Articles citing this paper
Behavioural responses of brushtail possums to live trapping and implications for trap-catch correction
Phil Cowan A C and Guy Forrester B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Landcare Research, Private Bag 11052, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
B Landcare Research, PO Box 69, Lincoln 8152, New Zealand.
C Corresponding author. Email: cowanp@landcareresearch.co.nz
Wildlife Research 39(4) 343-349 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR11127
Submitted: 20 July 2011 Accepted: 16 March 2012 Published: 1 May 2012
6 articles found in Crossref database.
Demographical and morphological differences among coyotes (Canis latrans) relative to sampling method
Shutler Dave,
Priest Jenna M.,
Stewart Donald T., Boudreau Michael
Canadian Journal of Zoology. 2021 99(3). p.197
Varying effort in capture–recapture studies
Efford Murray G.,
Borchers David L.,
Mowat Garth, Ginenez Oliver
Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2013 4(7). p.629
Short-term welfare implications of capture-mark-recapture trapping of medium-sized mammals: the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) as a case study
Cowan P,
Forrester G, Warburton B
Animal Welfare. 2013 22(4). p.423
Using Continuous‐Time Spatial Capture–Recapture models to make inference about animal activity patterns
Distiller Greg B.,
Borchers David L.,
Foster Rebecca J., Harmsen Bart J.
Ecology and Evolution. 2020 10(20). p.11826
A spatially explicit capture–recapture estimator for single‐catch traps
Distiller Greg, Borchers David L.
Ecology and Evolution. 2015 5(21). p.5075
Livetrapping is not biased by the endocrine stress response: a preliminary study in the degu (Octodon degus)
Lapointe Michelle A.,
Bauer Carolyn M.,
Ebensperger Luis A.,
Reed J. Michael, Romero L. Michael
Journal of Mammalogy. 2015 96(4). p.762
