Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Are there habitat thresholds in koala occupancy in the semiarid landscapes of the Mulgalands Bioregion?

Andrew G. Smith A D , Clive McAlpine A , Jonathan Rhodes A , Leonie Seabrook A , Daniel Lunney B C and Greg Baxter A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The University of Queensland, Landscape Ecology and Conservation Group, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.

B Office of the Environment and Heritage, PO Box 1967, Hurstville, NSW 2220, Australia.

C School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: andrew.g.smith@uq.edu.au

Wildlife Research 40(5) 413-426 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR13010
Submitted: 17 January 2013  Accepted: 15 August 2013   Published: 9 September 2013

Abstract

Context: Habitat thresholds are the critical point(s), below which the probability of occurrence of a species declines. Identifying thresholds assists land managers to decide how much habitat is needed to conserve a species. However, for any given species, a threshold may not exist, or might occur at one scale but not at others, and it may differ across regions. The use of critical habitat thresholds can negatively affect populations if simplified conservation targets for habitat retention are prescribed. This problem is relevant to the koalas where there is evidence of habitat thresholds in mesic regions, but no studies of thresholds in semiarid regions.

Aims: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a threshold exists between the occupancy of a site by koalas and habitat variables at both the site and at four landscape scales in the semiarid Mulgalands Bioregion of Queensland, Australia.

Methods: We modelled habitat relationships using standard and piece-wise logistic regression, and an information-theoretic approach, to determine whether the best model that explained the occupancy–habitat relationships was linear or had a distinct threshold. The site-scale variable was the percentage of primary eucalypt species. The landscape-scale variables included the amount of primary and secondary habitat, and an interaction between them.

Key findings: There was a threshold relationship between the occurrence of koalas and the percentage of primary trees at the site scale. At the landscape scale, most threshold models failed to converge, and evidence pointed to a linear relationship between habitat amount and koala occupancy.

Conclusions: Conservation actions for koalas in the Mulgalands Bioregion should concentrate on protecting the primary tree resource for koalas, namely, river red gums (E. camaldulensis). However, the maintenance or restoration of primary and secondary habitat to distances of 1000 m from the creek is important because of the linear relationship between koala presence and habitat amount.

Implications: As habitat is lost in the semiarid Mulgalands Bioregion, koala occupancy declines. If known thresholds from mesic regions are used to define a minimum amount of habitat to be retained for koalas, conservation of local koala populations may well fail.

Additional keywords: piece-wise logistic regression, presence/absence data, river red gum, species distributions.


References

Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (2012). ‘Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) Listing.’ (Australian Government: Canberra.)

Betts, M. G., Forbes, G. J., and Diamond, A. W. (2007). Thresholds in songbird occurrence in relation to landscape structure. Conservation Biology 21, 1046–1058.
Thresholds in songbird occurrence in relation to landscape structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17650254PubMed |

Bjørnstad, O. N. (2012). ncf: spatial nonparametric covariance functions. Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ncf/index.html [verified 9 January 2013].

Bjørnstad, O. N., and Falck, W. (2001). Nonparametric spatial covariance functions: estimation and testing. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 8, 53–70.
Nonparametric spatial covariance functions: estimation and testing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-theoretic Approach.’ 2nd edn. (Springer: New York.)

Chatterjee, S., and Price, B. (1991). ‘Regression Analysis by Example.’ 2nd edn. (John Wiley & Sons: New York.)

Davies, R. B. (1987). Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 74, 33–43.

Department of Environment and Resource Management (2009). ‘Regional Vegetation Management Code for Western Bioregions – Version 2.’ (Queensland Government: Brisbane.)

Department of Environment and Resource Management (2010). Land cover change in Queensland 2008–2009: a statewide landcover and trees study (SLATS) report, 2011. Department of Environment and Resources Management, Brisbane.

Dique, D. S., Thompson, J., Preece, H. J., de Villiers, D. L., and Carrick, F. N. (2003). Dispersal patterns in a regional koala population in south-east Queensland. Wildlife Research 30, 281–290.
Dispersal patterns in a regional koala population in south-east Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ecke, F., Christensen, P., Sandström, P., and Hörnfeldt, B. (2006). Identification of landscape elements related to local declines of a boreal grey-sided vole population. Landscape Ecology 21, 485–497.
Identification of landscape elements related to local declines of a boreal grey-sided vole population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ellis, W. A., Melzer, A., Carrick, F. N., and Hasegawa, M. (2002). Tree use, diet and home range of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) at Blair Athol, central Queensland. Wildlife Research 29, 303–311.
Tree use, diet and home range of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) at Blair Athol, central Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fahrig, L. (2001). How much habitat is enough? Biological Conservation 100, 65–74.
How much habitat is enough?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fielding, A. H., and Bell, J. F. (1997). A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24, 38–49.
A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Freeman, E. A., and Moisen, G. (2008). ‘PresenceAbsence: an R Package for Presence–Absence Model Analysis.’ Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/PresenceAbsence/index.html [verified 9 January 2013].

Gordon, G., Brown, A. S., and Pulsford, T. (1988). A koala (Phascolarctos cinereus Goldfuss) population crash during drought and heatwave conditions in south-western Queensland. Australian Journal of Ecology 13, 451–461.
A koala (Phascolarctos cinereus Goldfuss) population crash during drought and heatwave conditions in south-western Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Homan, R. N., Windmiller, B. S., and Reed, J. M. (2004). Critical thresholds associated with habitat loss for two vernal pool-breeding amphibians. Ecological Applications 14, 1547–1553.
Critical thresholds associated with habitat loss for two vernal pool-breeding amphibians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lande, R. (1987). Extinction thresholds in demographic models of territorial populations. American Naturalist 130, 624–635.
Extinction thresholds in demographic models of territorial populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Landwehr, J. M., Pregibon, D., and Shoemaker, A. C. (1984). Graphical methods for assessing logistic regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79, 61–71.
Graphical methods for assessing logistic regression models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer, D. B., and Luck, G. (2005). Synthesis: thresholds in conservation and management. Biological Conservation 124, 351–354.
Synthesis: thresholds in conservation and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer, D. B., Fischer, J., and Cunningham, R. B. (2005). Native vegetation cover thresholds associated with species responses. Biological Conservation 124, 311–316.
Native vegetation cover thresholds associated with species responses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McAlpine, C., Fensham, R., and McIntyre, S. (2002). Sustainable management of Queensland landscapes: linking the science and action. The Rangeland Journal 24, 3–5.
Sustainable management of Queensland landscapes: linking the science and action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McAlpine, C. A., Rhodes, J. R., Callaghan, J. G., Bowen, M. E., Lunney, D., Mitchell, D. L., Pullar, D. V., and Possingham, H. P. (2006). The importance of forest area and configuration relative to local habitat factors for conserving forest mammals: a case study of koalas in Queensland, Australia. Biological Conservation 132, 153–165.
The importance of forest area and configuration relative to local habitat factors for conserving forest mammals: a case study of koalas in Queensland, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McAlpine, C. A., Rhodes, J. R., Bowen, M. E., Lunney, D., Callaghan, J. G., Mitchell, D. L., and Possingham, H. P. (2008). Can multiscale models of species’ distribution be generalized from region to region? A case study of the koala. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 558–567.
Can multiscale models of species’ distribution be generalized from region to region? A case study of the koala.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mönkkönen, M., and Reunanen, P. (1999). On critical thresholds in landscape connectivity: a management perspective. Oikos 84, 302–305.
On critical thresholds in landscape connectivity: a management perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moore, B. D., Lawler, I. R., Wallis, I. R., Beale, C. M., and Foley, W. J. (2010). Palatability mapping: a koala’s eye view of spatial variation in habitat quality. Ecology 91, 3165–3176.
Palatability mapping: a koala’s eye view of spatial variation in habitat quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21141178PubMed |

Muggeo, V. M. R. (2003). Estimating regression models with unknown break-points. Statistics in Medicine 22, 3055–3071.
Estimating regression models with unknown break-points.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muggeo, V. M. R. (2008). segmented: an R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. R News 8, 20–25.

Muggeo, V. M. R. (2012). segmented. R Package Version 0.2–9.3 edn. Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/segmented/index.html [verified 29 August 2013].

Neter, J., Wasserman, W., and Kutner, M. H. (1990). ‘Applied Linear Statistical Models. Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Design’. (Irwin: Homewood, IL.)

Parker, M., and Mac Nally, R. (2002). Habitat loss and the habitat fragmentation threshold: an experimental evaluation of impacts on richness and total abundances using grassland invertebrates. Biological Conservation 105, 217–229.
Habitat loss and the habitat fragmentation threshold: an experimental evaluation of impacts on richness and total abundances using grassland invertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Queensland Herbarium (2009). ‘Vegetation Communities and Regional Ecosystems Survey and Mapping Version 6.0b.’ (Department of Environment and Resource Management: Brisbane.)

R Development Core Team (2012). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org [verified 29 August 2012].

Rhodes, J. R., Callaghan, J. G., McAlpine, C. A., De Jong, C., Bowen, M. E., Mitchell, D. L., Lunney, D., and Possingham, H. P. (2008). Regional variation in habitat-occupancy thresholds: a warning for conservation planning. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 549–557.
Regional variation in habitat-occupancy thresholds: a warning for conservation planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rhodes, J. R., McAlpine, C. A., Zuur, A. F., Smith, G. M., and Ieno, E. N. (2009). GLMM applied on the spatial distribution of koalas in a fragmented landscape. In ‘Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R’. (Eds A. F. Zuur, E. N. Ieno, N. J. Walker, A. A. Saveliev and G. M. Smith.) pp. 469–492. (Springer: New York.)

Rodríguez, A., and Andrén, H. (1999). A comparison of Eurasian red squirrel distribution in different fragmented landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology 36, 649–662.
A comparison of Eurasian red squirrel distribution in different fragmented landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rompré, G., Boucher, Y., Bélanger, L., Côté, S., and Robinson, W. D. (2010). Conserving biodiversity in managed forest landscapes: the use of critical thresholds for habitat. Forestry Chronicle 86, 589–596.

Sattler, P., and Williams, R. (1999). ‘The Conservation Status of Queensland’s Bioregional Ecosystems.’ (Environmental Protection Agency: Brisbane.)

Seabrook, L., McAlpine, C., Baxter, G., Rhodes, J., Bradley, A., and Lunney, D. (2011). Drought-driven change in wildlife distribution and numbers: a case study of koalas in south west Queensland. Wildlife Research 38, 509–524.
Drought-driven change in wildlife distribution and numbers: a case study of koalas in south west Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith, A. G., McAlpine, C., Rhodes, J. R., Seabrook, L., Baxter, G., Lunney, D., and Bradley, A. (2013a). At what spatial scales does resource selection vary? A case study of koalas in a semi-arid region. Austral Ecology 38, 230–240.
At what spatial scales does resource selection vary? A case study of koalas in a semi-arid region.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith, A. G., McAlpine, C. A., Rhodes, J. R., Lunney, D., Seabrook, L., and Baxter, G. (2013b). Out on a limb: habitat use of a specialist folivore, the koala, at the edge of its range in a modified semi-arid landscape. Landscape Ecology 28, 415–426.
Out on a limb: habitat use of a specialist folivore, the koala, at the edge of its range in a modified semi-arid landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sullivan, B. J., Norris, W. M., and Baxter, G. S. (2003a). Low-density koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) populations in the mulgalands of south-west Queensland. II. Distribution and diet. Wildlife Research 30, 331–338.
Low-density koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) populations in the mulgalands of south-west Queensland. II. Distribution and diet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sullivan, B. J., Baxter, G. S., Lisle, A. T., Pahl, L., and Norris, W. M. (2004). Low-density koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) populations in the mulgalands of south-west Queensland. IV. Abundance and conservation status. Wildlife Research 31, 19–29.
Low-density koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) populations in the mulgalands of south-west Queensland. IV. Abundance and conservation status.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thackway, R., and Cresswell, I. D. (1995). ‘An Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia: a Framework for Establishing the National System of Reserves, Version 4.0.’ (Nature Conservation Agency: Canberra.)

With, K. A., and King, A. W. (1999). Extinction thresholds for species in fractal landscapes. Conservation Biology 13, 314–326.
Extinction thresholds for species in fractal landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |