Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Using PODs to integrate fire and fuels planning

William C. Buettner https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-8627 A * , Tyler A. Beeton B , Courtney A. Schultz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9972-7802 A , Michael D. Caggiano B and Michelle S. Greiner A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Public Lands Policy Group, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

B Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado Forest Restoration Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

* Correspondence to: cole.buettner@colostate.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 32(12) 1704-1710 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF23022
Submitted: 16 February 2023  Accepted: 15 November 2023  Published: 7 December 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of IAWF.

Abstract

Background

Potential Wildfire Operational Delineations (PODs) were developed as a pre-season planning tool to promote safe and effective fire response. Past research on PODs has identified uses in an incident management context. There has been little research on how PODs are being utilised in non-incident management contexts to align forest and wildfire planning objectives.

Aims

We sought to understand how actors are adopting and adapting the PODs framework to inform non-incident management, and to identify facilitators, barriers and recommendations.

Methods

We investigated three cases, the San Juan National Forest, the San Isabel National Forest and the Washington Department of Natural Resources, through 13 semi-structured, key informant interviews.

Key results

We found that PODs were helpful for validating fuels treatment plans and supporting communication among agency staff, and with private landowners and collaborators. Challenges included lack of technical knowledge and skills, unclear leadership direction, potential misalignment with other forest management goals and community and agency buy-in to using PODs.

Conclusions

We offer insights into how PODs are being utilised within our case studies and align these findings with diffusion of innovation literature.

Implications

This preliminary research is important given increased funding for PODs in recent legislation and the possibility of broader adoption for fuels treatment planning in the future.

Keywords: communication, fire activity, fire management, fuels treatment, planning, policy, Potential Wildfire Operational Delineations (PODs), wildland–urban interface.

References

Beeton TA, Caggiano MD, Colavito MM, Huayhuaca C (2022) Use of Risk Management Assistance During the 2021 Fire Season: A Technical Report. (Southwest Ecological Restoration Institutes) pp. 1–23. Available at https://cfri.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2022/12/Beeton_RMA_USE_2021_WildfireSeason_Report.pdf

Bernard HR (2017) ‘Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches’, 4th edn. (Rowman & Littlefield: New York)

Braun V, Clarke V (2012) Thematic analysis. In ‘ APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological’. (Eds H Cooper, PM Camic, DL Long, AT Panter, D Rindskopf, KJ Sher) pp. 57–71. (American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA) 10.1037/13620-004

Caggiano MD, O’Connor CD, Sack RB (2020) Potential Operational Delineations and Northern New Mexico’s 2019 Fire Season. CFRI-2020. Available at https://cfri.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/02/Caggiano_PODs-New-Mexico-Case-Study-2.14.20.pdf

Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(14), 8086-8091.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Colavito M (2021) The Human Dimensions of Spatial, Pre-Wildfire Planning Decision Support Systems: A Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Recommendations. Forests 12(4), 483.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dilling L, Lemos MC (2011) Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Global Environmental Change 21(2), 680-689.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dunn CJ, Thompson MP, Calkin DE (2017) A framework for developing safe and effective large-fire response in a new fire management paradigm. Forest Ecology and Management 404, 184-196.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

EMC, FAM (2022) ‘Draft FAQs: Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Sec. 40806 (Fuel Breaks CE).’ (USFS) Available at https://cfri.box.com/s/klubrh847c0bwtfhbinythyq3eow7nmu

Fernandez S, Rainey HG (2006) Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review 66(2), 168-176.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Greiner SM, Schultz CA, Kooistra C (2021) Pre-Season Fire Management Planning: The Use of Potential Operational Delineations to Prepare for Wildland Fire Events. International Journal of Wildland Fire 30(3), 170-178.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Holden ZA, Swanson A, Luce CH, Jolly WM, Maneta M, Oyler JW, Warren DA, Parsons R, Affleck D (2018) Decreasing Fire Season Precipitation Increased Recent Western US Forest Wildfire Activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(36), E8349-E8357.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Jolly WM, Cochrane MA, Freeborn PH, Holden ZA, Brown TJ, Williamson GJ, Bowman DM (2015) Climate-Induced Variations in Global Wildfire Danger from 1979 to 2013. Nature Communications 6(1), 7537.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lemos MC (2008) What Influences Innovation Adoption by Water Managers? Climate Information Use in Brazil and the United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44(6), 1388-1396.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moore R (2022) Match and Substantial Cash Contributions Policy Changes (1580). Available at https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/LC-GrantsAgreementsPolicyChangeLetter.pdf

Noble P, Paveglio TB (2020) Exploring Adoption of the Wildland Fire Decision Support System: End User Perspectives. Journal of Forestry 118(2), 154-171.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

O’Connor CD, Calkin DE (2019) Engaging the Fire before It Starts: A Case Study from the 2017 Pinal Fire (Arizona). Wildfire 28(1), 14-18 Available at https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/treesearch/57587.
| Google Scholar |

Radeloff VC, Helmers DP, Kramer HA, Mockrin MH, Alexandre PM, Bar-Massada A, Butsic V, Hawbaker TJ, Martinuzzi S, Syphard AD, Stewart SI (2018) Rapid Growth of the US Wildland-Urban Interface Raises Wildfire Risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(13), 3314-3319.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Rapp C, Rabung E, Wilson R, Toman E (2020) Wildfire decision support tools: An exploratory study of use in the United States. International Journal of Wildland Fire 29(7), 581-594.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rogers EM (1995) ‘Diffusion of Innovations’, 4th edn. (The Free Press: New York)

Ryan GW, Bernard HR (2003) Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods 15(1), 85-109.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Schultz CA, Thompson MP, McCaffrey SM (2019) Forest Service Fire Management and the Elusiveness of Change. Fire Ecology 15, 13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Schultz CA, Miller LF, Greiner SM, Kooistra C (2021) A Qualitative Study on the US Forest Service’s Risk Management Assistance Efforts to Improve Wildfire Decision-Making. Forests 12(3), 344.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Stratton R (2020) The Path to Strategic Wildland Fire Management Planning. Wildfire 29(1), 10.
| Google Scholar |

Thompson MP, Bowden P, Brough A, Scott JH, Gilbertson-Day J, Taylor A, Anderson J, Haas JR (2016) Application of Wildfire Risk Assessment Results to Wildfire Response Planning in the Southern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Forests 7(3), 3.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thompson MP, Gannon BM, Caggiano MD, O’Connor CD, Brough A, Gilbertson-Day JW, Scott JH (2020) Prototyping a Geospatial Atlas for Wildfire Planning and Management. Forests 11(9), 909.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thompson MP, Vogler KC, Scott JH, Miller C (2022a) Comparing risk-based fuel treatment prioritization with alternative strategies for enhancing protection and resource management objectives. Fire Ecology 18(1), 26.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thompson MP, O’Connor CD, Gannon BM, Caggiano MD, Dunn CJ, Schultz CA, Calkin DE, Pietruszka B, Greiner SM, Stratton R, Morisette JT (2022b) Potential operational delineations: New horizons for proactive, risk-informed strategic land and fire management. Fire Ecology 18(1), 17.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

USFS (2021) Potential Operational Delineations (PODs) | Rocky Mountain Research Station. Available at https://www.fs.usda.gov/rmrs/potential-operational-delineations-pods

USFS (2022a) USDA Forest Service National Prescribed Fire Program Review (2022). Available at https://www.frames.gov/documents/usfs/USFS_20220908_National-Prescribed-Fire-Program-Review.pdf

USFS (2022b) FY2023 Priorities. Available at https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/30a-2023-FS.pdf

Wejnert B (2002) Integrating Models of Diffusion of Innovations: A Conceptual Framework. Annual Review of Sociology 28(1), 297-326.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

WFMMC (2023) ON FIRE: The Report of the Wildland Fire Mitigation and Management Commission. Available at https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/wfmmc-final-report-09-2023.pdf