Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Analysis of pelvic floor muscle electromyography parameters in women with or without sexual dysfunction

Chunyan Wang https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9725-8928 A , Yan Che A B , Yumei Zhang A , Tingfeng Guan A , Jie Wang A and Xinying Du https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2194-2409 A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A People’s Hospital of Weifang City, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.

B NHC Key Lab of Reproduction Regulation, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Reproductive Health Drug and Devices, Shanghai Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies, Shanghai, China.

* Correspondence to: duxy2012@126.com

Handling Editor: Heather Armstrong

Sexual Health 21, SH24026 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH24026
Submitted: 2 November 2023  Accepted: 18 April 2024  Published: 14 May 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Background

To investigate the differences in pelvic floor muscle (PFM) electromyography (EMG) parameters between women with or without sexual dysfunction (FSD) and their correlations.

Methods

Women who voluntarily participated in a questionnaire-based survey on sexual function and underwent PFM EMG in Weifang People’s Hospital during the period from March 2021 to December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. The female sexual (dys)function was measured using the Female Sexual Function Index. Glazer PFM EMG was performed using a Melander instrument (MLD A2 Deluxe). The differences in PFM EMG parameters between women with or without FSD were compared, and the relationships between PFM EMG parameters and FSD were analysed using multiple linear regression models.

Results

A total of 305 women were enrolled, with 163 in the FSD group and 142 in the non-FSD group. Comparisons of PFM EMG parameters between these two groups revealed that the FSD group had significantly higher peak EMG amplitude during the phasic (flick) contractions and shorter recovery latency during the tonic contractions than the non-FSD group (both P < 0.05). Multivariate linear regression suggested that the peak EMG amplitude during the phasic (flick) contractions was 5.39 μV higher in the FSD group than in the non-FSD group, whereas the recovery latency during the tonic contractions was 0.29 s shorter (both P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The results of the pelvic floor EMG in this study suggest that the pelvic floor muscles of women with FSD may be more susceptible to fatigue, and may have poorer coordination of their pelvic floor muscles.

Keywords: dysfunction, female, female sexual function index, pelvic floor, pelvic floor dysfunction, pelvic floor muscle electromyography, sexual, sexual dysfunction.

Introduction

Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) is an umbrella term that encompasses several facets of sexuality in terms of desire, arousal, orgasm and/or sexual pain. FSD can occur during any phase of the sexual response cycle, and reduces the quality of life of women.1 Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) refers to a group of disorders related to abnormal positioning or function of the pelvic organs due to a variety of factors, such as defects/weakness, injuries and dysfunctions of pelvic floor support. PFDs typically include prolapse of the uterus, cervix, vagina, bladder and rectum, and incontinence. PFD can afflict women both physically and psychosomatically.2 The prevalence of FSD ranges from 30% to 50% in the general population, but the incidence of FSD can be as high as 50–83% in women with PFD.3

Electromyography (EMG) is an electromyographic mode that can be used to assess muscle fatigue.4 The amplitude of EMG signals is a measure of the strength of the muscles being activated. It is relatively small when the muscles are relaxed, but will be elevated when there are more muscle contractions.5 Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) EMG is a measurement of intravaginal bioelectrical signals collected from a series of muscles of the pelvic floor through contractions and rest according to the Glazer protocol,6 involving the following phases: pre-baseline rest, phasic contractions, tonic contractions, isometric contractions for muscle endurance evaluation and post-baseline rest. The level of contraction potential represents the degree of myoelectric fatigue, whereas the recovery latency represents the reduced capacity of muscle after contractions. It has good validity in assessing PFM function.7

Evidence suggests that women with greater PFM strength have better sexual function.8 Sexually active women have better PFM endurance than inactive women.9 However, it has also been reported that PFM strength is not correlated with sexual function.10 Here, we assessed female PFM function with EMG, and explored the relationships between EMG parameters and FSD, in an attempt to provide an objective basis for FSD diagnosis and treatment.

Participants and methods

Participants

Women who voluntarily underwent a questionnaire-based survey on sexual function and PFM EMG in Weifang People’s Hospital, Weifang, China, during the period from March 2021 to December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled.

The inclusion criteria were: (1) aged 18–50 years, (2) with regular sex partners, (3) cooperative during the questionnaire-based survey and EMG, and (4) voluntarily attended this study and signed the informed consent forms.

The exclusion criteria were: (1) with a comorbid neurological disease or liver and kidney dysfunction; (2) pregnant and postpartum women, vaginal inflammation and/or inflammatory gynaecological diseases; (3) did not cooperate in the survey due to conditions, such as mental illness; and (4) with other medical and/or surgical comorbidities.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Weifang People’s Hospital (approval number KYLL20211220-1).

Measurements

The female sexual (dys)function was measured using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), which has been considered the gold standard for measuring women’s sexual function over the past two decades.11 The questionnaire consists of 19 multiple-choice questions covering six domains of sexual response: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain/discomfort. Each question is scored individually on a 0–6 range. A mathematical calculation was performed to acquire a final index, which is the total score of the FSFI. A lower score indicates worse sexual function, and an FSFI score of <26.55 was classified as FSD.12

Glazer PFM EMG was performed using a Melander instrument (MLD A2 Deluxe).6 EMG can record the pelvic floor myoelectric signals from the PFM fibres and quantify the myoelectric voltage values of the different PFM fibres. Before the assessment, each participant was briefed about how to perform the correct muscle contraction by a single experienced examiner who was not informed about the FSFI scores. During the measurement, the participants were asked to lie supine. The first 30 s were spent learning the testing procedure, during which text and voice instructions were offered, along with the supervision by medical staff to avoid process errors. An endovaginal electrode was inserted into the vagina. According to the voice prompts, one 60-s rest, five phasic (flick) contractions, five sustained contractions and rest, and a 60-s contraction with a 60-s rest were performed. The muscle activities in each phase were measured by electromyography and pressure curves. In addition, the average mean amplitude and mean amplitude variability were recorded in the four phases including pre-baseline, phasic (flick) contractions, tonic contractions and post-baseline.

Statistical analysis

The data were imported into Excel, converted to a data format, and analysed statistically using SPSS 26.0 and EmpowerStats 3.0. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the participant features, with frequency and percentage (%) for qualitative indicators, mean ± s.d. for normally distributed quantitative data, and quartiles (Q1, Q3) for measures that did not conform to normal distribution. The inter-group comparisons of PFM EMG parameters were based on t-test. The Pearson’s correlation coefficients (ρ) were calculated between parameters, and the differences in PFM EMG parameters between FSD and non-FSD groups were compared after controlling for potential confounders using multiple linear regression models.

Ethics statement

Informed written consent was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Weifang People’s Hospital on December 20, 2021 (No. Kyll20211220-1).

Results

Participants

A total of 305 women aged 18–49 years met the inclusion criteria during the study period, including 163 (53.44%) in the FSD group and 142 (46.56%) in the non-FSD group. Their body mass index ranged from 18.1 to 35.8 kg/m2, with significant differences between FSD and non-FSD groups (P < 0.05). However, the age, white-collar/blue-collar jobs, number of pregnancies, history of vaginal delivery, history of Caesarean section and history of miscarriage did not statistically differ between these two groups (all P > 0.05; Table 1).

Table 1.Comparison of background characteristics between women with and without sexual dysfunction.

ItemNone FSD group (n = 142)FSD group (n = 163)StatisticsP-value
Age (mean, s.d.), years29.92 ± 6.2828.85 ± 6.98t = 1.3400.166
BMI (mean, s.d.), kg/m223.92 ± 2.6324.11 ± 3.01t = 0.586<0.001
Occupation, n (%)X2 = 0.0360.233
White-collar82 (57.8)83 (50.9)
Blue-collar60 (42.3)80 (49.1)
No. of births, n (%)X2 = 12690.260
≤164 (45.1)84 (51.5)
≥278 (54.9)79 (48.5)
History of vaginal delivery, n (%)X2 = 0.0410.839
None82 (57.8)96 (58.9)
≥160 (42.3)67 (41.1)
History of Caesarean section, n (%)X2 = 0.6020.602
None118 (83.1)139 (85.3)
≥124 (16.9)24 (14.7)
History of miscarriage, n (%)X2 = 1.8550.173
None87 (61.3)112 (68.7)
≥155 (38.7)51 (31.3)

BMI, body mass index; FSD, sexual dysfunction.

Comparisons of PFM EMG parameters between FSD and non-FSD groups

Comparisons of PFM EMG parameters between these two groups revealed that the FSD group had a significantly higher peak EMG amplitude during the phasic (flick) contractions and shorter recovery time during the tonic contractions than the non-FSD group (all P < 0.05). Other parameters were similar in the two groups (Table 2).

Table 2.Comparison of pelvic floor electromyography parameters between the sexual dysfunction and non-sexual dysfunction groups.

ItemNon-FSD group (n = 142)FSD group (n = 163)StatisticsP-value
Average mean EMG amplitude of pre-baseline rest (μV)6.23 ± 4.606.49 ± 4.41t = −0.5070.613
Peak EMG amplitude during the phasic (flick) contractions (μV)40.37 ± 19.6846.20 ± 23.16t = 2.3520.019
Ascending latency during the phasic (flick) contractions (s)0.43 ± 0.210.44 ± 0.23t = 0.2630.793
Recovery latency during the phasic (flick) contractions (s)0.75 ± 2.830.51 ± 0.35t = −1.0750.283
Average mean EMG amplitude during the tonic contractions (μV)25.78 ± 14.9427.64 ± 13.73t = 1.1330.250
Ascending latency during the tonic contractions (s)0.50 ± 0.340.64 ± 1.45t = 1.0250.306
Recovery latency during the tonic contractions (s)1.38 ± 1.021.06 ± 0.86t = −2.5200.012
Average mean EMG amplitude of post-baseline rest (μV)5.28 ± 3.675.82 ± 4.41t = 1.1530.250

Differences in PFM EMG parameters between FSD and non-FSD groups

Multivariate linear regression suggested that the peak EMG amplitude during the phasic (flick) contractions was 5.39 μV higher in the FSD group than in the non-FSD group, whereas the recovery latency during the tonic contractions was 0.29 s shorter (both P < 0.05; Table 3).

Table 3.Results of multivariate linear regression analysis of pelvic floor electromyography parameters in women with and without FSD.

Itemβ value (95%CI)P-value
Average mean EMG amplitude of pre-baseline rest (μV)0.10 (−0.91, 1.11)0.852
Peak EMG amplitude during the phasic (flick) contractions (μV)5.39 (0.59, 10.19)0.028
Average mean EMG amplitude during the tonic contractions (μV)1.60 (−1.64, 4.84)0.333
Ascending latency during the tonic contractions (s)0.17 (−0.11, 0.46)0.229
Recovery latency during the tonic contractions (s)−0.29 (−0.54, −0.05)0.021
Average mean EMG amplitude of post-baseline rest (μV)0.45 (−0.48, 1.37)0.344

Women’s age, body mass index, activity, history of vaginal delivery, history of Caesarean section and abortion were included in the linear regression model.

Discussion

The Glazer protocol is a commonly used tool in EMG devices for assessing PFM bioelectric activity.6 PFM EMG has shown good reliability in the quantification of PFM activity patterns.13 In the present study, among the PFM EMG parameters, the peak EMG amplitude during the phasic (flick) contractions and the recovery latency during the tonic contractions were closely related to FSD. Multivariate linear regression suggested that the peak EMG amplitude during the phasic (flick) contractions was 5.39 μV higher in the FSD group than in the non-FSD group, whereas the recovery latency during the tonic contractions was 0.29 s shorter.

EMG is the sum of the areas surrounded by the curve per unit time after the measured EMG signals are processed. It indicates the total number of discharges of motor units at a given time instant when the muscle is involved in an activity, reflecting the strength of the muscle’s electromyographic activity during this period. The muscle EMG value reflects the size of each motor unit’s discharge and the number of muscle fibres involved in muscle contraction during exercise. Typically, greater EMG amplitude indicates increased fatigue. Thus, EMG amplitude is a crucial indicator for assessing muscle fatigue.14 At a muscular level, fatigue posits the reduced capacity of muscle fibres to produce force, even in the presence of motor neuron excitation via either spinal mechanisms or electric pulses applied externally. Prior to decreased force, when sustaining physically demanding tasks, alterations in the muscle electrical properties take place. These alterations are termed myoelectric manifestation of fatigue.14 In the present study, the FSD group had greater peak EMG amplitude during the phasic (flick) contractions than the non-FSD group. This finding suggests that the pelvic floor muscles in women with FSD may be more susceptible to fatigue.

EMG records electrical activity generated by muscle fibres during muscle contraction, and the properties of the recorded activity depend on the fibre membrane potential and the nerve activation signals sent from motor neurons to the muscle. EMG has been widely used in various kinesiological studies.15 Skeletal muscle consists of three fast fibres and one slow fibre, among which types I and IIa are slow fibres that contain the highest mitochondrial content and fatigue resistance. Despite fibre type differences in the degree of fatigability, the contractile properties undergo characteristic changes with the development of fatigue that can be observed in whole muscles, single motor units and single fibres. In the absence of muscle fibre damage, the prolonged relaxation time associated with fatigue is reduced. The central nervous system senses this condition and reduces the alpha-motor nerve activation frequency as fatigue develops.16 The recovery latency of slow fibres indicates the speed of their response and correlates with muscle excitability. In the present study, the FSD group had a shorter recovery time during tonic contractions, suggesting that the coordination of pelvic floor muscles may be poorer in FSD women.

The relationship between PFM strength and sexual function remains controversial. PFD women also experience a significant burden of sexual dysfunction,17 Pasqualotto et al.18 found that FSD occurred less frequently in women with higher PFM strength, which was consistent with our finding: women in the FSD group had a shorter recovery latency during the tonic contractions, along with poorer muscular stability and coordination. However, it has also been proposed that female sexual function is not related to the pelvic floor. In a study evaluating PFM strength in different body positions in healthy women and its correlation with sexual activity, it was concluded that there was no correlation between PFM strength and orgasm.19 No evidence has demonstrated any possible association between PFM function and sexual satisfaction.20 In contrast, our study revealed that the presence or absence of FSD correlated with the peak EMG amplitude during the phasic (flick) contractions and the recovery latency during the tonic contractions among all the PFM EMG parameters, possibly due to differences in the study population.

Our findings may provide insights into the treatments of pelvic floor disorders in PFD women, facilitating the timely adjustment of the treatment regimens. PFM EMG is a reliable tool for early risk detection and preventive interventions of PFD.21 It has been suggested that the strength of at least two types of muscles (either abdominal or PFM muscles) can be improved if progress is observed in the sexual function; thus, EMG measurement is a potential technique to quantify the changes in female sexual function.22

To date, EMG has been widely used to study muscle coordination, although it is not able to measure deeper muscles. EMG relates primarily to nerve output from the spinal cord and, therefore, is associated with the number of activated motor units and their discharge rates.23 However, it is not clear whether the association between PFM strength and sexual function is due to the fact that women with stronger muscles have better sexual function or whether better sexual function leads to increased PFM strength.8 There may be an anatomical correlation between the PFMs and female sexual function.24 The somatic nerves innervating the PFMs are branches of sacral spinal nerves S3, S4 and S5. The pudendal nerve originates from the sacral plexus (S2–S4), and contains sensory and motor nerve fibres. It finally spreads into three main terminal branches: the motor branch of the inferior rectal nerve innervates the lower rectum and the external anal sphincter; and the sensory branch senses the skin anteriorly and laterally to the anus. The perineal nerve originates from the middle part of the pudendal canal, and terminates by bifurcating into motor and sensory branches to innervate the external urethral sphincter and perineal muscles. The terminal branch of the pudendal nerve is the dorsal nerve of the clitoris, which is responsible for clitoral sensation.25 Sexual arousal is primarily achieved through spinal cord reflexes. The congestion of the clitoris, labia,and vagina caused by stimulation of the autonomic nerves of the vagina and cavernous bodies of the clitoris is also a spinal cord sexual reflex.26 PFMs and sexual function are innervated by the same nerves. Pelvic floor muscle EMG parameters may change in women with FSD. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to explore specific patterns of these changes.

However, whether EMG signals can be used to accurately assess muscular coordination remains unclear.23 FSD cannot be better attributed to a specific condition, and its aetiology can be explained using a biopsychosocial model that includes biological, psychological and sociocultural factors, as well as interpersonal influences.27 Although our study showed that PFM EMG parameters showed certain changes among women with FSD that can be used as auxiliary indicators for the clinical treatment of FSD, these parameters alone are insufficient for diagnosing sexual dysfunction in women, because it is not possible to explain the abnormal signal variations through the physiological processes. Therefore, more research is required to demonstrate the correlations between FSD and PFM EMG parameters.

Data availability

The data that support this study cannot be publicly shared due to ethical or privacy reasons, and may be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author if appropriate.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

Declaration of funding

This work was supported by Weifang Municipal Health Commission.

References

Reed MA. Female sexual dysfunction. Clin Plast Surg 2022; 49: 495-504.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pauls RN, Berman JR. Impact of pelvic floor disorders and prolapse on female sexual function and response. Urol Clin North Am 2002; 29: 677-683.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Verbeek M, Hayward L. Pelvic floor dysfunction and its effect on quality of sexual life. Sex Med Rev 2019; 7: 559-564.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

González-Izal M, Malanda A, Gorostiaga E, Izquierdo M. Electromyographic models to assess muscle fatigue. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2012; 22: 501-512.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Rani GJ, Hashmi MF, Gupta A. Surface electromyography and artificial intelligence for human activity recognition—a systematic review on methods, emerging trends applications, challenges, and future implementation. IEEE Access 2023; 11: 105140-105169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Oleksy Ł, Wojciechowska M, Mika A, Antos E, Bylina D, Kielnar R, Pruszczyński B, Stolarczyk A. Normative values for Glazer Protocol in the evaluation of pelvic floor muscle bioelectrical activity. Medicine 2020; 99: e19060.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Brækken IH, Stuge B, Tveter AT, Bø K. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of pelvic floor muscle surface electromyography and manometry. Int Urogynecol J 2021; 32: 3267-3274.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Martinez CS, Ferreira FV, Castro AAM, Gomide LB. Women with greater pelvic floor muscle strength have better sexual function. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93: 497-502.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Sartori DVB, Kawano PR, Yamamoto HA, Guerra R, Pajolli PR, Amaro JL. Pelvic floor muscle strength is correlated with sexual function. Investig Clin Urol 2021; 62: 79-84.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

10  Baytur YB, Deveci A, Uyar Y, Ozcakir HT, Kizilkaya S, Caglar H. Mode of delivery and pelvic floor muscle strength and sexual function after childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 88: 276-280.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

11  Meston CM, Freihart BK, Handy AB, Kilimnik CD, Rosen RC. Scoring and interpretation of the FSFI: what can be learned from 20 years of use. J Sex Med 2020; 17: 17-25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

12  Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther 2005; 31: 1-20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

13  Koenig I, Luginbuehl H, Radlinger L. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle electromyography tested on healthy women and women with pelvic floor muscle dysfunction. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 60: 382-386.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

14  Marco G, Alberto B, Taian V. Surface EMG and muscle fatigue: multi-channel approaches to the study of myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue. Physiol Meas 2017; 38: R27-R60.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

15  Farina D, Enoka RM. Evolution of surface electromyography: From muscle electrophysiology towards neural recording and interfacing. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2023; 71: 102796.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

16  Fitts RH. Cellular mechanisms of muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev 1994; 74: 49-94.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

17  Li-Yun-Fong RJ, Larouche M, Hyakutake M, Koenig N, Lovatt C, Geoffrion R, Brotto LA, Lee T, Cundiff GW. Is pelvic floor dysfunction an independent threat to sexual function? A cross-sectional study in women with pelvic floor dysfunction. J Sex Med 2017; 14: 226-237.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

18  Pasqualotto L, Riccetto C, Biella AF, Marques J, Pereira LC, Alves FK, Lunardi ALB, de Vasconcelos Adami DB, Nagib A, Martinho N, et al. Impact of pelvic floor muscle strength on female sexual function: retrospective multicentric cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J 2022; 33: 1591-1599.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

19  Gameiro MO, Miraglia L, Gameiro LFO, Padovani CR, Amaro JL. Pelvic floor muscle strength evaluation in different body positions in nulliparous healthy women and its correlation with sexual activity. Int Braz J Urol 2013; 39: 847-852.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

20  Darski C, Barbosa LJF, Paiva LL, Vieira A. Association between the functionality of pelvic floor muscles and sexual satisfaction in young women. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2016; 38: 164-169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

21  Glazer HI, Romanzi L, Polaneczky M. Pelvic floor muscle surface electromyography. Reliability and clinical predictive validity. J Reproduct Med 1999; 44: 779-782.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |

22  Mohktar MS, Ibrahim F, Mohd Rozi NF, Mohd Yusof J, Ahmad SA, Su Yen K, Omar SZ. A quantitative approach to measure women’s sexual function using electromyography: a preliminary study of the Kegel exercise. Med Sci Monit 2013; 19: 1159-1166.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

23  Hug F. Can muscle coordination be precisely studied by surface electromyography. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2011; 21: 1-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

24  Shafik A. The role of the levator ani muscle in evacuation, sexual performance and pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2000; 11: 361-376.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

25  Neri I, Monari F, Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Facchinetti F, Volpe A. Computerized evaluation of fetal heart rate during tocolytic treatment: comparison between atosiban and ritodrine. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26: 259-263.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

26  Achtari C, Dwyer PL. Sexual function and pelvic floor disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 19: 993-1008 quiz A1–8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

27  Kingsberg SA, Simon JA. Female hypoactive sexual desire disorder: a practical guide to causes, clinical diagnosis, and treatment. J Womens Health 2020; 29: 1101-1112.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |