Morphological adjustments of soybean in response to plant equidistance and its relationship with grain yield of cultivars
Carlos A. Bahry
A * , Anelise T. Perboni A , Paulo H. Chitolina A , Ilana N. T. dos Santos B , Françoá S. Dal Prá C , Ângela A. Carleso D and Leandro A. Petkowicz E
A Federal
B
C
D
E
Abstract
Yield changes in soybean are influenced by edaphoclimatic and management factors, as well as by the genetics of the cultivar. The adequacy of the plant arrangement to the type of cultivar used is a fundamental point for the production performance of the crop.
We conducted experiments with the objective of evaluating how the equidistance between plants, represented by different combinations of row spacing and plant stand, regulates morphological traits and the agronomic performance of soybean cultivars.
Soybean cultivars were sown under different arrangements, represented by three plant populations and five row spacings. These arrangements were grouped into five equidistance indices, for which the higher the value was, the more balanced was the equidistance between the plants. Morphological parameters, yield components and grain yield were evaluated.
The distance between plants determined the competition for resources, through the regulation of the morphological and productive components of soybeans. The morphological adaptations of soybean plants that are distributed in a less equidistant way in the area, especially the increase in the size of petioles, showed a negative correlation with yield components and grain yield.
Regardless of the relative maturity group of the cultivars and the plant stand, the use of arrangements that allow better equidistance between plants is beneficial for soybean grain yield.
Crop establishment is a determining phase for soybean cultivation and it should be considered that arrangements that compromise the equidistance between plants can negatively affect the grain yield of the cultivars.
Keywords: agronomic performance, equidistance index, Glycine max, grain yield, intraspecific competition, morphology, plasticity, relative maturity group.
References
Balbinot Junior AA, Procopio S de O, Costa JM, Kosinski CL, Panison F, Debiasi H, Franchini JC (2015) Espaçamento reduzido e plantio cruzado associados a diferentes densidades de plantas em soja. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 36(5), 2977-2986.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Carmo EL do, Braz GBP, Simon GA, Silva AG da, Rocha AGC (2018) Desempenho agronômico da soja cultivada em diferentes épocas e distribuição de plantas. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias 17(1), 61-69.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cox WJ, Cherney JH (2011) Growth and yield responses of soybean to row spacing and seeding rate. Agronomy Journal 103, 123-128.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cruz SCS, de Sena Junior DG, Santos DMA dos, Lunezzo LO, Machado CG (2016) Cultivo de soja sob diferentes densidades de semeadura e arranjos espaciais. Revista de Agricultura Neotropical 3, 1-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cunha V dos S, Fipke GM, Conceição GM, Muller TM, Pires JLF, Fulaneti FS, Martin TN (2024) Intraspecific competition in row spacings in soybean. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 36, 1-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Heiffig LS, Câmara GMS, Marques LA, Pedroso DB, Piedade SMS (2006) Fechamento e índice de área foliar da cultura da soja em diferentes arranjos espaciais. Bragantia 65(2), 285-295.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hunter JD (2007) Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering 9(3), 90-95.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kandel HJ, Samarappuli DP, Johnson KL, Berti MT (2021) Soybean relative maturity, not row spacing, affected interseeded cover crops biomass. Agriculture 11(5), 441.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Klimek-Kopyra A, Bacior M, Lorenc-Kozik A, Neugschwandtner RW, Zając T (2021) Intraspecific competition as a driver for true production potential of soybean. Italian Journal of Agronomy 16(1), 1709.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kozuka T, Horiguchi G, Kim GT, Ohgishi M, Sakai T, Tsukaya H (2005) The different growth responses of the Arabidopsis thaliana leaf blade and the petiole during shade avoidance are regulated by photoreceptors and sugar. Plant and Cell Physiology 46(1), 213-223.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Li W, Wang L, Xue H, Zhang M, Song H, Qin M, Dong Q (2024) Molecular and genetic basis of plant architecture in soybean. Frontiers in Plant Science 15, 1477616.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ludwig MP, Dutra LMC, Lucca Filho OA, Zabot L, Jauer A, Uhry D (2011) Populações de plantas na cultura da soja em cultivares convencionais e Roundup Ready TM. Revista Ceres 58(3), 305-313.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mataa M, Sichilima I (2019) Phenotypic plasticity in soybean (Glycine max (Merrill)) genotypes with contrasting growth characteristics subjected to planting density stress at different developmental stages. African Journal of Agricultural Research 14(12), 643-651.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mauad M, Silva TLB, Neto AIA, Abreu VG (2010) Influência da densidade de semeadura sobre características agronômicas na cultura da soja. Revista Agrarian 3(9), 175-181 Available at https://ojs.ufgd.edu.br/agrarian/article/view/75.
| Google Scholar |
Modolo AJ, Schidlowski LL, Storck L, Benin G, Vargas TO, Trogello E (2016) Rendimento de soja em função do arranjo de plantas. Brazilian Journal of Agriculture – Revista de Agricultura 91(3), 216-229.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Qin X, Feng F, Li D, Herbert SJ, Liao Y, Siddique KHM (2017) Changes in yield and agronomic traits of soybean cultivars released in China in the last 60 years. Crop & Pasture Science 68, 973-984.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Roese AD, Melo LCP, Goulart ACP (2012) Espaçamento entre linhas e severidade da ferrugem-asiática da soja. Summa Phytopathologica 38(4), 300-305.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Santachiara G, Borrás L, Rotundo JL (2017) Physiological processes leading to similar yield in contrasting soybean maturity groups. Agronomy Journal 109(1), 158-167.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schutte M, Nleya T (2018) Row spacing and seeding rate effects on soybean seed yield. In ‘Soybean – biomass, yield and productivity’. (Ed. M Kasai) pp. 1–13. (IntechOpen) 10.5772/intechopen.80748
Silva RR, Macedo WR (2022) Increasing soybean productivity by plant equidistant arrangements and modification of technology levels of cropping systems. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias 21(3), 182-195.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Todeschini MH, Milioli AS, Rosa AC, Dallacorte LV, Panho MC, Marchese JA, Benin G (2019) Soybean genetic progress in South Brazil: physiological, phenological and agronomic traits. Euphytica 215, 124.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tourino MCC, Rezende PM de, Salvador N (2002) Espaçamento, densidade e uniformidade de semeadura na produtividade e características agronômicas da soja. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 37(8), 1071-1077.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Toyota M, Maitree L, Chomsang K (2017) Changes in radiation interception and R:FR over time and with canopy depth of two soybean cultivars with different branching characteristics. Plant Production Science 20(2), 205-214.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
van Versendaal E, Pereyra VM, Irby T, Kovacs P, Hefley T, Vara Prasad PV, Kyveryga P, Van De Woestyne BW, Ciampitti IA (2025) Soybean yield and seed quality in equidistant versus non-equidistant plant arrangements under different densities. Crop Science 65, e21364.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wu Y, Gong W, Yang W (2017) Shade inhibits leaf size by controlling cell proliferation and enlargement in soybean. Scientific Reports 7(1), 9259.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
