Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective

Articles citing this paper

‘Show me the money’: financial incentives increase chlamydia screening rates among tertiary students: a pilot study

Marian J. Currie A E , Matthias Schmidt B , Belinda K. Davis A , Anne M. Baynes A , Elissa J. O’Keefe C , Tim P. Bavinton B , Michelle McNiven D , Sarah J. Martin A C and Francis J. Bowden A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Academic Unit of Internal Medicine, Australian National University Medical School, Canberra Clinical School, Canberra Hospital, PO Box 11, Woden, ACT 2605, Australia.

B Sexual Health and Family Planning ACT, Level 1, 28 University Avenue, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

C Canberra Sexual Health Centre, Building 5, Canberra Hospital, PO Box 11, Woden, ACT 2606, Australia.

D ACT Pathology, Building 10, Canberra Hospital, PO Box 11, Woden, ACT 2605, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: marian.currie@act.gov.au

Sexual Health 7(1) 60-65 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH08091
Submitted: 8 December 2008  Accepted: 3 December 2009   Published: 15 February 2010



27 articles found in Crossref database.

Use of Digital Media Technology for Primary Prevention of STIs/HIV in Youth
Chávez Noé Rubén, Shearer Lee S., Rosenthal Susan L.
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 2014 27(5). p.244
Outreach for chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes
Hengel Belinda, Jamil Muhammad S, Mein Jacqueline K, Maher Lisa, Kaldor John M, Guy Rebecca J
BMC Public Health. 2013 13(1).
Do sexual health campaigns work? An outcome evaluation of a media campaign to increase chlamydia testing among young people aged 15–24 in England
Gobin Maya, Verlander Neville, Maurici Carla, Bone Angie, Nardone Anthony
BMC Public Health. 2013 13(1).
Understanding the acceptability, barriers and facilitators for chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening in technical colleges: qualitative process evaluation of the “Test n Treat” trial
Fleming Charlotte, Drennan Vari M., Kerry-Barnard Sarah, Reid Fiona, Adams Elisabeth J., Sadiq S. Tariq, Phillips Rachel, Majewska Wendy, Harding-Esch Emma M., Cousins Emma C., Yoward Freya, Oakeshott Pippa
BMC Public Health. 2020 20(1).
A pragmatic assessment of the relative efficiency of outreach chlamydia screening events conducted in non-clinical settings
Bowden Francis J, Currie Marian J, Todkill Muareen, Schmidt Mathias, Webeck Sue, Del Rosario Rendry, Bavinton Tim, Tyson Alexandra
BMC Public Health. 2012 12(1).
Text-Messaging-Enhanced HIV Intervention for African American Adolescents: A Feasibility Study
Cornelius Judith B., Dmochowski Jacek, Boyer Cherrie, St. Lawrence Janet, Lightfoot Marguerita, Moore Michael
Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. 2013 24(3). p.256
"Pee-in-a-Pot": acceptability and uptake of on-site chlamydia screening in a student population in the Republic of Ireland
Vaughan Deirdre, O'Connell Emer, Cormican Martin, Brugha Ruairi, Faherty Colette, Balfe Myles, O'Donovan Diarmuid
BMC Infectious Diseases. 2010 10(1).
Urine-based testing for Chlamydia trachomatis among young adults in a population-based survey in Croatia: Feasibility and prevalence
Božičević Ivana, Grgić Ivana, Židovec-Lepej Snježana, Čakalo Jurja-Ivana, Belak-Kovačević Sanja, Štulhofer Aleksandar, Begovac Josip
BMC Public Health. 2011 11(1).
‘Catching chlamydia’: combining cash incentives and community pharmacy access for increased chlamydia screening, the view of young people
Parker Rhian M., Bell Allison, Currie Marian J., Deeks Louise S., Cooper Gabrielle, Martin Sarah J., Del Rosario Rendry, Hocking Jane S., Bowden Francis J.
Australian Journal of Primary Health. 2015 21(1). p.79
How can university sexual health promotion events reach those most at risk? A cross-sectional study
Dunn Matthew E., McKinnon Merryn
Sexual Health. 2018 15(4). p.304
Incentive-Based Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections Screening in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
Lambert Teresa, Finlay Jenise, Krahn Jessica, Meyer Garret, Singh Ameeta E., Kennedy Megan, Caine Vera
Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2022 49(6). p.398
The Influence of Two Different Invitation Letters on Chlamydia Testing Participation: Randomized Controlled Trial
ten Hoor Gill, Hoebe Christian JPA, van Bergen Jan EAM, Brouwers Elfi EHG, Ruiter Robert AC, Kok Gerjo
Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2014 16(1). p.e24
Financial Incentives to Promote Active Travel
Martin Adam, Suhrcke Marc, Ogilvie David
American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2012 43(6). p.e45
The effect of financial incentives on chlamydia testing rates: Evidence from a randomized experiment
Dolan Paul, Rudisill Caroline
Social Science & Medicine. 2014 105 p.140
Vouchers versus Lotteries: What Works Best in Promoting Chlamydia Screening? A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Niza Claudia, Rudisill Caroline, Dolan Paul
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 2014 36(1). p.109
Is out-of-pocket cost a barrier to receiving repeat tests for chlamydia and gonorrhoea?
Shi L, Xie Y, Liu J, Kissinger P, Khan M
International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2013 24(4). p.301
Mobile Phone Interventions for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Systematic Review
L’Engle Kelly L., Mangone Emily R., Parcesepe Angela M., Agarwal Smisha, Ippoliti Nicole B.
Pediatrics. 2016 138(3).
Should young people be paid for getting tested? A national comparative study to evaluate patient financial incentives for chlamydia screening
Zenner Dominik, Molinar Darko, Nichols Tom, Riha Johanna, Macintosh Mary, Nardone Anthony
BMC Public Health. 2012 12(1).
Incentivizing HIV/STI Testing: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Lee Ramon, Cui Rosa R., Muessig Kathryn E., Thirumurthy Harsha, Tucker Joseph D.
AIDS and Behavior. 2014 18(5). p.905
Use of incentives to encourage sexually transmissible infection testing amongst sex-on-premises venue patrons
Stevens Brett, Debattista Joseph, Rutkin William
Sexual Health. 2013 10(2). p.156
Chlamydia Screening Strategies and Outcomes in Educational Settings
Jamil Muhammad Shahid, Bauer Heidi M., Hocking Jane S., Ali Hammad, Wand Handan, Walker Jennifer, Douglas Laura, Donovan Basil, Kaldor John M., Guy Rebecca J.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2014 41(3). p.180
Non-participation in chlamydia screening in the Netherlands: determinants associated with young people’s intention to participate in chlamydia screening
ten Hoor Gill A, Ruiter Robert AC, van Bergen Jan EAM, Hoebe Christian JPA, Houben Katrijn, Kok Gerjo
BMC Public Health. 2013 13(1).
Perceptions of Self-Testing for Chlamydia: Understanding and Predicting Self-Test Use
Powell Rachael, Pattison Helen, Marriott John
Healthcare. 2016 4(2). p.25
Zwakala Ndoda: a cluster and individually randomized trial aimed at improving testing, linkage, and adherence to treatment for hard-to reach men in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
van Rooyen Heidi, Makusha Tawanda, Joseph Phillip, Ngubane Thulani, Kulich Michal, Sweat Michael, Coates Thomas
Trials. 2019 20(1).
Home-based chlamydia testing of young people attending a music festival - who will pee and post?
Sacks-Davis Rachel, Gold Judy, Aitken Campbell K, Hellard Margaret E
BMC Public Health. 2010 10(1).
Incentives in Diabetic Eye Assessment by Screening (IDEAS) trial: a three-armed randomised controlled trial of financial incentives
Judah Gaby, Darzi Ara, Vlaev Ivo, Gunn Laura, King Derek, King Dominic, Valabhji Jonathan, Bishop Lisa, Brown Adrian, Duncan Grant, Fogg Anna, Harris Gemma, Tyacke Peter, Bicknell Colin
Health Services and Delivery Research. 2017 5(15). p.1
Adolescents' perceptions of a mobile cell phone text messaging‐enhanced intervention and development of a mobile cell phone‐based HIV prevention intervention
Cornelius Judith B., St. Lawrence Janet S., Howard Jacquelyn C., Shah Deval, Poka Avinash, McDonald Delilah, White Ann C.
Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing. 2012 17(1). p.61

Committee on Publication Ethics


Abstract Export Citation Get Permission