et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. et al. et al.
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective

Preference and practices relating to lubricant use during anal intercourse: implications for rectal microbicides

Marjan Javanbakht A C , Ryan Murphy A , Pamina Gorbach A , Marc-André LeBlanc B and Jim Pickett B

A School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Box 957353, 10880 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7353, USA.

B International Rectal Microbicide Advocates, 411 South Wells Street, Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email:

Sexual Health 7(2) 193-198
Submitted: 10 June 2009  Accepted: 23 February 2010   Published: 14 May 2010


Background: The importance of the acceptability of rectal microbicides for HIV and sexually transmissible infections (STIs) prevention is widely recognised. Given relatively consistent use of lubricants for anal intercourse (AI) and the potential for lubricant-like rectal microbicides, understanding barriers to lubricant use may help inform hurdles likely to be encountered once a rectal microbicide becomes available. Methods: We conducted an internet-based survey using a 25-item questionnaire to assess AI and lubricant use, including lubricant preferences and barriers to use. Results: The majority of the 6124 respondents who reported AI were male (93%), 25 years or older (80%) and from North America (70%). Consistent condom use during AI was reported by a minority (35%) and consistent lubricant use was reported by over half of respondents. Reasons for non-use differed by age and region. Among men, those <25 years were more likely to report barriers around cost compared with those 45 and older (odds ratio (OR) = 6.64; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.14–14.03). European men (OR = 1.92; 95% CI 1.50–2.45), Latin American women (OR = 3.69; 95% CI 1.27–10.75) and Asian women (OR = 4.04; 95% CI 1.39–11.78) were more likely to report sexual preference as a reason for non-use. Conclusions: Rectal lubricants are widely used, but barriers to use vary by age and region for dry sex. A lubricant-like rectal microbicide would potentially be acceptable and such a product may be useful as a method of HIV prevention. However, targeted marketing and educational approaches may be needed to enhance use and acceptability of such a product.

Additional keywords: condoms, HIV, safer sex, STIs, survey.


[1]  Padian N Marquis L Francis DP Anderson RE Rutherford GW O’Malley PM et al 1987 Male-to-female transmission of human immunodeficiency virus. JAMA 258 788 90 doi:10.1001/jama.258.6.788

[2]  Royce RA Sena A Cates W Jr Cohen MS 1997 Sexual transmission of HIV. N Engl J Med 336 1072 8 doi:10.1056/NEJM199704103361507

[3]  Chirgwin KD Feldman J Dehovitz JA Minkoff H Landesman SH 1999 Incidence and risk factors for heterosexually acquired HIV in an inner-city cohort of women: temporal association with pregnancy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 20 295 9

[4]  Leichliter JS Chandra A Liddon N Fenton KA Aral SO 2007 Prevalence and correlates of heterosexual anal and oral sex in adolescents and adults in the United States. J Infect Dis 196 1852 9

[5]  Mosher WD Chandra A Jones J 2005 Sexual behavior and selected health measures: men and women 15–44 years of age, United States, 2002. Adv Data 362 1 55

[6]  Flannery D Ellingson L Votaw KS Schaefer EA 2003 Anal intercourse and sexual risk factors among college women, 1993–2000. Am J Health Behav 27 228 34

[7]  Baldwin JI Baldwin JD 2000 Heterosexual anal intercourse: an understudied, high-risk sexual behavior. Arch Sex Behav 29 357 73

[8]  MacDonald NE Wells GA Fisher WA Warren WK King MA Doherty JA et al 1990 High-risk STD/HIV behavior among college students. JAMA 263 3155 9 doi:10.1001/jama.263.23.3155

[9]  Satterwhite CL Kamb ML Metcalf C Douglas JM Malotte CK Paul S et al 2007 Changes in sexual behavior and STD prevalence among heterosexual STD clinic attendees: 1993–1995 versus 1999–2000. Sex Transm Dis 34 815 9

[10]  Koblin BA Hoover DR Xu G Frye V Latka MH Lucy D et al 2010 Correlates of anal intercourse vary by partner type among substance-using women: baseline data from the UNITY study. AIDS Behav 14 132 40

[11]  Tian LH Peterman TA Tao G Brooks LC Metcalf C Malotte CK et al 2008 Heterosexual anal sex activity in the year after an STD clinic visit. Sex Transm Dis 35 905 9 doi:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318181294b

[12]  Cowan SA Haff J 2008 HIV and risk behaviour among men who have sex with men in Denmark – the 2006 Sex Life Survey. Euro Surveill 13 1 6

[13]  Erickson PI Bastani R Maxwell AE Marcus AC Capell FJ Yan KX 1995 Prevalence of anal sex among heterosexuals in California and its relationship to other AIDS risk behaviors. AIDS Educ Prev 7 477 93

[14]  DiClemente RJ Wingood GM Crosby RA Salazar LF Head S Rose E et al 2009 Anal sex is a behavioural marker for laboratory-confirmed vaginal sexually transmissible infections and HIV-associated risk among African-American female adolescents. Sex Health 6 111 6

[15]  Kilmarx PH van de Wijgert JH Chaikummao S Jones HE Limpakarnjanarat K Friedland BA et al 2006 Safety and acceptability of the candidate microbicide Carraguard in Thai women: findings from a phase II clinical trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 43 327 34 doi:10.1097/01.qai.0000243056.59860.c1

[16]  Rosen RK Morrow KM Carballo-Dieguez A Mantell JE Hoffman S Gai F et al 2008 Acceptability of Tenofovir gel as a vaginal microbicide among women in a phase I trial: a mixed-methods study. J Women’s Health 17 383 92 doi:10.1089/jwh.2006.0325

[17]  Ramjee G Morar NS Braunstein S Friedland B Jones H van de Wijgert J 2007 Acceptability of Carraguard, a candidate microbicide and methyl cellulose placebo vaginal gels among HIV-positive women and men in Durban, South Africa. AIDS Res Ther 4 20 doi:10.1186/1742-6405-4-20

[18]  Joglekar N Joshi S Kakde M Fang G Cianciola M Reynolds S et al 2007 Acceptability of PRO2000 vaginal gel among HIV un-infected women in Pune, India. AIDS Care 19 817 21 doi:10.1080/09540120601133576

[19]  Trottier S Omar RF Desormeaux A Drouin J Gagnon MT Vezina F et al 2007 Safety, tolerance and acceptability of the Invisible Condom and its vaginal applicator in healthy women and their male sexual partners. Contraception 76 117 25 doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.04.015

[20]  Nodin N Carballo-Dieguez A Ventuneac AM Balan IC Remien R 2008 Knowledge and acceptability of alternative HIV prevention bio-medical products among MSM who bareback. AIDS Care 20 106 15 doi:10.1080/09540120701449096

[21]  Carballo-Dieguez A Stein Z Saez H Dolezal C Nieves-Rosa L Diaz F 2000 Frequent use of lubricants for anal sex among men who have sex with men: the HIV prevention potential of a microbicidal gel. Am J Public Health 90 1117 21 doi:10.2105/AJPH.90.7.1117

[22]  Gross M Buchbinder SP Celum C Heagerty P Seage GR 1998 Rectal microbicides for U.S. gay men. Are clinical trials needed? Are they feasible? HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team. Sex Transm Dis 25 296 302 doi:10.1097/00007435-199807000-00005

[23]  Carballo-Dieguez A Dolezal C Bauermeister JA O’Brien W Ventuneac A Mayer K 2008 Preference for gel over suppository as delivery vehicle for a rectal microbicide: results of a randomised, crossover acceptability trial among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect 84 483 7 doi:10.1136/sti.2008.030478

[24]  Carballo-Dieguez A Exner T Dolezal C Pickard R Lin P Mayer KH 2007 Rectal microbicide acceptability: results of a volume escalation trial. Sex Transm Dis 34 224 9 doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000233715.59239.83

[25]  Ventuneac A Carballo-Dieguez A McGowan I Dennis R Adler A Khanukhova E et al 2010 Acceptability of UC781 gel as a rectal microbicide among HIV-uninfected women and men. AIDS Behav doi:10.1007/s10461-009-9611-5

[26]  Rader M Marks G Mansergh G Crepaz N Miller LC Appleby PR et al 2001 Preferences about the characteristics of future HIV prevention products among men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev 13 149 59 doi:10.1521/aeap.

[27]  Mantell JE Myer L Carballo-Dieguez A Stein Z Ramjee G Morar NS et al 2005 Microbicide acceptability research: current approaches and future directions. Soc Sci Med 60 319 30 doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.011

[28]  Elford J Bolding G Davis M Sherr L Hart G 2004 Web-based behavioral surveillance among men who have sex with men: a comparison of online and offline samples in London, UK. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 35 421 6 doi:10.1097/00126334-200404010-00012

[29]  Rhodes SD Bowie DA Hergenrather KC 2003 Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers. J Epidemiol Community Health 57 68 73 doi:10.1136/jech.57.1.68

[30]  Soni S Bond K Fox E Grieve AP Sethi G 2008 Black and minority ethnic men who have sex with men: a London genitourinary medicine clinic experience. Int J STD AIDS 19 617 9 doi:10.1258/ijsa.2008.008039

Export Citation Cited By (18)