Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

A culturally safe referral service for at-risk mothers and infants in marginalised, Aboriginal, and Culturally and Linguistically Diverse families

Anna T. Booth https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8945-4778 A * , Jennifer E. McIntosh A , Lakshmi Sri B , Sarah Decrea B , Jamie Lee B and Claire Ralfs B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The Bouverie Centre, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, 8 Gardiner Street, Brunswick, Vic. 3056, Australia.

B Relationships Australia South Australia, 49a Orsmond Street, Hindmarsh, SA 5007, Australia.

* Correspondence to: a.booth@latrobe.edu.au

Australian Health Review 47(1) 58-63 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22187
Submitted: 3 August 2022  Accepted: 31 October 2022   Published: 18 November 2022

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of AHHA. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

This case study describes the development and implementation of a replicable early assessment and referral service for mothers experiencing minority group disadvantage and family violence in the perinatal period. The service aims to mitigate harms for at-risk mother-infant dyads that can lead to involvement in statutory child protection systems. In doing this, the service follows a culturally safe, restorative practice approach to supporting vulnerable families, which emphasises the relationship between worker and client to create a nurturing environment for change. The service model has been developed and refined since 2018 to now, involving stakeholders from the service team, the not-for-profit community organisation, and a university partner organisation, who provided evidence enrichment and support for clinical skill development. To date: the model has provided practitioners with structured and evidence-based ways of creating shared understandings with clients to prioritise cultural and relational needs; achieved culturally safe ways of engaging with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Culturally and Linguistically Diverse families; improved practitioners’ confidence in detecting risk in parent-infant relationships; promoted effective communications with external providers; and enhanced therapeutic outcomes for vulnerable families at risk of entry into statutory child protection systems. The model may be suitable for uptake by practitioners and services seeking to improve cultural safety and therapeutic outcomes for diverse and vulnerable families. We share reflections on the scope and function of the model of care with reference to potential for broader application.

Keywords: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, child protection, cultural governance, Culturally and Linguistically Diverse, early intervention, family violence, First Nations peoples and communities, model of care, perinatal support, restorative practice.


References

[1]  Liddle C, Gray P, Burton J, Prideaux C, Solomon N, Cackett J, Jones M, Bhathal A, Corrales T, Parolini A, Tan WW. The Family Matters Report 2021: Measuring Trends to Turn the Tide on the Over-Representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children in Out-of-Home Care in Australia. Family Matters, SNAICC and University of Melbourne; 2021.

[2]  Kaur J. Cultural diversity and child protection. Brisbane: JK Diversity Consultants; 2012.

[3]  Gerlach AJ, Browne AJ, Suto MJ. Relational approaches to fostering health equity for Indigenous children through early childhood intervention. Health Sociol Rev 2018; 27 104–119.
Relational approaches to fostering health equity for Indigenous children through early childhood intervention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Preston N, Michalska A, Straker C. Restorative Practice. Children Young People Now 2017; 2017 27–30.
Restorative Practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Priest N, Mackean T, Davis E, Briggs L, Waters E. Aboriginal perspectives of child health and wellbeing in an urban setting: Developing a conceptual framework. Health Sociol Rev 2012; 21 180–195.
Aboriginal perspectives of child health and wellbeing in an urban setting: Developing a conceptual framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  White SC, Jha S. Therapeutic Culture and Relational Wellbeing. In: Nehring D, Madsen OJ, Cabanas E, Mills C, Kerrigan D, editors. The Routledge International Handbook of Global Therapeutic Cultures. London: Routledge; 2020. pp. 203–214.

[7]  Crooks K, Tully B, Allan L, Gillham K, Durrheim D, Wiggers J. Development and implementation of a shared governance model in a mainstream health unit: a case study of embedding Aboriginal voices in organisational decision making. Aust Health Rev 2021; 46 178–184.
Development and implementation of a shared governance model in a mainstream health unit: a case study of embedding Aboriginal voices in organisational decision making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Davidson P, Hickman L, Graham B, Halcomb E, Phillips J. Beyond the rhetoric: what do we mean by a ‘model of care’? Aust J Adv Nurs 2006; 23 47–55.
Beyond the rhetoric: what do we mean by a ‘model of care’?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9]  Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017 (South Australia) (Aust). Available at https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/__legislation/lz/c/a/children%20and%20young%20people%20(safety)%20act%202017/current/2017.25.auth.pdf

[10]  South Australia, Child Protection Systems Royal Commission, Nyland M. The life they deserve: Child protection systems Royal Commission Report. Government of South Australia; 2016.

[11]  McIntosh J, Olsson C. The Perinatal Emotional Growth Index. Unpublished Measure. The Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University; 2017.

[12]  Condon JT, Corkindale CJ. The assessment of parent-to-infant attachment: development of a self-report questionnaire instrument. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1998; 16 57–76.
The assessment of parent-to-infant attachment: development of a self-report questionnaire instrument.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Condon JT. The assessment of antenatal emotional attachment: development of a questionnaire instrument. Br J Med Psychol 1993; 66 167–183.
The assessment of antenatal emotional attachment: development of a questionnaire instrument.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Moran G, Pederson DR, Bento S. Maternal Behavior Q-Sort (MBQS)-Overview, Available Materials and Support. The Selected Works of Greg Moran; 2009.

[15]  McIntosh J, Ralfs C. Detection of Overall Risk Screen (DOORS) Handbook. Attorney-General’s Department; 2012.

[16]  Fong K. Concealment and constraint: Child protective services fears and poor mothers’ institutional engagement. Soc Forces 2019; 97 1785–1810.
Concealment and constraint: Child protective services fears and poor mothers’ institutional engagement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Slayter E, Križ K. Fear Factors and Their Effects on Child Protection Practice With Undocumented Immigrant Families—“A Lot of My Families Are Scared and Won’t Reach Out”. J Public Child Welf 2015; 9 299–321.
Fear Factors and Their Effects on Child Protection Practice With Undocumented Immigrant Families—“A Lot of My Families Are Scared and Won’t Reach Out”.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Pennell J. Restorative practices and child welfare: Toward an inclusive civil society. J Soc Issues 2006; 62 259–279.
Restorative practices and child welfare: Toward an inclusive civil society.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Lauridsen MB, Munkejord MC. Creating conditions for professional development through a trauma-informed and restorative practice. Soc Work 2022; 67 135–144.
Creating conditions for professional development through a trauma-informed and restorative practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Barolsky V. Truth-telling about a settler-colonial legacy: decolonizing possibilities? Postcolon Stud 2022; 1–17.
Truth-telling about a settler-colonial legacy: decolonizing possibilities?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Appleby G, Davis M. The Uluru statement and the promises of truth. Aust Hist Stud 2018; 49 501–509.
The Uluru statement and the promises of truth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Mercer D. Aboriginal self-determination and indigenous land title in post-Mabo Australia. Polit Geogr 1997; 16 189–212.
Aboriginal self-determination and indigenous land title in post-Mabo Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Mazel O. Self-determination and the right to health: Australian Aboriginal community-controlled health services. Hum Rights Law Rev 2016; 16 323–355.
Self-determination and the right to health: Australian Aboriginal community-controlled health services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Parter C, Murray D, Mohamed J, Rambaldini B, Calma T, Wilson S, Hartz D, Gwynn J, Skinner J. Talking about the ‘r’ word: a right to a health system that is free of racism. Public Health Res Pract 2021; 31 e3112102
Talking about the ‘r’ word: a right to a health system that is free of racism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[25]  Roach P, McMillan F. Reconciliation and Indigenous self-determination in health research: A call to action. PLOS Glob Public Health 2022; 2 e0000999
Reconciliation and Indigenous self-determination in health research: A call to action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[26]  Harris N. Family group conferencing in Australia 15 years on. Australian Institute of Family Studies; 2008. Available at https://aifs.gov.au/resources/policy-and-practice-papers/family-group-conferencing-australia-15-years

[27]  George C, Solomon J. Caregiving helplessness. In: George C, Solomon J, editors. Disorganized attachment and caregiving. The Guildford Press; 2011. pp. 133–166.

[28]  Patock-Peckham JA, Cheong J, Balhorn ME, Nagoshi CT. A social learning perspective: a model of parenting styles, self‐regulation, perceived drinking control, and alcohol use and problems. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2001; 25 1284–1292.
A social learning perspective: a model of parenting styles, self‐regulation, perceived drinking control, and alcohol use and problems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[29]  Mooney J, Riley L, Blacklock F. Yarning up: Stories of challenges and success. Aust J Educ 2018; 62 266–275.
Yarning up: Stories of challenges and success.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |