Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective

Use of the internet and self-collected samples as a sexually transmissible infection intervention in rural Illinois communities

Wiley D. Jenkins A D , Charlie Rabins B , Mathilda Barnes C , Patricia Agreda C and Charlotte Gaydos C

A Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, 913 N Rutledge Street, PO Box 19671, Springfield, IL 62791-9671, USA.

B Illinois Department of Public Health, Sexually Transmitted Diseases Section, 525 W Jefferson Street, Springfield, IL 62672, USA.

C Johns Hopkins University, 530 Rangos Building, 855 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email:

Sexual Health 8(1) 79-85
Submitted: 9 February 2010  Accepted: 30 March 2010   Published: 24 January 2011


Background: In the USA, reported cases of chlamydia (Chlamydia trachomatis) continue to rise despite substantial funding for screening. National gonorrhoea (Neisseria gonorrhoeae) rates have remained relatively stable, with clusters associated with metropolitan areas. Rural areas are no exception, as every county in Illinois reported cases of chlamydia in 2007. Morbidity associated with infection remains a public health concern, with costs of $US2.5+ billion annually. Novel screening interventions must be examined for their ability to reach those at risk who are missed by traditional methods. Methods: The website was modified to allow residents from 25 contiguous counties in Central Illinois to request a self-collected sample kit. Returned kits were tested for chlamydia and gonorrhoea. The initial study period was 12 months. Results: During the study period, 343 kits were requested from 20 counties and 39.9% were satisfactorily returned for analysis. Positivity rates for chlamydia and gonorrhoea were 5.8% and 1.2%, respectively, for females and 1.9% and 0% for males. Males comprised 37.7% of all internet samples (compared with 23.4% for traditional screening venues) and 40.4% of all internet samples submitted by whites (compared with only 17.2% of traditional screening). Conclusions: The female positivity rate was comparable to those seen in other screening venues and the method successfully engaged at-risk males. Overall, participation was low and the costs associated with the program outweighed the averted costs associated with the few cases identified. While this methodology resulted in sample requests from a wide area, it must be utilised by more individuals to become cost-effective.

Graphical Abstract Image

Additional keywords: chlamydia, gonorrhoea, testing.


[1]  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2002. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2002. Available online at: [verified September 2009].

[2]  CDC. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2006. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006. Available online at: [verified September 2009].

[3]  Sexually Transmitted Disease Section. Sexually transmitted diseases. Springfield: Illinois Department of Public Health; 2009. Available online at: [verified March 2009].

[4]  CDC. Chlamydia. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007. Available online at: [verified February 2009].

[5]  Mehta SD Bishai D Howell MR Rothman RE Quinn TC Zenilman JM 2002 Cost-effectiveness of five strategies for gonorrhoeae and chlamydia control among female and male emergency department patients. Sex Transm Dis 29 83 91 doi:10.1097/00007435-200202000-00004

[6]  Eng TR , Butler WT , eds. The hidden epidemic: confronting sexually transmitted diseases. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2007.

[7]  Chesson HW Collins D Koski K 2008 Formulas for estimating the costs averted by sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs in the United States. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 6 10 13 doi:10.1186/1478-7547-6-10

[8]  U.S. Preventive Services Task Force 2007 Screening for chlamydial infection: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 147 128 33

[9]  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2009 Chlamydia screening among sexually active young female enrollees of health plans – United States, 2000–2007. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep 58 362 5

[10]  US Census Bureau. Census 2000 Summary File 1. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce; 2000. Available online at: [verified January 2010].

[11]  Genc M Mardh PA 1996 A cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women. Ann Intern Med 124 1 7

[12]  Marrazzo JM Celum CL Hillis SD Fine D DeLisle S Handsfield HH 1997 Performance and cost-effectiveness of selective screening criteria for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women. Implications for a national chlamydia control strategy. Sex Transm Dis 24 131 41

[13]  Howell MR Gaydos JC McKee KT Quinn TC Gaydo CA 1999 Control of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female army recruits: cost-effective screening and treatment in training cohorts to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex Transm Dis 26 519 26 doi:10.1097/00007435-199910000-00007

[14]  Welte R Kretzschmar M Leidl R van den Hoek A Jager JC Postma MJ 2000 Cost-effectiveness of screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis: a population-based dynamic approach. Sex Transm Dis 27 518 29 doi:10.1097/00007435-200010000-00005

[15]  Mehta SD Bishai D Howell MR Rothman RE Quinn TC Zenilman JM 2002 Cost-effectiveness of five strategies for gonorrhea and chlamydia control among female and male emergency department patients. Sex Transm Dis 29 2 83 91 doi:10.1097/00007435-200202000-00004

[16]  Ginocchio RH Veenstra DL Connell FA Marrazzo JM 2003 The clinical and economic consequences of screening young men for genital chlamydia infection. Sex Transm Dis 30 99 106 doi:10.1097/00007435-200302000-00001

[17]  Kraut-Becher JR Gift TL Haddix AC Irwin KL Greifinger RB 2004 Cost-effectiveness of universal screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea in US jails. J Urban Health 81 453 71 doi:10.1093/jurban/jth130

[18]  Hu D Hook EW Goldie SJ 2004 Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in women 15 to 29 years of age: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med 141 501 13

[19]  Blake DR Gaydos CA Quinn TC 2004 Cost-effectiveness of screening adolescent males for chlamydia on admission to detention. Sex Transm Dis 31 85 95

[20]  Thomas JC Schoenbach VJ Weiner DH Parker EA Earp JA 1996 Rural gonorrhea in the south-eastern United States: a neglected epidemic? Am J Epidemiol 143 269 77

[21]  Ethier KA Kershaw T Niccolai L Lewis JB Ickovics JR 2003 Adolescent women underestimate their susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections. Sex Transm Infect 79 408 11

[22]  Anderko L Uscian M 2000 The effectiveness of a community-level HIV/STD prevention program in a three-county rural area. Fam Community Health 23 46 58

[23]  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1998 Risks for HIV infection among persons residing in rural areas and small cities – selected sites, southern United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 47 974 8

[24]  Michelson KN Thomas JC Boyd C Janssens AH 1999 Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a rural population: the importance of screening men. Int J STD AIDS 10 32 7

[25]  Root DT Hickner JM Nelson TC 1999 Prevalence and prediction of chlamydia cervical infection in a rural area: an UPRNet project. J Fam Pract 33 369 74

[26]  Winter L Goldy AS Baer C 1990 Prevalence and epidemiologic correlates of Chlamydia trachomatis in rural and urban populations. Sex Transm Dis 17 30 6

[27]  Shaw E Roberts D Connor PD 1995 Prevalence of and risk factors for chlamydia in a rural pregnant population. J Fam Pract 41 257 60

[28]  Ferris DG Litker M 1993 Chlamydial cervical infections in rural and urban pregnant women. South Ed J. 86 611 4

[29]  Bendall RP Keane FE Barlow MJ Paynter SJ 2007 Chlamydia screening in a rural population: access, outcomes and health-care planning. Int J STD AIDS 18 89 92 doi:10.1258/095646207779949673

[30]  Hilger TM Smith EM Ault K 2001 Predictors of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women attending rural Midwest family planning clinics. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 9 3 8 doi:10.1155/S1064744901000023

[31]  Pujazon-Zazik M Park MJ 2010 To tweet or not to tweet: gender differences and potential positive and negative outcomes of adolescents’ social internet use. Am J Men’s Health 4 77 85 doi:10.1177/1557988309360819

[32]  Williams AL Merten MJ 2008 A review of online social networking profiles by adolescents: implications for future research and intervention. Adolescence 43 253 74

[33]  Hansen DL Derry HA Resnick PJ Richardson CR 2003 Adolescents searching for health information on the internet: an observational study. J Med Internet Res 5 e25

[34]  Owens SL Arora N Quinn N Peeling RW Holmes KK Gaydos CA 2010 Utilising the internet to test for sexually transmitted infections: results of a survey and accuracy testing. Sex Transm Infect 86 112 6 doi:10.1136/sti.2009.037226

[35]  Gaydos CA Dwyer K Barnes M Rizzo-Price PA Wood BJ Flemming T et al 2006 Internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to reach non-clinic populations with mailed self-administered vaginal swabs. Sex Transm Dis 33 451 7 doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000200497.14326.fb

[36]  Lim EJ Haar J Morgan J 2008 Can text messaging results reduce time to treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis? Sex Transm Infect 84 563 4 doi:10.1136/sti.2008.032441

[37]  Menon-Johansson AS McNaught F Mandalia S Sullivan AK 2006 Texting decreases the time to treatment for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sex Transm Infect 82 49 51 doi:10.1136/sti.2004.014381

[38]  Blake DR Maldeis N Barnes MR Hardick A Quinn TC Gaydos CA 2008 Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for Chlamydia trachomatis using cervical swabs, urine, and self-obtained vaginal swabs in a sexually transmitted disease clinic setting. Sex Transm Dis 35 649 55 doi:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31816ddb9a

[39]  Gaydos CA Rizzo-Price PA Barnes M Dwyer K Wood BJ Hogan MT 2006 The use of focus groups to design an internet-based program for chlamydia screening with self-administered vaginal swabs: what women want. Sex Health 3 209 15 doi:10.1071/SH05059

[40]  Gaydos CA Barnes M Aumakhan B Quinn N Agreda P Whittle P et al 2009 Can e-technology through the Internet be used as a new tool to address the Chlamydia trachomatis epidemic by home sampling and vaginal swabs? Sex Transm Dis 36 577 80 doi:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181a7482f

[41]  Gaydos CA , Barnes M , Aumakhan B , Quinn N , Agreda P , Whittle P , Jett-Goheen M , Hogan T . Internet and home collection to screen males with self-obtained penile swabs and urine for C. trachomatis, T. vaginalis, and N. gonorrhoeae. (talk). 18th ISSTDR, London, England; June 28–July 1, 2009.

[42]  Montoya JA Kent CK Rotblatt H McCright J Kerndt PR Klausner JD 2005 Social marketing campaign significantly associated with increases in syphilis testing among gay and bisexual men in San Francisco. Sex Transm Dis 32 395 9 doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000154507.58437.40

[43]  Martínez-Donate AP Zellner JA Fernández-Cerdeño A Sañudo F Hovell MF Sipan CL et al 2009 Hombres Sanos: exposure and response to a social marketing HIV prevention campaign targeting heterosexually identified Latino men who have sex with men and women. AIDS Educ Prev 21 124 36 doi:10.1521/aeap.2009.21.5_supp.124

Export Citation