et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. et al.
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
REVIEW

Condoms for sexually transmissible infection prevention: politics versus science

Adrian Mindel A and Shailendra Sawleshwarkar A B

A Sexually Transmitted Infections Research Centre, Marian Villa, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: Shailendra.Sawleshwarkar@swahs.health.nsw.gov.au

Sexual Health 5(1) 1-8 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH07054
Submitted: 12 July 2007  Accepted: 9 November 2007   Published: 22 February 2008

Abstract

The present review assesses the protection that condoms offer against sexually transmissible infections (STI) and the impact that social, political and religious opinion in the USA has had in the past 8 years on promoting condoms for safer sex. Condoms offer protection against most STI. However, the degree of protection depends on correct and consistent use, the type of sexual activity and the biological characteristics of different infections. Cross-sectional and case-control studies and other observational data provide the majority of evidence for STI prevention. Condoms provide a high level of protection against those infections that are transmitted mainly via infected secretions, including HIV, gonorrhoea, chlamydia and trichomoniasis. Protection against those infections transmitted via skin and mucous membrane contact, including Herpes simplex virus infection and human papilloma virus, appears to be less. The Bush administration, driven by conservative political, social and religious elements in the USA, has mounted a concerted campaign to undermine the role of the condom in health-promotion activities in the USA and overseas by undervaluing and misrepresenting scientific data, and through a sustained and well-funded promotion of abstinence-only education. However, this has lead to considerable controversy and disillusionment with abstinence-only education, both at home and abroad, and there is now incontrovertible evidence that abstinence-only programs are ineffectual.

Additional keywords: abstinence-only education, sexually transmissible diseases and infections.


References


[1] Judson FN,  Ehret JM,  Bodin GF,  Levin MJ,  Rietmeijer CA. In vitro evaluations of condoms with and without nonoxynol 9 as physical and chemical barriers against chlamydia trachomatis, herpes simplex virus type 2 and human immunodeficiency virus. Sex Transm Dis 1989; 16 51–6.
PubMed |

[2] Frezieres RG,  Walsh TL,  Nelson AL,  Clark VA,  Coulson AH. Evaluation of the efficacy of a polyurethane condom: results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Fam Plann Perspect 1999; 31 81–7.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[3] Macaluso M,  Kelaghan J,  Artz L,  Austin H,  Fleenor M,  Hook EW, et al. Mechanical failure of the latex condom in a cohort of women at high STD risk. Sex Transm Dis 1999; 26 450–8.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[4] Trussell J,  Warner DL,  Hatcher R. Condom performance during vaginal intercourse: comparison of Trojan-Enz and Tactylon condoms. Contraception 1992; 45 11–9.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[5] Frezieres RG,  Walsh TL,  Nelson AL,  Clark VA,  Coulson AH. Breakage and acceptability of a polyurethane condom: a randomized, controlled study. Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 30 73–8.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[6] Mindel A , Estcourt C . Condoms for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. In: A Mindel (ed.). Condoms. London: BMJ Books; 2000. pp. 62–84.

[7] Holmes KK,  Levine R,  Weaver M. Effectiveness of condoms in preventing sexually transmitted infections. Bull World Health Organ 2004; 82 454–61.
PubMed |

[8] Sanchez J,  Campos PE,  Courtois B,  Gutierrez L,  Carrillo C,  Alarcon J, et al. Prevention of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in female sex workers: prospective evaluation of condom promotion and strengthened STD services. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30 273–9.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[9] Ahmed S,  Lutalo T,  Wawer M,  Serwadda D,  Sewankambo NK,  Nalugoda F, et al. HIV incidence and sexually transmitted disease prevalence associated with condom use: a population study in Rakai, Uganda. AIDS 2001; 15 2171–9.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[10] Davis KR,  Weller SC. The effectiveness of condoms in reducing heterosexual transmission of HIV. (Statistical data included). Fam Plann Perspect 1999; 31 272–9.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[11] Pinkerton SD,  Abramson PR. Effectiveness of condoms in preventing HIV transmission. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44 1303–12.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[12] Weller SC,  Davis-Beaty K. Condom effectiveness in reducing heterosexual HIV transmission. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 1 CD003255.
PubMed |

[13] Winer RL,  Hughes JP,  Feng Q,  O’Reilly S,  Kiviat NB,  Holmes KK, et al. Condom use and the risk of genital human papillomavirus infection in young women. N Engl J Med 2006; 354 2645–54.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[14] Wen LM,  Estcourt C,  Simpson JM,  Mindel A. Risk factors for the acquisition of genital warts: Are condoms protective? Sex Transm Infect 1999; 75 312–6.
PubMed |

[15] Hogewoning CJA,  Bleeker MCG,  van den Brule AJC,  Voorhorst FJ,  Snijders PJF,  Berkhof J, et al. Condom use promotes regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and clearance of human papillomavirus: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Cancer 2003; 107 811–6.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[16] Wald A,  Langenberg AGM,  Krantz E,  Douglas JM,  Handsfield HH,  DiCarlo RP, et al. The relationship between condom use and herpes simplex virus acquisition. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143 707–13.
PubMed |

[17] Gottlieb SL,  Douglas JM,  Foster M,  Schmid DS,  Newman DR,  Baron AE, et al. Incidence of herpes simplex type 2 infection in 5 sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics and the effect of HIV/STD risk-reduction counseling. J Infect Dis 2004; 190 1059–67.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[18] National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health and Department of Health and Human Services. Workshop Summary: Scientific evidence on condom effectiveness for sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention. Herdon, VA: 2001. Available online at: http://www.niaid.nih.gov/dmid/stds/condomreport.pdf [verified 12 June 2007].

[19] Kretzschmar M,  van Duynhoven YT,  Severijnen AJ. Modeling prevention strategies for gonorrhea and Chlamydia using stochastic network simulations. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 144 306–17.
PubMed |

[20] Warner L,  Stone KM,  Macaluso M,  Buehler JW,  Austin HD. Condom use and risk of gonorrhea and chlamydia: a systematic review of design and measurement factors assessed in epidemiologic studies. Sex Transm Dis 2006; 33 36–51.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[21] Barlow D. The condom and gonorrhoea. Lancet 1977; 310 811–3.
CrossRef |

[22] Ellen JM,  Langer LM,  Zimmerman RS,  Cabral RJ,  Fichtner R. The link between the use of crack cocaine and the sexually transmitted diseases of a clinic population: a comparison of adolescents with adults. Sex Transm Dis 1996; 23 511–6.
PubMed |

[23] Schwartz MA,  Lafferty WE,  Hughes JP,  Handsfield H. Risk factors for urethritis in heterosexual men: the role of fellatio and other sexual practices. Sex Transm Dis 1997; 24 449–55.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[24] Rosenberg M,  Davidson A,  Chen JH,  Judson FN,  Douglas JM. Barrier contraceptives and sexually transmitted diseases in women: a comparison of female-dependent methods and condoms. Am J Public Health 1992; 82 669–74.
PubMed |

[25] Kimoto K. Relations between taking contraceptive pills, condom use and sexually transmitted disease history among female sex workers. Jpn J Public Health 2001; 48 268–75.


[26] Crosby RA,  Diclemente RJ,  Wingood GM,  Lang D,  Harrington KF. Value of consistent condom use: a study of sexually transmitted disease prevention among African American adolescent females. Am J Public Health 2003; 93 901–2.
PubMed |

[27] Warner L,  Newman DR,  Austin HD,  Kamb ML,  Douglas JM,  Malotte CK, et al. Condom effectiveness for reducing transmission of gonorrhea and chlamydia: the importance of assessing partner infection status. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159 242–51.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[28] Finelli L,  Budd J,  Spitalny KC. Early syphilis. Relationship to sex, drugs, and changes in high-risk behavior from 1987–1990. Sex Transm Dis 1993; 20 89–95.


[29] Sanchez J,  Gotuzzo E,  Escamilla J,  Carrillo C,  Moreyra L,  Stamm W, et al. Sexually transmitted infections in female sex workers: reduced by condom use but not by a limited periodic examination program. Sex Transm Dis 1998; 25 82–9.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[30] Cameron DW,  Ngugi EN,  Ronald AR,  Simonsen JN,  Braddick M,  Bosire M, et al. Condom use prevents genital ulcers in women working as prostitutes. Sex Transm Dis 1991; 18 188–91.
PubMed |

[31] Hanenberg RS,  Rojanapithayakorn W,  Kunasol P,  Sokal DC. Impact of Thailand’s HIV-control programme as indicated by the decline of sexually transmitted diseases. Lancet 1994; 344 243–5.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[32] Irregular Times. On abstinence education, talk is not cheap – it’s against the law in some states. Available online at: http://irregulartimes.com/abstinenceed.html [verified 14 June 2007].

[33] On the Issues. George W. Bush on abortion. Cambridge, MA: On the Issues.Available online at: http://www.ontheissues.org/2004/George_W_Bush_Abortion.htm [verified 14 June 2007].

[34] Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn (Republican Jr Senator; previously US Rep). On the issues. Available online at: http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Tom_Coburn.htm [verified 15 June 2007].

[35] Literature on the Holocaust. Lawmaker criticizes ‘Schindler’s List’ airing Wednesday, February 26, 1997. Available online at: http://www.writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/Holocaust/schindler-on-tv.html [verified 17 June 2007].

[36] American Family Association. CDC director Dr Jeffrey Koplan should be replaced. Activism Action Alert. 30 July 2001. Tupelo, MS: American Family Association, 2007. Available online at: http://www.afa.net/activism/aa073001.asp [verified 14 June 2007].

[37] Abstinence Clearinghouse. Abstinence Clearinghouse networking people for abstinence. Washington, DC: Abstinence Clearinghouse, 2007. Available online at: http://www.abstinence.net/ [verified 19 June 2007].

[38] National Physicians Center For Family Resources. Malibu: National Physicians Center For Family, 2007. Available online at: http://www.physicianscenter.org/ [verified 7 June 2007].

[39] Family Research Council. Defending family faith and freedom. Washington, DC: Family Research Council, 2007. Available online at: http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?c=HOME [verified 16 May 2007].

[40] The Heritage Foundation. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation, 2007. Available online at: http://www.heritage.org/ [verified 1 December 2006].

[41] The Institute for Youth Development. Washington, DC: The Institute for Youth Development, 2007. Available online at: http://www.youthdevelopment.org/ [verified 21 June 2007].

[42] Catholic Educators Research Center. Bellevue, WA: Catholic Educators Research Center, 2007. Available online at: http://www.catholiceducation.org/ [verified 2 December 2006].

[43] The Traditional Values Coalition. Washington, DC: The Traditional Values Coalition. Available online at: http://www.traditionalvalues.org/index.php [verified 21 June 2007].

[44] People for the American Way. Washington, DC: People for the American Way. Available online at: http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=4211 [verified 8 June 2007].

[45] Office of the Federal Register. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) interim HIV content guidelines for AIDS-related materials, pictorials, audiovisuals, questionnaires, survey instruments, marketing, advertising and web site materials, and educational sessions in CDC school-based assistance programs. 2004. Volume 69, Number 115. Available online at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06jun20041800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2004/04-13553.htm [verified 18 June 2007].

[46] Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Fact sheet for public health personnel. Male latex condoms and sexually transmitted diseases. Atlanta: CDC, 2003 Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/od/condoms.pdf [verified 20 June 2007].

[47] Office of the Federal Register. National Archives and Records Administration; 2003. Volume 68, Number 236. Available online at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/pdf/03-30597.pdf [verified 19 June 2007].

[48] Morison KB . US Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children & Families Fact Sheet: Section 510 State Abstinence Education Program. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2007. Available online at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/fysb/content/abstinence/factsheet.htm [verified 14 June 2007].

[49] Office of Population Affairs Department of Health and Human Services. Rockville: Office of Population Affairs. Available online at: http://opa.osophs.dhhs.gov/titlexx/afl-grantees-ae.html [verified 11 June 2007].

[50] Lee C . Bush choice for family-planning post criticized. The Washington Post. November 17, 2006. Available online at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/16/AR2006111601929.html [verified 19 June 2007].

[51] Editorial. Science, not politics. Nat Med 2004; 10 759.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[52] Fraser D . NIH condom report draws fire Bay Area Reporter. Available online at: http://www.aegis.com/news/bar/2001/BR010714.html [verified 17 June 2007].

[53] Jorgensen SR,  Potts V,  Camp B. Project taking charge – 6-month follow-up of a pregnancy prevention program for early adolescents. Fam Relat 1993; 42 401–6.
CrossRef |

[54] Christopher FS,  Roosa MW. An evaluation of an adolescent pregnancy prevention program: Is ‘Just say no’ enough? Fam Relat 1990; 39 68–72.
CrossRef |

[55] Kirby D,  Barth RP,  Leland N,  Fetro JV. Reducing the risk: impact of a new curriculum on sexual risk-taking. Fam Plann Perspect 1991; 23 253–63.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[56] Jorgensen SR. Project taking charge: an evaluation of an adolescent pregnancy prevention program. Fam Relat 1991; 40 373–80.
CrossRef |

[57] St Pierre TL,  Mark MM,  Kaltreider DL,  Aikin KJ. A 27-month evaluation of a sexual activity prevention program in boys and girls clubs across the nation. Fam Relat 1995; 44 69–77.
CrossRef |

[58] Kirby D,  Korpi M,  Barth RP,  Cagampang HH. The impact of the postponing sexual involvement curriculum among youths in California. Fam Plann Perspect 1997; 29 100–8.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[59] Jemmott JB,  Jemmott LS,  Fong GT. Abstinence and safer sex HIV risk-reduction interventions for African American adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998; 279 1529–36.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[60] Doniger AS,  Adams E,  Utter CA,  Riley JS. Impact evaluation of the ‘not me, not now’ abstinence-oriented, adolescent pregnancy prevention communications program, Monroe County, New York. J Health Commun 2001; 6 45–60.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[61] Barnett JE,  Hurst CS. Abstinence education for rural youth: an evaluation of the Life’s Walk Program. J Sch Health 2003; 73 264–8.
PubMed |

[62] Roosa MW,  Christopher FS. Evaluation of an abstinence-only adolescent pregnancy prevention program: a replication. Fam Relat 1990; 39 363–7.
CrossRef |

[63] Lerner R. Can abstinence work? An analysis of the Best Friends Program. Adolescent Fam Health 2003; 3 185–92.


[64] Borawski EA,  Trapl ES,  Lovegreen LD,  Colabianchi N,  Block T. Effectiveness of abstinence-only intervention in middle school teens. Am J Health Behav 2005; 29 423–34.
PubMed |

[65] Goldfarb ES,  Donnelly J,  Duncan DF,  Young M,  Eadie C,  Castiglia D. Evaluation of an abstinence-based curriculum for early adolescents: first year changes in sex attitudes, knowledge and behavior. N Am J Psychol 1999; 1 243–54.


[66] Denny G,  Young M,  Spear CE. An evaluation of the ‘sex can wait’ abstinence education curriculum series. Am J Health Behav 1999; 23 134–43.


[67] Denny G,  Young M,  Rausch S,  Spear C. An evaluation of an abstinence education curriculum series: Sex Can Wait. Am J Health Behav 2002; 26 366–77.
PubMed |

[68] Howard M,  McCabe JB. Helping teenagers postpone sexual involvement. Fam Plann Perspect 1990; 22 21–6.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[69] Bearman PS,  Bruckner H. Promising the future: virginity pledges and first intercourse. AJS 2001; 106 859–912.
CrossRef |

[70] Kirby D . Do abstinence-only programs delay the initiation of sex amoung young people and reduce teen pregnancy. The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy: Washington, DC; 2002. Available online at: http://www.teenpregnancy.org/resources/data/pdf/abstinence_eval.pdf [verified 26 June 2007].

[71] Young M,  Penhollow T. The impact of abstinence education: what does the research say? Am J Health Educ 2006; 37 194–202.


[72] Trenholm C , Devaney B , Fortson K , Quay L , Wheeler J , Clark M . Impact of four title V, section 510. Abstinence education programs final report. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007; Available online at: http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/PDFs/impactabstinence.pdf [verified 20 June 2007].

[73] United States House of Representatives. The Content of Federally Funded Abstinence-Only Education Programs. United States House of Representatives, Committee on Government Reform – Minority Staff Special Investiagtion Division. Prepared for Rep. Henry A. Waxman. 2004. Available online at: http://oversight.house.gov/Documents/20041201102153-50247.pdf [verified 22 June 2007].

[74] Media Matters. Abstinence-only advocate defended misleading curricula with more distortions. Media matters for America. Washington, DC: Media Matters, 2004. Available online at: http://mediamatters.org/items/200412080002 [verified 20 June 2007].

[75] Jones M . Experts challenge abstinence-only programs. The Record. Independent Newspaper at Harvard Law School; 2006. Available online at: http://media.www.hlrecord.org/media/storage/paper609/news/2006/10/05/News/Experts.Challenge.AbstinenceOnly.Programs-2334232.shtml?norewrite200611081515&sourcedomain=www.hlrecord.org [verified 25 June 2007].

[76] PEPFAR. The United States President’s emergency plan for AIDS relief. Available online at: http://www.pepfar.gov/ [verified 1 June 2007].

[77] International Women’s Health Coalition. Global HIV/AIDS. New York: International Women’s Health Coalition, 2006. Available online at: http://www.iwhc.org/global/uspolicy/hivaids/index.cfm [verified 19 June 2007].

[78] Vasagar J , Borger J . Bush accused of Aids damage to Africa. Guardian Tuesday. 30 August 2005. Available online at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1558905,00.html [verified 27 June 2007].

[79] Human Rights Watch. What you need to know. Stop the export of US-funded abstinence-only HIV/AIDS programs. HIV/AIDS & Human Rights. New York: Human Rights Watch, 2006. Available online at: http://hrw.org/campaigns/aids/2005/uganda/facts.htm [verified 16 June 2007].

[80] Population Action International. Abstaining from reality: US restrictions on HIV prevention. Washington, DC: Population Action International. Available online at: http://216.146.213.75/Publications/Documentaries/Abstaining_from_Reality_U.S._Restrictions_on_HIV_Prevention.shtml [verified 18 June 2007].

[81] Tanne JH. US state rejects federal funding for abstinence only sex education. BMJ 2005; 331 715.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[82] Huffstutter PJ . States refraining from abstinence-only sex education. Refuse to accept dictates made by White House. 9 April 2007. The Boston Globe. Available online at: http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/09/states_refraining_from_abstinence_only_sex_education/ [verified 27 June 2007].

[83] Bleakley A,  Hennessy M,  Fishbein M,  Bleakley A,  Hennessy M,  Fishbein M. Public opinion on sex education in US schools. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006; 160 1151–6.
CrossRef | PubMed |

[84] Boseley S . Europeans reject abstinence message in split with US on Aids. The Guardian. Thursday. 1 December 2005. Available online at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/aids/story/0,1654864,00.html [verified 27 June 2007].



Rent Article (via Deepdyve) Export Citation Cited By (8)