Register      Login
Public Health Research and Practice Public Health Research and Practice Society
The peer-reviewed journal of the Sax Institute

Just Accepted

This article has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication. It is in production and has not been edited, so may differ from the final published form.

Dementia risk literacy in older Australians: beyond knowledge

Claire Eccleston 0000-0002-7913-6888, Alex Kitsos, James Vickers, Kathleen Doherty

Abstract

Objectives Knowledge about dementia risk influences preventive behaviours , yet has been primarily explored as risk factor awareness. This study investigated the understanding of dementia prevention by systematically assessing general dementia risk knowledge and participants’ capacity both to recognise specific evidencebased dementia risk mitigation strategies and to identify common misconceptions about specific purported mitigation strategies. Methods The Knowledge of Dementia Risk Reduction survey instrument was used to assess dementia literacy in a cross-sectional study. The multi-component instrument assesses general knowledge about dementia risk, recognition of mitigation strategies for risk factors and the ability to appraise specific common misconceptions. Items were generated from a literature review and expert consultation. The instrument was administered to participants of an Australian online public health cohort study into dementia risk selfmanagement. Results Participants numbered 3334, had a median age of 62 years, and most (72.5%). identified as female; 44.5% had a university education; and 49.1% had a family history of dementia. Most participants (79.5%) agreed you can reduce your chances of developing dementia. The most recognised mitigation strategies included increased physical activity, social activity and cognitive stimulation, with one-a quarter of par􀁊cipants unsure about the management of cholesterol and adoption of a Mediterranean diet. Scores for general dementia risk knowledge and recognition of modifiable risk reduction were mid -range and moderately correlated with each other. Correct appraisal of common misconceptions; for example, that aluminium exposure is a risk factor, was poor; only 5.0% of participants scored a midrange score (6/12) or higher, and only 0.2% of participants correctly identified all misconception items. Conclusions The study highlights the additional insights offered by simultaneously assessing multiple components of dementia risk literacy. Participants in the study demonstrated some knowledge of dementia risk and risk factor mitigation strategies, but poor appraisal of common misconceptions. Such insights can inform risk reduction messaging and enable more effective public health campaigns for future risk mitigation.

PU24108  Accepted 18 June 2025

© CSIRO 2025

Committee on Publication Ethics