Register      Login
Public Health Research and Practice Public Health Research and Practice Society
The peer-reviewed journal of the Sax Institute
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Cost-effectiveness and productivity impacts of call-back telephone counselling for smoking cessation

Paul Crosland A B C * , Michelle Scollo D , Sarah White D and Nikki McCaffrey C E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Systems Modelling, Simulation & Data Science; Youth Mental Health and Technology

B Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

C Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

D Quit Victoria, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia

E Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia

* Correspondence to: paul.crosland@sydney.edu.au

Public Health Research and Practice 33, e33232306 https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp33232306
Published: 6 December 2023

2023 © Crosland et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence, which allows others to redistribute, adapt and share this work non-commercially provided they attribute the work and any adapted version of it is distributed under the same Creative Commons licence terms.

Abstract

Objectives: Few existing economic evaluations of telephone call-back services for smoking cessation (quitlines) include productivity measures. The Economics of Cancer Collaboration Tobacco Control (ECCTC) model was developed by adopting a societal perspective, including productivity impacts. Study type: Economic simulation modelling Methods: A multi-health state Markov cohort microsimulation model was constructed. The population was the Victorian smoking population in 2018. The effectiveness of the Victorian Quitline was informed by an evaluation and compared with no service. Risks of developing disease for smokers and former smokers were obtained from the literature. The model calculated economic measures, including average and total costs and health effects; incremental cost-effectiveness ratios; and net monetary benefit (NMB) for both the healthcare and societal perspective. An extensive uncertainty analysis was conducted. Results: The Quitline service is cost-effective and dominant from both healthcare and societal perspectives, reducing costs with greater health benefits compared with no service. The expected incremental NMB was $2912 per person from the healthcare perspective and $7398 from the societal perspective. Total cost savings were $869 035 of healthcare costs, $1.1 million for absenteeism, $21.8 million for lost workforce participation, and $8.4 million for premature mortality, with a total reduction in societal costs of $32.2 million, over the 80 year timeframe of the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested a high degree of certainty in these results, and overall conclusions were robust to one-way sensitivity and scenario analyses. Conclusions: The Victorian Quitline service is cost-effective and should be retained and expanded where possible. The ECCTC model can be adapted to analyse the cost-effectiveness of other tobacco cessation interventions, populations and contexts.