Register      Login
Public Health Research and Practice Public Health Research and Practice Society
The peer-reviewed journal of the Sax Institute
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Challenges and solutions to sharing a cancer follow-up e-care plan between a cancer service and general practice

Jane Taggart A * , Melvin Chin B C , Winston Liauw D E F , David Goldstein B C F , Alex Dolezal G , John Plahn H and Mark Harris A F I
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, UNSW Sydney, Australia

B Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia

C Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Australia

D Cancer Services, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia

E St George Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia

F Translational Cancer Research Network, UNSW Sydney, Australia

G Central and Eastern Sydney Primary Health Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia

H eHealth NSW, New South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, Australia

I School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Australia

* Correspondence to: j.taggart@unsw.edu.au

Public Health Research and Practice 31, e31122108 https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp31122108
Published: 9 June 2021

Abstract

Objective:This paper describes the process of developing a shared cancer care approach in follow-up, and identifies the e-health options that support an interactive e-care plan shared between a public cancer service, general practitioners (GPs) and cancer survivors. Type of program/service: The cancer service improvement initiative for shared care in follow-up targets colorectal cancer patients who have completed active treatment and who agree to shared care between specialists, GPs and other care team members. The intiative is supported by an agreed shared care pathway and an interactive e-care plan that is dynamic, can be shared and has functionalities that support collaboration. Design and development: A consultative process with stakeholders (local and state health services, a Primary Health Network, GPs and a consumer) was undertaken. Responses from individual consultations (25 stakeholders) were collated and commonalities identified to inform a workshop with 13 stakeholders to obtain consensus on the care pathway and e-health solution. Implications for policy and practice were identified throughout the process. Outcomes: The stakeholders agreed to a shared care pathway, which included assessment and consent, GP engagement, tailoring the care plan and communicating results and information as tasks are completed. The nurse coordinator monitored care. No interactive e-care plans were available at national, state or local health service levels. A web-based GP interactive e-care plan was selected. The main concerns raised were uncertainty about the security of e-health systems not controlled by the local health service and sharing clinical information with external health providers, engaging GPs, and patient anxiety about the capacity of general practice to provide care. The e-care plan provided a low-risk solution to sharing patient information and supported collaborative care. Challenges to share e-care plans have implications for policy and practice. Lessons learnt: Stakeholders and the project team agreed that finding an e-health system that supported shared cancer care in follow-up and addressed the security and information sharing concerns could not all be–adequately addressed at the local level. A GP interactive e-care plan provides a promising solution to a number of the barriers.

2021 © Taggart et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence, which allows others to redistribute, adapt and share this work non-commercially provided they attribute the work and any adapted version of it is distributed under the same Creative Commons licence terms.