Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

An extra pair of eyes: do patients want a chaperone when having an anogenital examination?

James A. Baber A B , Stephen C. Davies A and Linda S. Dayan A

A Clinic 16, Department of Sexual Health, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: chewbaber@hotmail.com

Sexual Health 4(2) 89-93 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH06073
Submitted: 19 December 2006  Accepted: 26 February 2007   Published: 23 May 2007

Abstract

Background: Anogenital examinations can be embarrassing for patients and can leave clinicians open to accusations of professional misconduct. Little is known about the attitudes of patients in Australia towards the use of chaperones. Methods: In 2006, we surveyed 480 patients attending two sexual health clinics in northern Sydney. Our aim was to determine their attitudes towards the use of chaperones for anogenital examinations. Results: Of the 480, 58% were male and 42% female. Most women (64%) preferred a female examining clinician, whereas most men (68%) had no preference for gender of the examining clinician (P < 0.0001). While 32% of women wanted a chaperone if being examined by a male, 29% did not. Only 4% of women wanted a chaperone when being examined by a female. Only 1% of men wanted a chaperone irrespective of the sex of the examining clinician. Independent predictors of women wanting a chaperone with a male clinician were preference for a female clinician (OR 6.59, 2.48–17.5; P < 0.001) and preference for a female chaperone (OR 4.02, 1.44–11.2; P = 0.008). The majority of participants felt that they should be involved in the decision to have a chaperone. Conclusions: Although a substantial minority of women want a chaperone when being examined by a male, a similar proportion do not want a chaperone. If a woman requests a female clinician, she should be offered a chaperone if there is only a male examiner available. Further study is required to determine why some women want a chaperone and how to distinguish them from other women.

Additional keywords: anogenital examination, chaperone, genital examination, gynaecologic examination, intimate examination, physical examination.


Acknowledgements

We thank all the clients who completed the questionnaire. We are grateful for the support of the staff of our service, and we particularly thank the administrative clinical staff (T. Jenkin, H. Jennings, A. Rickett, J. Shoebridge) for giving the questionnaire to participants. We thank Professor B. Donovan for general advice and Dr K. Byth for help with statistical analysis.


References


[1] Fiddes P,  Alison S,  Fletcher J,  Glasier A. Attitudes towards pelvic examination and chaperones: a questionnaire survey of patients and providers. Contraception 2003; 67 313–7.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[2] Ehrenthal DB,  Farber NJ,  Collier VU,  Aboff BM. Chaperone use by residents during pelvic, breast, testicular and rectal exams. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15 573–6.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[3] General Medical Council. Guidance on good practice. Intimate examinations. London: General Medical Council; 2001. Available online at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/archive/Intimate_examinations_2001.pdf [verified 5 December 2006]

[4] Medical Council of New Zealand. When another person is present during a consultation. Wellington: Medical Council of New Zealand; March 2004. Available online at: http://www.mcnz.org.nz/Publications/Statements/tabid/81/Default.aspx [verified 5 December 2006]

[5] NSW Medical Board. Medicolegal guidelines. Sydney: NSW Medical Board; 2005. Available online at: http://www.nswmb.org.au/index.pl?page=52 [verified 5 December 2006]

[6] Torrance CJ,  Das R,  Allison MC. Use of chaperones in clinics for genitourinary medicine: survey of consultants. BMJ 1999; 319 159–60.
PubMed |

[7] Rosenthal J,  Rymer J,  Jones R,  Haldane S,  Cohen S,  Bartholomew J.. Chaperones for intimate examinations: cross sectional survey of attitudes and practices of general practitioners. BMJ 2005; 330 234–5.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[8] Brown S. Registrar report. Someone to watch over me. Australian Doctor, 25 November 2005; p. 47.

[9] Khan NS,  Kirkman R. Intimate examinations: use of chaperones in community-based family planning clinics. BJOG 2000; 107 130–2.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[10] Patton DD,  Bodtke S,  Horner RD. Patient perceptions of the need for chaperones during pelvic exams. Fam Med 1990; 22 215–8.
PubMed |

[11] Whitford DL,  Karim M,  Thompson G. Attitudes of patients towards the use of chaperones in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51 381–3.
PubMed |

[12] Price DH,  Tracy CS,  Upshur RE. Chaperone use during intimate examinations in primary care: postal survey of family physicians. BMC Fam Pract 2005; 6 52.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[13] Maw R,  Carne CA,  Miller RF. Chaperoning in genitourinary medicine clinics. Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17 27–9.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[14] Stern V. Gynaecological examinations post-Ledward – a private matter. Lancet 2001; 358 1896–8.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[15] Hilden M,  Sidenius K,  Langhoff-Roos J,  Wijma B,  Schei B. Women’s experiences of the gynaecologic examination: factors associated with discomfort. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82 1030–6.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[16] Anon. Review newsletter. Up close and personal – managing risk with chaperones. Medical Indemnity Protection Society. August 2005; p. 7.

[17] NHS Clinical Governance Support Team. Guidance on the role and effective use of chaperones in primary and community care settings. London: NHS; 2005. Available at: http://www.cgsupport.nhs.uk/downloads/Primary_Care/Chaperone_Framework.pdf [verified 13 February 2007]



Rent Article (via Deepdyve) Export Citation Cited By (18)