Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
REVIEW

Barriers and enablers to delivering preventative and early intervention footcare to people with diabetes: a scoping review of healthcare professionals’ perceptions

Leanne Mullan A D , Andrea Driscoll A B , Karen Wynter A C and Bodil Rasmussen A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia.

B Austin Health, Department of Cardiology, Studley Road, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia.

C Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research – Western Health Partnership, Sunshine Hospital, 176 Furlong Road, St Albans, Vic. 3021, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: mulea@deakin.edu.au

Australian Journal of Primary Health 25(6) 517-525 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY19115
Submitted: 27 May 2019  Accepted: 4 August 2019   Published: 13 November 2019

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine barriers and enablers to delivering preventative and early intervention footcare to people with diabetes, from the perspective of healthcare professionals within primary care. MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus databases, as well as Google Scholar, were searched in September 2018. Inclusion criteria included: English language, qualitative and quantitative studies, since 1998, reporting on barriers or enablers, as reported by primary care health professionals, to delivering preventative or early intervention footcare to people with diabetes. In total, 339 studies were screened. Eight studies met criteria. Perceived barriers to providing footcare included: geographical, administrative and communication factors; referral and care guideline availability and implementation challenges; limited availability of specialists and high-risk foot services; and limited resources including time and funding. Enablers to footcare were: implementation of footcare programs; education; clear definition of staff roles; development of foot assessment reminder systems; and reminders for people with diabetes to remove their shoes at appointments. Barriers and enablers to footcare are multifaceted. Healthcare professionals are affected by health system and individual factors. By implementing strategies to address barriers to footcare delivery, it is possible to improve outcomes for people with diabetes, thus reducing the effect of diabetes-related foot disease.

Additional keywords: diabetic foot disease, foot, prevention, primary care.


References

Allen ML, van der Does AMB, Gunst C (2016) Improving diabetic foot screening at a primary care clinic: a quality improvement project. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine 8, a955
Improving diabetic foot screening at a primary care clinic: a quality improvement project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Australian & New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery (2018) Amputation. (Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery: Melbourne. Vic., Australia) Available at http://www.anzsvs.org.au/patient-information/amputation/ [Verified 29 December 2018]

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2017) The Second Australian Atlas of Healthcare Variation 2017. (Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care: Sydney, NSW, Australia) Available at http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/atlas/ [Verified 24 May 2019]

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (2017) Burden of lower limb amputations due to diabetes in Australia: Australian burden of disease study 2011. (AIHW: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/burden-of-disease/lower-limb-amputations-due-to-diabetes/contents/summary [Verified 24 May 2019]

Bergin SM, Brand CA, Colman PG, Campbell DA (2009) An evaluation of community-based resources for management of diabetes-related foot disorders in an Australian population. Australian Health Review 33, 671–678.
An evaluation of community-based resources for management of diabetes-related foot disorders in an Australian population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20166917PubMed |

Boulton AJM (2010) What you can’t feel can hurt you. Journal of Vascular Surgery 52, 28S–30S.
What you can’t feel can hurt you.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boulton AJ, Meneses P, Ennis WJ (1999) Diabetic foot ulcers: a framework for prevention and care. Wound Repair and Regeneration 7, 7–16.
Diabetic foot ulcers: a framework for prevention and care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10231501PubMed |

Bureau of Health Information (2010) Healthcare in focus. (Bureau of Health Information: Chatswood, NSW, Australia) Available at http://www.bhi.nsw.gov.au/BHI_reports/healthcare_in_focus/2010 [Verified 29 December 2018]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) National diabetes statistics report, 2017: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. (US Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, GA, USA) Available at https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html [Verified 12 July 2019]

Clayton-Jones M (2015) Barriers to diabetic foot care [PowerPoint]. Paper presented at the WOCN National Conference, 6–10 June 2015, San Antonio, TX, USA. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274635458_Barriers_to_Diabetic_Foot_Care [Verified 29 December 2018]

Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, Kastner M, Moher D (2014) Scoping reviews: time for clarify in definition, methods and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 67, 1291–1294.
Scoping reviews: time for clarify in definition, methods and reporting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25034198PubMed |

Commonwealth of Australia (2011) National evidence-based guideline on prevention, identification and management of foot complications in diabetes. (Commonwealth of Australia: Barton, ACT, Australia) Available at http://t2dgr.bakeridi.edu.au/ [Verified 29 December 2018]

Diabetes UK (2017) 26,378 diabetes-related lower limb amputations in the last three years (Diabetes UK: London, UK) Available at https://www.diabetes.org.uk/about_us/news/lower-limb-amputations [Verified 12 July December 2019]

Diabetes Australia (2018) Facts and figures (Diabetes Australia: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://www.diabetesaustralia.com.au/fact-and-figures [Verified 24 May 2019]

Dorresteijn JAN, Kriegsman DMW, Assendelft WJJ, Valk GD (2014) Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 12, CD001488
Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goldfracht M, Proath A, Liebermann N (2005) Diabetes in the community: a nationwide diabetes improvement programme in primary care in Israel. Quality in Primary Care 15, 105–111.

Guell C, Unwin N (2015) Barriers to diabetic foot care in a developing country with a high incidence of diabetes related amputations: an exploratory qualitative interview study. BMC Health Services Research 15, 377
Barriers to diabetic foot care in a developing country with a high incidence of diabetes related amputations: an exploratory qualitative interview study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26369788PubMed |

Harrison-Blount M, Cullen M, Nester C, Williams A (2014) The assessment and management of diabetes related lower limb problems in India-an action research approach to integrating best practice. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 7, 30
The assessment and management of diabetes related lower limb problems in India-an action research approach to integrating best practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24862010PubMed |

Kasiya MM, Mang’anda GD, Heyes S, Kachapila R, Kaduya L, Chilamba J, Goodson P, Chalulu K, Allain TJ (2017) The challenge of diabetic foot care: review of the literature and experience at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Blantyre, Malawi. Malawi Medical Journal 29, 218–223.
The challenge of diabetic foot care: review of the literature and experience at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Blantyre, Malawi.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28955436PubMed |

Mills JL, Beckett WC, Taylor SM (1991) The diabetic foot: consequences of delayed treatment and referral. Southern Medical Journal 84, 970–974.
The diabetic foot: consequences of delayed treatment and referral.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1882274PubMed |

Pankhurst CJW, Edmonds ME (2018) Barriers to foot care in patients with diabetes as identified by healthcare professionals. Diabetic Medicine 35, 1072–1077.
Barriers to foot care in patients with diabetes as identified by healthcare professionals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29696678PubMed |

Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, Jude E, Piaggesi A, Bakker K, Edmonds M, Holstein P, Jirkovska A, Mauricio D, Tennvall GR, Reike H, Spraul M, Uccioli L, Urbancic V, Van Acker K, Van Baal J, Van Merode F, Schaper N (2008) Delivery of care to diabetic patients with foot ulcers in daily practice: results of the Eurodiale Study, a prospective cohort study. Diabetic Medicine 25, 700–707.
Delivery of care to diabetic patients with foot ulcers in daily practice: results of the Eurodiale Study, a prospective cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18544108PubMed |

Sayampanathan AA, Cuttilan AN, Pearce CJ (2017) Barriers and enablers to proper diabetic foot care amongst community dwellers in an Asian population: a qualitative study. Annals of Translational Medicine 5, 254
Barriers and enablers to proper diabetic foot care amongst community dwellers in an Asian population: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28706922PubMed |

Secure Analytics for Population Health Research and Intelligence (2019) HoPeD (Hospital Performance Dataset). Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence, St Leonards, NSW, Australia. Extracted 2019.

Shaw J (2014) Diabetes and amputation: are we making progress? Wound Practice and Research 22, 194–195.

Stone E (2017) Primary care providers’ knowledge of strategies to prevent diabetic foot ulcers. (The University of Arizona: Tucson, AZ, USA) Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10150/625630 [Verified 29 December 2018]

The Joanna Briggs Institute (2015) Methodology for JBI scoping reviews. (The Joanna Briggs Institute: The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia) Available at https://wiki.joannabriggs.org/display/MANUAL/Joanna+Briggs+Institute+Reviewer%27s+Manual [Verified 29 December 2018].

Tinloy J, Kaul S, Ulbrecht J, Schaefer E, Gabbay R (2014) Podiatric physicians’ perspectives on their role in promoting self-care in high-risk patients with diabetes. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 104, 387–393.
Podiatric physicians’ perspectives on their role in promoting self-care in high-risk patients with diabetes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25076083PubMed |

van Bruggen R, Gorter K, Stolk R, Verhoeven R, Rutten G (2008) Implementation of locally adapted guidelines on type 2 diabetes. Family Practice 25, 430–437.
Implementation of locally adapted guidelines on type 2 diabetes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18718886PubMed |

van Houtum WH (2005) Barriers to the delivery of diabetic foot care. Lancet 366, 1678–1679.
Barriers to the delivery of diabetic foot care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16291048PubMed |

Wu SC, Driver VR, Wrobel JS, Armstrong DG (2007) Foot ulcers in the diabetic patient, prevention and treatment. Vascular Health and Risk Management 3, 65–76.