Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Commonwealth Criminal Code restricts the use of carriage services to access voluntary assisted dying in Victoria: a perspective

Kate Furness https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4176-3050 A B * , Jim Howe A C , Mitchell Chipman A D E F G , Nirasha Parsotam A H I and Margaret O’Connor https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0700-8289 A D J
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Safer Care Victoria, 50 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia.

B Department of Nursing and Allied Health, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University, John Street, Hawthorn, Vic. 3122, Australia.

C School of Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia.

D School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia.

E Victorian Breast and Oncology Care, 166 Gipps Street, East Melbourne, Vic. 3002, Australia.

F Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Prahran, Vic. 3004, Australia.

G Epworth Health, 89 Bridge Road, Richmond, Vic. 3121, Australia.

H Health Innovation Program, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia.

I Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI), Asia-Pacific Region, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

J Melbourne City Mission Palliative Care, 230 Normanby Avenue, Thornbury, Vic. 3071, Australia.

* Correspondence to: katefurness@swin.edu.au

Australian Health Review 47(1) 64-66 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22192
Submitted: 8 September 2022  Accepted: 12 November 2022   Published: 2 December 2022

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of AHHA.

Abstract

A major barrier to Victorians with a terminal illness accessing voluntary assisted dying is the Commonwealth Criminal Code Amendment (Suicide Related Material Offences) 2005 (the Code), which prohibits the use of any electronic forms of communication when discussing suicide. The proliferation of telehealth as a means of access to medical practitioners as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic has heightened the anachronistic prohibition of such communication in relation to voluntary assisted dying, particularly in Victoria, as the federal law arguably prohibits its use. In this paper we explore the definition of suicide and its application to voluntary assisted dying and argue for a revision of the Code, to enable equitable and timely access to voluntary assisted dying for people of Victoria.

Keywords: telehealth, terminal illness, VAD, voluntary assisted dying.


References

[1]  Commonwealth of Australia. Criminal Code Amendment (Suicide Related Material Offences) Act 2005. Criminal Code Act 1995 2005. Available at https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2270

[2]  Close E, Willmott L, White BP. Regulating voluntary assisted dying practice: a policy analysis from Victoria, Australia. Health Policy 2021; 125 1455–74.
Regulating voluntary assisted dying practice: a policy analysis from Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Hon Philip Ruddock MP. Second Reading Speech. House of Representatives Hansard; 2005. pp. 4–5.

[4]  del Villar K, Close E, Hews R, Willmott L, White BP. Voluntary assisted dying and the legality of using a telephone or internet service: the impact of Commonwealth ‘carriage service’ offences. Monash Univ Law Rev 2020; 47 125–73.

[5]  Willmott L, White BP, Sellars M, Yates PM. Participating doctors’ perspectives on the regulation of voluntary assisted dying in Victoria: a qualitative study. Med J Aust 2021; 215 125–9.
Participating doctors’ perspectives on the regulation of voluntary assisted dying in Victoria: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  International Organisation for Standardisation. ISO/TS 13131:2014(en) Health informatics, Telehealth services: Quality planning guidelines. 2016. Available at https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:ts:13131:ed-1:en

[7]  Oliver P, Wilson M, Malpas P. New Zealand doctors’ and nurses’ views on legalising assisted dying in New Zealand. N Z Med J 2017; 130 10–26.

[8]  Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, Gellad ZF, Cho A, Phinney D, Curtis S, Roman M, Poon EG, Ferranti J, Katz JN, Tcheng J. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 957–62.
Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9]  Mann DM, Chen J, Chunara R, Testa PA, Nov O. COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: evidence from the field. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 1132–5.
COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: evidence from the field.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Hon Greg Hunt MP. Universal telehealth extended through 2021. 2021. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/universal-telehealth-extended-through-2021

[11]  Safer Care Victoria. Victorian Voluntary Assisted Dying Review Board: Report of operations: January–June 2021. Melbourne: Safer Care Victoria; 2021. Available at https://www.safercare.vic.gov.au/publications/voluntary-assisted-dying-report-of-operations-january-to-june-2021

[12]  Government of Western Australia, Department of Health. Western Australian voluntary assisted dying guidelines. Perth: Government of Western Australia, Department of Health; 2021. Available at https://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/-/media/Corp/Documents/Health-for/Voluntary-assisted-dying/VAD-guidelines.pdf

[13]  Tasmanian Government. End-of-Life Choices (Voluntary Assisted Dying) Act 2021. 2021. Available at https://www.legislation.tas.gov.au/view/whole/pdf/asmade/act-2021-001

[14]  Vermont General Assembly. The Vermont Statutes Online. The Patient Choice and Control at End of Life Act (Act 39) Vermont. 2013. Available at https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/chapter/18/113

[15]  Dion S, Wiebe E, Kelly M. Quality of care with telemedicine for medical assistance in dying eligibility assessments: a mixed-methods study. CMAJ Open 2019; 7 E721–9.
Quality of care with telemedicine for medical assistance in dying eligibility assessments: a mixed-methods study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia. Practice standards: medical assistance in dying. Vancouver: College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia; 2016. Available at https://www.cpsbc.ca/files/pdf/PSG-Medical-Assistance-in-Dying.pdf

[17]  Iqbal A, Raza A, Huang E, Goldstein L, Hughes SJ, Tan SA. Cost Effectiveness of a Novel Attempt to Reduce Readmission after Ileostomy Creation. JSLS 2017; 21 e2016.00082
Cost Effectiveness of a Novel Attempt to Reduce Readmission after Ileostomy Creation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Wade V, Soar J, Gray L. Uptake of telehealth services funded by Medicare in Australia. Aust Health Rev 2014; 38 528–32.
Uptake of telehealth services funded by Medicare in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Adler-Milstein J, Kvedar J, Bates DW. Telehealth among US hospitals: several factors, including state reimbursement and licensure policies, influence adoption. Health Aff 2014; 33 207–15.
Telehealth among US hospitals: several factors, including state reimbursement and licensure policies, influence adoption.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Sharpe K, Elcock M, Aitken P, Furyk J. The use of telehealth to assist remote hospital resuscitation and aeromedical retrieval tasking: a 12-month case review. J Telemed Telecare 2012; 18 260–6.
The use of telehealth to assist remote hospital resuscitation and aeromedical retrieval tasking: a 12-month case review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Head BA, Keeney C, Studts JL, Khayat M, Bumpous J, Pfeifer M. Feasibility and Acceptance of a Telehealth Intervention to Promote Symptom Management during Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer. J Support Oncol 2011; 9 e1–11.
Feasibility and Acceptance of a Telehealth Intervention to Promote Symptom Management during Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Gurney J, Fraser L, Ikihele A, Manderson J, Scott N, Robson B. Telehealth as a tool for equity: pros, cons and recommendations. N Z Med J 2021; 134 111–5.

[23]  Close E, Del Villar K, Willmott L, White BP. Voluntary assisted dying and telehealth: Commonwealth carriage service laws are putting clinicians at risk. Med J Aust 2021; 215 406–9.
Voluntary assisted dying and telehealth: Commonwealth carriage service laws are putting clinicians at risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |