Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Reply to Bridgewater (2021), ‘Response to Davies et al., ‘Towards a Universal Declaration of the Rights of Wetlands’’

G. T. Davies A B , C. M. Finlayson https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9991-7289 C D E J , E. Okuno F , N. C. Davidson E G , R. C. Gardner E F , W. R. Moomaw H and D. E. Pritchard E I
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A BSC Group, Inc., Worcester, MA 01608, USA.

B Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.

C School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, UNSW, NSW 2052, Australia.

D IHE Delft, Institute for Water Education, NL-2601 DA, Delft, Netherlands.

E Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.

F Institute for Biodiversity Law and Policy, College of Law, Stetson University, Gulfport, FL 33707, USA.

G Nick Davidson Environmental, Queens House, Wigmore, HR6 9UN, UK.

H Center for International Environment and Resource Policy, The Fletcher School, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.

I Environment, Culture, Heritage, Arts, Hexham NE46 3JL, UK.

J Corresponding author. Email: colin_maxwell.finlayson@unsw.edu.au

Marine and Freshwater Research - https://doi.org/10.1071/MF21132
Submitted: 7 May 2021  Accepted: 29 July 2021   Published online: 21 September 2021

Abstract

We reply to the main concerns raised by Bridgewater (2021) in his response to Davies et al. (2021a), ‘Towards a Universal Declaration of the Rights of Wetlands’. We appreciate the contribution of Bridgewater (2021) to this emerging conversation and, although we disagree with some of his assessments and statements, we do not find his points to be incompatible with support for the Declaration of the Rights of Wetlands (ROW). This reply focuses on four areas of concern raised by Bridgewater (2021). First, we describe why a wetlands-specific declaration will add important value to other Rights of Nature declarations. Second, we discuss how the ROW does not detract from, but rather can contribute to and complement, existing conservation and management approaches and mechanisms. Third, we agree on the importance of weaving Indigenous and local knowledge with other knowledges and emphasise that the ROW should not be confused with or misused to undermine the rights of Indigenous peoples and local communities. Finally, we explain how legal rights can and have been granted to non-humans, including elements of Nature, such as wetlands.

Keywords: Earth justice, Ramsar Convention, rights of Nature, traditional knowledge, wetlands.


References

Albrecht, G. (2020). The extinction of rights and the extantion of ghehds. Griffith Law Review 29, 513–533.
The extinction of rights and the extantion of ghehds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Anderson, M. G., Barnett, A., Clark, M., Ferree, C., Olivero Sheldon, A., and Prince, J. (2016) ‘Resilient site for terrestrial conservation in Eastern North America’, 2016 edn. (The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Conservation Science: Boston, MA, USA.)

Bradshaw, C. J. A., Ehrlich, P. R., Beattie, A., Ceballos, G., Crist, E., Diamond, J., Dirzo, R., Ehrlich, A. H., Harte, J., Harte, M. E., Pyke, G., Raven, P. H., Ripple, W. J., Saltré, F., Turnbull, C., Wackernagel, M., and Blumstein, D. T. (2021). Understanding the challenges of avoiding a ghastly future. Frontiers in Conservation Science 1, 615419.
Understanding the challenges of avoiding a ghastly future.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bridgewater, P. (2021). A response to Davies et al. (2020): ‘Towards a Universal declaration of the Rights of Wetlands’. Marine and Freshwater Research 72, 1397–1400.
A response to Davies et al. (2020): ‘Towards a Universal declaration of the Rights of Wetlands’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bridgewater, P., and Kim, R. E. (2021). The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands at 50. Nature Ecology & Evolution 5, 268–270.
The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands at 50.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bryner, N. (2018). Colombian Supreme Court recognizes rights of Amazon River ecosystem. Available at https://www.iucn.org/news/world-commission-environmental-law/201804/colombian-supreme-court-recognizes-rights-amazon-river-ecosystem#:~:text=Colombian%20Supreme%20Court%20Recognizes%20Rights%20of%20the%20Amazon%20River%20Ecosystem,-Fri%2C%2020%20Apr&text=The%20Supreme%20Court%20of%20Colombia,rights%20and%20beneficiary%20of%20protection [Verified 24 April 2021].

Davies, G. T., Finlayson, C. M., Pritchard, D. E., Davidson, N., Gardner, R. C., Moomaw, W. R., Okuno, E., and Whitacre, J. C. (2021a). Towards a Universal Declaration of the Rights of Wetlands. Marine and Freshwater Research 72, 593–600.
Towards a Universal Declaration of the Rights of Wetlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davies, G. T., Finlayson, C. M., Moomaw, W. R., and Davidson, N. (2021b). Shifting the paradigm: a society of wetland scientists rights of wetlands initiative. Wetland Science & Practice 38, 89–93.

Fargione, J. E., Bassett, S., Boucher, T., Bridgham, S. D., Conant, R. T., Cook-Patton, S. C., Ellis, P. W., Falcucci, A., Fourqurean, J. W., Gopalakrishna, T., Gu, H., Henderson, B., Hurteau, M. D., Kroeger, K. D., Kroeger, T., Lark, T. J., Leaveitt, S. M., Lomax, G., McDonald, R. I., Megonigal, P., Miteva, D. A., Richardson, C. J., Sanderman, J., Schoch, D., Spawn, S. A., Veldman, J. W., Williams, C. A., Woodbury, P. B., Zganjar, C., Baranski, M., Elias, P., Houghton, R. A., Landis, E., McGlynn, E., Schlesinger, W. H., Siikamaki, J. V., Sutton-Grier, A. E., and Griscom, B. W. (2018). Natural climate solutions for the United States. Science Advances 4, eaat1869.
Natural climate solutions for the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30443593PubMed |

Fennessy, M. S., Davidson, N., Whitacre, J., Pritchard, D., Simpson, M., Moomaw, W. R., Davies, G., and Finlayson, C. M. (2021). Further perspectives on shifting the paradigm to restore the human–wetland relationship through a Universal Declaration of the Rights of Wetlands. Wetland Science & Practice 38, 10–18.

Finlayson, C. M., and Gardner, R. (2021). Ten key issues from the global wetland outlook for decision makers. Marine and Freshwater Research 72, 301–310.
Ten key issues from the global wetland outlook for decision makers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Finlayson, C. M., Davies, G. T., Moomaw, W. R., Chmura, G. L., Natali, S. M., Perry, J. E., Roulet, N., and Sutton-Grier, A. E. (2019). The second warning to humanity – providing a context for wetland management and policy. Wetlands 39, 1–5.
The second warning to humanity – providing a context for wetland management and policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Finlayson, C. M., Davies, G. T., Pritchard, D. E., Davidson, N. C., Fennessy, M. S., Simpson, M., and Moomaw, W. R. (2021). Reframing the human–wetlands relationship through the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Wetlands Marine and Freshwater Research , .
Reframing the human–wetlands relationship through the Universal Declaration of the Rights of WetlandsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kang, K. (2019). On the problem of the justification of river rights. Water International 44, 667–683.
On the problem of the justification of river rights.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kauffman, C. M., and Martin, P. L. (2018). When rivers have rights: case comparisons of New Zealand, Colombia, and India. Available at http://files.harmonywithnatureun.org/uploads/upload585.pdf [Verified 25 April 2021].

Kuhn, T. S. (1972). ‘The Structure of Scientific Revolutions’, 2nd edn. (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.)

La Follette, C., and Maser, C. (Eds) (2020). ‘Sustainability and the Rights of Nature in Practice.’ (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.)

Matthews, G. V. T. (1993). The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: its history and development. (Ramsar Convention Bureau: Gland, Switzerland). Available at https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/lib/Matthews-history.pdf [Verified 24 April 2021].

McInnes, R. M., Davidson, N. C., Rostron, C., Simpson, M., and Finlayson, C. M. (2020). A citizen-science state of the world’s wetlands survey. Wetlands 40, 1577–1593.
A citizen-science state of the world’s wetlands survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moomaw, W. R., Chmura, G. L., Davies, G. T., Finlayson, C. M., Middleton, B. A., Natali, S. M., Perry, J. E., Roulet, N., and Sutton-Grier, A. E. (2018). Wetlands in a changing climate: science, policy and management. Wetlands 38, 183–205.
Wetlands in a changing climate: science, policy and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Donnell, E., Poelina, A., Pelizzon, A., and Clark, C. (2020). Stop burying the lede: the essential role of indigenous law(s) in creating rights of nature. Transnational Environmental Law 9, 403–427.
Stop burying the lede: the essential role of indigenous law(s) in creating rights of nature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Diaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., Watson, R. T., Basak Dessane, E., Islar, M., Kelemen, E., Maris, V., Quaas, M., Subramanian, S. M., Wittmer, H., Adlan, A., Ahn, S. E., Al-Hafedh, Y. S., Amankwah, E., Asah, S. T., Berry, P., Bilgin, A., Breslow, S. J., Bullock, C., Cáceres, D., Daley-Hassen, H., Figueroa, E., Golden, C. D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., González-Jiménez, D., Houdet, J., Keune, H., Kumar, R., Ma, K., May, P. H., Mead, A., O’Farrell, P., Pandit, R., Pengue, W., Pichis-Madruga, R., Popa, F., Preston, S., Pacheco-Balanza, D., Saarikoski, H., Strassburg, B. B., van den Belt, M., Verma, M., Wickson, F., and Yagi, N. (2017). Valuing nature’s contributions to people; the IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26–27, 7–16.
Valuing nature’s contributions to people; the IPBES approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (2015). Resolution XII.2. The 4th Strategic Plan 2016–2024. Available at https://www.ramsar.org/document/the-fourth-ramsar-strategic-plan-2016-2024 [Verified 29 April 2021].

Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (2018). ‘Global Wetland Outlook: State of the World’s Wetlands and Their Services to People.’ (Ramsar Convention Secretariat; Gland, Switzerland).

Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Galetti, M., Alamgir, M., Crist, E., Mahmoud, M. I., and Laurance, W. F. (2017). World scientists’ warning to humanity: a second notice. Bioscience 67, 1026–1028.
World scientists’ warning to humanity: a second notice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Barnard, P., and Moomaw, W. R. (2020). World scientists’ warning of a climate emergency. Bioscience 70, 8–12.
World scientists’ warning of a climate emergency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Simpson, M., Davidson, N., Davies, G., Finlayson, M., Moomaw, W. R., Pritchard, D. E., Fennessy, M. S., and Whitacre, J. (2020). Upcoming symposium: a Universal Declaration on the Rights of Wetlands – shifting the paradigm to restore the human-wetland relationship in support of wetland restoration, conservation and wise use. Bulletin – Society of Wetland Scientists 37, 82–84.

Stone, C. D. (2010). ‘Should Trees Have Standing? Law, Morality, and the Environment.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK).

Studley, J., and Bleisch, W. V. (2018). Juristic personhood for sacred natural sites: a potential means for protecting nature. Parks 24, 81–96.
Juristic personhood for sacred natural sites: a potential means for protecting nature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Supreme Court of the United States (1972). Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727.

Supreme Court of the United States (2010). Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310.

Trisos, C. H., Merow, C., and Pigot, A. L. (2020). The projected timing of abrupt ecological disruption from climate change. Nature 580, 496–501.
The projected timing of abrupt ecological disruption from climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32322063PubMed |