Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR23058
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 51(1)

Immobilisation efficacy of conducted electrical weapons on captive white-tailed deer

Patrick J. Grunwald A , Mark G. Ruder B , David A. Osborn A , Lisa I. Muller C , Kaitlin O. Goode D and Gino J. D’Angelo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7440-4794 A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 180 East Green Street, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

B Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, 589 D.W. Brooks Drive, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

C School of Natural Resources, University of Tennessee, 2505 E.J. Chapman Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.

D Wildlife Resources Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, 2067 US-278, Social Circle, GA 30025, USA.

* Correspondence to: gdangelo@uga.edu

Handling Editor: Lyn Hinds

Wildlife Research 51, WR23058 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR23058
Submitted: 25 May 2023  Accepted: 14 December 2023  Published: 11 January 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context

Wildlife emergencies (e.g. injured animals) often require capture or humane dispatch of animals to resolve the situation. Conducted electrical weapons (CEWs) have the potential to immobilise white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for a short duration to avoid potential risks of extended immobilisation (e.g. chemical immobilisation) and increase safety for managers and the public during humane killing by gunshot.

Aims

To test rapid immobilisation with minimal long-term physiological consequences of CEW immobilisation of white-tailed deer.

Methods

We arranged five treatment groups of captive deer, including (1) chemical immobilisation with 5-s CEW exposure (n = 5), (2) chemical immobilisation with 15-s CEW exposure (n = 5), (3) 5-s CEW exposure with no chemical immobilisation (n = 10), (4) 15-s CEW exposure with no chemical immobilisation (n = 10) and (5) a control group with no chemical immobilisation or CEW exposure (n = 10). We conducted treatments 1 and 2 to determine short-term physiological effects of CEWs on deer, related to overall welfare. In treatment groups 1 and 2, we sedated deer to collect blood immediately before CEW exposure, and 2 days and 5 days post-exposure for serum biochemical analysis (to measure physiological markers of organ and tissue damage). We observed deer before, during and after treatments to evaluate potential behavioural changes.

Key results

All deer showed signs of muscle paralysis immediately after exposure to CEW and regained muscle control immediately after the exposure ended. Serum biochemistry results for treatment group 1 and 2 revealed significant increases in creatine kinase (CK) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 2 days post-treatment, before returning to pre-exposure concentrations by day 5-post-exposure, suggesting temporary myopathy. By 15-days post-exposure, deer that were only exposed to the CEW had 27 of 39 (69%) remotely fired probes still attached. No long-term behavioural or physiological changes were observed post-treatment.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that for immobilisation of white-tailed deer, short-term exposure to a CEW to is a potential alternative to typical capture techniques and can provide sufficient immobilisation to approach and humanely kill deer by gunshot if necessary in wildlife emergencies.

Implications

As with all capture techniques, trainings and protocols should be developed to ensure the safety of personnel and animals during CEW exposures.

Keywords: behaviour, CEW, controlled electrical weapon, Odocoileus virginianus, physiology, stress, TASER®, white-tailed deer.

References

Al-Abbadi OS, Abu-Seida AM, Al-Hussainy SM (2014) Studies on rumen magnet usage to prevent hardware disease in buffaloes. Veterinary World 7, 408-411.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Alaska Department of Fish and Game (2010) III-735: TASER electronic control device use/safety. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Standard Operating Procedures, Juneau, Alaska, USA.

American Veterinary Medical Association (2008) Welfare implications of electroimmobilization. Available at https://www.avma.org/resources-tools/literature-reviews/welfare-implications-electroimmobilization [Accessed 26 August 2020]

American Veterinary Medical Association (2010) Welfare implications of the use of electro-muscular disruptive devices or TASER® devices on animals. Available at https://www.avma.org/welfare-implications-use-electro-muscular-disruptive-devices-or-taser-r-devices-animals [Accessed 26 August 2020]

American Veterinary Medical Association (2020) AVMA guidelines for the euthanasia of animals: 2020 edition. Available at https://avma.org/resources-tools/avma-policies/avma-guidelines-euthanasia-animals [Accessed 23 August 2023]

Ashraf MB, Akter MA, Saha M, Mishra P, Hoda N, Alam MM (2019) Clinicopathological evaluation on capture myopathy due to chemical immobilization in spotted deer. Turkish Journal of Veterinary Research 3, 73-79.
| Google Scholar |

Beringer J, Mabry P, Meyer T, Wallendorf M, Eddleman WR (2004) Post-release survival of rehabilitated white-tailed deer fawns in Missouri. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32, 732-738.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Biria M, Bommana S, Kroll M, Panescu D, Lakkireddy D (2010) Multi-organ effects of conducted electrical weapons (CEW): a review. In ‘32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology’. pp. 1266–1270. (IEEE: Buenos Aires, Argentina)

Boesch JM, Boulanger JR, Curtis PD, Erb HN, Ludders JW, Kraus MS, Gleed RD (2011) Biochemical variables in free-ranging white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) after chemical immobilization in Clover traps or via ground-darting. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 42, 18-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Boughton RK, Wight BS, Wisely S, Hood K, Main MB (2019) White-tailed deer of Florida. University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension. Available at https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-uw121-2020

Cattet M, Boulanger J, Stenhouse G, Powell RA, Reynolds-Hogland MJ (2008) An evaluation of long-term capture effects in ursids: implications for wildlife welfare and research. Journal of Mammalogy 89, 973-990.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Caudell JN, West BC, Griffin B, Davis K (2009) Fostering greater professionalism with firearms in the wildlife arena. In ‘13th Wildlife Damage Management Conference’. pp. 95–99. (Human Dimensions of Wildlife Damage Management: Saratoga Springs, New York, USA)

Conover MR (2011) Impacts of deer on society. In ‘Biology and management of white-tailed deer’. (Ed. DG Hewitt) pp. 399–408. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida, USA)

Curtis PD (2020) After decades of suburban deer research and management in the eastern United States: where do we go from here? Human–Wildlife Interactions 14, 111-128.
| Google Scholar |

Foreman-Hesterberg CR, Foreman JH (2023) Plasma creatine kinase and aspartate aminotransferase activities before, during, and after 5 days of intramuscular penicillin administration in sedentary horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 122, 104231.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Grovenburg TW, Jenks JA, Jacques CN, Klaver RW, Swanson CC (2009) Aggressive defensive behavior by free-ranging white-tailed deer. Journal of Mammalogy 90, 1218-1223.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ho J, Dawes D, Miner J, Kunz S, Nelson R, Sweeney J (2012) Conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task as a function of probe spread. Forensic Science Medical Pathology
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hubbard RD, Nielsen CK (2009) White-tailed deer attacking humans during the fawning season: a unique human-wildlife conflict on a university campus. Human-Wildlife Conflicts 3, 129-135.
| Google Scholar |

Jenkins DM, Jr, Murray WB, Kennett MJ, Hughes EL, Werner JR (2013) The effects of continuous application of the TASER X26 waveform on Sus scrofa. Journal of Forensic Sciences 58, 684-692.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Kuersten A (2020) Tasing the constitution: conducted electrical weapons, other forceful arrest means, and the validity of subsequent constitutional rights waivers. William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 28, 919-993.
| Google Scholar |

Lewis LL, Dawes D, Mooney P (2012) The use of an electronic control device in wildlife management: a case series. In ‘Proceedings of the 25th Vertebrate Pest Conference’. pp. 324–328. (University of California: Monterey, California, USA)

Lieske CL, Beckmen KB, Lewis LL (2018) Physiological responses in reindeer to the application of a conducted electrical weapon. Human–Wildlife Interactions 12, 160-170.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lin H, Walz P (2014) ‘Farm animal anesthesia: cattle, small ruminants, camelids, and pigs.’ (John Wiley & Sons: Ames, Iowa, USA)

McCance EC, Campbell MM, Baydack RK (2015) Identifying how human behavior influences urban white-tailed deer movement patterns in a Canadian metropolitan area. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 20, 471-483.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Potratz EJ, Brown JS, Gallo T, Anchor C, Santymire RM (2019) Effects of demography and urbanization on stress and body condition in urban white-tailed deer. Urban Ecosystems 22, 807-816.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Radosta M (2018) Legal frame for the use of non-lethal technologies at selected European Security Forces. Security Theory and Practice 4, 93-100.
| Google Scholar |

R Core Team (2021) ‘R: a programing environment for data analysis and graphics.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria)

Schwartz JA, Warren RJ, Henderson DW, Osborn DA, Kesler DJ (1997) Captive and field tests of a method for immobilization and euthanasia of urban deer. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25, 532-541.
| Google Scholar |

Sloane CM, Chan TC, Vilke GM (2008) Thoracic spine compression fracture after TASER activation. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 34, 283-285.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Soulsbury CD, White PCL (2015) Human-wildlife interactions in urban areas: a review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities. Wildlife Research 42, 541-553.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Stinchcomb TR, Ma Z, Nyssa Z (2022) Complex human-deer interactions challenge conventional management approaches: the need to consider power, trust, and emotion. Ecology and Society 27, 13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sun H, Webster JG (2007) Estimating neuromuscular stimulation within the human torso with Taser® stimulus. Physics in Medicine and Biology 52, 6401-6411.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

U.S. Climate Data (2022) Climate Athens – Georgia. Available at https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/athens/georgia/united-states/usga0027 [Accessed August 15 2022]

VerCauteren KC, Hygnstrom SE (2011) Managing white-tailed deer: Midwest North America. In ‘Biology and management of white-tailed deer’. (Ed. DG Hewitt) pp. 501–535. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida, USA)

Wesner ZG, Norton AS, Obermoller TR, Osborn DA, D’Angelo GJ (2022) Evaluation of expandable global positioning system collars for white-tailed deer fawns. Wildlife Society Bulletin 46, e1355.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |