Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR05103
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 33(8)

Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. II. Reliability of knowledge

Ben Reddiex A and David M. Forsyth B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Landcare Research, PO Box 69, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand. Present address: Department of Conservation, Wellington Conservancy, PO Box 5086, Wellington, New Zealand.

B Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Sustainability and Environment, PO Box 137, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: dave.forsyth@dse.vic.gov.au

Wildlife Research 33(8) 711-717 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR05103
Submitted: 16 November 2005  Accepted: 20 October 2006   Published: 19 December 2006

Abstract

Foxes, wild dogs, feral cats, rabbits, feral pigs, and feral goats are believed to have deleterious impacts on native biodiversity in Australia. However, although considerable resources have been expended controlling these six pest species, there are few reliable estimates of the effects of pest control on native biodiversity. We first show why reliable knowledge of the effects of pest animal control operations can be gained only by adopting proper experimental designs (i.e. treatment and non-treatment areas, replication, and random assignment of treatment and non-treatment areas) and monitoring of both the pest and biodiversity. We then review the design of 1915 pest control actions conducted with the aim of protecting native biodiversity in Australia during 1990–2003. Most (67.5%) pest control actions consisted of a single treatment area without monitoring of either the pest or biodiversity. Only 2.4% of pest control actions had one or more treatment and non-treatment areas, and very few treatment and non-treatment areas (0.3%) were randomly assigned. Replication of treatment and non-treatment areas occurred in only 1.0% of pest control actions. The field of wildlife management has been strongly criticised for its slow adoption of the tenets of experimentation to examine the effects of management actions, and our results show that this criticism applies to mammalian pest control in Australia. Until the principles of experimental design are adopted, knowledge of the effects of mammalian pest control in Australia will remain unreliable.


Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Victoria. We thank all the organisations, and individuals within those organisations, who patiently answered our questions. We thank E. McDonald-Madden, L. Einoder, R. Chick, A. Robley, P. Macak, K. Long, G. Swanson, and G. Heard for assisting with data collection and entry. P. Griffioen customised the database used to store data. H. Moller provided several useful references, and comments by P. Cowan, T. Clancy and two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the manuscript.


References

Bomford M., and Hart Q. (2002). Non-indigenous vertebrates in Australia. In ‘Biological Invasions: Economic and Environmental Costs of Alien Plant, Animal, and Microbe Species’. (Ed. D. Pimental.) pp. 25–45. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.)

Braysher M. (1993). ‘Managing Vertebrate Pests: Principles and Strategies.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.)

Caughley G., and Gunn A. (1996). ‘Conservation Biology in Theory and Practice.’ (Blackwell Science: Cambridge, UK.)

Choquenot D., McIlroy J., and Korn T. (1996). ‘Managing Vertebrate Pests: Feral Pigs.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.)

Choquenot, D. , Lukins, B. , and Curran, G. (1997). Assessing lamb predation by feral pigs in Australia’s semi-arid rangelands. Journal of Applied Ecology 34, 1445–1454.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Dickman C. R. (1996). Overview of the Impacts of Feral Cats on Australian Native Fauna. Report to the Australian Nature Conservation Agency, Canberra.

Fisher R. A. (1971). ‘The Design of Experiments.’ (Hafner: New York.)

Fleming P., Corbett L., Harden R., and Thomson P. (2001). ‘Managing the Impacts of Dingoes and Other Wild Dogs.’ (Bureau of Rural Sciences: Canberra.)

Gelman A., Carlin J. B., Stern H. S., and Rubin D. S. (2004). ‘Bayesian Data Analysis. ’ 2nd edn. (Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL.)

Hairston N. G. (1989). ‘Ecological Experiments: Purpose, Design and Execution.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Hone J. (1994). ‘Analysis of Vertebrate Pest Control.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Hone, J. (1999). Fox control and rock-wallaby population dynamics – assumptions and hypotheses. Wildlife Research 26, 671–673.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Krebs C. J. (1999). ‘Ecological Methodology.’ 2nd edn. (Benjamin Cummings: Menlo Park, CA.)

Macnab, J. (1983). Wildlife management as scientific experimentation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 11, 397–401.
Mead R. (1988). ‘The Design of Experiments. Statistical Principles for Practical Application.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Murtaugh, P. A. (2002). On rejection rates of paired intervention analysis. Ecology 83, 1752–1761.
O’Connor C., Warburton B., and Fisher P. (2005). Ethics and the killing of wild sentient animals. In ‘Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Vertebrate Pest Conference’. pp. 203–207. (The Museum of New Zealand: Wellington.)

Oksanen, L. (2001). Logic of experiments in ecology: is pseudoreplication a pseudoissue? Oikos 94, 27–38.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Parkes J., Henzell R., and Pickles G. (1996). ‘Managing Vertebrate Pests: Feral Goats.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.)

Parkes, J. , Robley, A. , Forsyth, D. M. , and Choquenot, D. (2006). Adaptive management experiments in vertebrate pest control in New Zealand and Australia. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34, 229–236.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Reddiex B., Forsyth D. M., McDonald-Madden E., Einoder L. D., Griffioen P. A., Chick R. R., and Robley A. J. (2004). Review of existing red fox, wild dog, feral cat, rabbit, feral pig, and feral goat control in Australia. I. Audit. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.

Reddiex, B. , Forsyth, D. M. , McDonald-Madden, E. , Einoder, L. , Griffioen, P. A. , Chick, R. R. , and Robley, A. J. (2006). Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. I. Patterns of control and monitoring. Wildlife Research 33, 691–709.
Saunders G., Coman B., Kinnear J., and Braysher M. (1995). ‘Managing Vertebrate Pests: Foxes.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.)

Stewart-Oaten, A. , Murdoch, W. W. , and Parker, K. R. (1986). Environmental impact assessment: “pseudoreplication” in time? Ecology 67, 929–940.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Williams K., Parer I., Coman B., Burley J., and Braysher M. (1995). ‘Managing Vertebrate Pests: Rabbits.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.)