Register      Login
Australian Journal of Zoology Australian Journal of Zoology Society
Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Innovative pandanus-tool folding by New Caledonian crows

Gavin R. Hunt A D , Jawad Abdelkrim B , Michael G. Anderson C , Jennifer C. Holzhaider A , Amy J. Marshall B , Neil J. Gemmell B and Russell D. Gray A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.

B Molecular Ecology Laboratory, Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

C Ecology and Conservation Group, Institute of Natural Resources, Albany Campus, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.

D Corresponding author. Email: grhunt@hotmail.com

Australian Journal of Zoology 55(5) 291-298 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO07048
Submitted: 5 September 2007  Accepted: 9 November 2007   Published: 8 February 2007

Abstract

The ratcheting of evolutionary innovations over time has enabled humans to produce complex technology. This process requires (1) technological innovations, (2) the accurate transmission of innovations by social learning, and (3) the faithful maintenance of new technology by its standardised reproduction. Although nonhuman primates are good behavioural innovators, there is no evidence that they have evolved cumulative technology. It has been previously suggested that New Caledonian crows have made cumulative changes to their pandanus tool manufacture. However, technological innovation by individual New Caledonian crows in the wild had not been observed. Here, we report that two distantly related male crows at the same location have a novel way of using pandanus tools by first folding them into a boomerang-like shape. The fine manipulation to fold tools was highly routinised and its two main manipulatory components (direction of head movement and holding technique) were exclusively lateralised. As a consequence the fold arrangement was invariable irrespective of a tool’s position before folding. The males’ tool-folding confirms that New Caledonian crows have a disposition to routinise and lateralise complex sequences of manipulatory actions. Such a disposition may facilitate the evolution of cumulative technology because it can act to standardise the reproduction of a technological innovation.


Acknowledgements

We thank W. Wadrobert for access to his family’s land, D. Houmbouy for permission to work on Maré and M. Sibley for preparing DVDs. MGA filmed the free-living male and JCH filmed the captive male. M. Corballis and A. Taylor provided helpful comments on the manuscript. Our work was carried out under University of Auckland Animal Ethics Committee approval R375 and complied with the laws of New Caledonia. This research was funded by a New Zealand Marsden Fund grant (RDG and GRH).


References

Aarts, H. , and Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: automaticity in goal-directed behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78, 53–63.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Bargh J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In ‘Advances in Social Cognition. Vol. X’. (Ed. R. S. Weyer.) pp. 1–61. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.: Mahwah, NJ.)

Biro, D. , Inoue-Nakamura, N. , Tonooka, R. , Yamakoshi, G. , Sousa, C. , and Matsuzawa, T. (2003). Cultural innovation and transmission of tool use in wild chimpanzees: evidence from field experiments. Animal Cognition 6, 213–223.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | James W. (1890). ‘The Principles of Psychology.’ (Macmillan: London.)

Kenward, B. , Rutz, C. , Weir, A. A. S. , and Kacelnik, A. (2006). Development of tool use in New Caledonian crows: inherited action patterns and social influences. Animal Behaviour 72, 1329–1343.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Reader S. M., and Laland K. N. (2003). ‘Animal Innovation’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Rutledge, R. , and Hunt, G. R. (2004). Lateralized tool use in wild New Caledonian crows. Animal Behaviour 67, 327–332.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Tomasello M., and Call J. (1997). ‘Primate Cognition.’ (Oxford University Press: New York.)

Tomasello, M. , Kruger, A. C. , and Ratner, H. H. (1993). Cultural learning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, 495–552.


Verplanken, B. , and Aarts, H. (1999). Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour: is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity? European Review of Social Psychology 10, 101–134.


Weir, A. A. S. , Chappell, J. , and Kacelnik, A. (2002). Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows. Science 297, 981.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Whiten, A. , Horner, V. , and de Waal, F. B. M. (2005). Conformity to cultural norms of tool use in chimpanzees. Nature 437, 737–740.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |





Appendix 1.  Genotypes of the 33 NC crows from Maré Island for the ten microsatellite loci used in the study. The two tool-folding male crows (H12163 and H33143) are indicated in bold
Click to zoom