Microbial allies in bee nests
Kenya E. Fernandes A B *A
B
![]() Dr Kenya Fernandes is a microbiologist exploring how microbes shape pollinator health, ecosystems and human wellbeing. Her research focuses on bee–microbe interactions, the antimicrobial properties of honey, and drug discovery for fungal infections. She is an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA) fellow at The University of Sydney and a Science & Technology Australia Superstar of STEM. |
Abstract
Bee nests harbour diverse microbial communities that play essential roles in bee health, nutrition and protection against disease. These microbial ecosystems can vary significantly across bee species, shaped by a combination of environmental factors, host behaviours and evolutionary histories. Bacteria and fungi contribute to the production, preservation and antimicrobial properties of bee foods like bee bread and honey. Within the bee body itself, microbial communities colonise the gut and exoskeleton, providing critical functions in digestion, immunity and pathogen defence. Environmental stressors such as agricultural chemicals, habitat fragmentation, climate change and disease increasingly disrupt these microbial communities, compromising colony health and survival. Understanding these complex bee–microbe interactions offers promising new perspectives for addressing global pollinator declines through microbe-aware management practices and conservation strategies. Effective pollinator conservation must protect both macroscopic and microscopic aspects of bee ecology, with significant implications for biodiversity, agriculture and ecosystem resilience.
Keywords: bee health, bee microbiome, colony health, environmental stressors, fermentation, honey bees, nest microbiome, pollinators, wild bees.
Introduction
Bee nests represent complex microbial ecosystems, shaped by the remarkable diversity of bee species and their nesting behaviours. The architectural variety – from the elaborate wax combs of honey bees to the enclosed resinous cavities of stingless bees and the soil or plant-based burrows of solitary bees – creates distinct microhabitats that support specialised microbial communities (Fig. 1). These microenvironments vary in temperature, humidity, substrate composition and chemical profiles and host diverse assemblages of bacteria, yeasts and filamentous fungi.1,2 As bees forage, they introduce microbes from floral nectar, pollen, soil and other environmental sources into their nests, continuously shaping the microbial landscape.3 These microbial communities interact with nest materials, the bees themselves, and each other, forming a dynamic and responsive ecosystem, influenced by both environmental inputs and host-mediated factors.4
Diverse bee nest architecture. Clockwise from top left: managed Apis mellifera hive (photograph by Ivan Radic, CC BY 2.0), wild Apis cerana nest in China (photograph by CBCGDF, CC BY 4.0), wild Dasypoda hirtipes ground nest in Germany (photograph by Dellex, CC BY 4.0), managed Tetragonula carbonaria hive in Australia (photograph by Kenya Fernandes), wild Nannotrigona testaceicornis nest in Brazil (photograph by Carlos Raposo, CC BY 4.0), wild Xylocopa sp. wood cavity nest in the United States (photograph by Thom Wolf, CC BY 4.0).

Research on bee–microbe interactions has expanded dramatically over the past two decades, driven by advances in molecular techniques and growing recognition of microbial contributions to bee health. However, this burgeoning field has disproportionately focused on honey bees (Apis mellifera), leaving significant knowledge gaps regarding microbial dynamics in the ~20,000 other bee species worldwide. As pollinators face unprecedented threats from habitat loss, pesticide exposure and climate change, understanding these microbial relationships across diverse bee taxa has become increasingly urgent for both conservation and agricultural sustainability.
Microbial roles in bee food products
Microorganisms are integral to the production, preservation and protection of bee food products like bee bread and honey. These food sources provide essential nutrients for bee growth and development, with microbes influencing their antimicrobial activity, chemical composition and stability within the hive. The relationship between bees and their microbial communities represents an evolutionary adaptation that enhances colony nutrition and helps defend against spoilage and pathogens.
Bee bread, a protein-rich resource crucial for nutrition in social bees, undergoes significant microbial transformation from raw pollen (Fig. 2). In honey bee colonies, workers mix pollen with glandular secretions containing enzymes, peptides and proteins, along with small amounts of nectar or honey.5 This mixture is packed into wax cells where microbial activity, particularly from lactic acid bacteria and yeasts, facilitates fermentation.6 This process lowers the pH, breaks down complex nutrients and produces antimicrobial compounds that inhibit pathogen growth and prevent spoilage. Similar microbial processes with community succession have been observed in other bee taxa such as Osmia and Megachile spp.,7 although the specific dynamics of fermentation are less well-characterised.
From pollen to bee bread. Pollen collected from flowers by forager bees undergoes microbial fermentation, transforming it into bee bread (photos by Elizabeth Frost). Adapted from Fernandes et al.22

Honey, primarily a carbohydrate-rich food source, also benefits from microbial stabilisation. Fresh nectar collected by forager bees is rich in sugars but highly perishable due to its high water content. Honey bees predominantly preserve nectar by physical means, reducing moisture content below ~20% through regurgitation and evaporation,8 although microorganisms play a role by contributing antimicrobial compounds such as peptides and organic acids that further help preserve the honey.9 By contrast, stingless bees (Meliponini spp.) maintain honey with a higher moisture content (~30–40%), and microbial fermentation plays a more prominent role in its preservation.10 Lactic and acetic acid bacteria, along with yeasts, lower the pH and produce antimicrobial metabolites, contributing to the distinctive pH and bioactive properties of stingless bee honey.
Microbial communities of bee bodies
The microbial ecosystem of bee nests extends beyond hive products to the bees themselves, which harbour diverse microbial communities that play essential roles in digestion, immunity and protection.11 Among these, the gut microbiome is the most extensively characterised, particularly in honey bees where a core set of bacterial species has co-evolved with their hosts over millions of years.12 This microbiome primarily comprises Gilliamella, Snodgrasella, Apilactobacillus Firm-4, Bombilactobacillus Firm-5 and Bifidobacterium. These species help break down complex plant polysaccharides and detoxify harmful secondary metabolites from floral resources,13 mediate immune defence pathways14 and provide vital protection against pathogens.11
Other social bees, such as bumblebees (Bombus spp.) and stingless bees, share some of these core bacterial lineages with honey bees but generally exhibit greater compositional variability.15,16 By contrast, although some solitary bees show reasonably stable associations with certain microbes, others host more transient, environmentally derived microbial communities with seemingly few host-specific symbionts.17 This difference is likely a reflection of their diverse foraging behaviours and independent nesting habits, which result in more variable microbial exposure compared to social species.
In addition to the gut, bees also harbour microbial communities on their exoskeleton, forming the cuticular microbiome. This external microbial layer serves as an additional line of defence, with many microbes producing antimicrobial compounds that help prevent pathogen colonisation.18 The finding that solitary bees host a more complex and diverse array of microbes than social bees, suggests that the cuticular microbiome is affected by visited plants, lifestyle and adaptation to temperature.19 Microbes have also been detected in honey bee drone reproductive tissue, although their possible functional roles in fecundity and health have yet to be characterised.20
Environmental stressors that perturb bee microbes
As we gain understanding of how microbes support nest stability and bee health, it is becoming increasingly clear that external stressors that disrupt these microbial communities can have significant consequences. Bees face a complex array of environmental challenges that can disrupt their microbial ecosystems, alter host–microbe interactions and heighten susceptibility to diseases. Multiple interacting anthropogenic and environmental factors, including habitat loss and fragmentation, agricultural intensification, pesticide exposure and climate change, influence the composition and functionality of both hive-associated and bee-hosted microbiomes. Recent research by myself and colleagues has shown that even minor stress can have cascading effects throughout the hive ecosystem, simultaneously affecting honey antimicrobial activity, altering microbial communities in pollen products, and disrupting gut microbiome composition in resident bees.21,22
Among these factors, pesticides pose one of the most significant and well-documented risks. Agricultural chemicals can directly alter the gut microbiome of honey bees, reducing microbial diversity and impairing essential functions related to digestion, detoxification and immune regulation.23 Similar disruptions have been observed in bumblebees exposed to glyphosate-based herbicides, suggesting broad impacts across bee taxa.24 Pathogens also play a role in disrupting bee microbiomes, with microsporidian infection caused by Nosema spp. interfering with gut microbial stability in honey bees.25 These pathogens can outcompete beneficial microbes and alter the metabolic environment of the gut. Additionally, antibiotic treatments used to control bacterial diseases in managed bee colonies can unintentionally eliminate beneficial gut bacteria, reducing overall microbial resilience and increasing vulnerability to opportunistic infections.26
Beyond chemical and biological threats, ecological changes significantly impact bee-associated microbes across species. Habitat loss and agricultural intensification restrict foraging options, leading to nutritional stress and likely limiting microbial acquisition from environmental sources.27 Wild bees foraging in monoculture landscapes encounter reduced diversity of floral-associated microbes, which may impair nutrition, immunity and fitness, particularly in specialised solitary bee species with specific pollen requirements.3 Climate change further compounds these challenges by altering flowering patterns28 and therefore microbial ecology.
Implications for beekeeping and conservation
Microbes play a crucial role in bee health, with direct implications for both beekeeping practices and pollinator conservation efforts. For beekeepers managing honey bees, understanding microbial contributions to hive health can inform practices that promote beneficial microbiomes – including minimising pesticide exposure, ensuring diverse forage access and maintaining optimal hive conditions. Recent research exploring targeted probiotic supplements to restore beneficial microbes and counteract environmental stressors in managed colonies have shown promising preliminary results with decreases in pathogen load29 and increases in brood population and harvestable honey.23 These microbiome-aware techniques may significantly improve colony survival rates and adaptive responses in the face of increasing environmental challenges.
Conservation strategies too must recognise the diverse microbial ecosystems that exist across bee taxa, from highly social honey bees and stingless bees to primitively social bumblebees and solitary bees. Habitat preservation that maintains plant diversity directly supports microbial diversity in bee food products and gut communities, strengthening overall pollinator resilience. Restoring native floral communities not only provides essential pollen and nectar but also facilitates the transmission of key microbial symbionts necessary for bee health. With wild bee populations declining worldwide30 a deeper understanding of bee–microbe interactions provides new insights for conservation, highlighting the need to protect both the macroscopic and microscopic components of their ecology.
Future directions in bee–microbe research
The frontier of bee–microbe research offers exciting opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration. Combining traditional ecological approaches with advanced metagenomic techniques and experimental manipulations will help identify keystone microbial species and critical functions that could be targeted for conservation or restoration. Although honey bees have dominated research attention, expanding our focus to encompass the vast diversity of wild bee species is critical. Developing standardised methods to assess microbiome health across diverse bee taxa will be essential for monitoring impacts of environmental change and evaluating the success of conservation interventions. By recognising bees as not just individual organisms but as hosts for complex microbial ecosystems, we gain powerful new tools for addressing the pollination crisis facing global agriculture and natural ecosystems alike.
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable as no new data were generated or analysed during this study.
Declaration of funding
This work was supported by the New South Wales Bushfire Industry Recovery Package Sector Development Grant (BIP-SDG-135). Dr Fernandes is the recipient of an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Award (DE250100611) funded by the Australian Government.
References
1 Rutkowski D et al. (2023) Bees just wanna have fungi: a review of bee associations with nonpathogenic fungi. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 99, fiad077.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
2 Kwong WK, Moran NA (2016) Gut microbial communities of social bees. Nat Rev Microbiol 14, 374-384.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
3 Nguyen PN, Rehan SM (2022) The effects of urban land use gradients on wild bee microbiomes. Front Microbiol 13, 992660.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Engel P et al. (2016) The bee microbiome: impact on bee health and model for evolution and ecology of host–microbe interactions. mBio 7, e02164-15.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Tautz J (2008) The buzz about bees: biology of a superorganism. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-540-78729-7
6 Anderson KE et al. (2014) Hive-stored pollen of honey bees: many lines of evidence are consistent with pollen preservation, not nutrient conversion. Mol Ecol 23, 5904-5917.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Voulgari-Kokota A et al. (2018) Bacterial community structure and succession in nests of two megachilid bee genera. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 95, fiy218.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Fernandes KE et al. (2022) The role of honey in the ecology of the hive: nutrition, detoxification, longevity, and protection against hive pathogens. Front Nutr 9, 954170.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
9 Brudzynski K (2021) Honey as an ecological reservoir of antibacterial compounds produced by antagonistic microbial interactions in plant nectars, honey and honey bee. Antibiotics 10, 551.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 Costa dos Santos A et al. (2021) Phenolic composition and biological activities of stingless bee honey: an overview based on its aglycone and glycoside compounds. Food Res Int 147, 110553.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 Raymann K, Moran NA (2018) The role of the gut microbiome in health and disease of adult honey bee workers. Curr Opin Insect Sci 26, 97-104.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
12 Steele MI, Moran NA (2021) Evolution of interbacterial antagonism in bee gut microbiota reflects host and symbiont diversification. mSystems 6, e00063-21.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
13 Zheng H et al. (2019) Division of labor in honey bee gut microbiota for plant polysaccharide digestion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116, 25909-25916.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Kwong WK et al. (2014) Genomics and host specialization of honey bee and bumble bee gut symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 11509-11514.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
15 Koch H, Schmid-Hempel P (2011) Socially transmitted gut microbiota protect bumble bees against an intestinal parasite. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 19288-19292.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 Leonhardt SD, Kaltenpoth M (2014) Microbial communities of three sympatric Australian stingless bee species. PLoS ONE 9, e105718.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
17 Voulgari-Kokota A et al. (2019) Drivers, diversity, and functions of the solitary-bee microbiota. Trends Microbiol 27, 1034-1044.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
18 Tejerina MR et al. (2023) Fungal microbiota isolated from native stingless bee species inhibited pathogens of Apis mellifera. Fungal Biol 127, 1267-1275.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
19 Thamm M et al. (2023) Solitary bees host more bacteria and fungi on their cuticle than social bees. Microorganisms 11, 2780.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
20 Burks A et al. (2025) Discovery of reproductive tissue-associated bacteria and the modes of microbiota acquisition in male honey bees (drones). mSphere 10, ee00705-24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
21 Fernandes KE et al. (2023) Low levels of hive stress are associated with decreased honey activity and changes to the gut microbiome of resident honey bees. Microbiol Spectr 11, e00742-23.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
22 Fernandes KE et al. (2024) Pollen products collected from honey bee hives experiencing minor stress have altered fungal communities and reduced antimicrobial properties. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 100, fiae091.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
23 Alberoni D et al. (2021) Neonicotinoids in the agroecosystem: in-field long-term assessment on honeybee colony strength and microbiome. Sci Total Environ 762, 144116.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
24 Motta EVS et al. (2020) Oral or topical exposure to glyphosate in herbicide formulation impacts the gut microbiota and survival rates of honey bees. Appl Environ Microbiol 86, e01150-20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
25 Lau E et al. (2024) Exploring the interactions between Nosema ceranae infection and the honey bee gut microbiome. Sci Rep 14, 20037.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
26 Li JH et al. (2019) New evidence showing that the destruction of gut bacteria by antibiotic treatment could increase the honey bee’s vulnerability to Nosema infection. PLoS ONE 12, e0187505.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
27 Steffan SA et al. (2024) Microbes, the ‘silent third partners’ of bee–angiosperm mutualisms. Trends Ecol Evol 39, 65-77.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
28 Settele J et al. (2016) Climate change impacts on pollination. Nat Plants 2, 16092.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
29 Daisley BA et al. (2020) Novel probiotic approach to counter Paenibacillus larvae infection in honey bees. ISME J 14, 476-491.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
30 Lima MAP et al. (2022) The decline of wild bees: causes and consequences. Front Ecol Evol 10, 1027169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
![]() Dr Kenya Fernandes is a microbiologist exploring how microbes shape pollinator health, ecosystems and human wellbeing. Her research focuses on bee–microbe interactions, the antimicrobial properties of honey, and drug discovery for fungal infections. She is an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA) fellow at The University of Sydney and a Science & Technology Australia Superstar of STEM. |