Where to for digital health? The Australian Council of Senior Academic Leaders in Digital Health action plan
Leanna Woods

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Abstract
Australia’s healthcare system faces major challenges related to sustainability, access and equity. Safe, effective care and growing demands require evidence-based innovation and a future-ready health workforce. Digital health – the use of data and digital technology in health and health care – is yet to fully realise its promise. The Australian Council of Senior Academic Leaders in Digital Health (the ‘Council’) has been established to promote, foster and support academic collaboration that helps address Australia’s key challenges and contribute to national and global health. This perspective provides an action plan in a crowded digital health landscape to improve the highlighted issues of effective innovation and a capable workforce. The Council has two key actions: (1) support research and innovation that advances digital health principles and practices by advocating for digital health research and development funding, strategic partnerships, communication, standard setting and adoption of research-informed digital health; and (2) enable system transformation through evidence-based education and training to produce future-fit healthcare workers by advancing health workforce education that embeds digital health capability standards and ongoing learning. True and transformative progress and continuous improvement in digital health require peer-reviewed evidence, as does any other area of health care. We need to acknowledge that our current workforce capabilities are no longer fit for purpose. Our workforce needs to be progressively ‘retooled’ to face the future of health care in a technological and data science revolution and in a sector that is slow to adapt to change. Implementing these actions will advance digital health research and education to positively impact Australia’s healthcare system.
Keywords: academia, digital health, education, health informatics, health personnel, health workforce, innovation, research, training programs.
Background
Australia’s healthcare system faces many challenges, including increasing consumer demands, an ageing population and declining workforce participation rates.1 Significant disparities exist in disease severity, access to care and health outcomes. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, rural and remote communities, and people of lower socio-economic status, currently experience shorter life expectancies, higher disease burden and more preventable hospitalisations.1
Despite the promise of digital technologies to improve health care, the patient experience remains fragmented,1 and these advancements have, in some cases, exacerbated existing inequalities.2 As 9.4% of Australians remain highly digitally excluded, the need to effectively apply data science and digital technology to strengthen healthcare delivery and health outcomes has never been greater.3
While digital health is an evolving field of knowledge and practice, its transformative potential has yet to be fully realised. Australia’s National Digital Health Strategy,4 roadmaps,5,6 action plans7,8 and blueprints9 define how this will happen through cross-sector partnerships. A national academic collaborative provides a new point of access to the expertise of Australia’s academic sector.
This paper reports the action plan for the Australian Council of Senior Academic Leaders in Digital Health (the ‘Council’) across two priority healthcare challenges that require urgent attention in Australia:
Supporting digital health research and innovation to contribute to and accelerate the adoption of known and emerging benefits and evidence aligned with health system priorities.
Train and educate a future-fit health workforce that can confidently adapt to evolving demands, technologies and opportunities.
Challenge 1: digital health research and innovation
Improving Australia’s health system requires research and effective translation. Despite over A$950 million in federal investment for digital health innovation in the 2023–24 budget,9,10 there are critical limitations in storing and sharing health information for research;5,10 embracing emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence;5 and monitoring outcomes at scale.5 Dedicated funding for multidisciplinary digital health research and academic–industry collaboration is limited.
Challenge 2: digital health education and workforce
Australia’s health workers are not prepared for digital health care. By 2050, health workers will need to provide four times the current level of service to meet anticipated demands.1 Digital transformation has highlighted the significant impact on provider well-being,11 a lack of interdisciplinary leadership in digital health care and an inability to harness digital capabilities for better patient care.10 In total, 40% of healthcare providers identified inadequate training and education as a barrier to adopting digital technologies.12 Successful digital transformation of the health system requires investment in people, not just technology.10 There is often confusion between training and education when upskilling a healthcare workforce13 (Table 1).
Domain | Training | Education | |
---|---|---|---|
Purpose | To teach specific vocational skills or behaviours | To create new intellectual frameworks to enable comprehensive knowledge generation, critical thinking and translation | |
Provider | Health sector | Academic sector | |
Example skill | How to enter a note into an electronic medical record | How to implement precision medicine from connected clinical datasets | |
Positive impacts | Allows tasks to be completed | Allows new knowledge creation and critical thinking | |
Negative impacts | Is task focused so does not facilitate innovation or enable the creation of new knowledge | Is expensive and time consuming |
The opportunity
Digital health is a powerful, transdisciplinary tool that can revolutionise health care and deliver the quintuple aim: improving population health, improving care team well-being, advancing health equity, improving the patient experience and reducing costs (Fig. 1).14 The quintuple aim of health care is now recognised as a comprehensive framework for evaluating the diverse outcomes of digital health initiatives.15 This framework carefully considers various stakeholders, maximises value and minimises potential drawbacks in the pursuit of digital health transformation.16,17 As digital health evolves, peer-reviewed evidence is increasingly needed to support healthcare workforce capabilities, roles and ways of working. The need for interdisciplinary collaboration in the systematic design, development and introduction of digital health curricula in health workforce education is recognised on a global scale.18,19 Peer-reviewed academic evidence is vital to successfully deliver the vision of Australia’s digital health future,4–9 contributing to the health and economic prosperity of all Australians.
Harnessing transdisciplinary academia
Advancing digital health transformation in Australia requires effective engagement with the necessary range of academic expertise across and within our universities. The transdisciplinary nature of research, translation, development and implementation of digital health requires expertise from a broad range of academic domains, including data science, engineering, health professions, public health, healthcare management, business and commercial acumen and ethico-legal expertise. Efforts by governments, health providers, industry and other stakeholders often face difficulty in gaining transdisciplinary views or collective perspectives. Globally, the development and uptake of digital health benefits from cross-sectoral efforts from academia and industry20 where practitioners and researchers have fruitful collaborations in understanding the complexities of digital transformation in health care.21 Academic alliances with universities are essential to drive collective action and progress in health care.
Establishment of the Australian Council of Senior Academic Leaders in Digital Health
An environmental scan of a range of ‘Deans councils’ across disciplines revealed valuable lessons for establishing a digital health council in Australia. Integrating cross-disciplinary collaboration, clear leadership structures, strong governance, evidence-based decision-making, inclusivity, transparency and shared strategic oversight for long-term success and sustainability were supported by the Academic Leaders Digital Health Forum and a proposed Terms of Reference agreed and approved by the Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre (DHCRC) Board as the administering auspice.
The DHCRC formed the Council in 2024 to harness combined academic power to advance digital technology, informatics, and data science and its application to health in Australia. The Council has representation across all Australian jurisdictions and 37 member universities (Table 2). Recommendations for prioritised action by the Council and its collaborators were developed by analysis of meeting minutes (n = 7) and Terms of Reference documents (n = 3). A draft version of the actions was circulated to Executive members and iteratively formulated using a modified Delphi method.
University | State/territory | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | Australian Catholic University | New South Wales | |
2 | Bond University | Queensland | |
3 | Central Queensland University | Queensland | |
4 | Charles Darwin University | Northern Territory | |
5 | Charles Sturt University | New South Wales | |
6 | Curtin University | Western Australia | |
7 | Deakin University | Victoria | |
8 | Edith Cown University | Western Australia | |
9 | Federation University Australia | Victoria | |
10 | Flinders University | South Australia | |
11 | Griffith University | Queensland | |
12 | James Cook University | Queensland | |
13 | La Trobe University | Victoria | |
14 | Macquarie University | New South Wales | |
15 | Monash University | Victoria | |
16 | Murdoch University | Western Australia | |
17 | Queensland University of Technology | Queensland | |
18 | RMIT University | Victoria | |
19 | Southern Cross University | New South Wales | |
20 | Swinburne University of Technology | Victoria | |
21 | The Australian National University | Australian Capital Territory | |
22 | The University of Melbourne | Victoria | |
23 | The University of Newcastle | New South Wales | |
24 | The University of Notre Dame Australia | Western Australia | |
25 | The University of Queensland | Queensland | |
26 | The University of Sydney | New South Wales | |
27 | The University of Western Australia | Western Australia | |
28 | University of Canberra | Australian Capital Territory | |
29 | University of New England | New South Wales | |
30 | University of South Australia | South Australia | |
31 | University of Southern Queensland | Queensland | |
32 | University of Tasmania | Tasmania | |
33 | University of Technology Sydney | New South Wales | |
34 | University of the Sunshine Coast | Queensland | |
35 | University of Wollongong | New South Wales | |
36 | University of New South Wales | New South Wales | |
37 | Western Sydney University | New South Wales |
Action plan
The Council action plan outlines the following priority actions to advance digital health research and education in Australia to improve healthcare outcomes (Box 1). Contributing to this agenda is the Council collaborating with the Australian Digital Health Agency to embed digital health education into university degrees. The initiative involves the development of nationally standardised core topics and learning plans through wide engagement with higher education providers, healthcare stakeholders and digital health subject matter experts. These education resources can then be customised locally to be embedded within undergraduate health degree curriculum of individual universities.
Conclusion
The Council is committed to providing strategic leadership and collective action to foster digital health advancements across Australia’s health and education sectors. This coordinated effort, in partnership with others, aims to address key challenges for sustainable, equitable, high-quality health care for all Australians.
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable as no new data were generated or analysed during this study.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of, and should not be attributed to the publisher, the journal owner or CSIRO.
References
1 Baxby L, Bennett S, Watson P, et al. Australia’s health reimagined: the journey to a connected and confident consumer. 2022. Available at https://digitalhealthcrc.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Australias-health-reimagined_Report_WEB_FINAL.pdf [accessed January 2025].
2 Yao R, Zhang W, Evans R, et al. Inequities in health care services caused by the adoption of digital health technologies: scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24(3): e34144.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
3 Thomas J, McCosker A, Parkinson S, et al. Measuring Australia’s Digital Divide. Australian Digital Inclusion Index 2023. Melbourne: ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society, RMIT University, Swinburne University of Technology and Telstra; 2023. 10.25916/528s-ny91. Available at https://www.digitalinclusionindex.org.au/dashboard/Total.aspx
4 Australian Digital Health Agency. National Digital Health Strategy 2023-2028. Sydney: Australian Digital Health Agency; 2023. Available at https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/national-digital-health-strategy-2023-2028.pdf [accessed January 2025].
5 Australian Digital Health Agency. National Digital Health Strategy 2023-2028: Delivery Roadmap. Sydney: Australian Digital Health Agency; 2023. Available at https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/national-digital-health-strategy-roadmap-2023-2028.pdf [accessed January 2025].
6 Australian Digital Health Agency. National digital health workforce and education roadmap. Australia: Australian Digital Health Agency; 2020. Available at https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-11/Workforce_and_Education-Roadmap.pdf [accessed January 2025].
7 Australian Digital Health Agency. The National Digital Health Capability Action Plan. Australia: Australian Government; 2022. Available at https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/national-digital-health-capability-action-plan.pdf [accessed January 2025].
8 Department of Health and Aged Care. Action Plan for the Digital Health Blueprint 2023-2033. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2023. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-12/the_action_plan_for_the_digital_health_blueprint_2023-2033.pdf [accessed January 2025].
9 Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Digital Health Blueprint 2023–2033. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2023. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/the-digital-health-blueprint-and-action-plan-2023-2033_0.pdf [accessed January 2025].
10 Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre. Annual Report FY2022/23. Available at https://digitalhealthcrc.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/DHCRC_Annual-Report_2022-2023.pdf [accessed January 2025].
11 Li C, Parpia C, Sriharan A, et al. Electronic medical record-related burnout in healthcare providers: a scoping review of outcomes and interventions. BMJ Open 2022; 12(8): e060865.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
13 Hasman A, Sosa M. Education and training of health informatics in Europe. Technol Health Care 1994; 2(1): 61-70.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Nundy S, Cooper LA, Mate KS. The quintuple aim for health care improvement: A new imperative to advance health equity. JAMA 2022; 327(6): 521-522.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
15 Woods L, Eden R, Canfell OJ, et al. Show me the money: how do we justify spending health care dollars on digital health? Med J Aust 2023; 218(2): 53-57.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 Nguyen K-H, Comans T, Nguyen TT, et al. Cashing in: cost-benefit analysis framework for digital hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24(1): 694.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
17 Badr N. Technology for Quintuple Aim: Evidence of Technology Innovations in Reaching the Aim of Health Equity. ITAIS 2022 Proceedings. 2022. Available at https://aisel.aisnet.org/itais2022/22
18 Car J, Ong QC, Fox TE, et al. The digital health competencies in medical education framework: an international consensus statement based on a Delphi study. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8(1): e2453131.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
19 Rony MKK, Parvin MR, Ferdousi S. Advancing nursing practice with artificial intelligence: Enhancing preparedness for the future. Nurs Open 2024; 11(1): e2070.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
20 Liu C, Shao S, Liu C, Bennett GG, Prvu Bettger J, Yan LL. Academia–industry digital health collaborations: A cross-cultural analysis of barriers and facilitators. Digit Health 2019; 5: 2055207619878627.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
21 Burton-Jones A, Akhlaghpour S, Ayre S, Barde P, Staib A, Sullivan C. Changing the conversation on evaluating digital transformation in healthcare: Insights from an institutional analysis. Inf Organ 2020; 30(1): 100255.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |