Articles citing this paper
5 articles found in Crossref database.
The scientific, financial and ethical implications of three common wildlife-trapping designs
Waudby Helen P.,
Petit Sophie, Gill Matthew J.
Wildlife Research. 2019 46(8). p.690
A comparison of an environmental impact assessment (EIA) vertebrate fauna survey with a post-approval fauna salvage program: consequences of not adhering to EIA survey guidelines, a Western Australian example
Thompson Graham G., Thompson Scott A.
Pacific Conservation Biology. 2020 26(4). p.412
The welfare and ethics of research involving wild animals: A primer
Soulsbury Carl D.,
Gray Helen E.,
Smith Lauren M.,
Braithwaite Victoria,
Cotter Sheena C.,
Elwood Robert W.,
Wilkinson Anna,
Collins Lisa M., Fisher Diana
Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2020 11(10). p.1164
New Online Resource on the 3Rs Principles of Animal Research for Wildlife Biologists, Ecologists, and Conservation Managers
Zemanova Miriam A.
Conservation. 2021 1(2). p.106
Camera-traps are a cost-effective method for surveying terrestrial squamates: A comparison with artificial refuges and pitfall traps
Welbourne Dustin J.,
Claridge Andrew W.,
Paull David J.,
Ford Frederick, Allen Benjamin Lee
PLOS ONE. 2020 15(1). p.e0226913
