded allometric predictions. On average, the egg
contents contained 26% yolk, 80% water and had an energy density
of 25·82 kJ g -1 dry mass. The 3·3-g
hatchling contained 83% water and had an energy density of 21·28
kJ g-1 dry mass; its size and composition suggested that
it was not exceptionally mature and thus that embryonic growth was inherently
slow, but no extra energy loading was evident in the egg to meet the predicted
high maintenance costs. Nestling growth was also inherently slow,
K for the logistic growth model being 0·266 and
t10-90 16·5 days. Nestlings
attained asymptotic mass after about two- thirds of the nestling period had
elapsed, exceeded adult mass by up to 3·5-g and then underwent a
15% prefledging mass recession. Fledglings contained 67% water,
had a mean energy density of 23·33 kJ g -1 dry
mass and were capable of efficient flight. Nestling growth was highly labile
and intrabrood mass hierarchies and brood reduction through nestling
starvation were common and may be adaptations to short-term food shortages.
The mean incubation constancy (54% of daytime) and the mean nestling
feeding rate of 4 meals per nestling h of breeders were comparatively low; the
former probably reflects the insulation of the burrow from ambient temperature
oscillations and the latter the slow nestling growth rate. Members of breeding
pairs often contributed to feeding the brood quite disparately and
auxiliaries’ contributions in the 24% of breeding units that
contained them were relatively small. The unpredictable nature of the
species’ aeroplankton diet may have favoured slow nestling growth
through its influence on breeders’ food gathering capacity and by
favouring a relatively high degree of physiological maturity and
self-sufficiency in fledglings.
Full text doi:10.1071/ZO96065
© CSIRO 1997





e-Alerts
Connect with us





