Tobacco control interventions for populations living in subsidised, low-income housing: a scoping review
Germaine Lai A * , Kylie Morphett A , Driss Ait Ouakrim B , Kate Mason B C , Samantha Howe B , Vaughan Rees D , Stephen Li A and Coral Gartner AA
B
C
D
Abstract
Objectives:People living in subsidised low-income housing are more likely to smoke and experience secondhand smoke exposure compared to the general population. While tobacco control interventions have yielded substantial population health benefits, people living in subsidised housing experience a greater burden of tobacco-related harms. We synthesised existing peer-reviewed and grey literature to determine tobacco control interventions that have been implemented in subsidised housing globally, and to understand their impact on smoking and secondhand smoke exposure. Methods: We searched five databases for peer-reviewed research, and Google Advanced for grey literature. We adhered to the JBI Scoping Review Methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Results: Fifty-seven sources met the eligibility criteria. The most common type of intervention was mandatory smoking bans covering all indoor spaces (n = 32), followed by cessation-focused interventions (n = 19). Interventions that indirectly addressed smoking were the least common (n = 6). Our findings suggest smoking bans can increase smoking cessation and reduce secondhand smoke exposure, especially if implemented alongside cessation support strategies. Conclusion: Tobacco control interventions targeting subsidised housing demonstrate positive effects on tobacco-related outcomes for residents and provide an important opportunity to address health disparities. Future research should examine the long-term impacts of the interventions, including potential unintended consequences, in varied subsidised housing contexts.References
1 GBD 2019 Tobacco Collaborators. Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and attributable disease burden in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2021;397(10292):2337–60. Crossref | PubMed
2 Office on Smoking and Health (US). The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014. PubMed
3 Global Burden of Disease. Seattle, WA: Institute of Health Metrics; 2019 [updated 11 July 2023] [cited 2024 Mar 12]. Available from: vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare
9 Office for National Statistics. Adult smoking habits in the UK: 2018. Newport, UK: ONS; 2018 [cited 2024 Mar 12]. Available from: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/healthandlifeexpectancies/bulletins/adultsmokinghabitsingreatbritain/2018
13 Homa DM, Neff LJ, King BA, Caraballo RS, Bunnell RE, Babb SD, et al. Vital signs: disparities in nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand smoke – United States, 1999–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(4):103. PubMed
18 World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. Switzerland, Geneva: WHO; 2004. PubMed
19 Office of Smoking and Health (US). The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006. PubMed
20 World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2005 [cited 2024 Mar 11]. Available from: fctc.who.int/who-fctc/overview
21 World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2023: protect people from tobacco smoke. Geneva: WHO; 2023 [cited 2024 Mar 11]. Available from: www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240077164
22 US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Instituting smoke-free public housing: a rule by the Housing and Urban Development Department. US: Department of Housing and Urban Development; 2017 [cited 2024 Mar 12]. Available from: www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/12/05/2016-28986/instituting-smoke-free-public-housing
23 Kirkey S. 'We have no rights': couple seeks ban on secondhand smoke seeping in from neighbour's shared wall. Canada: National Post; 2023 Nov 14 [cited 2024 Mar 12]. Available from: nationalpost.com/news/canada/couple-seeks-ban-on-secondhand-smoke-neighbours
27 Lai G. Tobacco control interventions for populations living in public or social housing: a scoping review protocol. Open Science Framework. 2023. Available from: osf.io/hy62g
28 Covidence. Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Information [cited 2024 Mar 12]. Available from: www.covidence.org
29 Microsoft Corporation. US: Microsoft Excel; 2018 [cied 2024 Mar 12]. Available from: www.microsoft.com/en-au/microsoft-365/excel
35 US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Request for Information on adopting smoke-free policies in PHAs and multifamily housing. US: Federal Register; 2012 [cited 2024 Mar 12]. Available from: www.federalregister.gov/documents/2012/10/04/2012-24430/request-for-information-on-adopting-smoke-free-policies-in-phas-and-multifamily-housing
