Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Nighttime driver detection distances for Tasmanian fauna: informing speed limits to reduce roadkill

Alistair J. Hobday
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. Email: alistair.hobday@csiro.au

Wildlife Research 37(4) 265-272 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09180
Submitted: 24 December 2009  Accepted: 8 April 2010   Published: 28 June 2010

Abstract

Context. Roadkill is a wildlife management issue in areas where high traffic volume passes through relatively intact natural habitat. High density of roadkill in Tasmania is observed in concentrated ‘hotspots’, and local mitigation of vehicle speed may thus be an appropriate management response. Although warning signage is often advocated, this may not effectively reduce roadkill if the suggested speed does not provide sufficient time for the animal to be detected and for the vehicle to be stopped.

Aims. The detection distance at night for common roadkill species and corresponding driving speeds to avoid collision were determined. The importance of animal size and fur colour in determining detection distance was also evaluated.

Methods. Mounts of nine nocturnal Tasmanian mammal species were used to determine nighttime driver detection distances based on individual driver trials. These were converted to appropriate stopping speeds by accounting for reaction time and braking distance. Photographs and digital image analysis were used to evaluate fur brightness.

Key results. A total of 339 individual detection distances for the 9 species were recorded for 18 drivers. Detection distance differed between the species tested at both high- and low-beam headlight settings. The endangered Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) had the shortest mean detection distance when headlights were on high beam (60.8 m), and the second shortest on low beam (33.9 m), which corresponded to a driving speed which would permit a safe stop of 54 km h–1 and 38 km h–1, respectively. The greatest detection distance was for the introduced hare (Lepus europaeus): 116 m (83 km h–1) and 50.4 m (48 km h–1), respectively.

Conclusions. Nighttime driving speeds slower than 80 km h–1 may be effective in reducing roadkill in wildlife hotspots. Detection distance was significantly related to fur brightness, as determined by image analysis, and not animal size.

Implications. The variation in detection distance allows species-specific nighttime driving speeds to be considered by individual drivers and by road and wildlife managers planning mitigation efforts for vulnerable species.


Acknowledgements

The provision of animal mounts by Brian Looker and Andy Baird (TMAG) and Jenni Burdon (Parks Tasmania) for use in the experiments was greatly appreciated. Many thanks to Louise Conboy (CSIRO) who photographed animals for image analysis, Russ Grierson (Traffic Engineer MIE CPEng) for providing information about calculation of stopping distances, and Jessica Farley (CSIRO) for statistical assistance. The laser range finder was borrowed from the School of Zoology, University of Tasmania. The assistance of the following experimental drivers is also greatly appreciated: Lucy Robinson, Jo Brockman, Mel Puckridge, Clare Hawkins, Keith Martin-Smith, Matt Costello, Scott Ling, Clare Brooker, Neil Holbrook, Chris Lewis, Belinda Lewis, Peter Hobday, Sue Hobday, Sarah Jennings, Hugh Maguire, Jess Ford, Louise Cooper, Tim Ryan, Chris Brown, Sarah Tassell, Gretta Pecl, and Erik Wapstra. Comments from two anonymous reviewers and the editor improved the clarity of this paper.


References

Austroads (2009). ‘Guide to Road Design – Part 3: Geometric Design.’ AGRD03/09. (Austroads Inc.: Sydney.)

Coulson, G. M. (1982). Road-kills of macropods on a section of highway in Central Victoria. Australian Wildlife Research 9, 21–26.
CrossRef |

Dickerson, L. M. (1939). The problem of wildlife destruction by automobile traffic. The Journal of Wildlife Management 3, 104–116.
CrossRef |

Dique, D. S. , Thompson, J. , Preece, H. J. , Penfold, G. C. , de Villiers, D. L. , and Leslie, R. S. (2003). Koala mortality on roads in south-east Queensland: the koala speed-zone trial. Wildlife Research 30, 419–426.
CrossRef |

Forman, R. T. T. , and Alexander, L. E. (1998). Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29, 207–231.
CrossRef |

Glista, D. J. , DeVault, T. L. , and DeWoody, J. A. (2009). A review of mitigation measures for reducing wildlife mortality on roadways. Landscape and Urban Planning 91, 1–7.
CrossRef |

Harris L. D. , and Gallagher P. B. (1989). New initiatives for wildlife conservation. The need for movement corridors. In ‘In Defense of Wildlife: Preserving Communities and Corridors’. (Ed. G. Mackintosh.) pp. 11–34. (Defenders of Wildlife: Washington, DC.)

Hawkins, C. E. , Baars, C. , Hesterman, H. , Hocking, G. J. , and Jones, M. E. , et al. (2006). Emerging disease and population decline of an island endemic, the Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii. Biological Conservation 131, 307–324.
CrossRef |

Hobday, A. J. , and Minstrell, M. L. (2008). Distribution and abundance of roadkill on Tasmanian highways: human management options. Wildlife Research 35, 712–726.
CrossRef |

Jones, M. E. (2000). Road upgrade, road mortality and remedial measures: impacts on a population of eastern quolls and Tasmanian devils. Wildlife Research 27, 289–296.
CrossRef |

Magnus Z. (2006). Wildlife Roadkill Mitigation Information Kit: a guide for local government and land managers. (Ed. B. Chamberlain.) (Tasmanian Environment Centre Inc.: Hobart.) Available at http://www.tasmanianenvironmentcentre.org.au/documents/roadkill_kit.pdf [Verified 24 December 2009].

Magnus Z. , Kriwoken L. , Mooney N. , and Jones M. (2004) Reducing the Incidence of Wildlife Roadkill: Improving the visitor experience in Tasmania. Technical Report. (Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism: Gold Coast MC.) Available at http://ecite.utas.edu.au/36064 [Verified 24 December 2009].

Pojar, T. M. , Prosence, R. A. , Reed, D. F. , and Woodard, T. N. (1975). Effectiveness of a lighted animated deer crossing sign. The Journal of Wildlife Management 39, 87–91.
CrossRef |

Reed, D. F. , and Woodard, T. N. (1981). Effectiveness of highway lighting in reducing deer-vehicle accidents. The Journal of Wildlife Management 45, 721–726.
CrossRef |

Rodgers, A. R. , and Robins, P. J. (2006). Moose detection distances on highways at night. Alces (Thunder Bay, Ont.) 42, 75–87.


Rowden, P. , Steinhart, D. , and Sheehan, M. (2008). Road crashes involving animals in Australia. Accident; Analysis and Prevention 40, 1865–1871.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Seiler, A. (2005). Predicting locations of moose–vehicle collisions in Sweden. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 371–382.
CrossRef |

Seiler A. , and Helldin J. O. (2006). Mortality in wildlife due to transportation. In ‘The ecology of transportation: Managing mobility for the environment’. (Eds J. Davenport and J. L. Davenport.) pp. 165–189. (Springer Verlag: Berlin.)

Trombulak, S. C. , and Frissell, C. A. (2000). Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology 14(1), 18–30.
CrossRef |

van Langevelde F. , and Jaarsma C. F. (2009). Modeling the effect of traffic calming on local animal population persistence. Ecology and Society 14(2), 39. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art39/



Rent Article (via Deepdyve) Export Citation Cited By (4)

View Altmetrics