Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF06220
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 58(6)

A diatom species index for bioassessment of Australian rivers

Bruce C. Chessman A B E , Nina Bate C , Peter A. Gell B D and Peter Newall C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Natural Resources, PO Box 3720, Parramatta, NSW 2124, Australia.

B e-Water Cooperative Research Centre, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

C Environment Protection Authority, 40 City Road, Southbank, Vic. 3006, Australia.

D Geographical and Environmental Studies, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: Bruce.Chessman@dnr.nsw.gov.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 58(6) 542-557 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF06220
Submitted: 21 November 2006  Accepted: 5 April 2007   Published: 25 June 2007

Abstract

The Diatom Index for Australian Rivers (DIAR), originally developed at the genus level, was reformulated at the species level with data from diatom sampling of rivers in the Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia and Victoria. The resulting Diatom Species Index for Australian Rivers (DSIAR) was significantly correlated with the ARCE (Assessment of River Condition, Environment) index developed in the Australian National Land and Water Resources Audit (NLWRA), and with nine of the ARCE’s constituent indices and sub-indices, across 395 river reaches in south-eastern Australia. These correlations were generally stronger than those shown by the biological index that was used to assess river condition in the NLWRA, the ARCB (Assessment of River Condition, Biota) index based on macroinvertebrates and the Australian River Assessment System (AUSRIVAS). At a finer spatial scale, DSIAR was strongly and significantly correlated with measures of catchment urbanisation for streams in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne, Victoria. DSIAR scores across south-eastern Australia bore little relationship to the latitude, longitude or altitude of sampling sites, suggesting that DSIAR is not greatly affected by macro-geographical position. In addition, DSIAR scores did not vary greatly among small-scale hydraulic environments within a site. DSIAR appears to have potential as a broad-scale indicator of human influences on Australian rivers, especially the effects of agricultural and urban land use, and also for impact studies at a local scale. Further evaluation is warranted to test the sensitivity of the index to natural variables such as catchment geology, and to assess its performance in northern, western and inland Australia.

Additional keywords: biological monitoring, biotic index, water quality.


Acknowledgements

We are grateful to staff of the following organisations for the collection of diatom samples and associated environmental data: the Australian Water Quality Centre (especially Chris Madden), the Environment Protection Authority of South Australia (especially Peter Goonan), the Environment Protection Authority of Victoria, the Northern Basin Laboratory of the Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre (Mark Southwell, Anthony Wallace and Glenn Wilson), the NSW Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources (especially Warren Martin and Meredith Royal) and the Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines (Aquatic Ecosystem Health Unit and departmental hydrographers). Diatoms were identified by the Diatoma group at the University of Adelaide. We also thank Jennie Fluin for advice on some diatom taxonomic issues, Peter Liston for the provision of ARC data, and Chris Walsh for permission to use data from the Melbourne study.


References

Blinn, D. W. , and Bailey, P. C. E. (2001). Land-use influence on stream water quality and diatom communities in Victoria, Australia: a response to secondary salinization. Hydrobiologia 466, 231–244.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Chessman B. C. (2002). ‘Assessing the Conservation Value and Health of New South Wales Rivers. The PBH (Pressure-Biota-Habitat) Project.’ (Department of Land and Water Conservation: Sydney.)

Chessman, B. C. (2003). New sensitivity grades for Australian river macroinvertebrates. Marine and Freshwater Research 54, 95–103.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Chessman B. , Gell P. , Newall P. , and Sonneman J. (1999 a). Draft protocol for sampling and laboratory processing of diatoms for the monitoring and assessment of streams. In ‘An Illustrated Key to Common Diatom Genera from Southern Australia. Identification Guide No. 26’. (Eds P. Gell, J. Sonneman, M. Reid, M. Illman and A. Sincock.) pp. 58–61. (Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre: Albury.)

Chessman, B. , Growns, I. , Currey, J. , and Plunkett-Cole, N. (1999b). Predicting diatom communities at the genus level for the rapid biological assessment of rivers. Freshwater Biology 41, 317–331.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Davies P. E. (2000). Development of a national river bioassessment system (AUSRIVAS) in Australia. In ‘Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques’. (Eds J. F. Wright, D.W. Sutcliffe and M. T. Furse.) pp. 113–124. (Freshwater Biological Association: Ambleside, UK.)

Dela-Cruz, J. , Pritchard, T. , Gordon, G. , and Ajani, P. (2006). The use of periphytic diatoms as a means of assessing impacts of point source inorganic nutrient pollution in south-eastern Australia. Freshwater Biology 51, 951–972.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | DSE (2005). ‘Index of Stream Condition: the Second Benchmark of Victorian River Condition.’ (Department of Sustainability and Environment: Melbourne.)

EHMP (2005). ‘Ecosystem Health Monitoring Program 2003–04 Annual Technical Report.’ (Moreton Bay Waterways and Catchment Partnership: Brisbane.)

Fitzpatrick, F. A. , Scudder, B. C. , Lenz, B. N. , and Sullivan, D. J. (2001). Effects of multi-scale environmental characteristics on agricultural stream biota in eastern Wisconsin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37, 1489–1507.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Gell P. , Sonneman J. , Reid M. , Illman M. , and Sincock A. (1999). ‘An Illustrated Key to Common Diatom Genera from Southern Australia. Identification Guide No. 26.’ (Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre: Albury.)

Gell, P. , Tibby, J. , Fluin, J. , Leahy, P. , and Reid, M. , et al. (2005). Accessing limnological change and variability using fossil diatom assemblages, south-east Australia. River Research and Applications 21, 257–269.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Krammer K. (2000). ‘Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats, Vol. 1. The genus Pinnularia.’ (A. R. G. Gantner-Verlag K. G.: Ruggell.)

Krammer K. , and Lange-Bertalot H. (1986). ‘Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd 2/1. Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil: Naviculaceae.’ (Gustav Fisher Verlag: Stuttgart.)

Krammer K. , and Lange-Bertalot H. (1988). ‘Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd 2/2. Bacillariophyceae. 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae.’ (Gustav Fisher Verlag: Stuttgart.)

Krammer K. , and Lange-Bertalot H. (1991 a). ‘Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd 2/3. Bacillariophyceae. 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae.’ (Gustav Fisher Verlag: Stuttgart.)

Krammer K. , and Lange-Bertalot H. (1991 b). ‘Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd 2/4. Bacillariophyceae. 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema.’ (Gustav Fisher Verlag: Stuttgart.)

Lange-Bertalot H. (2001). ‘Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats, Vol. 2. Navicula sensu stricto. 10 genera separated from Navicula sensu lato. Frustulia.’ (A. R. G. Gantner-Verlag K. G.: Ruggell.)

Lange-Bertalot H. , and Metzeltin D. (1996). ‘Indicators of Oligotrophy. 800 taxa Representative of Three Ecologically Distinct Lake Types. Carbonated Buffered – Oligodystrophic – Weakly Buffered Soft Water. Iconographia Diatomologica 2.’ (Koeltz Scientific Books: Königstein.)

Lenoir A. , and Coste M. (1996). Development of a practical diatom index of overall water quality applicable to the French National Water Board Network. In ‘Use of Algae in Monitoring Rivers II’. (Eds B.A. Whitton and E. Rott). pp. 29–43. (Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck: Innsbruck.)

Marchant, R. , Norris, R. H. , and Milligan, A. (2006). Evaluation and application of methods for biological assessment of streams: summary of papers. Hydrobiologia 572, 1–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | MDBC (2004). ‘Sustainable Rivers Audit Program.’ (Murray–Darling Basin Commission: Canberra.)

Newall, P. , and Walsh, C. J. (2005). Response of epilithic diatom assemblages to urbanization influences. Hydrobiologia 532, 53–67.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Norris R. H. , Prosser I. , Young B. , Liston P. , Bauer N. , Davies N. , Dyer F. , Linke S. , and Thoms M. (2001). ‘The Assessment of River Condition (ARC). An Audit of the Ecological Condition of Australian Rivers.’ (CSIRO Land and Water: Canberra.)

Philibert, A. , Gell, P. , Newall, P. , Chessman, B. , and Bate, N. (2006). Development of diatom-based tools for assessing stream water quality in south eastern Australia: assessment of environmental transfer functions. Hydrobiologia 572, 103–114.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Reichardt E. (1999). ‘Zur Revision der Gattung Gomphonema. Die Arten um G. affine/insigne, G. angustatum/micropus, G. acuminatum sowie gomphonemoide Diatomeen aus dem Oberoligozän in Böhmen. Iconographia Diatomologica 8.’ (Koeltz Scientific Books: Königstein.)

Round F. E. , Crawford R. M. , and Mann D. G. (1990). ‘The Diatoms: Biology and Morphology of the Genera.’ (Cambridge University Press: New York.)

Smith, M. J. , Kay, W. R. , Edward, D. H. D. , Papas, P. J. , and Richardson, K. , et al. (1999). AusRivAS: using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological conditions of rivers in Western Australia. Freshwater Biology 41, 269–282.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sonneman J. , Sincock A. , Fluin J. , Reid M ., Newall P. , Tibby J. , and Gell P. A. (2000). ‘An Illustrated Guide to Common Stream Diatom Species from Temperate Australia. Identification Guide No. 33.’ (Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre: Albury.)

Sonneman, J. A. , Walsh, C. J. , Breen, P. F. , and Sharpe, A. K. (2001). Effects of urbanization on streams of the Melbourne region, Victoria, Australia. II. Benthic diatom communities. Freshwater Biology 46, 553–565.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Stevenson R. J. , and Pan Y. (1999). Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms. In ‘The Diatoms. Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences’. (Eds E. Stoermer and J. P. Smol.) pp. 11–40. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Turak, E. , Flack, L. K. , Norris, R. H. , Simpson, J. , and Waddell, N. (1999). Assessment of river condition at a large spatial scale using predictive models. Freshwater Biology 41, 283–298.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Witkowski A. , Lange-Bertalot H. , and Metzeltin D. (2000). ‘Diatom Flora of Marine Coasts, Volume 1. Iconographia Diatomologica 7.’ (Koeltz Scientific Books: Königstein.)

Wunsam, S. , Cattaneo, A. , and Bourassa, N. (2002). Comparing diatom species, genera and size in biomonitoring: a case study from streams in the Laurentians (Québec, Canada). Freshwater Biology 47, 325–340.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |





Appendix 1.  Average sensitivity values (SVs) for diatom species
Standard deviations (s.d.) are given for all species present in more than one data set (Frequency > 1)
Click to zoom