Partnership factors enabling co-planning of sustainable rural health models
Belinda O’Sullivan A B , Pam Harvey A , Catherine Lees A C D E , Mandy Hutchinson E , Trevor Adem F , Dallas Coghill G , Donna Doyle H Nerida Hyett
A C D *
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Abstract
Strong partnerships are the cornerstone for effectively co-planning primary healthcare models that meet community needs, however, there are few examples specifically for rural areas where smaller health services cover a dispersed population and wide geography with limited resources (thin markets). This study aimed to explore the partnership factors enabling the co-planning of sustainable rural health models in thin markets.
A qualitative study drawing upon in-depth focus groups with eight partnership members covering a combined estimated resident population of 24,620 people across three local government areas with small rural towns (<5000 population) was undertaken. Verbatim transcripts were thematically analysed.
The overarching theme was that the partnership was valued and should continue. Four sub-themes included: the importance of the skilled and independent project lead to coordinate co-planning, the leadership and commitment of rural health service executives, strength and fragility of the project in the face of limited resources and staffing changes, and the importance of trust and relationships.
The research suggested that partnerships for co-planning of sustainable rural health models in rural thin markets are important. Independent and skilled leadership can assist small rural health services to engage with co-planning. This context also relies on committed rural health service executives who pay attention to building relationships and trust. Partnerships within this context are likely to be dynamic and require executives to spend time together to understand the range of problems and potential solutions as conditions change. With attention to these partnership factors, work on sustainable rural health models can be maintained.
Keywords: access, co-design, equity, model of care, participatory health research, partnerships, planning, primary healthcare, rural health.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2021) Census. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/census
Bautista-Gómez MM, van Niekerk L (2022) A social innovation model for equitable access to quality health services for rural populations: a case from Sumapaz, a rural district of Bogota, Colombia. International Journal for Equity in Health 21(1), 23.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Cairns A, Rodda D, Wymarra F, Bird K (2024) Healthy ageing in remote Cape York: a co-designed Integrated Allied Health Service Model. Australian Journal of Primary Health 30(1), PY23135.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Conlin M, McLaren D, Spelten E, MacDermott S (2024) Cultivating participatory approaches in health promotion planning, delivery, and evaluation: a case study of an academic-health service partnership in rural Victoria. Health Promotion Journal of Australia 35(3), 804-812.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
De Savigny D, Adam T, Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research & World Health Organization (2009) ‘Systems thinking for health systems strengthening.’ (Eds D De Savigny, T Adam) (Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research & World Health Organization) Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44204
Department of Health (2021) 2020–25 National Health Reform Agreement (NHRA). Available at https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/2020-25-national-health-reform-agreement-nhra
Department of Health (2022) Future focused primary health care: Australia’s Primary Health Care 10 Year Plan 2022–2032, pp. 1–71. Australian Government, Canberra. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/australias-primary-health-care-10-year-plan-2022-2032 [verified 27 July 2022]
Department of Health (2023) Modified Monash Model. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/health-topics/rural-health-workforce/classifications/mmm
Gillespie J, Cosgrave C, Malatzky C (2022) Making the case for place based governance in rural health workforce recruitment and retention: lessons from Canada and Australia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 6(1), 100356.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hoon Chuah FL, Srivastava A, Rajkumar Singh S, Haldane V, Choon Huat Koh G, Kee Seng C, McCoy D, Legido-Quigley H (2018) Community participation in general health initiatives in high and upper-middle income countries: a systematic review exploring the nature of participation, use of theories, contextual drivers and power relations in community participation. Social Science & Medicine 213, 106-122.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hyett N, Hutchinson M, Doyle D, Adem T, Coghill D, Harvey P, Lees C, O’Sullivan B (2024) Rural community-centred co-planning for sustainable rural health systems. Australian Journal of Rural Health 32(5), 1-15.
| Google Scholar |
Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, Salsberg J, Bush PL, Henderson J, Sirett E, Wong G, Cargo M, Herbert CP, Seifer SD, Green LW, Greenhalgh T (2012) Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. The Milbank Quarterly 90(2), 311-346.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Jones D, McAllister L, Dyson R, Lyle D (2018) Service-learning partnerships: features that promote transformational and sustainable rural and remote health partnerships and services. The Australian Journal of Rural Health 26(2), 80-85.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lazo-Porras M, Perez-Leon S, Cardenas MK, Pesantes MA, Miranda JJ, Suggs LS, Chappuis F, Perel P, Beran D (2020) Lessons learned about co-creation: developing a complex intervention in rural Peru. Global Health Action 13(1), 1754016.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Leask CF, Sandlund M, Skelton DA, Altenburg TM, Cardon G, Chinapaw MJM, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Verloigne M, Chastin SFM, on behalf of the GrandStand, Safe Step and Teenage Girls on the Move Research Groups (2019) Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions. Research Involvement and Engagement 5(1), 2.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Levesque J-F, Harris MF, Russell G (2013) Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. International Journal for Equity in Health 12(1), 18.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McDonald J, Murphy A, Payne W (2001) Ballarat health consortium: a case study of influential factors in the development and maintenance of a health partnership. Australian Journal of Primary Health 7(2), 75-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McMaster University (2018) Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool v2.0. McMaster University. Available at https://ppe.mcmaster.ca/resources/public-and-patient-engagement-evaluation-tool/
Ramsden R, Davies S, Colbran R, Haigh A, Connors M, Nott S, Lowe E, Edwards M, Clegg R, Bagnulo S, Pit S (2021) Collaborative care: primary health workforce and service delivery in Western New South Wales—A case study. Australian Journal of Rural Health 29(5), 768-778.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Salignac F, Wilcox T, Marjolin A, Adams S (2018) Understanding collective impact in Australia: a new approach to interorganizational collaboration. Australian Journal of Management 43(1), 91-110.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
VicHealth (2011) The partnership analysis tool. VicHealth. Available at https://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/VHP-part-toollow-res.pdf
World Health Organization (2017) WHO community engagement framework for quality, people-centred and resilient health services. WHO, Geneva. pp. 1–56. Available at https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/259280/WHO-HIS-SDS-2017.15-eng.pdf;jsessionid=D7746ED9FDBDD2CDA77BAD7C5D623809?sequence=1 [verified 1 March 2024]
Yadav UN, Lloyd J, Baral KP, Bhatta N, Mehata S, Harris M (2021) Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a co-design approach to developing an integrated model of care for people with multi-morbid COPD in rural Nepal: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 11(1), e045175.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Zhao Y, Russell DJ, Guthridge S, Ramjan M, Jones MP, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J (2019) Costs and effects of higher turnover of nurses and Aboriginal health practitioners and higher use of short-term nurses in remote Australian primary care services: an observational cohort study. BMJ Open 9(2), e023906.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
