The conduct of Australian Indigenous primary health care research focusing on social and emotional wellbeing: a systematic review

Sara Farnbach; Anne-Maree Eades; Josephine Gwynn; Nick Glozier; Maree Hackett

doi:10.1071/phrp27451704

RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

The conduct of Australian Indigenous primary health care research focusing on social and emotional wellbeing: a systematic review

Sara Farnbach ^A ^B ^* , Anne-Maree Eades ^A ^B ^C , Josephine Gwynn ^D ^E , Nick Glozier ^F ^G and Maree Hackett ^A ^B ^H

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Australia

^B School of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

^C Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia

^D Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

^E Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

^F Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

^G Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

^H Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK

^* Correspondence to: sfarnbach@georgeinstitute.org.au

Public Health Research and Practice 28, e27451704 https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp27451704

Published: 14 June 2018

Abstract

Objectives and importance of study:Values and ethics: guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research (Values and ethics) describes key values that should underpin Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous)–focused health research. It is unclear how research teams address this document in primary health care research. We systematically review the primary health care literature focusing on Indigenous social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB) to identify how Values and ethics and community preferences for standards of behaviour (local protocols) are addressed during research. Study type: Systematic review in accordance with PRISMA Guidelines and MOOSE Guidelines for Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies. Methods: We searched four databases and one Indigenous-specific website for qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method studies published since Values and ethics was implemented (2003). Included studies were conducted in primary health care services, focused on Indigenous SEWB and were conducted by research teams. Using standard data extraction forms, we identified actions taken (reported by authors or identified by us) relating to Values and ethics and local protocols. Results: A total of 25 studies were included. Authors of two studies explicitly mentioned the Values and ethics document, but neither reported how their actions related to the document’s values. In more than half the studies, we identified at least three actions relating to the values. Some actions related to multiple values, including use of culturally sensitive research processes and involving Indigenous representatives in the research team. Local protocols were rarely reported. Conclusion: Addressing Values and ethics appears to improve research projects. The academic community should focus on culturally sensitive research processes, relationship building and developing the Indigenous research workforce, to facilitate acceptable research that affects health outcomes. For Values and ethics to achieve its full impact and to improve learning between research teams, authors should be encouraged to report how the principles are addressed during research, including barriers and enablers that are encountered.

2018 © Farnbach et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence, which allows others to redistribute, adapt and share this work non-commercially provided they attribute the work and any adapted version of it is distributed under the same Creative Commons licence terms.