Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Enhancing whole-of-river conservation

Richard G. Pearson https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6047-031X A B * , Aaron M. Davis B and R. Alastair Birtles A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.

B TropWater, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.

* Correspondence to: richard.pearson@jcu.edu.au

Handling Editor: Max Finlayson

Marine and Freshwater Research 73(6) 729-741 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF21287
Submitted: 30 September 2021  Accepted: 20 February 2022   Published: 2 May 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

We argue for improved conservation of freshwater ecosystems at catchment or eco-regional scales by explicit assignment of values to all river sections and wetlands, recognising current disturbance, and aiming for ‘no further harm’ to the commons. The need is indicated by the global deterioration of biodiversity and ecosystem services of rivers and wetlands, increasing demands on water and land resources, and climate change. Regional pressures include multiple jurisdictions, competing demands, piecemeal management, pollution and habitat impacts. Effective resource and conservation management needs to integrate multiple uses via governance of activities of stakeholders, recognising hydrogeomorphic, water quality and ecological properties of ecosystems. Complete ecological protection is impractical amidst water-resource and land-use development, but we suggest that all river reaches and wetlands be given a conservation rating based on habitat, biodiversity and connectivity values. We present a straightforward approach to spatial conservation rating of freshwaters, using hydrogeomorphic typology and assignment of conservation values on the basis of available information and expert elicitation. We illustrate the approach by using the large Burdekin River catchment in north-eastern Australia. This approach is complementary to more spatially focused conservation prioritisation and could greatly improve management for sustainability, reduce further decline in conservation values, and facilitate rehabilitation.

Keywords: Burdekin River, catchment scale, development, prioritisation, stream, tropic, typology, water resources, wetland.

Introduction

Effective management of freshwater resources and ecosystems is regarded as one of humanity’s highest priorities because of increasing demands on water resources (Dudgeon et al. 2006; Vörösmarty et al. 2010; Elliott et al. 2019; Albert et al. 2021) and the disproportionate loss of biodiversity in these habitats (Williams-Subiza and Epele 2021). These demands impair the ecological status of waterways as a result of changes to natural hydrology, morphology and water quality (Lemm et al. 2021). The need for improved stewardship of the common asset is urgent; for example, the ‘Brisbane Declaration’ calls for action to restore flows and ecosystems for their values and services as an integral component of water resource management and sustainable development (Arthington et al. 2018a, 2018b). The recent ‘second warning to humanity’ highlighted the need to address ‘the loss and degradation of wetlands, the declining availability of freshwater, and the likely consequences of climate change’ (Finlayson et al. 2019). Although it is generally recognised that freshwaters and estuaries provide vital ecosystem services as a commons (e.g. Capon and Bunn 2015; Maynard et al. 2015; Pearson et al. 2021), explicit whole-of-river, or even subcatchment, conservation is very rare. Conservation of freshwater ecosystems is challenging because of extensive catchment and instream connectivity. However, environmental management at the catchment scale has advanced greatly in some jurisdictions; for example, in Australia, natural resource management (NRM) organisations partner with government, funding agencies, landowners, scientists and other stakeholders, aiming for positive environmental outcomes (e.g. Bohnet et al. 2013; Curtis et al. 2014; NRM Regions Australia 2021). Nevertheless, these entities have inconsistent governance mandates among states and their activities are constrained by competing priorities, including agricultural and water resource developments, which frequently prevail over resource and biodiversity conservation (e.g. Beasley 2021). Informed management may also be constrained by limited research on the links among biogeography, climate change, ecosystem processes and biodiversity (Barmuta 2003).

A strong theoretical base for conservation management has developed, mostly focused on areal terrestrial and marine management. In the past decade, interest has grown in rivers and riparian zones as important habitats and, particularly, as agents of instream and catchment connectivity (Kingsford et al. 2005; Hermoso et al. 2011; Linke et al. 2011, 2012). The emphasis has been mainly on prioritising high-value species and ecosystems, but the need to accommodate both biodiversity and human utility in conservation (Barmuta et al. 2011) is recognised, for example, via ‘multiple protection tiers’, which indicate different levels of conservation action to accommodate human use (Linke et al. 2019). Modelling approaches for conservation prioritisation require substantial data input (e.g. Kennard 2011; Turak et al. 2011) but in data-poor areas more coarse strategies are necessary – for example, classification according to landscape and hydrogeomorphic characteristics for conservation planning (van Deventer et al. 2016).

Protected areas provide inadequate conservation of freshwaters globally because they typically do not capture the full range of aquatic habitats (Hermoso et al. 2016). For example, in Australia, ~8% of streams are in protected areas (Stein and Nevill 2011), compared with ~15% globally (Bastin et al. 2019). Even in the Australian Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, in which nearly 50% of the land is in protected areas (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2012), only headwater streams are well represented, and ~80% of freshwater habitat is excluded (Januchowski-Hartley et al. 2011). Although there are promising signs of greater acknowledgement of environmental issues in water management (e.g. Productivity Commission 2021) and environmental assessment (e.g. Queensland Government 2017b), proactive catchment-wide conservation management is limited. Management of the Murray–Darling system via legislation and planning was promising, but has not been entirely successful (Chen et al. 2021).

Given the need for improved conservation management, we advocate whole-of-river conservation categorisation by using a straightforward approach, especially for systems with limited availability of ecological data. Most advanced approaches to conservation relate to prioritisation of the areas of highest value. Although such prioritisation is valuable, a whole-of-river approach is required (Kingsford et al. 2005) because limiting explicit protection to river sections of greatest conservation value precludes capture of the entirety of habitat types, biodiversity and vital connectivity. We propose a prior and complementary step based on geomorphological typology and simple conservation value assignment, applied comprehensively across whole systems as a basis for their protection and management, within the context of current and possible future land and water use (cf. Connolly et al. 2011). Our approach has the ultimate aim of broad adoption. We illustrate this approach through a case study of the Burdekin River (Fig. 1), a major system draining into the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) lagoon, which reflects many of the management issues that apply to freshwater systems worldwide. Before outlining our methodology, we summarise the ecological values of the Burdekin River, its current and proposed development status, current management regimes and the need for its explicit conservation within the development context.


Fig. 1.  Map of the Burdekin Basin, including the coastal Haughton River, which delineates the western edge of the floodplain. Locations, rivers and dams referred to in the text are indicated; proposed impoundments include Hells Gates Dam (2110 GL) on the Burdekin River, Urannah Dam (970 GL) on the Broken River, raising the current Burdekin Falls Dam (from current 1860 to 2446 GL) and Big Rocks Weir (10 GL) near Charters Towers (SMEC 2018; Queensland Government 2021a, 2021b, 2021c). Inset shows the location of the basin in Australia.
Click to zoom


Burdekin catchment: landscape, ecology, development

Background

We focus on the Burdekin system because of its large size, its economic importance and associated environmental pressures (NQ Dry Tropics 2016a), its ecosystem values and services, including the diversity of its environments and biota (Brizga et al. 2006; NQ Dry Tropics 2016a), its Indigenous values (Davis et al. 2014), the importance of its discharge and associated contaminants to the GBR (McCloskey et al. 2021), the moderate (although patchy) scientific knowledge of the system (Connolly et al. 2011), important management activities in the landscape (e.g. Landsberg et al. 1998; O’Reagain et al. 2005McIvor 2012; NQ Dry Tropics 2016b), and because the region is reportedly uniquely positioned for agricultural expansion (Australian Government 2015). Despite extensive development, important conservation criteria (e.g. naturalness, representativeness, diversity, rarity, linked habitats, migratory species and dispersal of terrestrial species; Dunn 2004) are relevant to the Burdekin River (Brizga et al. 2006), and all 47 subcatchments have been rated positively for their aquatic ecosystem and cultural values (Kerr 2013). However, only 6% of the Burdekin catchment area is in protected areas (NQ Dry Tropics 2016b), including some perennial streams and many wetlands, and does not capture intermittent streams or the larger rivers. Environmental research on the Burdekin and other rivers of the GBR catchment has focused on delivery of land-based pollutants to the GBR (e.g. Brodie et al. 2012, 2017). Although the need for enhanced holistic planning and management of linked land- and seascapes has been recognised (Productivity Commission 2021), particularly in the GBR region, (Brodie and Pearson 2016; Waterhouse et al. 2016), publications concerning the ecology and values of rivers themselves are limited (see below).

Landscape and ecology

Broad biophysical descriptions of the Burdekin River and basin are summarised in Table 1. The flow regime is dominated by the seasonal wet and dry cycle, and while the seasonality is predictable, flow volumes are not (Fig. 2). The catchment has received much attention because of its major inputs of freshwater discharge, fine sediments and nutrients into GBR waters (McCloskey et al. 2021), but less attention is being given to its freshwater systems. Here we outline the patchy ecological knowledge of the river and wetlands (Table 2).


Table 1.  Burdekin catchment landscape.
Click to zoom


Fig. 2.  Typical patterns of monthly and annual flow variability in the lower Burdekin River, 2010–2015, showing years of moderate and low flow. Over the period 1975–2020, mean discharge = 696 GL and median = 66 GL per month. Queensland Government data (https://water-monitoring.information.qld.gov.au/).
F2


Table 2.  Examples of published information on aquatic ecology in the Burdekin system.
Click to zoom

Headwaters include springs and rocky or sandy streams (orders 1–3), descending to broad plains with low gradient and mostly sandy substrata, eventually converging on the main tributaries. Substantial research has been undertaken on Birthday Creek, a perennial Wet Tropics stream, focusing on drivers of invertebrate diversity and dynamics, and trophic relationships, but this represents only a very small part of the Burdekin catchment. For much of the catchment, headwater streams are intermittent and have received little attention.

Mid-sized streams and rivers (orders 4, 5) may be perennial in basaltic areas but mostly flow seasonally, with disconnected waterholes sustained by the water table. They have moderate invertebrate and fish diversity and food webs are driven by multiple basal sources and omnivory. The larger tributaries and main Burdekin River (orders 6, 7) have high banks, well vegetated flats alongside the main channel, with the wetted area meandering within the channel over a sandy substratum and occasional rocky outcrops. Invertebrates are abundant but appear not to be diverse, whereas fish diversity is comparable with that of other rivers of similar size.

The Burdekin Falls (site of the major dam site) delineates middle- and lower-river sections. Many invertebrates and fish occur in the lower river, including many opportunistic marine or estuarine species and some that depend on connectivity between freshwater and marine environments for spawning (Pearson et al. 2021). However, there is very limited ecological information. The Burdekin estuary comprises the 1.0-km-wide main river channel and ancillary distributaries, within Australia’s largest delta. There is little published information on the estuary but it is expected to be productive and provide extensive habitat, like other estuaries in the region.

Lentic waters comprise lakes and swamps, both perennial and intermittent, as well as the riverine waterholes. In the upper catchment, groundwater sustains perennial wetlands, especially in basaltic parts of the north. The floodplain has a great expanse of freshwater and brackish wetlands that are of international importance and Ramsar-listed. They are fed by local rainfall, occasional flooding of the Burdekin River and high groundwater levels, as well as by irrigation supply and tailwater.

Groundwater sustains the river and wetlands through most of the year, in the absence of surface run-off and irrigation tailwater (e.g. Davis et al. 2017). It is used for irrigation on the delta, requiring control of recharge and use (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2013). There is very little ecological information on groundwater in the catchment.

Development impacts

Little of the Burdekin system has escaped the impact of development over the past 150 years, including changes in land use, water quality and habitat, water flow, and climate, many of which co-occur and probably interact (Pearson et al. 2021). The major land use in the catchment by areal extent is cattle grazing across the wooded and cleared rangelands. Resultant impacts have been weed invasion, erosion, salinity and elevated sediment and nutrient loads in the river (Table 3). Cropping is dominated by irrigated sugarcane (~80 000 ha) on the delta and coastal floodplain. Irrigation has caused issues of water management (greatly raising some water tables and lowering others), loss of riparian vegetation, weed invasion and water quality for the extensive wetlands (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2013; NQ Dry Tropics 2016b). The huge Burdekin Falls Dam has reduced floods and coarse sediment transport, while supplementing dry-season flow in the river and across the floodplain, with impact on invasive weeds and water quality. Climate change is predicted to affect various attributes of coastal wetlands and to reduce biodiversity. The catchment is not subject to concentrated heavy industry or intense urbanisation. Mining occurs to a limited extent.


Table 3.  Major development impacts in the Burdekin system.
Click to zoom

Future development

The Australian Government’s (2015) White Paper on developing the north highlighted the unique ecological values of the rangelands (‘the largest intact tropical savanna in the world’) and identified the key threats as fire, climate change, coastal development, feral animals, overgrazing, fishing, weeds, land clearing and water quality. An additional threat is loss of Indigenous values and cultural heritage. All are relevant to proposed impoundments in the Burdekin catchment (Fig. 1). These proposals, associated with agricultural expansion and within the framework of the Burdekin Basin Water Plan (Queensland Government 2007), have long been mooted, with substantial public funding to investigate proposals. Raising of the Burdekin Falls Dam is the most cost-effective development in the whole of northern Australia (Petheram et al. 2018), although it may exacerbate current environmental issues (Brizga et al. 2006). Nevertheless, the other proposals are being strongly promoted. All proposals present high risk of substantial degradation of habitats, connectivity and ecological processes, including migrations by freshwater fish (Burrows 1999; Brizga et al. 2006), coastal fishery production, sediment transport and possibly floodplain wetlands (Burrows 1999; Wolanski and Hopper 2022).


Management and research for mitigation and conservation

Typically, governance and management of a catchment is within the auspices of several government departments and agencies, the goals of which may differ and compete. For example, for the Burdekin River, there is a complex of regulations and plans relevant to water management, environmental protection and native title (Queensland Government 2007, 2017a, 2021c; NQ Dry Tropics 2016b). Improvements in land management are promoted and facilitated by the NRM board, which has a whole-of-system approach to land and water management, in partnership with funding bodies, stakeholders and researchers, in keeping with the Reef Water Quality Protection Plan and Reef 2050 Plan targets (NQ Dry Tropics 2016a, 2016b, 2021). However, adoption by industry of best-practice guidelines has been slow (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2019), with mixed success in restoration of wetlands (Waltham et al. 2019).

The current environmental impact statement (EIS) process in Queensland, required for new projects, is illustrated by the terms of reference for the Urannah Dam proposal (Queensland Government 2021a). The objectives include assessment of environmental, social and economic impacts of the project, within the regional and local infrastructure context, and refer specifically to environmental-flow objectives, terrestrial impacts, crops to be irrigated and resultant water quality, and long-term protection of aquatic biodiversity and connectivity. The context includes possible cumulative impacts and the need for holistic appraisal, which were not addressed in the development of the Burdekin Falls Dam (Day 1989; Moon 1998); however, anecdotal information suggests that holistic assessment may not be achieved because of the involvement of different practitioners on the various projects.

Current conservation status

Conservation approaches and associated legislation vary among jurisdictions. In Queensland, the government increasingly recognises the importance of freshwaters (Queensland Government 2017b), but protected-area management is mainly focused on terrestrial systems, with limited explicit conservation of river sections, as elsewhere (Stein and Nevill 2011; Nogueira et al. 2021). Incidental protection may occur in land-based reserves, such as in the Wet Tropics, a large proportion of which is in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area; however, even there, protection of the bioregion’s freshwater habitats is limited (Januchowski-Hartley et al. 2011). Although the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, the Bowling Green Bay Ramsar wetlands and declared fish habitat afford some protection in the Burdekin catchment (Connolly et al. 2011), these areas fail to capture the full diversity of freshwater/estuarine environments. Implicit protection may apply through regulations on water quality or species protection, but may be ineffective, for example, for nesting turtles downstream of the Burdekin Falls Dam (Brizga et al. 2006). More explicit conservation, especially of rivers, is warranted (Pearson et al. 2021) and, recognising the current development status, could be applied to different extents to specified sections (Linke et al. 2019). For example, the upper-middle Burdekin River is largely in good condition and warrants special protection, whereas downstream of the Burdekin Falls Dam, which has been greatly modified, urgent protection of remaining habitat, connectivity and biodiversity values is warranted. A conservation management plan for the whole river and floodplain is required (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2013) to provide stewardship, protecting against further damage (Reside et al. 2017), mitigating predicted species losses (James et al. 2017) and rehabilitating damaged systems (Burrows and Butler 2007) from catchment to coast (Waterhouse et al. 2016).


Towards more explicit conservation in holistic management

A first step towards broad-scale conservation management is an understanding of the characteristics and values of the ‘riverscape’ (Fausch et al. 2002), including consideration of scale, patchiness and connectivity (Poole 2002), and holistic flow management (Tonkin et al. 2021). A hydrogeomorphic typology of waterways is a useful starting point (Rinaldi et al. 2016), because it can be a good predictor of the biota (Lathouri et al. 2021) and could define management requirements of a practicable number of management units. In Australia, methodologies have been proposed for New South Wales (Brierley et al. 2011; Fryirs et al. 2021) and tropical rivers (Erskine et al. 2005). Butler et al. (2009) introduced a bottom-up typology for assessment of site-based water quality and ecological processes in the Burdekin River. However, in the absence of comprehensive data, a top-down approach is more tractable for broad conservation zoning. This can involve statistical classification of management units (e.g. Olden et al. 2021) but, again, this approach requires substantial data input. Alternatively, generic typologies (e.g. Parsons et al. 2004; The Aquatic Ecosystems Task Group 2012) can be adapted as required. In the Burdekin system, a typology would include riverine, estuarine and floodplain habitats, enhanced by land-use and ecological information (Table 4; see also example in Supplementary material online).


Table 4.  Simple typology for delineating management zones and associated biota in the Burdekin River.
Click to zoom

Parallel to developing this biophysical framework, identification of environmental values is required. The Queensland Government (2019) assesses environmental values of wetlands and river sections by equating conservation value with the level of disturbance, with the following four categories: High Conservation Value, Slightly and Moderately Disturbed (sometimes used collectively), and Highly Disturbed, which include implicit targets for improvement (e.g. Connolly et al. 2011; Godfrey and Pearson 2012). We propose to use the same system for consistency. A separate process identifies water-quality objectives and guidelines (NQ Dry Tropics 2016b; Newham et al. 2017). Both approaches recognise that even with the lowest rating, systems may retain some ecological values; that is, disturbance and conservation value are not mutually exclusive. We suggest that ascribing conservation value by means of expert elicitation (e.g. Hemming et al. 2018), especially when ecological information is patchy, is the simplest way forward. It should be strongly guided by the precautionary principle, to avoid further deterioration of any river section or wetland or the vital connectivity between them. Combination of this with the typology to delineate conservation zones (Fig. 3) would provide clarity on the needs for river and wetland conservation and would facilitate the subsequent stage, which is developing enhanced conservation targets and rehabilitation programs (Linke et al. 2012, 2019; Cattarino et al. 2015; Reis et al. 2019). It would involve such criteria as distinctiveness and representativeness of hydrological, geomorphological and ecological assets and services (biodiversity and processes; see example in Supplementary material). It would highlight potential constraints on land-use change and water management, and would inform catchment planning processes.


Fig. 3.  Framework for conservation zoning of rivers and wetlands. Details of categories are shown in Table 4.
F3


Conclusions

We advocate holistic conservation categorisation of systems to protect remaining values while balancing competing demands (Pusey et al. 2020), with the major goal of ecological sustainability. This process is set in the context of current and future infrastructure and land-use development, and requires an appropriate plan adopted before further development (Productivity Commission 2021). We suggest that all river sections or wetland sites should be given protection levels commensurate with their explicit values, coordinated appropriately to alleviate future negative change (Finlayson et al. 2019). We argue, therefore, not via special pleading for our case study catchment, but to present it as a model for river stewardship generally.

In Australia, there is opportunity to protect against further impact on rivers and wetlands and avoid the mistakes of the past, which have caused loss of ecological values and continuing expensive mitigation. We support the principles of integrated catchment management, adopted in Queensland in 1990, including explicit policy for ecosystem sustainability (Thoms and Sheldon 2000; Davis et al. 2014). To be effective, such a framework requires whole-of-catchment consideration of development, as evident in contemporary EIS requirements (e.g. Queensland Government 2021a). It also needs more systematic information gathering and adaptive management to enhance our suggested approach, ideally under the auspices of a governing body. We agree with the Productivity Commission (2021) that water planning processes need to be upgraded to best practice and involve trade-offs between environmental, economic and social outcomes, recognising the needs of Indigenous peoples, and including a specific focus on climate change. Additionally, river conservation policies need to be made more explicit, as is the case in some jurisdictions (Perry et al. 2021). Management by a body with jurisdictional authority is required, especially because of the wide range of relevant regulations and stakeholders (Queensland Government 2007, 2017a; NQ Dry Tropics 2016b). This might be achieved by providing NRM bodies with stronger legislative and regulatory frameworks for sustainable management or creation of independent management authorities with appropriate powers. Such an approach was embodied in the establishment of the Murray–Darling Management Authority and associated legislation, but its progress has been beset by substantial failures, partly owing to interstate disagreement and vested interests (Beasley 2021; Chen et al. 2021; Ryan et al. 2021). Catchments within states should not have transboundary problems. Australia, as a developed country, is in a position to take a lead in this issue by providing a robust model for sustainable conservation and management of rivers and wetlands. To ensure ‘wise use’ (following the Ramsar Convention; Kumar et al. 2021), it is important that sustaining environmental values, including ecosystem services of direct value to communities, provides the basis for sustainable development.


Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable as no new data were generated or analysed during this study.


Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


Declaration of funding

This study received no external funding.


Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available online.



Acknowledgements

We thank Jim Tait, Ben Pearson, Niall Connolly, Steve Lewis, Steph Januchowski-Hartley, John Connell and Dane Moulton for helpful discussion and information.


References

Albert, JS, Destouni, G, Duke-Sylvester, SM, Magurran, AE, Oberdorff, T, et al. (2021). Scientists’ warning to humanity on the freshwater biodiversity crisis. Ambio 50, 85–94.
Scientists’ warning to humanity on the freshwater biodiversity crisis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32040746PubMed |

Arthington, AH, Bhaduri, A, Bunn, SE, Jackson, SE, Tharme, RE, et al. (2018a). The Brisbane declaration and global action agenda on environmental flows. Frontiers in Environmental Science 6, 45.
The Brisbane declaration and global action agenda on environmental flows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arthington, AH, Kennen, JG, Stein, ED, and Webb, JA (2018b). Recent advances in environmental flows science and water management – innovation in the Anthropocene. Freshwater Biology 63, 1022–1034.
Recent advances in environmental flows science and water management – innovation in the Anthropocene.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Australian Government (2015) ‘Our north, our future, white paper on developing northern Australia’, (Australian Government: Canberra, ACT, Australia)

Australian Government (2019) Burdekin: Geographic information. Australian Bureau of Meteorology. Available at www.bom.gov.au/water/nwa/2019/burdekin/ [Verified 11 January 2022]

Barbarossa, V, Bosmans, J, Wanders, N, King, H, Bierkens, MFP, et al. (2021). Threats of global warming to the world’s freshwater fishes. Nature Communications 12, 1701.
Threats of global warming to the world’s freshwater fishes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33723261PubMed |

Barmuta, LA (2003). Imperilled rivers of Australia: challenges for assessment and conservation. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 6, 55–68.
Imperilled rivers of Australia: challenges for assessment and conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barmuta, LA, Linke, S, and Turak, E (2011). Bridging the gap between ‘planning’ and ‘doing’ for biodiversity conservation in freshwaters. Freshwater Biology 56, 180–195.
Bridging the gap between ‘planning’ and ‘doing’ for biodiversity conservation in freshwaters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bartley R, Bainbridge ZT, Lewis SE, Kroon FJ, Wilkinson SN, et al. (2014) From coral to cows – using ecosystem processes to inform catchment management of the Great Barrier Reef. In ‘Proceedings of the 7th Australian Stream Management Conference’. Townsville, Queensland. (Eds G Vietz, ID Rutherfurd, R Hughes) pp. 9–16. (River Basin Management Society: Australia)

Bastian, M, Boyero, L, Jackes, BR, and Pearson, RG (2007). Leaf litter diversity and shredder preferences in an Australian tropical rain-forest stream. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23, 219–229.
Leaf litter diversity and shredder preferences in an Australian tropical rain-forest stream.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bastin, L, Gorelick, N, Saura, S, Bertzky, B, Dubois, J, et al. (2019). Inland surface waters in protected areas globally: current coverage and 30-year trends. PLoS One 14, e0210496.
Inland surface waters in protected areas globally: current coverage and 30-year trends.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30653553PubMed |

Beasley R (2021) ‘Dead in the Water’, (Allen and Unwin)

Bengsen, AJ, and Pearson, RG (2006). Examination of factors potentially affecting riparian bird assemblages in a tropical Queensland savanna. Ecological Management & Restoration 7, 141–144.
Examination of factors potentially affecting riparian bird assemblages in a tropical Queensland savanna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Benson, LJ, and Pearson, RG (2020). Dynamics of organic material and invertebrates in a tropical headwater stream. Hydrobiologia 847, 121–136.
Dynamics of organic material and invertebrates in a tropical headwater stream.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blanchette, ML, and Pearson, RG (2012). Macroinvertebrate assemblages in rivers of the Australian dry tropics are highly variable. Freshwater Science 31, 865–881.
Macroinvertebrate assemblages in rivers of the Australian dry tropics are highly variable.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blanchette, ML, and Pearson, RG (2013). Dynamics of habitats and macroinvertebrate assemblages in rivers of the Australian dry tropics. Freshwater Biology 58, 742–757.
Dynamics of habitats and macroinvertebrate assemblages in rivers of the Australian dry tropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blanchette, ML, Davis, AM, Jardine, TD, and Pearson, RG (2014). Omnivory and opportunism characterise food webs in a large dry-tropics river system. Freshwater Science 33, 142–158.
Omnivory and opportunism characterise food webs in a large dry-tropics river system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bohnet IC, Hill R, Turton SM, Bell R, Hilbert DW, Hinchley D, Pressey RL, Rainbird J, Standley P-M, Cvitanovic C, Crowley G, Curnock M, Dale A, Lyons P, Moran C, Pert PL (2013) Supporting regional natural resource management (NRM) organisations to update their NRM plans for adaptation to climate change. In ‘20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation’, 1–6 December 2013, Adelaide, SA, Australia. pp. 2214–2220. (Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand) Available at https://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim2013/K7/bohnet.pdf [Verified 10 December 2021]

Boyero, L, Pérez, J, López-Rojo, N, Tonin, AM, Correa-Araneda, F, Pearson, RG, Bosch, J, Albariño, RJ, Anbalagan, S, Barmuta, LA, Beesley, L, Burdon, FJ, Caliman, A, Callisto, M, Campbell, IC, Cardinale, BJ, Casas, JJ, Chará-Serna, AM, Ciapała, S, Chauvet, E, Colón-Gaud, C, Cornejo, A, Davis, AM, Degebrodt, M, Dias, ES, Díaz, ME, Douglas, MM, Elosegi, A, Encalada, AC, de Eyto, E, Figueroa, R, Flecker, AS, Fleituch, T, Frainer, A, França, JS, García, EA, García, G, García, P, Gessner, MO, Giller, PS, Gómez, JE, Gómez, S, Gonçalves, JF, Graça, MAS, Hall , RO, Hamada, N, Hepp, LU, Hui, C, Imazawa, D, Iwata, T, Junior, ESA, Kariuki, S, Landeira-Dabarca, A, Leal, M, Lehosmaa, K, M’Erimba, C, Marchant, R, Martins, RT, Masese, FO, Camden, M, McKie, BG, Medeiros, AO, Middleton, JA, Muotka, T, Negishi, JN, Pozo, J, Ramírez, A, Rezende, RS, Richardson, JS, Rincón, J, Rubio-Ríos, J, Serrano, C, Shaffer, AR, Sheldon, F, Swan, CM, Tenkiano, NSD, Tiegs, SD, Tolod, JR, Vernasky, M, Watson, A, Yegon, MJ, and Yule, CM (2021). Latitude dictates plant diversity effects on instream decomposition. Science Advances 7, eabe7860.
Latitude dictates plant diversity effects on instream decomposition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33771867PubMed |

Brierley, G, Fryirs, K, Cook, N, Outhet, D, Raine, A, et al. (2011). Geomorphology in action: Linking policy with on-the-ground actions through applications of the River Styles framework. Applied Geography 31, 1132–1143.
Geomorphology in action: Linking policy with on-the-ground actions through applications of the River Styles framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brizga S, Lait R, Butler B, Cappo M, Connolly N, Kapitzke R, Pearson R, Post D, Pusey B, Smithers S, Werren G (2006). ‘Burdekin Basin draft water resource plan environmental assessment report phase I – current environmental condition, volume I.’ (Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Water)

Brodie, JE, and Pearson, RG (2016). Ecosystem health of the Great Barrier Reef: time for effective management action based on evidence. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 183, 438–451.
Ecosystem health of the Great Barrier Reef: time for effective management action based on evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brodie, JE, Kroon, FJ, Schaffelke, B, Wolanski, EC, Lewis, SE, et al. (2012). Terrestrial pollutant runoff to the Great Barrier Reef: an update of issues, priorities and management responses. Marine Pollution Bulletin 65, 81–100.
Terrestrial pollutant runoff to the Great Barrier Reef: an update of issues, priorities and management responses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22257553PubMed |

Brodie, JE, Lewis, SE, Collier, CJ, Wooldridge, S, Bainbridge, ZT, et al. (2017). Setting ecologically relevant targets for river pollutant loads to meet marine water quality requirements for the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: a preliminary methodology and analysis. Ocean and Coastal Management 143, 136–147.
Setting ecologically relevant targets for river pollutant loads to meet marine water quality requirements for the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: a preliminary methodology and analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burrows DW (1999) An initial environmental assessment of water infrastructure options in the Burdekin catchment. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Report number 99/29, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.

Burrows DW (2004) ‘Translocated fishes in streams of the Wet Tropics region, North Queensland: distribution and potential impact.’ Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management. (Rainforest CRC: Cairns, Qld, Australia)

Burrows DW, Butler B (2007) Determining end-point goals and effective strategies for rehabilitation of coastal wetlands: samples from the Burdekin River, North Queensland. In ‘Proceedings of the 5th Australian Stream Management Conference. Australian Rivers: Making a Difference’. (Eds AL Wilson, RL Dehaan, RJ Watts, KJ Page, KH Bowmer, A Curtis) pp. 49–55. (Charles Sturt University: Albury, NSW, Australia)

Burrows DW, Davis A, Knott M (2009) Survey of the freshwater fishes of the Belyando-Suttor system, Burdekin catchment, Queensland. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research Report number 09/08, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.

Butler B, Burrows D, Loong D (2009) Strategies for monitoring freshwater habitats in the Burdekin dry Tropics NRM region. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research report number 09/26, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.

Capon SJ, Bunn SE (2015) Assessing climate change risks and prioritising adaptation options using a water ecosystem services-based approach. In ‘Water Ecosystem Services: a Global Perspective’. (Eds J Martin-Ortega, RC Ferrier, IJ Gordon, S Khan) pp. 17–25. (UNESCO/Cambridge University Press)

Cattarino, L, Hermoso, V, Carwardine, J, Kennard, MJ, and Linke, S (2015). Multi-action planning for threat management: a novel approach for the spatial prioritization of conservation actions. PLoS One 10, e0128027.
Multi-action planning for threat management: a novel approach for the spatial prioritization of conservation actions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26020794PubMed |

Chen, Y, Colloff, MJ, Lukasiewicz, A, and Pittock, J (2021). A trickle, not a flood: environmental watering in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 72, 601–619.
A trickle, not a flood: environmental watering in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheshire, K, Boyero, L, and Pearson, RG (2005). Food webs in tropical Australian streams: shredders are not scarce. Freshwater Biology 50, 748–769.
Food webs in tropical Australian streams: shredders are not scarce.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clayton, PD, and Pearson, RG (2016). Harsh habitats? Waterfalls and their faunal dynamics in tropical Australia. Hydrobiologia 775, 123–137.
Harsh habitats? Waterfalls and their faunal dynamics in tropical Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Commonwealth of Australia (2020) Wetlands. Available at https://www.awe.gov.au/water/wetlands [Verified 16 April 2022]

Commonwealth of Australia (2021) Bowling Green Bay. Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/wetlands/ramsardetails.pl?refcode=42 [Verified 30 April 2021]

Connolly, NM, and Pearson, RG (2007). The effect of fine sedimentation on tropical stream macroinvertebrate assemblages: a comparison using flow-through artificial stream channels and recirculating mesocosms. Hydrobiologia 592, 423–438.
The effect of fine sedimentation on tropical stream macroinvertebrate assemblages: a comparison using flow-through artificial stream channels and recirculating mesocosms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Connolly, NM, and Pearson, RG (2018). Colonisation, emigration and equilibrium of stream invertebrates in patchy habitats. Freshwater Biology 63, 1446–1456.
Colonisation, emigration and equilibrium of stream invertebrates in patchy habitats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Connolly NM, Moulton D, Kelton M, Watson F (2011) ‘Broad-scale waterway condition assessments using categories in the Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009. A trial in the Burdekin and Black Ross basins undertaken as part of the Burdekin and Black-Ross Water Quality Improvement Plans.’ (Queensland Government, Department of Environment and Resource Management: Townsville, Qld, Australia)

Connolly NM, Kahler C, Mackay S, Fry S, Cameron R (2012) Variations in wetland condition across land zones in the lower Burdekin. Aquatic weed distributions determined by underlying differences in water and salinity regimes. Report prepared for the NQ Dry Tropics NRM, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection. Queensland Government, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

Coughlan, JF, Pearson, RG, and Boyero, L (2010). Crayfish process leaf litter in tropical streams even when shredding insects are common. Marine and Freshwater Research 61, 541–548.
Crayfish process leaf litter in tropical streams even when shredding insects are common.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Curtis, A, Ross, H, Marshall, GR, Baldwin, C, Cavaye, J, Freeman, C, Carr, A, and Syme, G (2014). The great experiment with devolved NRM governance: lessons from community engagement in Australia and New Zealand since the 1980s. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 21, 175–199.
The great experiment with devolved NRM governance: lessons from community engagement in Australia and New Zealand since the 1980s.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davis, AM, Pearson, RG, Pusey, BJ, Perna, C, Morgan, DL, et al. (2011). Trophic ecology of northern Australia’s terapontids: ontogenetic dietary shifts and feeding classification. Journal of Fish Biology 78, 265–286.
Trophic ecology of northern Australia’s terapontids: ontogenetic dietary shifts and feeding classification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21235560PubMed |

Davis, AM, Blanchette, ML, Pusey, BJ, Jardine, TD, and Pearson, RG (2012). Gut-content and stable-isotope analyses provide complementary understanding of ontogenetic dietary shifts and trophic relationships among fishes in a tropical river. Freshwater Biology 57, 2156–2172.
Gut-content and stable-isotope analyses provide complementary understanding of ontogenetic dietary shifts and trophic relationships among fishes in a tropical river.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davis AM, Lewis SE, O’Brien DS, Bainbridge ZT, Bentley C, et al. (2014) Water resource development and high value coastal wetlands on the lower Burdekin floodplain, Australia. In ‘Estuaries of Australia in 2050 and Beyond’. (Ed. E Wolanski) pp. 223–246. (Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands)
| Crossref |.

Davis, AM, Pearson, RG, Kneipp, IJ, Benson, LJ, and Fernandes, L (2015). Spatiotemporal variability and environmental determinants of invertebrate assemblage structure in an Australian tropical river. Freshwater Science 34, 634–647.
Spatiotemporal variability and environmental determinants of invertebrate assemblage structure in an Australian tropical river.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davis, AM, Pearson, RG, Brodie, JE, and Butler, B (2017). Review and conceptual models of agricultural impacts and water quality in waterways of the Great Barrier Reef catchment area. Marine and Freshwater Research 68, 1–19.
Review and conceptual models of agricultural impacts and water quality in waterways of the Great Barrier Reef catchment area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davis, AM, Pusey, BJ, and Pearson, RG (2018). Big floods, big knowledge gap: food web dynamics in a variable river system. Ecology Freshwater Fish 27, 898–909.
Big floods, big knowledge gap: food web dynamics in a variable river system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Day, DG (1989). Resources development or industry protection? The case of Queensland, Australia. The Environmentalist 9, 7–23.
Resources development or industry protection? The case of Queensland, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dell, AI, Alford, RA, and Pearson, RG (2014). Intermittent pool beds are permanent cyclic habitats with distinct wet, moist and dry phases. PLoS One 9, e108203.
Intermittent pool beds are permanent cyclic habitats with distinct wet, moist and dry phases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25244550PubMed |

Dudgeon, D, Arthington, AH, Gessner, MO, Kawabata, Z-I, Knowler, DJ, et al. (2006). Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 81, 163–182.
Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16336747PubMed |

Dunn, H (2004). Defining the ecological values of rivers: the views of Australian river scientists and managers. Aquatic Conservation 14, 413–433.
Defining the ecological values of rivers: the views of Australian river scientists and managers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Elliott M, Day JW, Ramachandran R, Wolanski E (2019) A synthesis: what is the future of the coasts, estuaries, deltas and other transitional habitats in 2050 and beyond? In ‘Coasts and Estuaries the Future’. (Eds M Elliott, JW Day, R Ramachandran, E Wolanski) pp. 1–28. (Elsevier)

Erskine, WD, Saynor, MJ, Erskine, L, Evans, KG, and Moliere, DR (2005). A preliminary typology of Australian tropical rivers and implications for fish community ecology. Marine and Freshwater Research 56, 253–267.
A preliminary typology of Australian tropical rivers and implications for fish community ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fausch, KD, Torgerson, CE, Baxter, CV, and Li, HW (2002). Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. Bioscience 52, 483–498.
Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Finlayson, CM, Davies, GT, Moomaw, WR, Chmura, GL, Natali, SM, et al. (2019). The second warning to humanity: providing a context for wetland management and policy. Wetlands 39, 1–5.
The second warning to humanity: providing a context for wetland management and policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fryirs, K, Hancock, F, Healey, M, Mould, S, Dobbs, L, et al. (2021). Things we can do now that we could not do before: developing and using a cross-scalar, state-wide database to support geomorphologically-informed river management. PLoS One 16, e0244719.
Things we can do now that we could not do before: developing and using a cross-scalar, state-wide database to support geomorphologically-informed river management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33481832PubMed |

Godfrey P, Pearson RG (2012) Wet Tropics waterways condition assessment: Mulgrave, Russell, Johnstone and Herbert rivers. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research report number 12/03, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2012) ‘Informing the Outlook for Great Barrier Reef Coastal Ecosystem’, (GBRMPA: Townsville, Qld, Australia)

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2013) ‘Coastal ecosystems management – case study: water management.’ (GBRMPA: Townsville, Qld, Australia)

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2019) Great Barrier Reef Outlook Report 2019, GBRMPA, Townsville, Qld, Australia.

Grieger, R, Capon, SJ, Hadwen, WL, and Mackey, B (2020). Between a bog and a hard place: a global review of climate change effects on coastal freshwater wetlands. Climatic Change 163, 161–179.
Between a bog and a hard place: a global review of climate change effects on coastal freshwater wetlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hemming, V, Walshe, TV, Hanea, AM, Fidler, F, and Burgman, MA (2018). Eliciting improved quantitative judgements using the IDEA protocol: a case study in natural resource management. PLoS One 13, e0198468.
Eliciting improved quantitative judgements using the IDEA protocol: a case study in natural resource management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29933407PubMed |

Hermoso, V, Linke, S, Prenda, J, and Possingham, HP (2011). Addressing longitudinal connectivity in the systematic conservation planning of freshwaters. Freshwater Biology 56, 57–70.
Addressing longitudinal connectivity in the systematic conservation planning of freshwaters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hermoso, V, Abell, R, Linke, S, and Boon, P (2016). The role of protected areas for freshwater biodiversity conservation: challenges and opportunities in a rapidly changing world. Aquatic Conservation 26, 3–11.
The role of protected areas for freshwater biodiversity conservation: challenges and opportunities in a rapidly changing world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

James, CS, Reside, AE, VanDerWal, J, Pearson, RG, Burrows, D, et al. (2017). Sink or swim? Potential for high faunal turnover in Australian rivers under climate change. Journal of Biogeography 44, 489–501.
Sink or swim? Potential for high faunal turnover in Australian rivers under climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Januchowski-Hartley, SR, Pearson, RG, Puschendorf, R, and Rayner, T (2011). Fresh waters and fish diversity: distribution, protection and disturbance in tropical Australia. PLoS One 6, e25846.
Fresh waters and fish diversity: distribution, protection and disturbance in tropical Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21998708PubMed |

Kennard MJ (Ed.) (2011) Priorities for identification and sustainable management of high conservation value aquatic ecosystems in northern Australia. Final Report for the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Populations and Communities and the National Water Commission, Tropical Rivers and Coastal Knowledge (TRaCK) Commonwealth Environmental Research Facility, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.

Kerr R (2013) ‘Community draft environmental values for the waters of the Burdekin Dry Tropics region’, (NQ Dry Tropics: Townsville, Qld, Australia)

Kingsford RT, Dunn H, Love D, Nevill J, Stein J, et al. (2005) ‘Protecting Australia’s rivers, wetlands and estuaries of high conservation value. Product number PR 050823.’ (Department of Environment and Heritage Australia: Canberra, ACT, Australia)

Kumar, R, McInnes, R, Finlayson, CM, Davidson, N, Rissik, D, et al. (2021). Wetland ecological character and wise use: towards a new framing. Marine and Freshwater Research 72, 633–637.
Wetland ecological character and wise use: towards a new framing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Landsberg, RG, Ash, AJ, Shepherd, RK, and McKeon, GM (1998). Learning from history to survive in the future: management evolution on Trafalgar Station, north-east Queensland. The Rangeland Journal 20, 104–118.
Learning from history to survive in the future: management evolution on Trafalgar Station, north-east Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lankester A, Dight I, Brodie J, Bainbridge Z, Lewis S (2007). Environmental Values and Water Quality Objectives for the estuarine and coastal areas of the Lower Burdekin region. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research report number 07/23, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.

Lathouri, M, England, J, Dunbar, MJ, Hannah, DM, and Klaar, M (2021). A river classification scheme to assess macroinvertebrate sensitivity to water abstraction pressures. Water and Environment Journal 35, 1226–1238.
A river classification scheme to assess macroinvertebrate sensitivity to water abstraction pressures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lemm, JU, Venohr, M, Globevnik, L, Stefanidis, K, Panagopoulos, Y, et al. (2021). Multiple stressors determine river ecological status at the European scale: towards an integrated understanding of river status deterioration. Global Change Biology 27, 1962–1975.
Multiple stressors determine river ecological status at the European scale: towards an integrated understanding of river status deterioration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33372367PubMed |

Linke, S, Turak, E, and Nel, J (2011). Freshwater conservation planning: the case for systematic approaches. Freshwater Biology 56, 6–20.
Freshwater conservation planning: the case for systematic approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lewis, SE, Bartley, R, Wilkinson, SN, Bainbridge, ZT, Henderson, AE, James, CS, Irvine, SA, and Brodie, JE (2021). Land use change in the river basins of the Great Barrier Reef, 1860 to 2019: A foundation for understanding environmental history across the catchment to reef continuum. Marine Pollution Bulletin 166, 112193.
Land use change in the river basins of the Great Barrier Reef, 1860 to 2019: A foundation for understanding environmental history across the catchment to reef continuum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33706212PubMed |

Linke, S, Kennard, MJ, Hermoso, V, Olden, JD, Stein, J, et al. (2012). Merging connectivity rules and large-scale condition assessment improves conservation adequacy in river systems. Journal of Applied Ecology 49, 1036–1045.
Merging connectivity rules and large-scale condition assessment improves conservation adequacy in river systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Linke, S, Hermoso, V, and Januchowski‐Hartley, S (2019). Toward process‐based conservation prioritizations for freshwater ecosystems. Aquatic Conservation 29, 1149–1160.
Toward process‐based conservation prioritizations for freshwater ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Maughan M, Burrows D, Butler B, Lymburner L, Lukas G (2006) Assessing the condition of wetlands in the Burdekin catchments using existing GIS data and field knowledge, for the Coastal Catchments Initiative. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research report 06/20, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.

Maynard S, James D, Hoverman S, Davidson A, Mooney S (2015) An ecosystem services-based approach to integrated regional catchment management — the South East Queensland experience. In ‘Water Ecosystem Services A Global Perspective’. (Eds J Martin-Ortega, RC Ferrier, IJ Gordon, S Khan) pp. 90–98. (UNESCO/Cambridge University Press)

McCloskey, GL, Baheerathan, R, Dougall, C, Ellis, R, Bennett, FR, et al. (2021). Modelled estimates of fine sediment and particulate nutrients delivered from the Great Barrier Reef catchments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 165, 112163.
Modelled estimates of fine sediment and particulate nutrients delivered from the Great Barrier Reef catchments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33640848PubMed |

McIvor J (2012) ‘Sustainable management of the Burdekin grazing lands.’ (State of Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry: Brisbane, Qld, Australia)

Moon, B (1998). Environmental impacts assessment in Queensland, Australia: governmental massacre! Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 16, 33–47.
Environmental impacts assessment in Queensland, Australia: governmental massacre!Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newham M, Moss A, Moulton D, Thames, D (2017) ‘Draft environmental values and water quality guidelines: Burdekin River Basin fresh and estuarine waters.’ (Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation: Brisbane, Qld, Australia)

Nogueira, JG, Teixeira, A, Varandas, S, Lopes-Lima, M, and Sousa, R (2021). Assessment of a terrestrial protected area for the conservation of freshwater biodiversity. Aquatic Conservation 31, 520–530.
Assessment of a terrestrial protected area for the conservation of freshwater biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

NQ Dry Tropics (2016a) Burdekin Dry Tropics Natural Resource Management Plan 2016–2026. (NQ Dry Tropics: Townsville, Qld, Australia). Available at https://nrm.nqdrytropics.com.au/downloadpdf/ [Verified 30 April 2021]

NQ Dry Tropics (2016b) Burdekin Region Water Quality Improvement Plan 2016. (NQ Dry Tropics: Townsville, Qld, Australia). Available at https://www.nqdrytropics.com.au [Verified 30 April 2021]

NQ Dry Tropics (2021) NQ Dry Tropics online reference library. (NQ Dry Tropics: Townsville, Qld, Australia). Available at https://www.nqdrytropics.com.au/publications/ [Verified 1 May 2021].

NRM Regions Australia (2021) NQ Dry Tropics Group Inc: About NQ Dry Tropics Group Inc. Available at https://nrmregionsaustralia.com.au/NQ-Dry-Tropics-Group-Inc/ [Verified 10 December 2021]

Olden, JD, Messager, ML, Tharme, RE, Kashaigili, JJ, Munkyala, D, et al. (2021). Hydrologic classification of Tanzanian rivers to support national water resource policy. Ecohydrology 14, e2282.
Hydrologic classification of Tanzanian rivers to support national water resource policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Reagain, PJ, Brodie, J, Fraser, G, Bushell, JJ, Holloway, CH, et al. (2005). Nutrient loss and water quality under extensive grazing in the upper Burdekin River catchment, North Queensland. Marine Pollution Bulletin 51, 37–50.
Nutrient loss and water quality under extensive grazing in the upper Burdekin River catchment, North Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15757706PubMed |

Orr, TM, and Milward, NE (1984). Reproduction and development of Neosilurus ater (Perugia) and Neosilurus hyrtlii Steindachner (Teleotei: Plotosidae) in a tropical Queensland stream. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 35, 187–195.
Reproduction and development of Neosilurus ater (Perugia) and Neosilurus hyrtlii Steindachner (Teleotei: Plotosidae) in a tropical Queensland stream.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parsons, M, Thoms, MC, and Norris, RH (2004). Development of a standardised approach to river habitat assessment in Australia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 98, 109–130.
Development of a standardised approach to river habitat assessment in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15473532PubMed |

Pearson, RG, Connolly, NM, and Boyero, L (2015). Ecology of streams in a biogeographic isolate – the Queensland Wet Tropics, Australia. Freshwater Science 34, 797–819.
Ecology of streams in a biogeographic isolate – the Queensland Wet Tropics, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pearson, RG, Christidis, F, Connolly, NM, Nolen, JA, St Clair, RM, et al. (2017). Stream macroinvertebrate assemblage uniformity and drivers in a tropical bioregion. Freshwater Biology 62, 544–558.
Stream macroinvertebrate assemblage uniformity and drivers in a tropical bioregion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pearson, RG, Connolly, NM, Davis, AM, and Brodie, JE (2021). Fresh waters and estuaries of the Great. Barrier Reef catchment: effects and management of anthropogenic disturbance on biodiversity, ecology and connectivity. Marine Pollution Bulletin 166, 112194.
Fresh waters and estuaries of the Great. Barrier Reef catchment: effects and management of anthropogenic disturbance on biodiversity, ecology and connectivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33690082PubMed |

Pearson RG, Davis AM, Birtles RA (2022) The Burdekin River: a review of its ecology, conservation and management. TropWater report 22/06, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia. Available at https://www.tropwater.com/publications/technical-reports/

Perna, CN, Cappo, M, Pusey, BJ, Burrows, DW, and Pearson, RG (2012). Removal of aquatic weeds greatly enhances fish community richness and diversity: an example from the Burdekin River floodplain, tropical Australia. River Research and Applications 28, 1093–1104.
Removal of aquatic weeds greatly enhances fish community richness and diversity: an example from the Burdekin River floodplain, tropical Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Perry, D, Harrison, I, Fernandes, S, Burnham, S, and Nichols, A (2021). Global analysis of durable policies for free-flowing river protections. Sustainability 13, 2347.
Global analysis of durable policies for free-flowing river protections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Petheram C, Gallant J, Wilson P, Stone P, Eades G, et al. (2014) Northern rivers and dams: a preliminary assessment of surface water storage potential for northern Australia. CSIRO Land and Water Flagship Technical Report, CSIRO, Australia.

Petheram, C, Gallant, J, Stone, P, Wilson, P, and Read, A (2018). Rapid assessment of potential for development of large dams and irrigation across continental areas: application to northern Australia. The Rangeland Journal 40, 431–449.
Rapid assessment of potential for development of large dams and irrigation across continental areas: application to northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Poole, GC (2002). Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. Freshwater Biology 47, 641–660.
Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Preite, CK, and Pearson, RG (2017). Water quality variability in dryland riverine waterholes: a challenge for ecosystem assessment. Annales de Limnologie – International Journal of Limnology 53, 221–232.
Water quality variability in dryland riverine waterholes: a challenge for ecosystem assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Preite, CK, and Pearson, RG (2021). Phytoplankton in dryland riverine waterholes: environmental drivers, variability, and ecosystem-monitoring potential using different levels of taxonomic resolution and dataset reduction. Marine and Freshwater Research 72, 244–255.
Phytoplankton in dryland riverine waterholes: environmental drivers, variability, and ecosystem-monitoring potential using different levels of taxonomic resolution and dataset reduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Productivity Commission (2021) National Water Reform 2020. Inquiry Report number 96, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Pusey, B, Burrows, D, Arthington, A, and Kennard, M (2006). Translocation and spread of piscivorous fishes in the Burdekin River, north-eastern Australia. Biological Invasions 8, 965–977.
Translocation and spread of piscivorous fishes in the Burdekin River, north-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pusey, BJ, Arthington, AH, Stewart-Koster, B, Kennard, MJ, and Read, MG (2010). Widespread omnivory and low temporal and spatial variation in the diet of fishes in a hydrologically variable northern Australian river. Journal of Fish Biology 77, 731–753.
Widespread omnivory and low temporal and spatial variation in the diet of fishes in a hydrologically variable northern Australian river.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20701651PubMed |

Pusey, BJ, Douglas, M, Olden, JD, Jackson, S, Allsop, Q, et al. (2020). Connectivity, habitat, and flow regime influence fish assemblage structure: Implications for environmental water management in a perennial river of the wet–dry tropics of northern Australia. Aquatic Conservation 30, 1397–1411.
Connectivity, habitat, and flow regime influence fish assemblage structure: Implications for environmental water management in a perennial river of the wet–dry tropics of northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Queensland Government (2007) ‘Water Act 2000; Water Plan (Burdekin Basin) 2007.’ (Parliamentary Counsel, Brisbane: Qld, Australia)

Queensland Government (2017a) ‘Burdekin basin water management protocol, May 2017.’ (Department of Natural Resources and Mines: Brisbane, Qld, Australia)

Queensland Government (2017b) WetlandInfo. Department of Environment and Science. Available at https://wetlandinfo.des.qld.gov.au/wetlands/management/ [Verified 1 June 2021]

Queensland Government (2019) Environmental Protection (Water and Wetland Biodiversity) Policy 2019. (Department of Environment and Science: Brisbane, Qld, Australia). Available at https://environment.des.qld.gov.au/management/water/policy [Verified 16 April 2022]

Queensland Government (2021a) Urannah project. Available at www.statedevelopment.qld.gov.au/coordinator-general/assessments-and-approvals/coordinated-projects/current-projects/ [Verified 3 June 2021].

Queensland Government (2021b) Burdekin Falls Dam raising Project. Available at www.statedevelopment.qld.gov.au/coordinator-general/assessments-and-approvals/coordinated-projects/current-projects/ [Verified 3 June 2021]

Queensland Government (2021c) Draft terms of reference for an environmental impact statement. Big Rocks Weir project. Available at www.dsdilgp.qld.gov.au [Verified 3 June 2021]

Reis, V, Hermoso, V, Hamilton, SK, Bunn, S, and Linke, S (2019). Conservation planning for river-wetland mosaics: a flexible spatial approach to integrate floodplain and upstream catchment connectivity. Biological Conservation 236, 356–365.
Conservation planning for river-wetland mosaics: a flexible spatial approach to integrate floodplain and upstream catchment connectivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reside, AE, Beher, J, Cosgrove, AJ, Evans, MC, Seabrook, L, et al. (2017). Ecological consequences of land clearing and policy reform in Queensland. Pacific Conservation Biology 23, 219–230.
Ecological consequences of land clearing and policy reform in Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rinaldi, M, Gurnell, AM, Gonzalez del Tanago, M, Bussettini, M, and Hendriks, D (2016). Classification of river morphology and hydrology to support management and restoration. Aquatic Sciences 78, 17–33.
Classification of river morphology and hydrology to support management and restoration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rosser, ZC, and Pearson, RG (2018). Hydrology, hydraulics and scale influence macroinvertebrate responses to disturbance in tropical streams. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 33, 1–17.
Hydrology, hydraulics and scale influence macroinvertebrate responses to disturbance in tropical streams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ryan, A, Colloff, MJ, and Pittock, J (2021). Flow to nowhere: the disconnect between environmental watering and conservation of threatened species in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 72, 1408–1429.
Flow to nowhere: the disconnect between environmental watering and conservation of threatened species in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schmidt, K, Blanchette, M, Pearson, RG, Alford, RA, and Davis, AM (2017). Trophic roles of tadpoles in tropical Australian streams. Freshwater Biology 62, 1929–1941.
Trophic roles of tadpoles in tropical Australian streams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sheaves, M (2009). Consequences of ecological connectivity: the coastal ecosystem mosaic. Marine Ecology Progress Series 391, 107–115.
Consequences of ecological connectivity: the coastal ecosystem mosaic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sheaves J (2015) Influence of seasonal variability and salinity gradients on benthic invertebrate assemblages in tropical and subtropical Australian estuaries. PhD Thesis, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.

Sheaves, M, and Johnston, R (2008). Influence of marine and freshwater connectivity on the dynamics of subtropical estuarine wetland fish metapopulations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 357, 225–243.
Influence of marine and freshwater connectivity on the dynamics of subtropical estuarine wetland fish metapopulations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sheaves, M, and Johnston, R (2009). Ecological drivers of spatial variability among fish fauna of 21 tropical Australian estuaries. Marine Ecology Progress Series 385, 245–260.
Ecological drivers of spatial variability among fish fauna of 21 tropical Australian estuaries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

SMEC (2018) Hells Gates Dam feasibility study. Final feasibility report. Chapter 2 Technical feasibility, SMEC Australia Pty Ltd.

Smith, REW, and Pearson, RG (1987). The macro-invertebrate communities of temporary pools in an intermittent stream in tropical Queensland. Hydrobiologia 150, 45–61.
The macro-invertebrate communities of temporary pools in an intermittent stream in tropical Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stein, J, and Nevill, J (2011). Counting Australia’s protected rivers. Ecological Management & Restoration 12, 200–206.
Counting Australia’s protected rivers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stitz, L, Fabbro, L, and Kinnear, S (2017a). Macroinvertebrate community succession under variable flow regimes in subtropical Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 68, 1153–1164.
Macroinvertebrate community succession under variable flow regimes in subtropical Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stitz, L, Fabbro, L, and Kinnear, S (2017b). Response of macroinvertebrate communities to seasonal hydrologic changes in three sub-tropical Australian streams. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 189, 254.
Response of macroinvertebrate communities to seasonal hydrologic changes in three sub-tropical Australian streams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28477274PubMed |

Tait J (2021) ‘Environmental management plan Sheep Station Creek ecosystem.’ (NQ Dry Tropics: Townsville, Qld, Australia)

Tarte D, Yorkston H (2020) Monitoring estuarine wetlands within the Reef 2050 Integrated Monitoring and Reporting Program: Final Report of the Wetlands Expert Group. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville, Qld, Australia.

The Aquatic Ecosystems Task Group (2012) ‘Aquatic Ecosystems Toolkit. Module 1: Aquatic Ecosystems Toolkit Guidance Paper.’ (Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities: Canberra, ACT, Australia)

Thoms, MC, and Sheldon, F (2000). Lowland rivers: an Australian introduction. Regulated Rivers 16, 375–383.
Lowland rivers: an Australian introduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tonkin, JD, Olden, JD, Merritt, DM, Reynolds, LV, Rogosch, JS, et al. (2021). Designing flow regimes to support entire river ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 19, 326–333.
Designing flow regimes to support entire river ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turak, A, Ferrier, S, Barrett, T, Mesley, E, Drielsma, M, et al. (2011). Planning for the persistence of river biodiversity: exploring alternative futures using process-based models. Freshwater Biology 56, 39–56.
Planning for the persistence of river biodiversity: exploring alternative futures using process-based models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Valentine, LE (2006). Avoidance of introduced weed by native lizards. Austral Ecology 31, 732–735.
Avoidance of introduced weed by native lizards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Valentine, LE, Schwarzkopf, L, Johnson, CN, and Grice, AC (2007). Burning season influences the response of bird assemblages to fire in tropical savannas. Biological Conservation 137, 90–101.
Burning season influences the response of bird assemblages to fire in tropical savannas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Deventer, H, Nel, J, Mbona, N, Job, N, Ewart-Smith, J, Snaddon, K, et al. (2016). Desktop classification of inland wetlands for systematic conservation planning in data-scarce countries: mapping wetland ecosystem types, disturbance indices and threatened species associations at country-wide scale. Aquatic Conservation 26, 57–75.
Desktop classification of inland wetlands for systematic conservation planning in data-scarce countries: mapping wetland ecosystem types, disturbance indices and threatened species associations at country-wide scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vörösmarty, CJ, McIntyre, PB, Gessner, MO, Dudgeon, D, Prusevich, A, et al. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467, 555–561.
Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20882010PubMed |

Waltham, NJ, Burrows, D, Wegscheidl, C, Buelow, C, Ronan, M, et al. (2019). Lost floodplain wetland environments and efforts to restore connectivity, habitat, and water quality settings on the Great Barrier Reef. Frontiers in Marine Science 6, 71.
Lost floodplain wetland environments and efforts to restore connectivity, habitat, and water quality settings on the Great Barrier Reef.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Waltham, NJ, Coleman, L, Buelow, C, Fry, S, and Burrows, D (2020a). Restoring fish habitat values on a tropical agricultural floodplain: learning from two decades of aquatic invasive plant maintenance efforts. Ocean and Coastal Management 198, 105355.
Restoring fish habitat values on a tropical agricultural floodplain: learning from two decades of aquatic invasive plant maintenance efforts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Waltham, NJ, Pyott, M, Buelow, C, and Wearne, L (2020b). Mechanical harvester removes invasive aquatic weeds to restore water quality and fish habitat values on the Burdekin floodplain. Ecological Management & Restoration 21, 187–197.
Mechanical harvester removes invasive aquatic weeds to restore water quality and fish habitat values on the Burdekin floodplain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Waterhouse, J, Brodie, J, Lewis, S, and Audas, D (2016). Land-sea connectivity, ecohydrology and holistic management of the Great Barrier Reef and its catchments: time for a change. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 16, 45–57.
Land-sea connectivity, ecohydrology and holistic management of the Great Barrier Reef and its catchments: time for a change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weller D, Kidd L, Lee C, Klose S, Jaensch R, et al. (2020) Directory of Important Habitat for Migratory Shorebirds in Australia. Prepared for Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment. BirdLife Australia, Melbourne, Vic., Australia. Available at https://birdlife.org.au/projects/shorebirds/national-directory-ms-habitat [Verified 12 May 2020]

Wilkinson, SN, Kinsey-Henderson, AE, Hawdon, AA, Hairsine, PB, Bartley, R, et al. (2018). Grazing impacts on gully dynamics indicate approaches for erosion control in northeast Australia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 43, 1711–1725.
Grazing impacts on gully dynamics indicate approaches for erosion control in northeast Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williams, SE (1994). The importance of riparian habitats to vertebrate assemblages in North Queensland woodlands. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 35, 248.

Williams, J, Bui, EN, Gardner, EA, Littleboy, M, and Probert, ME (1997). Tree clearing and dryland salinity hazard in the Upper Burdekin Catchment of North Queensland. Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 785–801.
Tree clearing and dryland salinity hazard in the Upper Burdekin Catchment of North Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williams-Subiza, EA, and Epele, LB (2021). Drivers of biodiversity loss in freshwater environments: a bibliometric analysis of the recent literature. Aquatic Conservation 31, 2469–2480.
Drivers of biodiversity loss in freshwater environments: a bibliometric analysis of the recent literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wolanski, E, and Hopper, C (2022). Dams and climate change accelerate channel avulsion and coastal erosion and threaten Ramsar-listed wetlands in the largest Great Barrier Reef watershed. Ecology and Hydrobiology 22, 197–212.
Dams and climate change accelerate channel avulsion and coastal erosion and threaten Ramsar-listed wetlands in the largest Great Barrier Reef watershed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wootton, A, Pearson, RG, and Boyero, L (2019). Patterns of flow, leaf litter and shredder abundance in a tropical stream. Hydrobiologia 826, 353–365.
Patterns of flow, leaf litter and shredder abundance in a tropical stream.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wulf, P, and Pearson, RG (2017). Mossy stones gather more bugs: bryophytes as habitats and refugia for tropical stream invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 790, 167–182.
Mossy stones gather more bugs: bryophytes as habitats and refugia for tropical stream invertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |