Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
REVIEW

A systematic review of ground-based shooting to control overabundant mammal populations

Andrew J. Bengsen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2205-4416 A E , David M. Forsyth A , Stephen Harris B , A. David M. Latham C , Steven R. McLeod A and Anthony Pople D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, NSW Department of Primary Industries, 1447 Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

B School of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom.

C Wildlife Ecology and Management, Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand.

D Invasive Plants and Animals, Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, Qld 4102, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: andrew.bengsen@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Wildlife Research 47(3) 197-207 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR19129
Submitted: 30 July 2019  Accepted: 6 November 2019   Published: 20 March 2020

Abstract

Context: Ground-based shooting is widely used in management programs aiming to alleviate the impacts of invasive or overabundant wildlife populations. However, evaluations of individual shooting operations have shown variable results, and the effectiveness of ground-shooting as a population-management intervention has not been systematically examined.

Aims: Our review aimed to (1) assess the efficacy of shooting as a population management tool, and (2) identify commonalities among studies that will help managers identify situations where ground-shooting is most likely to be effective.

Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature to identify studies involving ground-shooting. From each study, we collated information about operational objectives, target taxa, geographic context, type of shooter used, effort, effectiveness, and use of additional control tools.

Key results: Most studies had no a priori quantifiable objectives. However, 60% of the 64 case studies produced a detectable reduction in population density and/or damage. The most common type of operation used unpaid or commercial harvest-oriented shooters to reduce herbivore density or damage. Only 30% of the operations that used volunteer shooters or recreational hunters achieved their objectives. Target taxa, geographic area or integration of shooting with other population-control methods had no detectable effect on the effectiveness of shooting operations. Common factors that hindered the effectiveness of shooting operations included immigration of target species from adjacent areas (n = 13), decreasing effort from shooters as the target population declined (n = 7) and selective harvesting (n = 7).

Conclusions: Ground-based shooting can be an effective management tool for overabundant wildlife populations, but many shooting operations did not achieve a notable decrease in animal abundance or damage. The source of failure could often be attributed to an inability to remove a sufficient proportion of the population to cause a population decline.

Implications: Managers contemplating using ground-based shooting to reduce the impacts or density of wildlife populations should (1) carefully consider whether this is a suitable management tool to achieve the desired outcomes, (2) establish clear objectives that aim to meet defined outcomes and allow for continuous improvement, and (3) ensure that operations are sufficiently resourced to achieve and maintain those objectives.

Additional keywords: hunting, human–wildlife interactions, sharp-shooting, vertebrate pest, wildlife management.


References

Banko, P. C., Hess, S. C., Scowcroft, P. G., Farmer, C., Jacobi, J. D., Stephens, R. M., Camp, R. J., Leonard, D. L., Brinck, K. W., Juvik, J. O., and Juvik, S. P. (2014). Evaluating the long-term management of introduced ungulates to protect the palila, an endangered bird, and its critical habitat in subalpine forest of Mauna Kea, Hawai ‘i. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 46, 871–889.
Evaluating the long-term management of introduced ungulates to protect the palila, an endangered bird, and its critical habitat in subalpine forest of Mauna Kea, Hawai ‘i.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barron, M. C., Anderson, D. P., Parkes, J. P., and ‘Ohukani’ohi’a Gon, S. M. (2011). Evaluation of feral pig control in Hawaiian protected areas using Bayesian catch-effort models. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 35, 182–188.

Bartmann, R. M., White, G. C., and Carpenter, L. H. (1992). Compensatory mortality in a Colorado mule deer population. Wildlife Monographs 121, 1–39.

Bengsen, A. J., and Sparkes, J. (2016). Can recreational hunting contribute to pest mammal control on public land in Australia? Mammal Review 46, 297–310.
Can recreational hunting contribute to pest mammal control on public land in Australia?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bengsen, A. J., Gentle, M. N., Mitchell, J. L., Pearson, H. E., and Saunders, G. R. (2014). Impacts and management of wild pigs Sus scrofa in Australia. Mammal Review 44, 135–147.
Impacts and management of wild pigs Sus scrofa in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bennett, A., Haydon, S., Stevens, M., and Coulson, G. (2015). Culling reduces fecal pellet deposition by introduced sambar (Rusa unicolor) in a protected water catchment. Wildlife Society Bulletin 39, 268–275.
Culling reduces fecal pellet deposition by introduced sambar (Rusa unicolor) in a protected water catchment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boulanger, J. R., Goff, G. R., and Curtis, P. D. (2012). Use of ‘earn-a-buck’ hunting to manage local deer overabundance. Northeastern Naturalist 19, 159–172.
Use of ‘earn-a-buck’ hunting to manage local deer overabundance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Braysher, M. (2017) ‘Managing Australia’s Pest Animals: a Guide to Strategic Planning and Effective Management.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.)

Brown, T. L., Decker, D. J., Riley, S. J., Enck, J. W., Lauber, T. B., Curtis, P. D., and Mattfeld, G. F. (2000). The future of hunting as a mechanism to control white-tailed deer populations. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28, 797–807.

Caughley, G. (1981). Overpopulation. In ‘Problems in Management of Locally Abundant Wild Mammals.’ (Eds P. A. Jewel and S. Holt.) pp. 7–10. (Academic Press: New York, NY, USA.)

Comte, S., Umhang, G., Raton, V., Raoul, F., Giraudoux, P., Combes, B., and Boué, F. (2017). Echinococcus multilocularis management by fox culling: an inappropriate paradigm. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 147, 178–185.
Echinococcus multilocularis management by fox culling: an inappropriate paradigm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29254718PubMed |

Crouchley, D., Nugent, G., and Edge, K. (2011). Removal of red deer (Cervus elaphus) from Anchor and Secretary Islands, Fiordland, New Zealand. In ‘Island Invasives: Eradication and Management’. (Eds C. R. Veitch, M. N. Clout, and D. R. Towns.) pp. 422–425. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)

DeNicola, A. J., and Williams, S. C. (2008). Sharpshooting suburban white-tailed deer reduces deer–vehicle collisions. Human-Wildlife Conflicts 2, 28–33.

Ditchkoff, S. S., and Mitchell, M. S. (2009). Ft. Benning Military Installation. In ‘Wild Pigs: Biology, Damage, Control Techniques and Management’. (Eds J. Mayer and I. L. Brisbin.) pp. 357–364. (Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC: Aiken, SC, USA.)

Ditchkoff, S. S., Holtfreter, R. W., and Williams, B. L. (2017). Effectiveness of a bounty program for reducing wild pig densities. Wildlife Society Bulletin 41, 548–555.
Effectiveness of a bounty program for reducing wild pig densities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Doerr, M. L., McAninch, J. B., and Wiggers, E. P. (2001). Comparison of 4 methods to reduce white-tailed deer abundance in an urban community. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 1105–1113.

Domm, S., and Messersmith, J. (1990). Feral cat eradication on a Barrier Reef island, Australia. Atoll Research Bulletin 338, 1–4.
Feral cat eradication on a Barrier Reef island, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Engeman, R., Hershberger, T., Orzell, S., Felix, R., Killian, G., Woolard, J., Cornman, J., Romano, D., Huddleston, C., Zimmerman, P., Barre, C., Tillman, E., and Avery, M. (2014). Impacts from control operations on a recreationally hunted feral swine population at a large military installation in Florida. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 21, 7689–7697.
Impacts from control operations on a recreationally hunted feral swine population at a large military installation in Florida.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24622991PubMed |

Finch, N., Murray, P., Hoy, J., and Baxter, G. (2014). Expenditure and motivation of Australian recreational hunters. Wildlife Research 41, 76–83.
Expenditure and motivation of Australian recreational hunters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Forsyth, D. M. (1999). Long-term harvesting and male migration in a New Zealand population of Himalayan tahr Hemitragus jemlahicus. Journal of Applied Ecology 36, 351–362.
Long-term harvesting and male migration in a New Zealand population of Himalayan tahr Hemitragus jemlahicus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Forsyth, D. M., Ramsey, D. S. L., Veltman, C. J., Allen, R. B., Allen, W. J., Barker, R. J., Jacobson, C. L., Nicol, S. J., Richardson, S. J., and Todd, C. R. (2013). When deer must die: large uncertainty surrounds changes in deer abundance achieved by helicopter-and ground-based hunting in New Zealand forests. Wildlife Research 40, 447–458.
When deer must die: large uncertainty surrounds changes in deer abundance achieved by helicopter-and ground-based hunting in New Zealand forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fraser, K. W., Parkes, J. P., and Thomson, C. (2003) ‘Management of New Deer Populations in Northland and Taranaki.’ (Department of Conservation: Wellington, New Zealand.)

Frost, H. C., Storm, G. L., Batcheller, M. J., and Lovallo, M. J. (1997). White-tailed deer management at Gettysburg National Military Park and Eisenhower National Historic Site. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25, 462–469.

Gentle, M., and Pople, A. (2013). Effectiveness of commercial harvesting in controlling feral-pig populations. Wildlife Research 40, 459–469.
Effectiveness of commercial harvesting in controlling feral-pig populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gosling, L. M., and Baker, S. J. (1989). The eradication of muskrats and coypus from Britain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 38, 39–51.
The eradication of muskrats and coypus from Britain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gürtler, R. E., Martín Izquierdo, V., Gil, G., Cavicchia, M., and Maranta, A. (2017). Coping with wild boar in a conservation area: impacts of a 10-year management control program in north-eastern Argentina. Biological Invasions 19, 11–24.
Coping with wild boar in a conservation area: impacts of a 10-year management control program in north-eastern Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hagen, R., Haydn, A., and Suchant, R. (2018). Estimating red deer (Cervus elaphus) population size in the Southern Black Forest: the role of hunting in population control. European Journal of Wildlife Research 64, 42.
Estimating red deer (Cervus elaphus) population size in the Southern Black Forest: the role of hunting in population control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hampton, J. O., Forsyth, D. M., Mackenzie, D. I., and Stuart, I. G. (2015). A simple quantitative method for assessing animal welfare outcomes in terrestrial wildlife shooting: the European rabbit as a case study. Animal Welfare 24, 307–317.
A simple quantitative method for assessing animal welfare outcomes in terrestrial wildlife shooting: the European rabbit as a case study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hanson, L. B., Mitchell, M. S., Grand, J. B., Jolley, D. B., Sparklin, B. D., and Ditchkoff, S. S. (2009). Effect of experimental manipulation on survival and recruitment of feral pigs. Wildlife Research 36, 185–191.
Effect of experimental manipulation on survival and recruitment of feral pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Heydon, M. J., and Reynolds, J. C. (2000). Fox (Vulpes vulpes) management in three contrasting regions of Britain, in relation to agricultural and sporting interests. Journal of Zoology 251, 237–252.
Fox (Vulpes vulpes) management in three contrasting regions of Britain, in relation to agricultural and sporting interests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holling, C. S. (1959). The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Canadian Entomologist 91, 293–320.
The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holsman, R. H. (2000). Goodwill hunting? Exploring the role of hunters as ecosystem stewards. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28, 808–816.

Holsman, R. H., and Petchenik, J. (2006). Predicting deer hunter harvest behavior in Wisconsin’s chronic wasting disease eradication zone. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 11, 177–189.
Predicting deer hunter harvest behavior in Wisconsin’s chronic wasting disease eradication zone.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holsman, R. H., Petchenik, J., and Cooney, E. E. (2010). CWD after ‘the fire’: six reasons why hunters resisted Wisconsin’s eradication effort. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 15, 180–193.
CWD after ‘the fire’: six reasons why hunters resisted Wisconsin’s eradication effort.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hone, J. (2007). ‘Wildlife Damage Control.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.)

Hone, J., Drake, V. A., and Krebs, C. J. (2017). The effort–outcomes relationship in applied ecology: evaluation and implications. Bioscience 67, 845–852.
The effort–outcomes relationship in applied ecology: evaluation and implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hothorn, T., and Müller, J. (2010). Large-scale reduction of ungulate browsing by managed sport hunting. Forest Ecology and Management 260, 1416–1423.
Large-scale reduction of ungulate browsing by managed sport hunting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Husheer, S. W., and Robertson, A. W. (2005). High-intensity deer culling increases growth of mountain beech seedlings in New Zealand. Wildlife Research 32, 273–280.
High-intensity deer culling increases growth of mountain beech seedlings in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Husson, F., and Josse, J. (2014). Multiple correspondence analysis. In ‘Visualization and Verbalization of Data’. (Eds J. Blasius and M. Greenacre.) pp. 165–184. (CRC Press: Boca Raton. FL, USA.)

Hygnstrom, S. E., Garabrandt, G. W., and Vercauteren, K. C. (2011). Fifteen years of urban deer management: the Fontenelle Forest experience. Wildlife Society Bulletin 35, 126–136.
Fifteen years of urban deer management: the Fontenelle Forest experience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kaji, K., Saitoh, T., Uno, H., Matsuda, H., and Yamamura, K. (2010). Adaptive management of sika deer populations in Hokkaido, Japan: theory and practice. Population Ecology 52, 373–387.
Adaptive management of sika deer populations in Hokkaido, Japan: theory and practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kerr, G. N., and Abell, W. (2016). What are they hunting for? Investigating heterogeneity among sika deer (Cervus nippon) hunters. Wildlife Research 43, 69–79.
What are they hunting for? Investigating heterogeneity among sika deer (Cervus nippon) hunters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Krull, C. R., Stanley, M. C., Burns, B. R., Choquenot, D., and Etherington, T. R. (2016). Reducing wildlife damage with cost-effective management programmes. PLoS One 11, e0146765.
Reducing wildlife damage with cost-effective management programmes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26771384PubMed |

Latham, A. D. M., Latham, M. C., Herries, D., Barron, M., Cruz, J., and Anderson, D. P. (2018). Assessing the efficacy of aerial culling of introduced wild deer in New Zealand with analytical decomposition of predation risk. Biological Invasions 20, 251–266.
Assessing the efficacy of aerial culling of introduced wild deer in New Zealand with analytical decomposition of predation risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lewis, A. R., Pinchin, A. M., and Kestin, S. C. (1997). Welfare implications of the night shooting of wild impala (Aepyceros melampus). Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 6, 123–131.

Lieury, N., Ruette, S., Devillard, S., Albaret, M., Drouyer, F., Baudoux, B., and Millon, A. (2015). Compensatory immigration challenges predator control: an experimental evidence‐based approach improves management. The Journal of Wildlife Management 79, 425–434.
Compensatory immigration challenges predator control: an experimental evidence‐based approach improves management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Macdonald, N., Nugent, G., Edge, K., and Parkes, J. (2019). Eradication of red deer from Secretary Island, New Zealand: changing tactics to achieve success. In ‘Island Invasives: Scaling up to Meet the Challenge’. (Eds C. R. Veitch, M. N. Clout, A. R. Martin, J. C. Russell, and C. J. We.) pp. 256–260. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)

MacMillan, D. C., and Leitch, K. (2008). Conservation with a gun: understanding landowner attitudes to deer hunting in the Scottish Highlands. Human Ecology 36, 473–484.
Conservation with a gun: understanding landowner attitudes to deer hunting in the Scottish Highlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Martin, J.-L., and Baltzinger, C. (2002). Interaction among deer browsing, hunting, and tree regeneration. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32, 1254–1264.
Interaction among deer browsing, hunting, and tree regeneration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Masters, P., Markopoulos, N., Florance, B., and Southgate, R. (2018). The eradication of fallow deer (Dama dama) and feral goats (Capra hircus) from Kangaroo Island, South Australia. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 25, 86–98.
The eradication of fallow deer (Dama dama) and feral goats (Capra hircus) from Kangaroo Island, South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mawson, P. R., Hampton, J. O., and Dooley, B. (2016). Subsidized commercial harvesting for cost-effective wildlife management in urban areas: a case study with kangaroo sharpshooting. Wildlife Society Bulletin 40, 251–260.
Subsidized commercial harvesting for cost-effective wildlife management in urban areas: a case study with kangaroo sharpshooting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McDonald, J. E., Clark, D. E., and Woytek, W. A. (2007). Reduction and maintenance of a white-tailed deer herd in central Massachusetts. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 1585–1593.
Reduction and maintenance of a white-tailed deer herd in central Massachusetts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Millspaugh, J. J., Brundige, G. C., Gitzen, R. A., and Raedeke, K. J. (2000). Elk and hunter space-use sharing in South Dakota. The Journal of Wildlife Management 64, 994–1003.
Elk and hunter space-use sharing in South Dakota.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moberly, R. L., White, P. C. L., Webbon, C. C., Baker, P. J., and Harris, S. (2004). Modelling the costs of fox predation and preventive measures on sheep farms in Britain. Journal of Environmental Management 70, 129–143.
Modelling the costs of fox predation and preventive measures on sheep farms in Britain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15160739PubMed |

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., The Prisma Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6, e1000097.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19753108PubMed |

Morellet, N., Gaillard, J.-M., Hewison, A. J. M., Ballon, P., Boscardin, Y., Duncan, P., Klein, F., and Maillard, D. (2007). Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores. Journal of Applied Ecology 44, 634–643.
Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newsome, T. M., Crowther, M. S., and Dickman, C. R. (2014). Rapid recolonisation by the European red fox: how effective are uncoordinated and isolated control programs? European Journal of Wildlife Research 60, 749–757.
Rapid recolonisation by the European red fox: how effective are uncoordinated and isolated control programs?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Norbury, G. L., Pech, R. P., Byrom, A. E., and Innes, J. (2015). Density-impact functions for terrestrial vertebrate pests and indigenous biota: guidelines for conservation managers. Biological Conservation 191, 409–420.
Density-impact functions for terrestrial vertebrate pests and indigenous biota: guidelines for conservation managers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nugent, G. (1988). Successful control of fallow deer by recreational hunters in the Blue Mountains, Otago. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 18, 239–252.

Nugent, G., and Choquenot, D. (2004). Comparing cost-effectiveness of commercial harvesting, state-funded culling, and recreational deer hunting in New Zealand. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32, 481–492.
Comparing cost-effectiveness of commercial harvesting, state-funded culling, and recreational deer hunting in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nugent, G., McShea, W. J., Parkes, J., Woodley, S., Waithaka, J., Moro, J., Gutierrez, R., Azorit, C., Mendez Guerrero, F., Flueck, W. T., and Smith-Flueck, J. M. (2011). Policies and management of overabundant deer (native or exotic) in protected areas. Animal Production Science 51, 384–389.
Policies and management of overabundant deer (native or exotic) in protected areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parkes, J. P. (1990). Feral goat control in New Zealand. Biological Conservation 54, 335–348.
Feral goat control in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parkes, J. P., Ramsey, D. S. L., Macdonald, N., Walker, K., McKnight, S., Cohen, B. S., and Morrison, S. A. (2010). Rapid eradication of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) from Santa Cruz Island, California. Biological Conservation 143, 634–641.
Rapid eradication of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) from Santa Cruz Island, California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Quirós-Fernández, F., Marcos, J., Acevedo, P., and Gortázar, C. (2017). Hunters serving the ecosystem: the contribution of recreational hunting to wild boar population control. European Journal of Wildlife Research 63, 57.
Hunters serving the ecosystem: the contribution of recreational hunting to wild boar population control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reddiex, B., and Forsyth, D. M. (2006). Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. II. Reliability of knowledge. Wildlife Research 33, 711–717.
Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. II. Reliability of knowledge.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reddiex, B., Forsyth, D. M., McDonald-Madden, E., Einoder, L. D., Griffioen, P. A., Chick, R. R., and Robley, A. J. (2006). Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. I. Patterns of control and monitoring. Wildlife Research 33, 691–709.
Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. I. Patterns of control and monitoring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rodríguez, C., Torres, R., and Drummond, H. (2006). Eradicating introduced mammals from a forested tropical island. Biological Conservation 130, 98–105.
Eradicating introduced mammals from a forested tropical island.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rohatgi, A. (2018). WebPlotDigitizer. Available at https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer [verified 21 August 2018].

Rutberg, A. T. (1997). The science of deer management: an animal welfare perspective. In ‘The Science of Overabundance: Deer Ecology and Population Management’. (Eds W. J. McShea, H. B. Underwood, and J. H. Rappole.) pp. 37–54. (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC, USA.)

Simard, M. A., Dussault, C., Huot, J., and Côté, S. D. (2013). Is hunting an effective tool to control overabundant deer? A test using an experimental approach. The Journal of Wildlife Management 77, 254–269.
Is hunting an effective tool to control overabundant deer? A test using an experimental approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tapper, S. C., Potts, G. R., and Brockless, M. H. (1996). The effect of an experimental reduction in predation pressure on the breeding success and population density of grey partridges Perdix perdix. Journal of Applied Ecology 33, 965–978.
The effect of an experimental reduction in predation pressure on the breeding success and population density of grey partridges Perdix perdix.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thurfjell, H., Ciuti, S., and Boyce, M. S. (2017). Learning from the mistakes of others: how female elk (Cervus elaphus) adjust behaviour with age to avoid hunters. PLoS One 12, e0178082.
Learning from the mistakes of others: how female elk (Cervus elaphus) adjust behaviour with age to avoid hunters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28614406PubMed |

Toïgo, C., Servanty, S., Gaillard, J.-M., Brandt, S., and Baubet, E. (2008). Disentangling natural from hunting mortality in an intensively hunted wild boar population. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 1532–1539.

Van Deelen, T., and Etter, D. (2003). Effort and the functional response of deer hunters. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 8, 97–108.
Effort and the functional response of deer hunters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Deelen, T. R., Dhuey, B. J., Jacques, C. N., McCaffery, K. R., Rolley, R. E., and Warnke, K. (2010). Effects of earn‐a‐buck and special antlerless‐only seasons on Wisconsin’s deer harvests. The Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 1693–1700.
Effects of earn‐a‐buck and special antlerless‐only seasons on Wisconsin’s deer harvests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

VerCauteren, K. C., Anderson, C. W., van Deelen, T. R., Drake, D., Walter, W. D., Vantassel, S. M., and Hygnstrom, S. E. (2011). Regulated commercial harvest to manage overabundant white-tailed deer: an idea to consider? Wildlife Society Bulletin 35, 185–194.
Regulated commercial harvest to manage overabundant white-tailed deer: an idea to consider?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wäber, K., Spencer, J., and Dolman, P. M. (2013). Achieving landscape-scale deer management for biodiversity conservation: the need to consider sources and sinks. The Journal of Wildlife Management 77, 726–736.
Achieving landscape-scale deer management for biodiversity conservation: the need to consider sources and sinks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Warburton, B., and Norton, B. (2009). Towards a knowledge-based ethic for lethal control of nuisance wildlife. The Journal of Wildlife Management 73, 158–164.
Towards a knowledge-based ethic for lethal control of nuisance wildlife.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williams, S. C., DeNicola, A. J., and Ortega, I. M. (2008). Behavioral responses of white-tailed deer subjected to lethal management. Canadian Journal of Zoology 86, 1358–1366.
Behavioral responses of white-tailed deer subjected to lethal management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williams, S. C., DeNicola, A. J., Almendinger, T., and Maddock, J. (2013). Evaluation of organized hunting as a management technique for overabundant white‐tailed deer in suburban landscapes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 37, 137–145.
Evaluation of organized hunting as a management technique for overabundant white‐tailed deer in suburban landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |