Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Identification of key environmental variables associated with the presence of Toothed Leionema (Leionema bilobum serrulatum) in the Strzelecki Ranges, Victoria, Australia

Wendy Wright A C , Xuan Zhu B and Mateusz Okurowski B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Applied Sciences & Engineering Monash University, Gippsland Campus Churchill, Vic. 3842, Australia.

B School of Geography & Environmental Science Monash University, Clayton Campus, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: wendy.wright@monash.edu

Australian Journal of Botany 59(3) 207-214 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT10197
Submitted: 8 August 2010  Accepted: 4 May 2011   Published: 9 May 2011

Abstract

Toothed Leionema is one of four subspecies of Leionema bilobum from the Rutaceae family. A dense shrub or small tree, growing to ~4 m high, it is a poorly investigated species which is considered rare in Victoria, Australia. This paper presents the results of a study using Geographical Information Systems and Weights-of-Evidence predictive modelling to assess the importance of seven environmental factors in determining habitat suitability for this species in the Strzelecki Ranges, Victoria. This method is particularly useful in understanding the distribution of rare species, especially where the ecology of the species of interest is not well understood. Of the seven environmental factors considered here, four were found to be important: elevation, aspect, distance to water and distance to plantation (disturbed) areas. The modelling results indicate that areas with elevations between 350 and 550 m and a dominant south-western aspect that are close to plantation areas (within 700 m), and to water (within 1100–1200 m), provide potentially suitable habitat for Toothed Leionema in the region.


References

Austin MP (2002) Spatial predictions of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modelling 157, 101–118.
Spatial predictions of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Austin MP, Smith TM (1989) A new model for the continuum concept. Vegetation 83, 35–47.
A new model for the continuum concept.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin 24, 43–69.
A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bonham-Carter GF, Agterberg FP, Wright DF (1988) Integration of geological data sets for gold exploration in Nova Scotia. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54, 1585–1592.

Bonham-Carter GF, Agterberg FP, Wright DF (1989) Weights of evidence modelling: a new approach to mapping mineral potential. In ‘Statistical applications in the earth sciences’. (Eds FP Agternerg, GF Bonham-Carter) pp. 171–183. (Geological survey of Canada: Ottawa)

Boyle C, Lowe KW (2004) ‘Biodiversity action planning – strategic overview for the Strzelecki Ranges Bioregion.’ (Department of Sustainability and Environment: Melbourne) 142 pp.

Brown DG (1994) Predicting vegetation types at treeline using topography and biophysical disturbance variables. Journal of Vegetation Science 5, 641–656.
Predicting vegetation types at treeline using topography and biophysical disturbance variables.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bureau of Meteorology (2010) Climate Data Online. Commonwealth of Australia, Bureau of Meteorology. Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/index.shtml [Verified 6 December 2010]

Corsi F, Dupre E, Boitani L (1999) A large scale model of wolf distribution in Italy for conservation planning. Conservation Biology 13, 150–159.
A large scale model of wolf distribution in Italy for conservation planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) (2005) ‘Advisory list of rare or threatened plants in Victoria – 2005.’ (Department of Sustainability and Environment: Melbourne)

Dixon P, Ellison AM (1996) Introduction: ecological applications of Bayesian inference. Ecological Applications 6, 1034–1035.
Introduction: ecological applications of Bayesian inference.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Duretto MF, Durham KL, James EA, Ladiges PY (2006) New subspecies of Leionema bilobum (Rutaceae). Muelleria 23, 7–14.

Elith J, Burgman MA (2002) Predictions and their validation: rare plants in the Central Highlands, Victoria, Australia. In ‘Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale’. (Eds JM Scott, P Heglund, ML Morrison, JB Haufler, MG Raphael, WA Wall, FB Samson) pp. 303–314. (Island Press: Covelo, CA)

Ellison AM (2004) Bayesian inference in ecology. Ecology Letters 7, 509–520.
Bayesian inference in ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fischer HS (1990) Simulating the distribution of plant communities in an alpine landscape. Coenoses 5, 37–43.

Franklin J (1998) Predicting the distribution of shrub species in southern California from climatic and terrain-derived variables. Journal of Vegetation Science 9, 733–748.
Predicting the distribution of shrub species in southern California from climatic and terrain-derived variables.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Giesler R, Högberg M, Högberg P (1998) Soil chemistry and plants in Fennoscandian boreal forest as exemplified by a local gradient. Ecology 79, 119–137.
Soil chemistry and plants in Fennoscandian boreal forest as exemplified by a local gradient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135, 147–186.
Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Guisan A, Weiss SB, Weiss AD (1999) GLM versus CCA spatial modelling of plant species distribution. Plant Ecology 143, 107–122.
GLM versus CCA spatial modelling of plant species distribution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Högberg P, Johannisson C, Nicklasson H, Högbom L (1990) Shoot nitrate reductase activities of field-layer species in different forest types. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 5, 449–456.
Shoot nitrate reductase activities of field-layer species in different forest types.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Horne VB (1983) Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. The Journal of Wildlife Management 47, 893–901.
Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jarvis AM, Robertson A (1999) Predicting population sizes und priority conservation areas for 10 endemic Namibian bird species. Biological Conservation 88, 121–131.
Predicting population sizes und priority conservation areas for 10 endemic Namibian bird species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kemp LD, Bonham-Carter GF, Raines GL (1999) Arc-WofE: Arcview Extension for Weights of Evidence Mapping. Available at http://www.ige.unicamp.br/wofe [Verified 9 March 2011]

Loyn R, McNabb EG, Volodina L, Willig R (2001) Modelling landscape distributions of large forest owls as applied to managing forests in north-east Victoria, Australia Biological Conservation 97, 361–376.
Modelling landscape distributions of large forest owls as applied to managing forests in north-east Victoria, AustraliaCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MacDonald GM (2002) ‘Biogeography: space, time, and life.’ (John Wiley & Sons: New York)

Master I (1980) ‘A Report on the Sunny Creek Catchment: a proposal for proclamation.’ (Land Conservation Council: Melbourne)

Moore DM, Lees BG, Davey SM (1991) A new method for predicting vegetation distributions using decision tree analysis in a geographic information system. Environmental Management 15, 59–71.
A new method for predicting vegetation distributions using decision tree analysis in a geographic information system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Okurowski M (2007 ) ‘Predicting Potential Sites of the Toothed Leionema Using a GIS-Based Weights-of-Evidence Model’. (Unpublished Honours thesis, Monash University)

Romero-Calcerrada R, Luque S (2006) Habitat quality assessment using Weights-of-Evidence based GIS modelling: the case of Picoides tridactylus as species indicator of the biodiversity value of the Finnish forest. Ecological Modelling 196, 62–76.
Habitat quality assessment using Weights-of-Evidence based GIS modelling: the case of Picoides tridactylus as species indicator of the biodiversity value of the Finnish forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Scott JM, Heglund P, Morrison ML, Haufler JB, Raphael MG, Wall WA, Samson FB (Eds) (2002) ‘Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale.’ (Island Press: Covelo, CA)

Sørensen R, Zinko U, Seibert J (2005) On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 2, 1807–1834.
On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Spiegelhalter DJ (1986) A statistical view of uncertainty in expert systems. In ‘Artificial intelligence and statistics’. (Ed. W Gale) pp. 17–55. (Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA)

Tucker K, Rushton SP, Sanderson RA, Martin EB, Blaiklock J (1997) Modelling bird distributions – a combined GIS and Bayesian rule-based approach. Landscape Ecology 12, 77–93.
Modelling bird distributions – a combined GIS and Bayesian rule-based approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zinko U (2004) Plants go with the flow – predicting spatial distribution of plant species in the Boreal Forest. PhD Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea, Sweden.

Zinko U, Seibert J, Dynesius M, Nilsson C (2005) Plant species numbers predicted by a topography based groundwater-flow index. Ecosystems (New York, N.Y.) 8, 430–441.
Plant species numbers predicted by a topography based groundwater-flow index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXpt1Whu7o%3D&md5=fb2214a3b4879e5080a673fd2ffb335fCAS |