Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Improving access for the vulnerable: a mixed-methods feasibility study of a pop-up model of care in south-eastern Melbourne, Australia

Grant Russell https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3773-2355 A J , Susannah Westbury A , Sharon Clifford A , Elizabeth Sturgiss B , Anna Fragkoudi C , Rob Macindoe D , Deborah Stuart E , Marina Kunin F G H , Jill Walsh B and Cathie Scott I
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Building 1, 270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, Vic. 3168, Australia.

B School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, 47–49 Moorooduc Highway, Frankston, Vic. 3199, Australia.

C Women’s and Children’s Health, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, 72 King William Road, North Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia.

D SEHCP Incorporated (enliven Victoria), 4/31 Robinson Street, Dandenong, Vic. 3175, Australia.

E Central Bayside Community Health Services, 335 Nepean Highway, Parkdale, Vic. 3195, Australia.

F Monash Health Refugee Health and Wellbeing, 122 Thomas Street, Dandenong, Vic. 3175, Australia.

G Alfred Health Child and Youth Mental Health Service, Level 2, 999 Nepean Highway, Moorabbin, Vic. 3189, Australia.

H Headspace Youth Early Psychosis Program, 973 Nepean Highway, Bentleigh, Vic. 3204, Australia.

I Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1 Canada.

J Corresponding author. Email: grant.russell@monash.edu

Australian Journal of Primary Health 28(2) 143-150 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY21188
Submitted: 6 August 2021  Accepted: 8 November 2021   Published: 25 February 2022

Journal Compilation © La Trobe University 2022 Open Access CC BY-NC

Abstract

Access to appropriate health and social care is challenging for vulnerable populations. We used a ‘pop-up’ delivery model to bring community-based services in contact with communities with poor access to health and social care. Our aim was to examine whether pop-up events improve access to essential health and social support services for selected vulnerable communities and increase collaboration between community-based health and social services. Set in south-eastern Melbourne, two pop-up events were held, one with people at risk of homelessness attending a community lunch and the other with South Sudanese women helping at-risk youth. Providers represented 20 dental, housing, justice, employment and mental health services. We made structured observations of each event and held semi-structured interviews with consumers and providers. Pre-post surveys of managers assessed acceptability and perceived impact. We reached 100 community participants who had multiple needs, particularly for dentistry. Following the events, participants reported increased knowledge of services and access pathways, community members spoke of increased trust and partnerships between service providers were fostered. The pop-up model can increase provider collaboration and provide new options for vulnerable populations to access needed services. ‘Bringing the service to the person’ is a compelling alternative to asking consumers to negotiate complex access pathways.

Keywords: community health: services, delivery of health care: integrated, health services: accessibility, primary health care.


References

Anderson LM, Adeney KL, Shinn C, Safranek S, Buckner-Brown J, Krause LK (2015) Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, CD009905
Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baird L, Holland P, Deacon S (1999) Learning from action: imbedding more learning into the performance fast enough to make a difference. Organizational Dynamics 27, 19–32.
Learning from action: imbedding more learning into the performance fast enough to make a difference.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Balasubramanian BA, Chase SM, Nutting PA, Cohen DJ, Strickland PA, Crosson JC, Miller WL, Crabtree BF (2010) Using Learning Teams for Reflective Adaptation (ULTRA): insights from a team-based change management strategy in primary care. Annals of Family Medicine 8, 425–432.
Using Learning Teams for Reflective Adaptation (ULTRA): insights from a team-based change management strategy in primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20843884PubMed |

Carmack HJ, Bouchelle Z, Rawlins Y, Bennet J, Hill C, Oriol NE (2017) Mobilizing a narrative of generosity: patient experiences on an urban mobile health clinic. Communication Quarterly 65, 419–435.
Mobilizing a narrative of generosity: patient experiences on an urban mobile health clinic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chung B, Ong M, Ettner SL, Jones F, Gilmore J, McCreary M, Sherbourne C, Ngo V, Koegel P, Tang L, Dixon E, Miranda J, Belin TR, Wells KB (2014) 12-month outcomes of community engagement versus technical assistance to implement depression collaborative care: a partnered, cluster, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 161, S23–S34.
12-month outcomes of community engagement versus technical assistance to implement depression collaborative care: a partnered, cluster, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25402400PubMed |

Corscadden L, Levesque JF, Lewis V, Strumpf E, Breton M, Russell G (2018) Factors associated with multiple barriers to access to primary care: an international analysis. International Journal for Equity in Health 17, 28
Factors associated with multiple barriers to access to primary care: an international analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29458379PubMed |

Glasgow RE, Estabrooks PE (2018) Pragmatic applications of RE-AIM for health care initiatives in community and clinical settings. Preventing Chronic Disease 15, 170271
Pragmatic applications of RE-AIM for health care initiatives in community and clinical settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gröne O, Garcia-Barbero M, WHO European Office for Integrated Health Care Services (2001) Integrated care: a position paper of the WHO European Office for Integrated Health Care Services. International Journal of Integrated Care 1, e21
Integrated care: a position paper of the WHO European Office for Integrated Health Care Services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16896400PubMed |

Levesque J-F, Harris MF, Russell G (2013) Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. International Journal for Equity in Health 12, 18
Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23496984PubMed |

Luque JS, Castañeda H (2013) Delivery of mobile clinic services to migrant and seasonal farmworkers: a review of practice models for community-academic partnerships. Journal of Community Health 38, 397–407.
Delivery of mobile clinic services to migrant and seasonal farmworkers: a review of practice models for community-academic partnerships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23054421PubMed |

MacNeil C (2002) Evaluator as steward of citizen deliberation. The American Journal of Evaluation 23, 45–54.
Evaluator as steward of citizen deliberation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission (2009) A healthier future for all Australians. Final report. (National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at http://www.cotasa.org.au/cms_resources/documents/news/nhhrc_report.pdf [Verified 12 November 2020]

Noyes J, Booth A, Moore G, Flemming K, Tunçalp Ö, Shakibazadeh E (2019) Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods. BMJ Global Health 4, e000893
Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30775016PubMed |

Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D (2016) SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Quality & Safety 25, 986–992.
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Russell G, Kunin M, Harris M, Levesque J-F, Descôteaux S, Scott C, Lewis V, Dionne É, Advocat J, Dahrouge S, Stocks N, Spooner C, Haggerty J (2019) Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions. BMJ Open 9, e027869
Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31352414PubMed |

South Eastern Melbourne Primary Health Network (2019) South Eastern Melbourne PHN Needs Assessment. (Department of Health and Human Services) Available at https://www.semphn.org.au/SEMPHN_Core_Needs_Assessment_2019_SEMPHN_WEBSITE_VERSION.pdf [Verified 9 December 2021]

Thomas DR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. The American Journal of Evaluation 27, 237–246.
A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19, 349–357.
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17872937PubMed |

Victorian Department of Health (2020) Adult specialist mental health services. Available at https://www.health.vic.gov.au/mental-health-services/adult-specialist-mental-health-services [Verified 9 December 2021]

Waisel DB (2013) Vulnerable populations in healthcare. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 26, 186–192.
Vulnerable populations in healthcare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23385323PubMed |