Stocktake Sale on now: wide range of books at up to 70% off!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Supporting complex care in general practice via an eConsultant model of care: the Australian specialist perspective

Joel Petre https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6365-8801 A * , Maria Donald A and Claire Jackson A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A UQ Centre for Health System Reform and Integration, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia.

* Correspondence to: j.petre@uq.edu.au

Australian Journal of Primary Health 29(5) 455-462 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22243
Submitted: 14 November 2022  Accepted: 11 April 2023   Published: 15 May 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Background

Accessing timely specialist physician advice and guidance is of critical importance to both Australian GP specialists (GPs) and their patients. The traditional method of referral, triage and subsequent face-to-face (FTF) consultation is facing challenges from an ever increasing volume of referrals and the needs of underserved populations. In response to such issues, electronic consults (eConsults) have been successfully used internationally to provide GPs with a means of asynchronously accessing specialist physician advice and guidance within 72 h. Few studies have addressed the potential impact of eConsults from the view of the non-GP specialist receiving the request, and none specifically related to specialist adult medicine physicians. The aim of this study was to determine the perceptions of current Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) adult medicine Fellows towards establishing an eConsult model of care within their own clinical practice.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 RACP adult medicine Fellows between December 2019 and February 2020. Purposive and snowball sampling strategies were used to recruit physicians of differing ages and gender from diverse specialties and healthcare settings. The data were subjected to a descriptive thematic analysis.

Results

We describe five key themes of relevance to study participants: (1) improved access to non-GP specialist care; (2) the business model in relation to remuneration and time; (3) enhanced GP–Physician relationships; (4) impact on physician work–life balance; and (5) the need for a structured model of care. There was broad consensus that a significant number of outpatient referrals to adult medicine physicians would be more appropriately addressed in primary care with support via an asynchronous eConsult arrangement. RACP Fellows agreed this could improve access to timely specialist advice, place downward pressure on outpatient FTF clinic waiting times and reduce unnecessary patient travel.

Conclusion

These findings identify the drivers and barriers to the establishment of an Australian eConsultant model of care from the adult medicine physician’s perspective.

Keywords: advice and guidance, digital health, eConsult, eConsultant, eHealth, eReferral, online consult, Telehealth.

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2018) Patient experiences in Australia: summary of findings, 2017-18. [online]. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4839.0Main+Features12017-18?OpenDocument [Accessed 1 February 2022]

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2018) Australia’s health 2018. Australia’s health series no. 16. AUS 221. AIHW, Canberra.

Britt H, Miller GC, Henderson J, et al. (2016) General practice activity in Australia 2015–16. General practice series no. 40. Sydney University Press, Sydney.

Bureau of Health Information (2016) How does New South Wales compare? 2016 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey of adults [online]. Available at https://www.bhi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/384421/bhi-commonwealthfund-survey-questionnaire.pdf [Accessed 1 February 2022]

Guglani S, Liddy C, Afkham A, et al. (2022) The Ontario electronic consultation (eConsult) service: cross-sectional analysis of utilization data for 2 models. JMIR Formative Research 6(4), e32101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Job J, Donald D, Borg S, et al. (2021) Feasibility of an asynchronous general practitioner-to-general physician eConsultant outpatient substitution program: a Queensland pilot study. Australian Journal for General Practitioners 50(11), 857-862.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Job J, Nicholson C, Calleja Z, et al. (2022) Implementing a general practitioner-to-general physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia. BMC Health Services Research 22(1), 1278.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Job J, Nicholson C, Donald M, et al. (2023) An eConsultant versus a hospital-based outpatient consultation for general (internal) medicine: a costing analysis. PREPRINT (Version 1). Available at research square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2610239/v1

Liddy C, Moroz I, Mihan A, et al. (2018) A systematic review of asynchronous, provider-to-provider, electronic consultation services to improve access to specialty care available worldwide. Telemedicine and e-Health 25, 184-198.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Liddy C, Mitchell R, Guglani S, et al. (2022) The provincial spread and scale of the Ontario eConsult service: evaluation of the first 2 years. The Annals of Family Medicine 20(3), 262-265.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Vimalananda VG, Gupte G, Seraj SM, et al. (2015) Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 21(6), 323-330.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |