Optimising prevention activities in primary care for cancer survivors: a novel socio-technical approach using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method
Sundresan Naicker





A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Abstract
Primary care provides comprehensive whole-of-person patient-centred care with important responsibilities in prevention among cancer survivors. This includes cancer surveillance, the management of other chronic diseases, health promotion and preventative care. However, there is inconsistent application of prevention activities. We explored the experiences of Australian general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses to: (1) understand the delivery of prevention activities for cancer survivors; and (2) identify determinants to optimise disease prevention activities within the current general practice context. Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer in Australia. However, each GP will likely diagnose only one new case of colorectal cancer per year. Colorectal cancer survivorship care was provided as an example to prompt discussion on the delivery of prevention activities for cancer survivors and determinants to optimise prevention.
A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with GPs and practice nurses from New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Interviews were conducted between June 2021 and February 2022. Transcripts were reflexively analysed and mapped to the Functional Resonance Analysis Method framework.
We conducted 15 interviews with GPs (n = 11) and practice nurses (n = 4) from 12 practices. Three potential activities fundamental to disease prevention for cancer survivors were identified: risk assessment, partnering with the patient and co-planning prevention activities.
Primary care is a complex and adaptive system. The Functional Resonance Analysis Method approach, by visualising the dynamic interactions and interdependencies between people, resources, time and system conditions involved in prevention activities, offers a pragmatic guide to develop acceptable, scalable and adaptable interventions for promoting disease risk estimation (cancer and other chronic diseases), therapeutic partnerships and co-planning activities within the socio-technological constraints of the system studied using the resources available. This approach represents a key paradigm shift in health system innovation for cancer survivors.
Keywords: cancer, cancer survivorship, general practice, healthcare systems, health promotion, nurse–physician collaboration, prevention, primary health care.
References
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2025) The national general practice accreditation scheme. Available at https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/accreditation/national-general-practice-accreditation-scheme [retrieved 28 July 2025]
Australian Digital Health Agency (2025) My Health Record. Available at https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/healthcare-providers/initiatives-and-programs/my-health-record [retrieved 28 July 2025]
Australian Government (2014) MBS Online Medicare Benefits Schedule. Available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/Medicare-Benefits-Schedule-MBS-1
Australian Government (2025) National Cancer Screening Register. Available at https://www.ncsr.gov.au/au/en.html [retrieved 28 July 2025]
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care (2024) MyMedicare. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/mymedicare [retrieved 29 July 2024]
Booth BJ, Zwar N, Harris MF (2013) Healthcare improvement as planned system change or complex responsive processes? a longitudinal case study in general practice. BMC Family Practice 14(1), 51.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
BreastScreen NSW (2025) Your breast screen appointment. Available at https://www.breastscreen.nsw.gov.au/frequently-asked-questions-faqs/your-breast-screen/#:~:text=If%20you%20are%20aged%20between,by%20calling%2013%2020%2050 [retrieved 28 July 2025]
Bryant J, Turon H, Mansfield E, Cameron E, Dodd N (2019) Discussions about lifestyle risk factors following a cancer diagnosis: findings from a sample of australian cancer outpatients. Journal of Cancer Education 35(6), 1170-1176.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Burton C, Elliott A, Cochran A, Love T (2018) Do healthcare services behave as complex systems? Analysis of patterns of attendance and implications for service delivery. BMC Medicine 16(1), 138.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Clarke V, Braun V (2017) Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology 12(3), 297-298.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cuthbert CA, Farragher JF, Farrer CL, Cheung WY (2021) Living with paradox: a qualitative study of colorectal cancer patients’ experiences in managing their health after cancer treatment. European Journal of Cancer Care 30(3), e13416.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Derksen F, Bensing J, Kuiper S, Van Meerendonk M, Lagro-Janssen A (2015) Empathy: what does it mean for GPs? A qualitative study. Family Practice 32(1), 94-100.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
English W, Gott M, Robinson J (2022) The meaning of rapport for patients, families, and healthcare professionals: a scoping review. Patient Education and Counseling 105(1), 2-14.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Larkins S, Evans R (2014) Greater support for generalism in rural and regional Australia. Australian Family Physician 43(7), 487-490.
| Google Scholar |
Foo KM, Sundram M, Legido-Quigley H (2020) Facilitators and barriers of managing patients with multiple chronic conditions in the community: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 20(1), 1-15.
| Google Scholar |
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18(1), 59-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hanson K, Brikci N, Erlangga D, Alebachew A, De Allegri M, Balabanova D, Blecher M, Cashin C, Esperato A, Hipgrave D, Kalisa I, Kurowski C, Meng Q, Morgan D, Mtei G, Nolte E, Onoka C, Powell-Jackson T, Roland M, Sadanandan R, Stenberg K, Vega Morales J, Wang H, Wurie H (2022) The Lancet Global Health Commission on financing primary health care: putting people at the centre. The Lancet Global Health 10(5), e715-e772.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Harris MF, Parker SM, Litt J, Van Driel M, Russell G, Mazza D, Jayasinghe UW, Smith J, Del Mar C, Lane R, Elizabeth Denney-Wilson On behalf of the Preventive Evidence into Practice Partnership Group (2017) An Australian general practice based strategy to improve chronic disease prevention, and its impact on patient reported outcomes: evaluation of the preventive evidence into practice cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research 17, 637.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jefferson L, Golder S, Heathcote C, Avila AC, Dale V, Essex H, Van Der Feltz Cornelis C, McHugh E, Moe-Byrne T, Bloor K (2022) GP wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. British Journal of General Practice 72(718), e325-e333.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kaya GK, Hocaoglu MF (2020) Semi-quantitative application to the Functional Resonance Analysis Method for supporting safety management in a complex health-care process. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 202, 106970.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Koelsch LE (2013) Reconceptualizing the member check interview. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 12(1), 168-179.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Long KM, McDermott F, Meadows GN (2018) Being pragmatic about healthcare complexity: our experiences applying complexity theory and pragmatism to health services research. BMC Medicine 16(1), 94.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McAvoy BR (2007) General practitioners and cancer control. Medical Journal of Australia 187(2), 115-117.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Morris M, Halcomb E, Mansourian Y, Bernoth M (2022) Understanding how general practice nurses support adult lifestyle risk reduction: an integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 78(11), 3517-3530.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Murugan H, Spigner C, McKinney CM, Wong CJ (2018) Primary care provider approaches to preventive health delivery: a qualitative study. Primary Health Care Research & Development 19(5), 464-474.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Noordman J, Post B, Van Dartel AAM, Slits JMA, Olde Hartman TC (2019) Training residents in patient-centred communication and empathy: evaluation from patients, observers and residents. BMC Medical Education 19, 128.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
O’Cathain A, Croot L, Sworn K, Duncan E, Rousseau N, Turner K, Yardley L, Hoddinott P (2019) Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: a systematic methods overview. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 5(1), 41.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Petrocchi S, Iannello P, Lecciso F, Levante A, Antonietti A, Schulz PJ (2019) Interpersonal trust in doctor-patient relation: evidence from dyadic analysis and association with quality of dyadic communication. Social Science & Medicine 235, 112391.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Renjith V, Yesodharan R, Noronha JA, Ladd E, George A (2021) Qualitative methods in health care research. International Journal of Preventive Medicine 12(1), 20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Rhodes T, Lancaster K (2019) Evidence-making interventions in health: a conceptual framing. Social Science & Medicine 238, 112488.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (2024) General practice health of the nation. Available at https://www.racgp.org.au/FSDEDEV/media/documents/Health-of-the-Nation-2024.pdf
Schmalstieg-Bahr K, Popert UW, Scherer M (2021) The role of general practice in complex health care systems. Frontiers in Medicine 8, 680695.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Services Australia (2025) Bulk billing. Available at https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/bulk-billing?context=60092 [retrieved 28 July 2025]
Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, Boyd KA, Craig N, French DP, McIntosh E (2021) A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 374, n2061.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |