Clients’ preferred methods of obtaining sexually transmissible infection or HIV results from Sydney Sexual Health CentreLynne Martin A C , Vickie Knight A , Phillip J. Read A B and Anna McNulty A B
A Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney Hospital, GPO Box 1614, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia.
B School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Sexual Health 10(1) 91-92 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH12062
Submitted: 2 April 2012 Accepted: 4 June 2012 Published: 19 November 2012
Given the documented benefits of using text messaging (short message service; SMS), the internet and email to deliver sexually transmissible infection (STI) test results, including high acceptability among clients, Sydney Sexual Health Centre (SSHC) aimed to identify which methods our clients preferred for receiving their results, using a cross-sectional survey. There was a preference for SMS (32%) for negative STI results, and for SMS (27%), phone call (27%) and in-person (26%) for negative HIV results. An in-person preference was shown for receiving positive STI results (40%) and positive HIV results (56%, P < 0.001). While many clients would prefer to receive STI test results via text messages or phone call, many also still prefer a return visit, with this preference is dependent on the type and nature of the results. Our study suggests that, ideally, several options for obtaining results should be available.
References Brown TJ, Kovacs S, Beaulieu A, Gatski M, Muzny C, El-Baghdady H, et al. Patient preferences regarding electronic delivery of STD clinic test results in Jackson, Mississippi. Paper presented at National STD Prevention Conference, 8–11 March 2010, Atlanta, USA.
 Mena LA, Taylor S, Kovacs S, Beaulieu A, Schmidt N, Brown TJ, et al. Technology use among STD clinic patients in New Orleans, LA and Jackson, MS. Paper presented at National STD Prevention Conference, 8–11 March 2010, Atlanta, USA.
 Lim EJ, Haar J, Morgan J. Can text messaging results reduce time to treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis? Sex Transm Infect 2008; 84 563–564.
| Can text messaging results reduce time to treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis?CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cjot1yjuw%3D%3D&md5=6f7e6f51a339ce1b38b9f8c58fcc592cCAS | 18723584PubMed |
 Menon-Johansson AS, Cohen CE, Jones R, Nwokolo N, McOwan A, Barton SE, et al Interventions to increase access to STI services: a study of England’s ‘high impact changes’ across three central London clinics. Sex Transm Infect 2010; 86 540–544.
| Interventions to increase access to STI services: a study of England’s ‘high impact changes’ across three central London clinics.CrossRef |
 Menon-Johansson AS, McNaught F, Mandalia S, Sullivan AK. Texting decreases the time to treatment for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sex Transm Infect 2006; 82 49–51.
| Texting decreases the time to treatment for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD287gslegsQ%3D%3D&md5=67333ed838f7b1edc70dc66ccd82feb6CAS | 16461603PubMed |
 Lim M, Hocking J, Hellard M, Aitken CK. SMS STI: a review of the uses of mobile phone text messaging in sexual health. Int J STD AIDS 2008; 19 287–90.
| SMS STI: a review of the uses of mobile phone text messaging in sexual health.CrossRef | 18482956PubMed |
 Dhar J, Leggat C, Bonas S. Texting – a revolution in sexual health communication. Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17 375–7.
| Texting – a revolution in sexual health communication.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28zgslKrtA%3D%3D&md5=d837f4d24e4690ea69d3cad9f50aa16eCAS | 16734957PubMed |