Experiences of research-policy engagement in policy-making processes
Carmel Williams A B * , Tahna Pettman C , Ian Goodwin-Smith C , Yonatal Tefera A B , Somayya Hanifie A B and Katherine Baldock AA
B
C
Abstract
Objectives and importance of study: For public policy to respond effectively to social, economic, and health challenges, there is an urgent need for research-policy collaboration to advance evidence-informed policy. Many organisations seek to promote these engagement activities, but little is known about how this is experienced by researchers and policy actors. This study aimed to understand how policy actors and researchers in Australia experience collaboration and the impediments and enablers they encounter. Study type and methods: An online survey was developed, and using convenience sampling, self-identified Australian policy actors and researchers were invited to participate. Results: In total, 170 responses were analysed, comprising 58% policy actors and 42% researchers. Respondents reported the primary purpose for collaboration was evidence-informed policy making. Policy actors reported that the most common barrier to collaboration with academics was ‘budget constraints’ while academics reported ‘budget, ‘political risk’ and ‘structural barriers’. Reported enablers were ‘leadership’ and ‘connections’. Conclusions: Our findings build upon existing evidence that highlights the importance of collaboration for facilitating evidence-informed policy. Structural deficits in both policy agencies and research funding systems and environments continue to present challenges to policy-research partnerships. Future initiatives could use these findings to implement preferred collaboration methods, alongside rigorous evaluation, to explore ‘what works’ in promoting engagement for evidence-informed policy.References
1 Cairney P, St Denny E, Mitchell H. The future of public health policymaking after COVID-19: a qualitative systematic review of lessons from Health in All Policies [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. Open Research Europe. 2021;1(23). Crossref
2 Quayle A, Kelly B. Building informal knowledge-sharing relationships between policy makers and academics: Insights from a PM&C engagement project. Aust J Public Adm. 2019;78(2):311–8. Crossref
4 Head BW. Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Aust J Public Adm. 2008;67(1):1–11. Crossref
6 Nutley S, Boaz A, Davies H, Fraser A. New development: What works now? Continuity and change in the use of evidence to improve public policy and service delivery. Public Money Manag. 2019;39(4):310–6. Crossref
11 Oliver K, Hopkins A, Boaz A, Guillot-Wright S, Cairney P. What works to promote research-policy engagement? Evid Policy. 2022;18(4):691–713. Crossref
13 Nguyen T, Graham ID, Mrklas KJ, Bowen S, Cargo M, Estabrooks A, et al. How does integrated knowledge translation (IKT) compare to other collaborative research approaches to generating and translating knowledge? Learning from experts in the field. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):35. Crossref | PubMed
18 Baum F, Delany-Crowe T, MacDougall C, van Eyk H, Lawless A, Williams C, et al. To what extent can the activities of the South Australian Health in All Policies initiative be linked to population health outcomes using a program theory-based evaluation? BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):88. Crossref | PubMed
19 Government of South Australia. Working together for joined-up policy delivery report: Creating better outcomes for South Australians through joined-up policy delivery: South Australia: Department for Health and Ageing, Department of the Premier and Cabinet and The Office for the Public Sector; 2016 [cited 2023 Jul 7]. Available from: www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/Public+Content/SA+Health+Internet/About+us/About+SA+Health/Health+in+All+Policies/90+Day+Projects/Joined+Up+Policy/Working+Together+for+Joined+Up+Policy+resources
24 Uneke CJ, Ezeoha AE, Uro-Chukwu HC, Ezeonu CT, Igboji J. Promoting researchers and policy-makers collaboration in evidence-informed policy-making in Nigeria: outcome of a two-way secondment model between university and Health Ministry. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(6):522–31. Crossref | PubMed
27 Head BW. Relationships between policy academics and public servants: learning at a distance? Aust J Public Adm. 2015;74(1):5–12. Crossref
28 Head B, Ferguson M, Cherney A, Boreham P. Are policy-makers interested in social research? Exploring the sources and uses of valued information among public servants in Australia. Policy Soc. 2014;33(2):89–101. Crossref
29 Wilson A. Punching our weight: The humanities and social sciences in public policy making. British Academy Report. 2008. UK: British Academy; 2008 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: heranet.info/assets/uploads/2017/11/Punching-our-weight-the-humanities-and-social-sciences-in-public-policy-making-British-Academy.pdf
33 Government of South Australia & SA Health. Public health partner authorities. Adelaide; SA Health; 2022 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/public+content/sa+health+internet/about+us/about+sa+health/health+in+all+policies/public+health+partner+authorities/public+health+partner+authorities
34 Cvitanovic C, Shellock RJ, Mackay M, van Putten EI, Karcher DB, Dickey-Collas M, et al. Strategies for building and managing ‘trust’ to enable knowledge exchange at the interface of environmental science and policy. Environ Sci Policy. 2021;123:179–89. Crossref
