Priorities for building Australian workforce capacity to leverage population-based, routinely collected data: views from pharmacoepidemiology
Derrick Lopez A * , Cecily Strange A , Frank Sanfilippo A , Benjamin Daniels B , Sallie Pearson B and David Preen AA
B
Abstract
Aim:To explore perspectives of leaders in pharmacoepidemiology on building workforce capacity in the routinely collected data arena to enable researchers to generate evidence to support clinical and policy decision-making. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted between May and August 2018 with 13 leaders in pharmacoepidemiology in Australia. Discussion topics included training needs, workforce enablers, barriers and priorities for building capacity. The data was analysed using a content analysis approach. Results: Leaders identified a range of knowledge and skills that are needed to work with routinely collected data and generate evidence to support clinical and policy decision making. Enablers identified included collaborations and promoting awareness to attract new people to work with this data type. Barriers included difficulty accessing data, lack of critical mass of human capital to build skill levels and funding issues. Conclusions: Building workforce capacity involves addressing identified enablers and barriers. Central to building workforce capacity is the harmonisation of Australia’s data infrastructure, which can improve the way people work, learn, collaborate, share ideas and expand their professional network.References
7 Glauert R. Multi-agency data linkage- How to and lessons learnt through the Western Australian Developmental Pathways Program. Int J Popul Data Sci. 2017;1(1):199. Crossref
11 Pickstone C, Nancarrow S, Cooke J, Vernon W, Mountain G, Boyce RA, et al. Building research capacity in the allied health professions. Evid Policy. 2008;4(1):53–68. Crossref
12 Biostatistic Collaboration of Australia. Sydney: BCA;2022 [cited 2022 Apr 6]. Available from: www.bca.edu.au
13 Data Linkage Expert Advisory Group. Developing a whole-of-government data linkage model. A review of Western Australia’s data linkage capabilities. Western Australia: Data Linkage Expert Advisory Group; 2016 [cited 2021 Jan 10]. Available from: www.jtsi.wa.gov.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/a-review-of-western-australia%27s-data-linkage-capabilities---developing-a-whole-of-government-model---December-2016.pdf?sfvrsn=0
14 National Health and Medical Research Council. Canberra: National Certification Scheme for the ethics review of multi-centre research. Canberra: NHRMC; 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 22]. Available from: www.nhmrc.gov.au/research-policy/ethics/national-certification-scheme-ethics-review-multi-centre-research
19 Office of the National Data Commissioner. About. Canberra: Australian Government; 2022 [cited 2022 Apr 22]. Available from: www.datacommissioner.gov.au/about
20 Parliament of Australia. Data and Availability and Transparency Bill 2022. Canberra: Parliament of Australia; 2022 [cited 2022; Apr 6]. Available from: www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_LEGislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r6649
21 Population Health Research Network. WA: PHRN; 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 6]. Available from: www.phrn.org.au/
22 UNSW Medicine. Australian and New Zealand Real-World Data Network. Sydney; RADiANT; 2018 [cited 2022 Apr 6]. Available from: radiant.med.unsw.edu.au/.
25 Bottle A, Cohen C, Lucas A, Saravanakumar K, Ul-Haq Z, Smith W, et al. How an electronic health record became a real-world research resource: comparison between London’s Whole Systems Integrated Care database and the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. BMC Med Inform Decis. 2020;20(1):71. Crossref | PubMed
26 UNSW Sydney. Centre for Big Data Research in Health. Sydney: Centre of Research Excellence in Medicines Intelligence; 2020. [cited 2022 Apr 22]. Available from: cbdrh.med.unsw.edu.au/project/centre-research-excellence-medicines-intelligence.