Register      Login
Public Health Research and Practice Public Health Research and Practice Society
The peer-reviewed journal of the Sax Institute
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Evaluating portable air cleaner effectiveness in residential settings to reduce exposures to biomass smoke resulting from prescribed burns

Amanda Wheeler A B C * , Fabienne Reisen A , Christopher Roulston A , Martine Dennekamp D E , Nigel Goodman F G and Fay Johnston B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO, Environment, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

B Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

C Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

D Environment Protection Authority Victoria, Melbourne, Australia

E School of Population Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

F School of Property Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

G National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

* Correspondence to: Amanda.Wheeler@csiro.au

Public Health Research and Practice 34, e33232307 https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp33232307
Published: 4 April 2024

2024 © Wheeler et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence, which allows others to redistribute, adapt and share this work non-commercially provided they attribute the work and any adapted version of it is distributed under the same Creative Commons licence terms.

Abstract

Aim:Prescribed burning is the most common method employed to reduce fuel loads in flammable landscapes. This practice is designed to reduce the hazard associated with uncontrolled bushfires. Prescribed burns are frequently conducted close to residential areas, and the associated smoke impacts can adversely affect community health. Particulate matter is the predominant pollutant within the smoke and is strongly and consistently linked with adverse health effects. Outdoor smoke readily infiltrates buildings and reduces the quality of indoor air. Portable air cleaners containing high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters are a promising indoor air quality intervention for reducing outdoor smoke exposure. Methods: We provided 10 homes from semirural regions of Victoria, Australia, with HEPA cleaners and conducted continuous monitoring of indoor and outdoor fine particulate matter (PM2.5) for 2–4 weeks during prescribed burning periods. We calculated the potential improvements to indoor air quality when operating a HEPA cleaner during a smoke episode. Ventilation measures were conducted to identify points of smoke ingress and housing characteristics that could lead to higher infiltration rates. Results: Depending on the house, the use of HEPA cleaners resulted in a reduction in indoor PM2.5 concentrations of 30–74%. Conclusions: HEPA cleaners have the potential to substantially improve indoor air quality during episodic smoke episodes.

References

Bowman D, Morgan GG, Jalaludin BB, Johnston FH. Unprecedented smoke-related health burden associated with the 2019–20 bushfires in eastern Australia. Med J Aust. 2020;213(6):282–3. Crossref | PubMed

Johnston FH. Understanding and managing the health impacts of poor air quality from landscape fires. Med J Aust.2017;207(6):229–30. Crossref | PubMed

Dennekamp M, Straney LD, Erbas B, Abramson MJ, Keywood M, Smith K, et al. Forest fire smoke exposures and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Melbourne, Australia: A case-crossover study. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(10):959–64. Crossref | PubMed

Reid CE, Maestas MM. Wildfire smoke exposure under climate change: impact on respiratory health of affected communities. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2019;25(2):179–87. Crossref | PubMed

Cascio WE. Wildland fire smoke and human health. Sci.Total Environ. 2018;624:586–95. Crossref | PubMed

Phillips N. Climate change made Australia’s devastating fire season 30% more likely. Nature. 2020; Mar 4. Online ahead of print. Crossref | PubMed

Johnston FH. Burning to reduce fuels: the benefits and risks of a public health protection strategy. Med J Aust. 2020;213(6):246–8.e1. Crossref | PubMed

Barn PK, Elliott CT, Allen RW, Kosatsky T, Rideout K, Henderson SB. Portable air cleaners should be at the forefront of the public health response to landscape fire smoke. Environmental Health. 2016;15(1):1–8. Crossref | PubMed

Keywood M, Cope M, Meyer CM, Iinuma Y, Emmerson K. When smoke comes to town: The impact of biomass burning smoke on air quality. Atmos Environ. 2015;121:13–21. Crossref

10  Department of Health. Bushfire Smoke and Your Health; 2023 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: www.health.tas.gov.au/publichealth/air/bushfire_smoke

11  Laumbach R, Meng Q, Kipen H. What can individuals do to reduce personal health risks from air pollution? J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(1):96–107. Crossref | PubMed

12  Wheeler AJ, Gibson MD, MacNeill M, Ward TJ, Wallace LA, Kuchta J, et al. Impacts of air cleaners on indoor air quality in residences impacted by wood smoke. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(20):12157–63. Crossref | PubMed

13  Barn P, Larson T, Noullett M, Kennedy S, Copes R, Brauer M. Infiltration of forest fire and residential wood smoke: an evaluation of air cleaner effectiveness. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008;18(5):503–11. Crossref | PubMed

14  Allen RW, Carlsten C, Karlen B, Leckie S, van Eeden S, Vedal S, et al. An air filter intervention study of endothelial function among healthy adults in a woodsmoke-impacted community. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(9):1222–30. Crossref | PubMed

15  Reisen F, Powell JC, Dennekamp M, Johnston FH, Wheeler AJ. Is remaining indoors an effective way of reducing exposure to fine particulate matter during biomass burning events? J Air Waste Manag. 2019;69(5):611–22. Crossref | PubMed

16  Ward TJ, Semmens EO, Weiler E, Harrar S, Noonan CW. Efficacy of interventions targeting household air pollution from residential wood stoves. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017;27(1):64–71. Crossref | PubMed

17  Hart JF, Ward TJ, Spear TM, Rossi RJ, Holland NN, Loushin BG. Evaluating the effectiveness of a commercial portable air purifier in homes with wood burning stoves: a preliminary study. J Environ Public Health. 2011;2011:324809. Crossref | PubMed

18  McNamara ML, Thornburg J, Semmens EO, Ward TJ, Noonan CW. Reducing indoor air pollutants with air filtration units in wood stove homes. Sci Total Environ. 2017;592:488–94. Crossref | PubMed

19  Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) and tracked via the Forest Fire Management Victoria (FFMV) site. 2023 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: plannedburns.ffm.vic.gov.au/

20  Reisen F, Cooper J, Powell JC, Roulston C, Wheeler AJ. Performance and deployment of low-cost particle sensor units to monitor biomass burning events and their application in an educational initiative. Sensors. 2021;21(21):7206. Crossref | PubMed

21  ASTM E770-19. Standard test method for determining air leakage rate by fan pressurization. US: ATSM International; 2019 [cited 2023 Jul 20]. Available from: Available from: https://www.astm.org/e0779-19.html

22  Wheeler AJ, Allen RW, Lawrence K, Roulston CT, Powell J, Williamson GJ, et al. Can public spaces effectively be used as cleaner indoor air shelters during extreme smoke events? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(8):4085. Crossref | PubMed

23  O’Dwyer T, Abramson MJ, Straney L, Salimi F, Johnston F, Wheeler AJ, et al. Sub-Clinical Effects of outdoor smoke in affected communities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):1131. Crossref | PubMed

24  Ambrose M, Syme M. Air Tightness of new Australian residential buildings. Procedia Eng. 2017;180:33–40., Crossref

25  Australian Building Codes Board. National Construction Code 2022 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: ncc.abcb.gov.au/editions/ncc-2022/adopted/volume-two/h-class-1-and-10-buildings/part-h6-energy-efficiency

26  Munro C, Seagren J. The smoke infiltration situation. Ecolibrium. 2020;19.3:22–43. Article