Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Breeding-site selection by cane toads (Bufo marinus) and native frogs in northern New South Wales, Australia

M. Semeniuk A , F. Lemckert A B and R. Shine A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Biological Sciences A08, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

B Forest Science Centre, Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 100, Beecroft, NSW 2119, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: rics@bio.usyd.edu.au

Wildlife Research 34(1) 59-66 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR06112
Submitted: 21 August 2006  Accepted: 14 December 2006   Published: 27 February 2007

Abstract

Previous research on cane toads (Bufo marinus) has documented non-random selection of breeding sites by this invasive species. In the wet–dry tropics of the Northern Territory, toads selected spawning sites in open areas with gently sloping banks and shallow water. If consistent, such biases may present opportunities for toad control via waterbody manipulation – but first we need to know whether such criteria for spawning-site selection (1) are consistent across other parts of the toad’s extensive Australian range, and (2) differ from those of native anurans breeding at the same waterbodies. We quantified the attributes of potential and actual spawning-sites in north-eastern New South Wales, in temperate-zone habitat where cane toads have been present for many decades; our study area thus differs in many ways from the previously studied tropical site. We compared habitat and water chemistry variables between 23 cane toad breeding sites and 23 nearby unused sites. To examine habitat use at an even finer scale, we conducted nocturnal surveys of microhabitat use by calling male toads and native anurans. Our results revealed that cane toads in this region were highly selective in their choice of breeding sites, and that the criteria they used in this respect were similar to those used by toads in the Northern Territory. Calling male cane toads also used microhabitats non-randomly within each pond, apparently based on similar criteria to those used when selecting among ponds. Toads differed significantly from native anurans in these respects, suggesting that it may be feasible to manipulate waterbody attributes to impact on invasive toads without disrupting reproduction by native anurans.


Acknowledgements

We thank M. Hagman, M. Fitzgerald, T. Pizzuto, J. Nicholl, N. Coleman, R. Jago, L. Wellman, H. Bower and N. Graham for advice and assistance. This project was conducted under permits from the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, and the Department of Environment and Conservation.


References

Anstis M. (2002). ‘Tadpoles of South-eastern Australia.’ (Reed New Holland: Sydney.)

Banks, B. , and Beebee, T. J. C. (1987). Factors influencing breeding site choice by the pioneering amphibian Bufo calamita. Holarctic Ecology 10, 14–21.


Braysher M. (1993). ‘Managing Vertebrate Pests: Principles and Strategies.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.)

Burnett, S. (1997). Colonizing cane toads cause population declines in native predators: reliable anecdotal information and management implications. Pacific Conservation Biology 3, 65–72.


Chen, K. K. , and Kovarikova, A. (1967). Pharmacology and toxicology of toad venom. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 56, 1535–1541.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Cogger H. G., Eschmeyer W. N., Paxton J. R., and Zweifel R. G. (2003). ‘Encyclopedia of Reptiles, Amphibians and Fishes.’ (Fog City Press: San Francisco.)

Crossland, M. R. (1998). A comparison of cane toad and native tadpoles as predators of native anuran eggs, hatchlings and larvae. Wildlife Research 25, 373–381.
CrossRef |

Crossland, M. R. (2000). Direct and indirect effects of the introduced toad Bufo marinus (Anura: Bufonidae) on populations of native anuran larvae in Australia. Ecography 23, 283–290.
CrossRef |

Crossland, M. R. , and Alford, R. A. (1998). Evaluation of the toxicity of eggs, hatchlings and tadpoles of the introduced toad, Bufo marinus (Anura: Bufonidae) to native Australian aquatic predators. Australian Journal of Ecology 23, 129–137.
CrossRef |

Department of the Environment and Heritage (2006). http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/invasive/

English A. W., and Chapple R. S. (2002). Report on the management of feral animals by the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service. NSW NPWS, Hurstville.

Evans, M. , Yaber, C. , and Hero, J. M. (1996). Factors influencing choice of breeding site by Bufo marinus in its natural range. Copeia 1996, 904–912.
CrossRef |

Freeland, W. J. (1986). Populations of cane toad Bufo marinus in relation to time since colonization. Australian Wildlife Research 13, 321–330.
CrossRef |

Freeland, W. J. , and Kerin, S. H. (1988). Within-habitat relationships between invading Bufo marinus and Australian species of frog during the tropical dry season. Australian Wildlife Research 15, 293–305.
CrossRef |

Hagman, M. , and Shine, R. (2006). Spawning-site selection by feral cane toads (Bufo marinus) at an invasion front in tropical Australia. Austral Ecology 31, 551–558.
CrossRef |

Holland, A. A. , Wilson, K. R. , and Jones, M. S. (2006). Characteristics of boreal toad (Bufo boreas) breeding habitat in Colorado. Herpetological Review 37, 157–159.


Kiesecker, J. M. , Blaustein, A. R. , and Miller, C. L. (2001). Potential mechanisms underlying the displacement of native red-legged frogs by introduced bullfrogs. Ecology 82, 1964–1970.
CrossRef |

Lever C. (2001). ‘The Cane Toad. The History and Ecology of a Successful Colonist.’ (Westbury: Otley, West Yorkshire.)

Lever C. (2003). ‘Naturalized Reptiles and Amphibians of the World.’ (Oxford University Press: New York.)

National Parks and Wildlife Service (2006). http://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/npws.nsf/Content/bufo_marinus_ktp

Phillips, B. L. , Brown, G. P. , Webb, J. K. , and Shine, R. (2006). Runaway toads: an invasive species evolves speed and thus spreads more rapidly through Australia. Nature 439, 803.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Richardson R. H. (1979). ‘The Screw-worm Problem: Evolution of Resistance to Biological Control.’ (University of Texas Press: Austin.)

Robinson M. (2004). ‘A Field Guide to the Frogs of Australia.’ (Reed New Holland: Sydney.)

Seabrook, W. (1991). Range expansion of the introduced cane toad Bufo marinus in New South Wales. Australian Zoologist 27, 58–62.


Seabrook W. (1993). Habitat use of the cane toad Bufo marinus: implications for assessment of impact and control strategies. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sydney.

Shine, R. , and Covacevich, J. (1983). Ecology of highly venomous snakes: the Australian genus Oxyuranus (Elapidae). Journal of Ecology 17, 60–69.


Slade, R. W. , and Moritz, C. (1998). Phylogeography of Bufo marinus from its natural and introduced ranges. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 265, 769–777.
CrossRef |

Sutherst, R. W. , Floyd, R. B. , and Maywald, G. F. (1995). The potential geographical distribution of the cane toad, Bufo marinus L. in Australia. Conservation Biology 9, 294–299.


Tyler M. J. (1994). ‘Australian Frogs. A Natural History.’ (Reed New Holland: Sydney.)

Van Beurden, E. K. , and Grigg, C. G. (1980). An isolated and expanding population of the introduced toad Bufo marinus in New South Wales. Australian Wildlife Research 7, 305–310.
CrossRef |

Williamson, I. (1999). Competition between the larvae of the introduced cane toad Bufo marinus (Anura: Bufonidae) and native anurans from the Darling Downs area of southern Queensland. Australian Journal of Ecology 24, 636–643.
CrossRef |

Wittenberg R., and Cock M. J. W. (2001). ‘Invasive Alien Species: A Toolkit of Best Prevention and Management Practices.’ (CAB International: Wallingford, UK.)

Zug, G. R. , and Zug, P. B. (1979). The marine toad, Bufo marinus: a natural history resumé of native populations. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 284, 1–58.



Rent Article (via Deepdyve) Export Citation Cited By (29)